User talk:Mcy jerry

Wikipedia:Babel

yue 呢位用户嘅母语系粤语/广州话。 呢位用戶嘅母語係粵語/廣州話。

zh-3 該用戶能以熟練的中文進行交流。 该用户能以熟练的中文进行交流。

en-3 This user can contribute with an advanced level of English.

ja-1 この利用者は初級の日本語ができます。

fr-1 Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau élémentaire de français.

Jerry Crimson Mann is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Kennethmyers (talk) 16:33, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change the name of the article any more, the article was created by me and I have already explained why it should be called "Uncle Bus" in Wikipedia in the article "Bus Uncle". --- CMB Transit, May 26, 2006, 16:01 (BST)

If you really feel that the title of the topic should change, you are always welcomed to have an arguement with me off the Wiki system. DO NOT modify it yourself before we have discussed about it and have come up with a final decision, I've reverted your changes just because you didn't ask my permission as the creator/starter of the topic. By the way, the topic has already established its fame so I think it is more imappropriate to change the title now. --- CMB Transit, May 26, 2006, 17:31 (BST)

My MSN: [email protected]

Please also read this first: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_Uncle

Hereby, I award Jerry Crimson Mann with the Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for actively and untiredly dealing with Vandalism on many Hong Kong-related articles.

The awarder would like to remain anonymous, and you're not likely to be able to find him out ^_^ -218.188.27.77 09:37, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No. He was actually a social activist like Leung Kwok Hung. He held a desecrated flag in his hand during a rally, and was therefore convicted. — Instantnood 14:46, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

What I know is entirely from the law case reports. :-| — Instantnood 17:27, July 19, 2005 (UTC)

You've done it already. It'll keep you busy for a few days to satisfy the demands.. :-) — Instantnood 14:46, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, not sure what you meant by "Would it be too simple?"... JoeSmack (talk) 06:07, July 13, 2005 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for adding very nice pictures to Xiangqi! They significantly improved the article. One image still is not yet Ok, this is which was intended to show checkmate situation. However it is not checkmate, black can capture red pawn with his advisor. After that the red cannon doesn't attack the black king anymore. You can fix this e.g. by replacing this red pawn with a black advisor. Andreas Kaufmann 13:31, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is checkmate. Nomatter whose turn it is, the black side loses. If it's the red side's turn, the player can do a cannon jumpover and capture the king. At the same time, if it's the black's turn, nomatter what the player does, the cannon is still in the checking place. Nothing can be avoided. Deryck C. 07:22, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Seems they're the same thing... learnt something new.. :-D Thanks so much for pointing me to that article. — Instantnood 19:08, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

I'm dropping you a note to let you know that The 1970s in Hong Kong, which you voted on, became the Hong Kong Collaboration of the Week! You are highly encouraged to contribute whatever you can to the topic! CrossTimer 03:19, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Much thanks for buying my points in many discussions. ^_^ BTW why don't you put the Barnstar onto your user page instead of leaving it like an orphan here? Deryck C. 17:53, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not just puny, it's simply non-existant! :-(--K.C. Tang 18:45, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!! Thanks for updating the waterfall formation picture. It looks far greater than the original! Thanks! Dragons Bay

Hello Jerry this map is really nice. Would be great if the district borders over water are also drawn. :-) — Instantnood 15:56, July 22, 2005 (UTC)

as a matter of fact I cant remember, unless that's the memory of my before-life: I was yet to be born at that time. I just read the incident from a book. :-\ --K.C. Tang 11:24, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jerry. Several weeks ago, we have been talking about a project for making the maps of the position of a particular district within the territory of the Hong Kong SAR (the so-called "highlight map"). Actually, I have been making a new version for the highlight maps that I uploaded before, as you said that the old version was not very good. :-P After replacing the old versions with the new versions, I started to make the map for some more districts. But as I was about to upload my map for Central and Western District, I saw that you have made another version too, and you have made a template. The template is super great! (I modified it for a little bit) Thank you for your contribution! But I think your highlight is not clear enough (because of the colour combinations). I tried to put the one that I made into the template, and see whether it looks good. You may go to the page and see whether it is good. (I have made the maps for Sha Tin, Tai Po, Sai Kung, Tuen Mun and Central already.)
Alanmak 22:23, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Great map! Immense effort appreciated! However, some minor errors. I'm sure that Ap Lei Chau, Green Island and some other islands around Hong Kong Island are administered by the district councils on the island, not "Outlying Islands". Dragons Bay

Right... in fact not many islands are part of the Islands District. Only Lamma, Hei Ling Chau, The Brothers, Kau Yi Chau, Soko Islands, Po Toi Islands, Peng Chau, etc., are part of it, but not Kau Sai Chau, High Islands, Ping Chau, Round Island (Ngan Chau), Middle Island (Tong Po Chau), Magazine Island (Fo Yeuk Chau). Ma Wan and the northeastern corner of Lantau, including Yam O and the majority of Penny's Bay, is part of Tsuen Wan District. And again, it would be great to have the maritime boundaries between the districts, and between Hong Kong and the mainland. — Instantnood 15:59, July 24, 2005 (UTC)

