User talk:Merzostin

I declined your request for 3P0 because there are more than two participants. Perhaps you should try WP:Requests for Comment, the dispute resolution noticeboard, the talk page of a Wikiproject or one of the other WP:Dispute resolution options. I hope this helps. Thanks! - Nemov (talk) 13:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i understand but the edit dispute is more between me and Nitsukee, but that still counts as more than two participants. I think the other participant wether it's another account or not had agreed with my edit Merzostin (talk) 13:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 11:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Edit warring on ship-related articles. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 14:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 17:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing the articles about Djong and Junk (ship) directly, for a period of 3 months, to prevent further edit warring. The block does not prevent you from discussing the articles on the articles' talk pages, nor does it prevent you from convincing others using {{edit partially-blocked}} to perform uncontroversial changes on your behalf. This requires finding a consensus about controversial edits, and it discourages further incivility.

In general, during a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]