User talk:Meridiana solare

Hello, Meridiana solare, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

• Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
• Check out some of these pages:
  • Contributing to Wikipedia
  • Introduction to Wikipedia
  • How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
  • The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

• If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 06:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  
  
  
  

==References== {{Reflist}} 

We get that you don’t think deposed/former royal houses etc should have ongoing references to past titles or even have articles. It’s a ‘point of view’ (POV) that’s often been debated at various articles. But notability tagging or ‘expert needed’ tagging is WP:POINTy and an incorrect use of maintenance tags. By all means open up a talk page discussion - but when there are multiple newspaper articles about the subject cited, for instance, the notability tag is inappropriate per WP:GNG. DeCausa (talk) 10:50, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dogger Bank incident, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hague Convention. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pressure-balanced valve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diaphragm.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Order of the Bath, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Medical officer and Military order.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Order of the Thistle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mantle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please could you note that it is not overlinking to link the first instance in the main text, as well as once in the lead, and once in an image caption. Other links may be acceptable in some cases All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 02:13, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiswick Chap, sorry, which article are you talking about? Meridiana solare (talk) 13:53, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, Silmarils. I put a couple of links back. All ok now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:29, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiswick Chap But they were not in an image caption, the were both the main text (once in lead section and once in another section). Actually one wikilinks was repeated the very next line of text. Meridiana solare (talk) 14:33, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I only mentioned the caption as a further instance which would be ok. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:35, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What you just posted did not substitute properly. I suggest you try again, but this time, precede "Uw-test1" with "subst:"

— Anita5192 (talk) 19:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Anita5192, thank you. I've give a look. It's seem that a bot has already substed it. Meridiana solare (talk) 19:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Buona sera @Meridiana solare. Nel mio più recente commento sulla Wikipedia in Italiano, ho dichiarato che non modificherò più almeno fino al 29 febbraio incluso, prendendo atto dei consigli tuoi e degli altri utenti. Per quanto riguarda la tua curiosità, me lo hanno detto nella mia pagina di discussione. In particolare: "However, wikipedia admins of any project tend to look kindly on a history of constructive contributions to other Wikimedia projects, so if you can undertake to build up such a history of constructive contributions for six months or a year, with no socking on the Italian Wikipedia, a subsequent unblock request may be granted". Comunque ripeto che come ho già detto non contribuirò, nè da IP nè da altra utenza, almeno fino al 29 febbraio/1 marzo, sulla Wikipedia in Italiano 14 novembre (talk) 18:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@14 novembre Sì, ma non sono tenuti a farlo. Può invogliare un pochino a sbloccare, se già ci sono altri motivi per farlo e i motivi del blocco non erano gravi (ora io non so cosa sia successo nel tuo caso, ma il blocco è infinito, quindi non penso una cosa leggera..)

P.S. 29 febbraio / 1 marzo mi sembra po' prestino, vorrebbe dire -hanno detto che si bloccato da 2 mesi- 4 mesi di blocco. Magari avresti più possibilità di successo se non ti prefiggesti questi "obbiettivi" di tornare per un giorno X. E capire, visti gli ultimissimi messaggi allo Aiuto:Sportello informazioni , perché anche (alcune? molte?) delle tue modifiche non vandaliche non vadano bene. Meridiana solare (talk) 18:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Meridiana solare Non ti voglio far perdere tempo in una cosa che non ti riguarda, comunque il mio caso (anche e soprattutto nel primo blocco) era stato segnalato nei CU, quindi puoi vedere lì. Poi ti ringrazio per il consiglio di non pormi obbiettivi di rientro, comunque era una dichiarazione di non voler assolutamente contribuire prima di quella data, di poter valutare, magari sentendo il parere di qualcuno qui. E comunque, assolutamente, nel periodo di inattività (più o meno lungo che sia) rifletterò su cosa c'era che non andava in modo da non fare gli stessi errori al momento di eventuale rientro. Grazie di nuovo per la disponibilità e buona serata 14 novembre (talk) 19:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Da correggere risultato finale nel tabellone, grazie 14 novembre (talk) 19:55, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, @14 novembre, di calcio non me ne intendo proprio, tanto meno dei (complicati e spesso per nulla intuitivi) template e sintassi che usano. Meridiana solare (talk) 20:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Va bene grazie lo stesso. A chi posso segnalare? 14 novembre (talk) 18:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Di utenti non saprei. In teoria dovresti segnalarlo nella pagina di discussone della voce, ma sei bloccato. Meridiana solare (talk) 18:51, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Meridiana solare Grazie della risposta, se non fossi bloccato avrei potuto farlo anch'io. Cercherò di farlo presente qui sulla wikipedia inglese a qualche utente di quella italiana che contribuisce molto sul calcio. Buona serata 14 novembre (talk) 18:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]