Umm... let me know when u're not sure, and I'll tell who's in who's out. And in fact you can read the district council constituency maps, which are available at the external links section of the district articles on Wikipedia. — Instantnood 16:10, July 24, 2005 (UTC)

r u sure that the chain store part should occupy another page? I dun think that deserves an independent entry. :-( --K.C. Tang 16:47, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think the principle should be that something deserves an independent entry when it is either informational (like the division of HK districts) or interesting or both (like the HK flag articel :-D). R there any official guideline for that? I am not sure ... By the way, r u sure that there r traditional Dai Pai Dong in Wan Chai? where r they located? i am thinking to go to take some photos for the article. --K.C. Tang 06:57, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, Central and Sham Shi Po is a must; i just wonder where the dai pai dong are located in Wan Chai. --K.C. Tang 07:04, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

that doesn;t matter... talking about Wan Chai, I have just created the Lee Tung Street article, u could help if u've got more information. :-D --K.C. Tang 07:51, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

O, u have already mentioned that! I am too careless, I should've taken a look at the Wan Chai article first. u think it appropriate to merge my little entry into the big article? --K.C. Tang 08:02, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good, then pls help upload some 封舖相 onto the article. Thx--K.C. Tang 08:11, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Great. I was there some time ago, but I didn't have my camera with me that day.. :-( — Instantnood 08:13, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

I even saw a "tour group" led by a certain political party visiting there on the past Sunday! --K.C. Tang 10:54, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think what you meaned was that it is a little bit girlish to put Khaki and pink together, eh? :-P Well, but at least it makes a clearer indication than the versions that use grey, white or green to indicate the landmass. But generally, I believe that we just have to, based on the khaki-and-pink version that I have just made, and modify the colours so that it looks nicer. (We can discuss about the use of colour with some Hong Kong Wikipedians.) Other than the combination of the colours, I think everything else works out pretty well. (Do you agree with that? :-) ) For instance, since the map is used to indicate the position of a district within the territory of the Hong Kong SAR, we don't have to include any part of Shenzhen or any zoom-out map showing the entire China. This was done in the khaki-and-pink version that I have just made. Also, it would be a good idea to add two square boxes at the left-hand upper corner showing which colour is for which. This was also done. Again, we may discuss with some Hong Kong Wikipedians to get some inspirations.

By the way, I have a silly question to ask. What is the difference between JPG and PNG formats? PNG is a pretty new format to me. I used to use JPG for any graphics that I made. Why is it better to use PNG? What is the principle behind? Would the size of the image file be larger if we use PNG?

Again, thank you for your effort on the template. It is really good and well-organized to use a template. But the reason why I prefer using "Hong Kong Special Administrative Region" to using "Hong Kong" is that many foreign readers - like those Americans :-P, who are not care about international affairs at all, may still think that Hong Kong is an country. As a result, they may think that those 18 districts are the provinces in a country, rather than the sub-divisions within a province-level city. (Especially if those maps don't have the scales, they don't know that everything in the map is just something within a city.) Well, Wikipedia should take care of those "silly" people. :-P It is no harm to write "Hong Kong Special Administrative Region." Furthermore, I heard that, in the flag-raising ceremony at Wanchai on 1/7/2005, the English M.C. also said "Hong Kong Special Administrative Region" EVERY TIME! So, it is pretty official to say in that way. :-P

Another thing... In your user page in Wikipedia, you said you know a little bit Japanese. And in your ICQ info, you said you are going to learn French. It is really good to be multi-lingual! I have started learning German too. Maybe we can contribute to some Hong Kong-related articles in those Wikipedias in foreign languages. For example, recently I have contributed these: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:Karte_von_Hongkong_mit_Ortsnamen.png http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:WusteGobi.jpg

As a Chinese, I really think it is pretty sad that Chinese Wikipedia has very few articles (a lot less that English, German, Japanese Wikipedias) even China is the mosyt populous country in the world. But frankly speaking, some articles in Chinese Wikipedia are pretty crappy. I don't have the motive to improve Chinese Wikimedia if I have to do it alone. As you are an active participant in Wikipedia, should we encourage other Hong Kong Wikipedians to contribute more in Chinese Wikipedia and the Wikipedias in foreign languages?

Recently, I see that there is a "Cantonese Wikipedia" under test. Those "words" used in Cantonese Wikipedia are not even words at all! It even promotes some bad culture of using Chinese language. Hm...I think most of the participants there are Hong Kongers. What do you think about that? :-/

Alanmak 21:07, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to look for its logo on the Internet, but seems there isn't any. Do you think it's printed on the cover of its CD and VCD? Perhaps we can scan it and upload it. — Instantnood 10:35, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

At least My Life as McDull needs it.. I guess.. :-) — Instantnood 15:09, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

No wonder. See how bad is my memory.. Lol~ — Instantnood 16:11, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

Hey Jerry don't forget to add new articles to the list of Hong Kong-related topics. :-) — Instantnood 17:35, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

Please kindly include the Disneyland on your map by filling up Penny's Bay. :-D -- 218.188.0.150 04:40, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, it's not yet revealed that will the border between Tsuen Wan and Islands districts across the Penny's Bay be redrawn.. :-| For the boundary over sea, see [1] and [2] (PDF format). — Instantnood 08:31, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

Actually I responded at template talk:underground Railway in China before you actually notified me at my talk page. For the quality of try resolve it through conversations first. :-D — Instantnood 10:34, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

