User talk:MTLskyline

While I've found numerous valid sources for the statement that alderman Joseph Schubert temporarily served as acting mayor of Montreal in 1927, I can't find a source which explains why the city needed an acting mayor in the first place. Specifically, I can't find any sources which explain what, if anything, would have interrupted Médéric Martin's term in office. Do you have any insight into this, or any access to sources which might explain it in more depth? Bearcat (talk) 22:38, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I tried looking for sources as well but I turned up nothing. Joseph Schubert is mentioned in a surprisingly small number of places. If the archives of the Montreal Star were posted online, we might have more luck. While it appears he was appointed to the position in August 1927, this article on the city of Montreal's website mentions Martin being at the inauguration of a public bath on August 31, 1927. I'm wondering if Schubert was actually appointed as mayor Pro tempore (known in French as a "pro-maire" or "maire suppléant") rather than as an acting mayor. According to the Quebec Cities and Towns Act (# 56, 57) all municipalities are required to have a pro-mayor at all times. I don't know if this was the case in 1927 though.--MTLskyline (talk) 02:37, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think you just might be right about that. In my search I did also find a news blurb from a Montreal newspaper (can't remember which one offhand) about Schubert's initial appointment as "acting mayor" after another councillor, J.B. Rochon, stepped down from the position — which implies that it was a constant position rather than a temporary one, and thus since there's still no evidence that Martin was not performing the role of mayor at the time it seems very plausible indeed that maybe it was actually an inaccurate or misleading terminology for what we today would call a mayor pro tem or a deputy mayor. Bearcat (talk) 16:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Montrea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

apparent typo

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — 2dk (talk) 23:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can't believe no one else has awarded you another barnstar yet (since I did in 2010), especially for all the contributions related to Quebec.

		The Barnstar of National Merit
		It's about time that all the many contributions to Quebec-related articles are recognized with The Barnstar of National Merit. Good work!
		this WikiAward was given to MTLskyline by P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:31, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'm glad I could contribute!--MTLskyline (talk) 22:12, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lasalle College logo .jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:CL e-cmyk gif.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:59, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you pronounce "fight" for the word fête ? Fête (talk) 14:54, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm anglophone, but yes, I think that "fight" is similar to how it is pronounced. --MTLskyline (talk) 18:37, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you record the word fête in Wikimedia Commons please ? Fête (talk) 18:40, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Amqui (talk) 02:23, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey MTLskyline; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:04, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just for your info, most if not all Quebec community articles have these headers. If for whatever reason you'd like to change them, you're probably better to use a bot. Gordalmighty (talk) 22:52, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Park Avenue (Montreal) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:47, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Société de transport de Montréal may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• CTM became the Commission de transport de la communauté urbaine de Montréal (CTCUM)in January 1970), and in 1985, rebranded itself again by becoming the Société de Transport de la Communauté Urbaine

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:07, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Montreal Metro has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Secondarywaltz (talk) 07:19, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Guzzo logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:00, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MTLskyline, could you fix the template for the Saint-Jérôme Line? Vaudreuil-Hudson's and Candiac's colored squares are stuck together, and Candiac is listed as Delson-Candiac. Thanks! P-S: I wonder, since it is not that far from Montreal, how is Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu not part of the Montreal CMA? Mtlfiredude (talk) 22:51, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, unfortunately I am not sure how to edit route templates. Did you try asking Secondarywaltz? I did correct Delson-Candiac to Candiac however.

