User talk:Mdmday

You can not put images of random people or images portraying violence. The title section is for highly notable Baluch people. And this is not vandalism, putting incorrect information is vandalism. Usualphonexs (talk) 12:40, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mdmday. Please see a discussion at User talk:EdJohnston#When to provide the name of a Bollywood film in Urdu script as well as English and Hindi. You may add your own comment there if you wish. Since admins may decide to take some action on this, it would be wise for you to stop removing Urdu script until a conclusion is reached. I remind you that using more than one account to revert a contested article is forbidden by WP:SOCK, in case that is a consideration. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Discussion at User talk:EdJohnston.

I'm afraid that what you've just described, about sharing your ideas with your friends offline, meets the definition of WP:MEAT, which violates our sock policy. If you continue to remove Urdu script from film articles you risk getting a block from other admins, not just me. EdJohnston (talk) 19:35, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Kal Ho Naa Ho. Thank you. Naohiro19 revertvandal (talk) 08:32, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about the whole indian subcontinent till 1947, so the persian and greek conquests are valid. I dont know why it was named "history of india" or such. but there were lots of discussions and this halfway consensus was agree. check the talk page archives.--Sodabottle (talk) 15:13, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mdmday. You have new messages at Talk:History of India.
Message added SBC-YPR (talk) 16:01, 8 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hi Mdmday. Losing ones caste is a minor offence in Hinduism. It is not a big deal.In the Manu Smriti, chapter 11, verses 60 to 67 there is a list of minor offences that can cause loss of caste.By losing ones caste one does not cease to belong to that caste.Although he cannot carry out the duties that are assigned to him by his caste.A Hindu can lose his caste by traveling abroad. I have read that after his studies when Mahatma Ghandi went back to India he had to go through "shudhi karan" purification ceremony to be reinstated back to his original caste.So, there are ways to be reinstated back to ones caste if someone loses his caste for some reason.As for muslim Rajputs although they have lost their right to perform their duties according to their Kshatriya dharma, but they have not ceased to be Rajputs. They are still Rajputs.If a muslim Rajput decides to convert back to Hindu religion he can be reinstated to his former Kshatriya Dharma and Rajput caste status, by going through "shudhi karan" purificatory rite. The important thing is that one must be a Rajput by birth in order to be reinstated back to his Kshatriya Dharma and Rajput caste status. Rather than saying that muslim Rajputs are not Rajputs anymore, what you should do is try to persuade them politely to convert back to Hindu religion and try to reinstate them back to their kshatriya Dharma and Hindu Dharma.99.99 per cent muslim rajputs were converted by force.No one gives up religion of their forefathers willingly.I think this is the best way forward.Rajbaz (talk) 18:43, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 15:18, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —SpacemanSpiff 18:10, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Indian neoconservatism. Since you had some involvement with the Indian neoconservatism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Robofish (talk) 13:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Quit Kashmir Movement (2010). Since you had some involvement with the Quit Kashmir Movement (2010) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). DBigXray 13:11, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]