Hey, if I use the pic of a person, say, who has been dead for 100 years, taken from a book; what copyright tag should i use? the author of the pic is unknown, of course. --K.C. Tang 15:22, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jerry, did you get my email? -- Tonync 15:56, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah.. looks like the Wikipedia server didn't let it go through. I wanted to translate your map of the 18 districts of Hong Kong into Chinese - would you be able to send me the original (hopefully a Photoshop file)? Addy is same username at gmail. Keep up the awesome graphics! -- Tonync 16:14, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is the file too large to be sent? -- Tonync 08:32, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man. Oh yeah, I noticed the new Hong Kong demographics series. :) You sure are talented with graphics! -- Tonync 08:39, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops...jumped the gun on that one. I'm so used to "this page needs to be wikified" meaning "this page was cut-and-pasted from the Internet" that I didn't look for a (c) notice. Mea culpa. 140.247.60.206 15:35, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

r u sure 腸粉 is called rice roll instead of steamed vermicelli roll? I am not sure. --K.C. Tang 17:27, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding K.C.'s request on my talk page. :-D — Instantnood 10:22, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

Er, are you sure you want to be writing "evidence of evolution"? I mean, it's not as if (1) it is really needed, and (2) since nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution, you're going to be attempting to write the whole of natural history. I think it better than horse evolution goes into its own article and only gets a mention there, despite it frequently being used as a case study. Dunc|☺ 15:46, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Enzymes looking good now, give it a go at FAC, but they're a harsh bunch as I'm sure you know :D --PopUpPirate 14:47, July 31, 2005 (UTC)

I've supported this article for you at FAC - I've currently got Iron Maiden (band) up on there for your consideration and / or support! --PopUpPirate 15:28, July 31, 2005 (UTC)

Hi Jerry, I'm planning on going over the article tonight with my old textbook to tidy up anything thats still missing. I'll probably also restrucure the text a bit since there are some parts that are hard to read. I'm not trying to stand in the way of getting it featured, I just want it to be the best possible article :) --nixie 04:47, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What else have you made illustrations for?--nixie 05:03, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How this didn't get featured is beyond me! --PopUpPirate 22:58, September 3, 2005 (UTC)

Guess it's much better now. The only problem left would be the box of dairy industry problems. :-/ — Instantnood 19:48, August 1, 2005 (UTC)

Pleasure. :-D — Instantnood 19:51, August 1, 2005 (UTC)

Re: Japanese Occupation of Hong Kong: it's nice to be appreciated! Feel free to correct any of my changes, btw. 8^) --Spudtater 20:51, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you tagged Image:Happycorner.jpg with Template:PD-China. However, I believe that template is inapproprate since the image is less than 50 years old. The image is also imprinted with a non GFDL compliant restriction. If the image is to remain on wikipedia, it must be released either under GFDL or into the public domain. --Jiang 17:37, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I note that you've now tagged the image as being under the GFDL. The "Wikipedia only" restriction that's embedded in the image itself is incompatible with the GFDL, and the image compresses better as a PNG, so I'm making the derivative version Image:Happycorner.png with the restriction notice removed. Just keeping you informed of this. Bryan 17:41, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you check the url in the copyvio notice its the same text, word for word, on a .hk site and the bottom notice says copyright and no reproduction allowed unless authorized. So there's some confusion there, we need to find out which notice is correct first. Elfguy 17:14, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The copyrighy notice of the HKO .gov.hk/readme/readme.htm seems to be quite different from other departments. :-| — Instantnood 17:30, August 4, 2005 (UTC)

Seems like they're a bit contradictory.. anyways stay calm and be courteous. :-) — Instantnood 17:36, August 4, 2005 (UTC)

Well you know what most of my time is occupied by.. :-) — Instantnood 11:18, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

Well that is.. try to let him know what you think, stay calm, and remember - don't bite newbies. :-) — Instantnood 17:30, August 4, 2005 (UTC)

In fact I've never reported any of such attacks, and it ended up these people filed an ArbCom case on me. :-( — Instantnood 11:28, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

I have some pictures you might be interested in. I have three pictures of the HK SAR flag when it is displayed on a desk (eg. table flags). I can ask my friend, who sent them, if I can upload it here under the GFDL license. Plus, sorry I was being rough on ya when you uploaded the small animated gif of the Hong Kong flag. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 17:44, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the plastic flags that I have are very similar to this photo and to this photo. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 18:47, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing, a section about the legality of flag desrecration can be started. I have found this: http://law.hku.hk/lawof/UploadFile/986.htm:

"ANOTHER CONVICTION FOR FLAG DESECRATION

April Fifth Action Group activist Leung Kwok-hung is no stranger to the law banning the desecration of the Chinese and Hong Kong flags and emblems. He was convicted for a second time in March 2002 and fined HK$3,000, along with another group member, Koo Sze-yiu. The pair were charged in connection with a demonstration in Central in May 2001. The court heard that two petals of Hong Kong’s bauhinia emblem had been blacked out.

Mr Leung argued that everyone should be entitled to exercise freedom of expression, and that the law under which he was prosecuted, the Regional Flag and Regional Emblem Ordinance, should be scrapped.

However, the magistrate did not see the case in this light. In addition to fining the pair, he ordered Mr Leung to pay the HK$3,000 good-behaviour bond imposed on him in February 2001 for his first offence. The pair’s supporters paid their fines, which meant they did not have to serve jail terms. Mr Leung said at the time of his first conviction that he would not appeal against the sentence because he did not believe he could win.

A previous desecration case—the first since the relevant laws were enacted in July 1997—went all the way to the Court of Final Appeal. The Court of Appeal found in favour of two activists accused of desecrating the Chinese flag, arguing that the laws were an unnecessary restriction on freedom of expression, and therefore in breach of both the Basic Law and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. But the Court of Final Appeal re-imposed the guilty verdicts imposed by a lower court, arguing that the laws imposed a permissible restriction on freedom of expression.

