User talk:Messier6

A tag has been placed on Boundless (technology company), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:14, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article. On the now deleted talk p. you said essentially that you thought you had written a NPOV article. But sentences like "For a fixed fee of $500, generally much less than most immigration lawyers charge for the same service," are straightforward advertising, not encyclopedic content. And the sentence about the personal experience of the founder is exactly the way press releases are written. The qualification of the founder, with links to his go related government service, is also straight advertising.

All oft he first 14 references are either mere inclusions on a list, or routine notices , or advertorials, or at best straight PR-based non-independent articles. None of these show notability. DGG ( talk ) 02:43, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The references appear to be in the nature of press releases and not substantial in-depth coverage of the company.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boundless (technology company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Boundless (technology company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:03, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In answer to your inquiry at User talk:Doc James: The declined article at Draft:Boundless (technology company) talks about plans for the future and raising of money, but there is not much on the company's actual activities. Have they started? Have they helped people actually get their visas approved? Have the company's practical successes been the subject of comment in reliable sources? If you do get an article approved, it could be more logical to name it Boundless Immigration rather than Boundless (technology company). Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 17:11, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you EdJohnston for your response and for taking the time to review my questions about notability. The company's practical successes are likely to receive more media coverage soon. Would you be willing to review the draft once I'm able to add more sources and content as you've suggested? Many thanks again, Messier6 (talk) 21:18, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, if there are new sources I'll take a look. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 01:13, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• flattered to have been asked. I have been banned from editing on immigration. E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:04, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you are aggressively seeking neutral editors to assist you in using Wikipedia to publicize your company, and have posted to the talk pages of at least four editors asking them for their help. If you really are interested in having a neutral article on your company in Wikipedia (although that is sort of a contradiction in terms, because a neutral article is neither beneficial nor detrimental), then my advice is to be less aggressive in canvassing for an editor to help you. If your company does in fact satisfy corporate notability, it will eventually be covered. If it does not satisfy corporate notability, no amount of work within Wikipedia will change that. By campaigning aggressively to find a neutral editor to help you, you are making it more difficult to find a neutral editor to help you. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:09, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Boundless Immigration, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Messier6. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Boundless Immigration, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 02:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Messier6. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Boundless Immigration".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]