Regarding Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, it is not included in the Montreal Census Metropolitan Area by Statistics Canada because it has its own Census Agglomeration. StatCan defines CMAs based upon commuting patterns. Since St-Jean is considered a CA in its own right, in order to join the Montreal CMA it would have to have a proportion of at least 35% of its employed labour force commuting to and from the Montreal CMA. You can see StatCan's definition of CMA here (along with the formula they use): [1].--MTLskyline (talk) 04:26, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stade Municipal (Quebec City) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• title=Québec Capitales - Stade Municipal|url=http://www.canamleague.com/teams/quebec.php|publisher=[[Canadian American Association of Professional Baseball]|accessdate=17 September 2013}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:45, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing of Rivière des Prairies has mixed up many of the references that support the text. I do not appreciate having to redo/recheck the references.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 15:19, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Embedding external links in the body of the article is against policy. I converted the external links to references. If you do not want to have to recheck your references, I suggest entering them properly. I've had to clean up a fair number of your edits. --MTLskyline (talk) 17:20, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I recognize you did fix the links to the historical maps, thank you. We are both trying to make the article better I believe. I apologize if I offended you, I was in a bad mood when I wrote my complaint. Yes I started the problem with improper references. I do not know the proper HTML "ref" syntax to cite the government websites as references. At this time the references have no description.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 11:56, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it, most registered users here edit in good faith. I appreciate your additions of references to the articles. The easiest way to add references is to click the "Cite" button in the editing toolbar, then in the "Templates" drop down menu, select "cite web". It gives you a bunch of fields to fill out, and you can input whatever information you know. It also automatically adds the ref tags around the information you input. If you want to use the same source more than once in the article, you can place the shorthand version each time: <ref name=NameofReference" /> (more information here). Here is the template it uses if you prefer to enter it manually, or if you want to know what the various parameters are for. --MTLskyline (talk) 05:42, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for accepting my apology and the information on the "ref". --Mark v1.0 (talk) 15:12, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jack Astor's Bar & Grill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

zero evidence for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 04:02, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I am a new editor to Wikipedia so I was wondering if you could tell me what the problem is with the page you reviewed? Your log didn't include a lot of information so I just wanted to check :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hargb91 (talk • contribs) 07:55, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! The ISaute page has relatively few issues for a new article. Generally speaking, when making an article about a business it is important to prove that it is notable as per WP:COMPANY. There is not much of a precedent for trampoline parks having articles. However, I'm leaning toward it being notable, since it is the only one of its kind in Quebec, and is mentioned by various secondary sources you linked to. You could improve it by using the Cite web tool (located in the editing toolbox) to specify when each source was used. Let me know if you have any questions or need any help!--MTLskyline (talk) 06:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Having read the description of this club, and that it is one of the country's most exclusive clubs, I'm doubtful that it's a "Visitor attraction in Monteregie". Very few people see it. PKT(alk) 16:04, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are probably right. I included it because Category:Golf clubs and courses in Canada is listed under Category:Visitor attractions in Canada and figured that the same would apply to the individual golf club articles. However, as you say, it is generally closed to the public, with even their website requiring a log in. I think I'll remove the category for now.--MTLskyline (talk) 06:50, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bishops Coat of Arms.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:53, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Concordia COA.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to André Spénard may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:People from Thetford Mines]]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Philippe Couillard may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• head of the department of neurosurgery at [[Hôpital Saint-Luc]] from 1989 to 1992 and again at the [[Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de [[Sherbrooke]] from 1996 to 2003. From 1992 to 1996, he
• |}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:LogoMagog.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:10, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Magog coat of arms.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:12, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Magog coat of arms.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:29, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Port of Quebec logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:09, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mail Montenach has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN mall.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 00:51, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jean Lesage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:54, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Carrefour Richelieu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN 455,035 sq ft mall.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 19:26, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carrefour Richelieu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carrefour Richelieu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 03:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey MTLskyline, just wanted to know if you planned on taking another Montreal skyline pic from the Champlain Bridge this summer? It should be interesting with the appearance of Altoria and a part of Deloitte, plus with the Marriott Courtyard being nearly completed! Mtlfiredude (talk) 15:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SkahHigh/Mtlfiredude. I will definitely take a shot from the Champlain this summer some time (probably on some weekend, and once the traffic/repairs have died down a bit). Another good spot is from the AMT Mont-Saint-Hilaire line. I take that into work every day (great views!), however, I would only use my phone for that. --MTLskyline (talk) 21:52, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Because the Montreal page is in dying need of a good skyline pic... I take the Champlain Bridge often into Montreal and I find it is the best angle! Mtlfiredude (talk) 16:58, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you are listed in the active members list of WikiProject Quebec.