Four weeks after their conviction in the flag desecration case, Leung Kwok-hung and Koo Sze-yiu were jailed for 14 days for shouting slogans in the Legislative Council chamber during a question-and-answer session with the chief executive, Tung Chee-hwa. That incident took place in October 2001, shortly after Mr Tung delivered his annual policy address. It was the fifth time Mr Leung had disrupted a Legislative Council session, and the second time he had gone to jail. The activist said it was unfair to jail him as he had only been expressing his political opinions." Thoughts? Zscout370 (Sound Off) 19:26, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I dun know Greek (the grammar is really difficult), I just switched to the German (Deutsch) Wiki and got the info - the german are usually careful in etymological matter. By the way, I noticed that u r writing evidence of evolution ... it's great, do u basically based on Darwin's book? there r really so much to cover, especially the genetic stuff. Add Oil :D --K.C. Tang 17:48, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have some plans, but some r not Hong Kong-related. u loves biology? did u read James Watson's Double Helix? funny reading. --K.C. Tang 18:10, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think ur illustrations r really good, especially the horse one. I once worked in a newspaper, n i would say what u make is better then those made by the artists working there. :P --K.C. Tang 18:20, 4 August 2005 (UT )

tle wonder. Great biologists r always great drawers, including Darwin, not to mention Cuvier. When i was a student, my chemistry and biology teachers always took pain to decipher what I drew. :( --K.C. Tang 18:32, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In fact I am unemployed more often than not :( --K.C. Tang 03:53, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please change your Image:Activation2.png? How about changing

• reactant (e.g.C6H12O6 +O2) to substarat (A+B)
• products (C+D)
• "transition state (TS) without enzyme" instead of "without enzyme"
• "transition state (TS) with enzyme" instead of "with enzyme"

otherwise I like your image!

Hey Jerry. Lemme try to explain the title tool first. In Chinese wikipedia, u can use -{T|correct title}- to modify the title; and with the new title, you can even apply regional translations, so the whole title modifier can become e.g. -{T|zh-cn:布什;zh-tw:布希;zh-hk:布殊}-. I don't know who exactly invented this small but mighty tool, but since it looks like it's unique to Chinese wikipedia, I suspect it comes from zh:user:zhengzhu, who invented the entire Simp/Trad translation system in Chinese wikipedia.

There's also something called "A標籤" in Chinese wikipedia and I can't seem to work out what it is. I suspect it's a translation system that applies throughout the entire article, rather than for an individual case like -{zh-cn:布什;zh-tw:布希;zh-hk:布殊}-. I tried googling zh.wikipedia.org but to no avail.

As for collaboration between zh and en HK users... I'm afraid I won't be of much use in leading the project, since I'm currently back in London and will be quite busy with work. I'd be happy to do take part if time allows me to do so, though. Hello World from Chinese Wikipedia seems to be the most active Hong Konger over there, and he's an admin too -- so I suggest you contact him instead if you have any collaboration projects in mind? Good luck! -- Tonync 21:06, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded them. I have two more photos from his, also under the GFDL license, that I can upload. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 05:00, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Buddha says that a person who rolls like a chariot rather than rising in anger, is the true charioteer. Everyone else is just holding the reins. Let it go. I've told Alanmak on that page to be polite. I even did something I don't believe in doing and removed the offensive words. I think personal attack words should stay as a testament to character of the person who said them, but these I removed. SchmuckyTheCat 05:32, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

so u're seeking collaborations between zh and en HK users? that would be great. --K.C. Tang 06:38, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

but how to collaborate, u have some plans? by the way, what conflict do u have? calm down. :P --K.C. Tang 06:52, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

O, wiki is a funny place, so we are easily to be absored, and when we are absored, we are liable to lose etiqutte. Of course personal attack is the last thing we expect to see on Wiki ... but that's not really a big deal if u think about it, it's not like being killed in civil wars or SARS or something like that. Cool :D --K.C. Tang 18:01, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, following ur advice, I've opened a WikiCommon account; if i upload some of my old pics there, do I need to delete them here? --K.C. Tang 18:46, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gakmo, User:Burn, User:Wrightbus, User:Tomchiukc also come from Hong Kong and are admins in Chinese Wikipedia. You may wish to contact them too.--Hello World! 08:55, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jerry your locator map for the North District was removed by User:Alanmak. [3] — Instantnood 11:01, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

Let's see. :-) — Instantnood 11:32, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

The template you referred to in page am730 is specifically implemented in the software for the Chinese wikipedia, mainly to support cutomized conversion between traditional and simplified Chinese in the title, but people quickly found out that it can be used for other purposes as well, like the case of am730. It is fairly easy to implement this function for other languages like English, and I will be happy to do so. However you should first check with the the specific language community to see if such feature is desirable. I suggest you ask around at village pump or post to wikipedia-l and wikitech-l, and contact me again. (I am kind of on break now, with new jobs and everything...) Thanks! --Zhengzhu 17:32, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

多謝關照!!! :P --K.C. Tang 16:33, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

We'll need you to draw two maps, basically based on the district maps, but according to the 2000 coastlines. :-) Meanwhile are you having difficulties with the district maps? Is it possible to add the borders on sea? — Instantnood 16:42, August 7, 2005 (UTC)

Hmm.. actually I'm talking about the borders between the districts on sea, but anyways good try. For the borders between districts over the sea you can take a look at [4], [5], etc. (PDF maps). The maps for UrbCo and RegCo will basically be Hong Kong Island + Kowloon + New Kowloon, and the rest, respectively. But since they're scrapped in 2000 we cannot show the current (2005) coastline. Have you got a RegCo library card by the way? You're living in the New Territories right? — Instantnood 17:06, August 7, 2005 (UTC)

I'm double checking the Hong Kong-mainland China sea boundary.. I'm afraid it's not too accurate... Seems like I'm a bit demanding ain't I? — Instantnood 17:14, August 7, 2005 (UTC)

Hmm.. is there a library out there? Or people prefers going to City Hall? Actually the Islands District is only one among the the nine districts of the New Territories.. perhaps it was relatively remote and people won't normally include it when talking about "New Territories" in common speech. Just like few consider New Kowloon part of the New Territories, and many consider Tseung Kwan O, Clear Water Bay, or even Sai Kung part of Kowloon. — Instantnood 17:23, August 7, 2005 (UTC)

I love maps, but I'm idiot in computer graphics. Are you having any trouble with the sea boundaries between the districts, and between Hong Kong and mainland? — Instantnood 17:23, August 7, 2005 (UTC)

I received your message, Jerry. Actually, I don't know much information about that. I nominated these two articles mainly because I want to know more about that. :-) But anyway, should we make an outline first - like what information should be included, and what should not be include? In that way, we can have the "headings" for each section of the article first. I think the picture (masterpiece? :-D) that you guys are talking about can be added later. The texts should be ready first. - Alanmak 20:55, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, how did you get your images moved to the commons? Did you upload them again there, or someone did the move for you? Thanks! ;)--Huaiwei 17:26, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The useful tools are {{move to Wikimedia Commons}}, {{dbc}} and {{nowcommons}} :-D . — Instantnood 18:02, August 7, 2005 (UTC)

File:HKSAR flag raising cememony start.jpg

File:Image-HKSAR flag raising cememony finish.jpg

This is the start of the ceremony. I have the end result with the flags flying in the air. Enjoy. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 19:26, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded the finish part of the ceremony. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 19:35, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The article is long and detailed and really takes some time to edit, but we have time, "no need to rush"; and I will try to take the raising-flag pic if possible (it's difficult to live up with the barnstar u gave me, guy!) By the way, u r going to study medicine? Congratulations :P (though I myself as a habit dun see doctor) --K.C. Tang 05:05, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, under the advocation of Zscout370, I've put Flag of Hong Kong onto WP:FAC. Let's vote for it. Deryck C. 07:26, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

BTW what is your chinese name? Deryck C. 09:00, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so what does Mcy as in Mcy jerry stand for? Deryck C. 09:23, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that's his initials.. one of the letters is from his surname. :-D — Instantnood 09:25, August 9, 2005 (UTC)

But it spells "Mann"? Deryck C. 09:31, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you just hide the spelling of your surname then? (like what I'm doing) Deryck C. 09:36, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really doing the opposite. Many people from my school hide his surname on electronic signatures such as those on Xanga, Wikipedia, etc. Deryck C. 09:42, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

Should it be part of WP:HKWNB, WP:TRTNB and WP:CRTNB, or attached to or devolved from them? — Instantnood 09:54, August 9, 2005 (UTC)

Is it a two-way translation project? — Instantnood 10:22, August 9, 2005 (UTC)

You've made some great flags of Hong Kong depicting the proper usage of the flag. Since the [{Flag of India]] will be featured later this week, would you be willing to improve the India images I've made, like you've done for Hong Kong? (The bottom four need to be replaced.) Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 14:56, August 9, 2005 (UTC)

That was really a quick resonse and very professional work. Thanks. =Nichalp «Talk»= 17:16, August 9, 2005 (UTC)

Suddenly gone missing from the FA list.... most odd! Vandalism? --PopUpPirate 21:07, August 9, 2005 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for the work. Is the file really to big to be sent via e-mail? Even if you zip it? I'm back in London already so I can't collect it from you in person (a meet-up would have been cool). I'm also quite busy with work and other stuff right now, so even if I get the file I probably won't be able to work on it quite yet. Let me know if you have any suggestions. BTW, Can I ask you to do an interwiki on your Chinese page, so it links to your talk page? That would make replying to you a LOT easier. Thanks. -- Tonync (talk) (講) 23:45, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese version done! -- Tonync (talk) (講) 00:50, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

...for your cool support vote for my Restoration spectacular for FA! I was very encouraged to hear that it rolled your mouse! ;-) Bishonen | talk 10:03, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

u think that's good? I think that's not sharp enough (the day was misty when I took that) :( By the way, would u have time to go through the whole HK Flag article? I think we must assume the reader knows nth about the HK flag before reading the entry; there seem to me some context-less info in the article. But I'm afraid u will be very busy entering university ... anyway, enjoy both Wiki and ur new U life! :P --K.C. Tang 15:07, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Haven't really pay much attention to it. What do you think? Perhaps you can contact the major contributor to that article, user:TonySapphire, and see how that can be improved. — Instantnood 18:23, August 10, 2005 (UTC)

Hey Jerry are you watching the documentary on ATV Home? — Instantnood 14:35, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

Nominate her/him at WP:AN/3RR. — Instantnood 15:39, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

Free to take a glance at list of office-holders (history)? — Instantnood 16:00, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

Hmm...interesting stuff....--Huaiwei 16:31, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done (well actually some time ago). :-D — Instantnood 19:00, August 15, 2005 (UTC)