I have made a number of drastic changes to the project in an effort to bring some more life to it. I would appreciate hearing your feedback on these changes here. Thanks! - Sweet Nightmares 19:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have interacted with both the article and its creator I saw it fit to notify you of ISaute's proposed deletion. Discussion is being held here. - Sweet Nightmares 23:02, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, how do English-speakers pronounce the word "dépanneur", maybe "day-puh-NURR" ? Fort123 (talk) 19:24, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I happened to see your post here. I just added a pronunciation in IPA on the dépanneur page. Yes, it should resemble "day-pah-NURR".

Jurjenb (talk) 20:20, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I noticed that one of the many edits you made on the Terminus Centre-Ville page was the ridership info in the infobox. However, the link ended up in ERROR, so I deleted it. Furthermore, the source was no longer available. I found the new address for the source, but 1) I don't understand the link structure you've used; and 2) the ridership info ("performance indicators") refer to 'terminus' in a very general way, it's not clear if this refers to the Downtown Terminal, all the terminals on the Chevrier bus route or all terminals of the AMT in general. Hence, I prefered to delete it for now. If you have more info regarding the ridership, please add it! Thanks! Jurjenb (talk) 20:02, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the data entry for that template and it works now. Secondarywaltz (talk) 20:34, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The report has either been moved or deleted and I will try to find it or perhaps the current one. If you find it let me know. Secondarywaltz (talk) 20:37, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lasalle College logo .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:18, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:René Lévesque.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Courtyard Marriott Montreal Centre-Ville. Since you had some involvement with the Courtyard Marriott Montreal Centre-Ville redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --BDD (talk) 19:58, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Quebec political party has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox political party. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS (talk) 20:32, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:JD Irving Ltd logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:56, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello skyline
Re: Charlevoix tourist train. Perhaps you can prod them into giving us some technical details. All the links and the email address are in Talk:Charlevoix tourist train#The rolling stock. My email address is [email protected]
Peter Horn User talk 21:23, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I moved your RM requests from Talk:Le Quartier Chinois to WP:Requested moves/Technical requests#Requests to revert undiscussed moves per WP:RMUM. The onus should not be on you to oppose an undiscussed controversial move. —  AjaxSmack  23:48, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MTLskyline. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Champlain lennoxville.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Projet Montreal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Les Affaires logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Les-Affaires-24-Mars-2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Leduc (Quebec politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Leduc (Quebec politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 20:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Marcotte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Marcotte until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 03:49, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philippe Brunet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippe Brunet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 04:54, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sean Finn (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Finn (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 05:02, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Rive-Sud Express. I do not think that Rive-Sud Express fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because A newspaper is a business, but also a creative work, and as such, out of scope for A7. I request that you consider not re-tagging Rive-Sud Express for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 02:50, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bishop's University logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MTLskyline. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Les Affaires logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Les-Affaires-24-Mars-2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Skyline
Please join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint-Michel Boulevard (Montreal). I think that outsiders should stay out of Quebec in general and out of Montreal in particular. Peter Horn User talk 12:19, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re Saint-Michel Boulevard (Montreal) Peter Horn User talk 13:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MTLskyline. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Btmm.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo Le Journal de Montréal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Quebec Chronicle-Telegraph Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CJAD Logo 2011.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I would like to know if some Canadians distinguish the 1st vowel, are there some Canadians pronounce the word father as "fahther", but the word bother as "bawther"? 138.229.19.202 (talk) 12:40, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Liberte logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:37, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Les Affaires logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Les-Affaires-24-Mars-2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jamie Orchard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established. Subject is a local news anchorperson, albeit in a sizeable city. Should have some independent reliable sources to show notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PKT(alk) 19:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of hospitals in Montreal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of hospitals in Montreal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 05:59, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Concordia Stingers Buzz.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Largest cities of Canada has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:06, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Montreal has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Heritage Regional High School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cited to naught but a single primary (404) source for 16.86 years, 99.54% unverified, and exhibiting no evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 00:18, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:LOGOAerocentreHYUco.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TheGazetteA1page.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sept Days is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sept Days until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Northern Moonlight 23:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rosemount High School (Montreal) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosemount High School (Montreal) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 19:02, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 November 7 § Category:Buildings and structures by decade of destruction on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BlasterOfHouses (HouseBlaster's alt • talk • he/they) 17:38, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]