I have posted some comments in Image talk:Hk map 18.png. Please have a look. Thank you! -Hello World! 03:36, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted some comments in Image talk:Hk map 18.png. Please have a look. Thank you! -Hello World! 03:37, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mcy jerry — I have several questions for you at talk:agriculture in Hong Kong. If you could provide the Chinese names, that would be great. Thanks — Pekinensis 16:46, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I really like the images you created for templates like Template:Economy of Hong Kong, etc. I was wondering if you would consider doing me a favour, and creating similar images for South Africa using hte South African Coat of Arms? I'd really appreciate it! Thank you! Páll ^{(Die pienk olifant)} 06:28, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for agreeing to help me, just tell me what kind of images you'd like, and I'll try and get them for you, or check out South Africa on Commons. Páll ^{(Die pienk olifant)} 04:25, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think can be to improve this article to save it from vfd? — Instantnood 10:41, August 25, 2005 (UTC)

Do the Filipinas in Hong Kong all speak Tagalog as the lingua franca? I always thought they speak many different languages. :-) — Instantnood 07:58, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

Perhaps it has to be reflected in the article, that it's a lingua franca, instead of a mother tongue of everyone of them. :-D — Instantnood 19:01, August 27, 2005 (UTC)

Hello Jerry I've a little request and sent something to your mailbox, could you do me a favour? :-D — Instantnood 09:28, August 27, 2005 (UTC)

I sent it to the mailbox that I sent you the district council map before. :-\ — Instantnood 17:50, August 27, 2005 (UTC)

Is it lost or filtered or something? — Instantnood 17:56, August 28, 2005 (UTC)

I've tried again, anyways. — Instantnood 18:07, August 28, 2005 (UTC)

Mind email me an alternative email address of yours? Thanks. :-D — Instantnood 06:42, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

Hi Jerry, you wrote, of course cyanide is reversible...otherwise who has swallowed cyanide MUST die.... This is not true. Once cyanide binds complex IV it will not come off. Whether you die depends on how much cyanide is swallowed not whether it's binding can be reversed. If you swallow enough to itochondria you are dead. That is not the only reason it is a bad example for non competitive inhibition since cyanide does bind the active site and competes with oxygen for that active site! This example is more like a suicide inhibitor. David D. (Talk) 16:16, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi jerry I did some more research and you are right with regard to the non competitive nature. With a google search i found web sites claoming competitive and non competitive. However, I trust the following source:

http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.40.1.353

Quoted from the text:

Inhibitors of Complex IV, Cytochrome c Oxidase

Complex IV, cytochrome c oxidase (COX) (EC 1.9.3.1) is a heme/copper terminal oxidase that uses cytochrome c as electron donor (Figure 1C). According to the classification by Nicholls & Chance (40), COX inhibitors fall into four categories: (a) heme-binding inhibitors that are noncompetitive with both O2 and cytochrome c (e.g. azide, cyanide, and sulfide), (b) inhibitors competitive with oxygen, such as carbon monoxide (CO) and nitric oxide (NO), (c) inhibitors competitive with cytochrome c (polycations); and (d) noncompetitive inhibitors not affecting the heme groups, such as phosphate ions and alkaline pH.

With regard to reversible or irreversible, again i found claims for both but nothing concrete. More research is needed but I still tend towards if not irreversible then 'effectively' irreversible. David D. (Talk) 18:57, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that the wiki page for cytochrome c oxidase claims irreversible for cyanide. I'm not sure of the basis for this claim. David D. (Talk) 22:28, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if you've got noticed of my response at talk:politics of Hong Kong#Point form. :-D — Instantnood 18:28, August 28, 2005 (UTC)

[6] Isn't ice kachang known as red bean fleecy or red bean icy in Hong Kong? — Instantnood 20:07, August 28, 2005 (UTC)

I'm even wondering if they are different drinks, but sharing the same name. — Instantnood 15:11, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

Let's see. :-D — Instantnood 15:11, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

What had happened that morning? :-) Did you got my mail btw? — Instantnood 17:19, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Will it worth if we produce the spoken edition of the Flag of Hong Kong article together? As far as I can see, nobody is currently doing that. (ie. 2 voices) Deryck C. 13:34, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading and Image:Nuwatemple.jpg. I notice they currently don't have an image copyright tag, so their copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the pictures then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know on the [[:Image:|image description page]] where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Otherwise, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Thanks so much. --Thryduulf 16:39, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:MJ tiles.jpg. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law. We need you to specify two things on the image description page:

• The copyright holder, and
• The copyright status

The copyright holder is usually the creator. If the creator was paid to make this image, then their employer may be the copyright holder. If several people collaborated, then there may be more than one copyright holder. If you created this image, then you are the copyright holder.

Because of the large number of images on Wikipedia, we've sorted them using image copyright tags. Just find the right tag corresponding to the copyright status of this image, and paste it onto the image description page like this: {{TAGHERE}}.

There are 3 basic ways to licence an image on Wikipedia:

• An open content licence
• Public Domain
• Fair Use

• The copyright holder gets the best protection of his work by licencing their work under an open content license like the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence. If you have the express permission of the copyright holder to licence their work under the above licence, use the image copyright tag: {{cc-by-sa-2.5}}. The GNU Free Documentation License is another choice for licencing one's work. Again, if you have the express permission of the copyright holder, use the tag: {{GFDL}}.

• The copyright holder can also release his work into the public domain, see here for images released into the public domain.

• • Images from certain sources are automatically release into the Public Domain. This is true for most governments like the federal United States government. (See here for images from the government of the USA and here for other governments) However not all governments release their work into the public domain, such as the UK government (See herefor images from the UK government). Non-free licence governments are listed here.

• Also, in some cases, an image is copyrighted but allowed on Wikipedia because of Fair Use. To see if this image qualifies and then how to tag it, see Wikipedia:Fair use.

For any other sources of for more information see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. Please remember that if you don't tag your images, they will be deleted.

P.S. If you have uploaded other images without including copyright tags, please go back and tag them. Also, please tag all images that you upload in the future.

If you have any questions, just leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again. --Thryduulf 16:41, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

r u sure there r African restaurants in Chungking Mansion? --K.C. Tang 16:53, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

but is there menu written in African languages? --K.C. Tang 17:20, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

maybe the part arfrican languages could be omitted if sufficient information is lacking? and the part Portugese? --K.C. Tang 19:35, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry,

Will you accept if I nominate you to RfA?

Deryck C. 09:18:16, 2005-09-03 (UTC)

Yeh know, you're one of those on the "list of non-admins with high edits" and is adviced by the list creator to be made sysop. Deryck C. 09:25:30, 2005-09-04 (UTC)

I saw that you made a pronunciation file to go with Hong Kong. Do you think you could make a another one with just "Hong Kong" (in Cantonese) since the short form is the one actually used outside of official or very formal situations. That we we have one that would properly match the Mandarin pronunciation. Also, please consider uploading it to Commons, so that it can be used by all other Wikipedias.

I'll be watching your talkpage, so please reply here.

Peter ^Isotalo 16:03, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we can have the short form and the full name in the same file. ;-) — Instantnood 18:06, September 7, 2005 (UTC)

The actual pronunciation of "Hong Kong" is not descernable from the current recording unless you know Chinese to some extent. There needs to be a pronunciation of the common name before the official name. / Peter ^Isotalo 21:09, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Same here Jerry. Got something to talk with you.. have you relocated your computer overthere? :-P — Instantnood 20:57, September 9, 2005 (UTC)

Hello, Jerry, how things go? as to the section, Instantnood has already done the translation elegantly; n I've just turned some phrasings. ^_^ --K.C. Tang 17:53, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much K.C. I discovered that section when Jerry made changes to the section on C H Tung. :-) — Instantnood 18:16, September 10, 2005 (UTC)

Hey there, the Hong Kong article needs your help to defeat the current Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pronunciation of Hong Kong movement. Would you mind looking at the page and voting? Thank you! Páll ^{(Die pienk olifant)} 18:18, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Will maps here be useful to your Wan Chai coastline animation? :-) — Instantnood 16:29, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've just removed the notice for the past meetup in September. What happened in that? Deryck C. ^RfA 01:46, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Don't praise me... :-P Right.. it has actually been on my to-do list for months... just that I have been busy dealing with some other guys that leave me with little time to work on such templates.. :-( — Instantnood 06:23, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, could think of some words and phrases Hong Kongers usually use when they speak?[7] --K.C. Tang 08:51, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

no no, i mean "real english" ppl use when speaking Cantonese, like "somehow", "anyway"... u can follow the link to add some examples[8] :P --K.C. Tang 03:11, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I just read your oh-so-wrong comments about the foreigners' understanding of Hong Kong culture. I deleted the POV view about gweilos in the Kung hei fat choi article. Maybe you should meet more foreigners in Hong Kong, and you might be realize that many of them know much more than you seem to believe. In any case, writing such things in what is supposed to be an ENCYCLOPEDIA is not appropriate. olivier 12:34, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested to look at user:Fuzheado/jmsc0101 and user:Fuzheado/jmsc0101/instructions. I myself would prefer cleaning up these articles when they've finished (just a few more days to go..).  :-) — Instantnood 15:33, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, instantnood, u've also solved a mystery for me! i've been wondering for some time who these contributers are ... well, they are probably the only obligatory wikipedians on the planet (great laugh) --K.C. Tang 17:33, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know too until a couple of days ago when I was curious enough to see what links to those articles. Hope they'd enjoy and would turn real wikipedians. :-) — Instantnood 19:16, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

um, hope that the assignment will finish soon (great laugh again)--K.C. Tang 02:38, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jerry, hope you're settling in well in uni. Question about the Map of Hong Kong. How come you removed the 'borders' of Hong Kong in the end? Please reply in my Chinese discussion page, thanks. -- Tonync (talk) (講) 00:07, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! This is user ng_iman@USA, new to Wikipedia. Yesterday when I tried to upload an MTR image, I the computer rejected it and it said, " "." is not a recommended image file format." So I was wondering why I could not upload my image... but I promise my MTR image will be helpful to those that wants to know more about MTR history. I made my MTR (1967) map from Freeman & Fox's study, which could be incorporated into the MTR article. Do you mind if you give me your e-mail address and I'll attach the map so you can help me upload the image? (Ng iman@USA 00:58, 29 October 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Hello Iman you can use the E-Mail tool. — Instantnood 06:21, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've got the exact same problem in my new mediawiki installation. I applied the setting $wgFileExtensions = array('gif','png','jpg','jpeg'); to my LocalSettings.php so I don't get the point. Any suggestions?

Glad you're back finally. There's little much we can do to stop him.. but Jiang has in the past removed some of those already. Sigh.. there's another set of similar templates. What's your opinion on the Korean one, by the way? — Instantnood 06:21, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. — Instantnood 08:26, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jerry be patience... and be reminded not to disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. :-) — Instantnood 10:11, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've nomintated Sun Yat-sen for featured article removal. Since you originally supported the nomination, your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Sun Yat-sen. --Jiang 12:11, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jerry. Thank you for your FAC thoughts. I have tried to fix the rferecnes as you suggested. I'm also waiting for a photo to arrive. One that has, if I've addressed all your concerns, I hope you'll reconsider your vote. Alternately, please also feel free to express any more constructive criticism. Regards, Proto t c 16:53, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Additional pictures have also been added to the article. Let me know if this has satisfied your concerns. Proto t c 09:42, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be around Central, say, Theatre Lane, and take a picture there some time? :-) — Instantnood 15:58, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please reconsider your objections - they have been dealt with, I believe. Proto t c 12:58, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've similar plans in minds. Anything particular interesting that you think should be included in the station articles? As for the pronunciation one, I'm afraid image is not usually preferred so as to reduce the load to the server. — Instantnood 15:56, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think about the infobox and the sections of Tai Koo Station? — Instantnood 08:45, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I hope you undertsnad now that your actions of cutting and pasting and moving that produced Freddy (weather) was improper. By doing this the edit history of the original page which has become The Freddy was lost. You shoud have put your new text into a new page instead. Aso, you should have changed the redirect in TVB News and other articles linked to Freddy. Please do this yourself in HK notice boards. mikka (t) 16:43, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please look into the history of the page The Freddy. It looks as if you are the only author of the article about the dance. A non-suspicious one would never guess to look into the history of Freddy (weather) to find who wrote what. This may be necessary not only to claim someone's glory. I understand that you were a newbie and added a piece abiout a weatherman into the article about dance. I hope you will not do something like this any more. mikka (t) 20:46, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This map from this website is useful I guess.. :-D — Instantnood 14:17, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello can you keep an eye on the ongoing edits to 1990s in Hong Kong and the other articles listed at User:Fuzheado/JMSC0007? Thanks. — Instantnood 20:43, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jerry, thanks for your vote of support for shoe polish to become a Featured article. And now, wonderfully, shoe polish is now a featured article! Regards, Proto t c 10:13, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice work on the Kidult article. - Brian Kendig 06:20, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Would you consider putting Wan Chai to peer review or FA? — Instantnood 14:33, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold~ — Instantnood 15:19, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

An image can be either fair use or GFDL but not both - please chose one copyright tag.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 05:55, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: [9]. Although the simplified characters are not commonly used, I don't find any harm to include them, unless it's going to make the leading sentence terribly long. What I found a bit unacceptable and annoying was that he was doing it in a manner like disrupting to illustrate a point (see the edit history of Ghee Hin Kongsi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and Secret societies in Singapore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)). — Instantnood 16:21, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you add back the picture without any explanation? It does not have close relation with ifc. (oh yea btw I have a reply to your msg on Talk: Tung Chung) 199.111.230.195 07:18, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? Just because I don't have an account doesn't mean I don't deserve your kind response to my inquiry. Thanks. 199.111.230.195 04:03, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't perform any cut and paste move. Use the move button instead, to avoid losing edit history information. — Instantnood 17:01, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Remember~ :-) — Instantnood 18:42, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration case on which you commented, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Instantnood 2, has closed. The Committee's decision is as follows:

Instantnood, Huaiwei, and SchmuckyTheCat are all placed on Probation for topics relating to China for a year. This means that any sysop, in the exercise of their judgement for reasonable cause, documented in a section of this decision, may ban them from any article which relates to China which they disrupt by inappropriate editing. In doing so, the sysop must notify the banned user on their talk page, and a note must also placed on WP:AN/I. They may post suggestions on the talk page of any article from which they are banned from editing. This remedy is crafted to permit them to continue to edit articles in these areas which are not sources of controversy. In addition to this, Instantnood is restricted to proposing only one page move, poll of editors, or policy change relating to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese) per week, and reminded to make useful edit summaries.

Yours,

James F. (talk) 19:18, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about transliterations versus direct translations and mostly stay away from arguments about it. I do hate seeing revert wars about it. And I know visually once it's gotten past one of them I like the infobox on the side rather than inline. SchmuckyTheCat 15:28, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling. All are fixed. Don't think that guy is really a member of HKSSU.. seriously.. — Instantnood 17:52, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jerry you may be interested to take a look at a complete rewrite [10] to the article on the Punti-Hakka Clan Wars. — Instantnood 07:59, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The article is now nominated to be moved to gong xi fa cai. — Instantnood 14:04, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

yes, but this is a kind of an ad hoc article, it is almost bound to be messy ... u know the funny thing is that the office i'm working in sits right opposite the Victoria Park, so i just went there during lunch time to "feel the atmosphere", and took some pics. u should go to take a look. :D --K.C. Tang 07:04, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

btm, r u going to quit eng wiki, as u stated on instantnood's talk page? --K.C. Tang 07:12, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

um ... difficult ppl are everywhere, in Chi wiki as in Eng wiki :O but it's nice to see u on Chi wiki anyway. learn 九方, 倉頡 ect (but not 速成!) quickly!!! :D --K.C. Tang 08:23, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

could you also make images like Image:HorsePieceAgainstHorsePiece.png for janggi? --68.74.116.120 04:28, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In light of the abuses that Huaiwei has hurled at both novacatz and I, as well as the lack of consensus of the move to Chinese New Year, I will be starting a WP:RfC soon. Any comments before I do so? enochlau (talk) 22:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thanks... although we've recently found out that there's an Arbitration Committee ruling on this - Huaiwei and Schmucky the cat are on probation on Chinese-related articles. Your comment is much appreciated at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Huaiwei_and_User:SchmuckyTheCat_violating_probation_order. Thanks again! enochlau (talk) 03:53, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in commenting at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Huaiwei. enochlau (talk) 14:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply. Do watch out the RfC. — Instantnood 20:24, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]