User talk:Mikael07

Hi Mikael07, your talk page is blank? By the way, I agree with you to have the picture deleted. You can delete that picture, and provide an explanation that the picture is already available in Post-Suharto Era and therefore is not needed in this context. You can also remove the paragraph too if you want to, I think, but provide good explanation. By the way. Do you live in Buenos Aires at the moment? --Rochelimit (talk) 18:04, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Indonesia, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Merbabu (talk) 10:15, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I do love the picture of Jakarta cityscape... but well.., maybe you should do it for yourself if you think it is necesarry. I believe you have problems probably with editors.... However in Jakarta article there is always this problems about excessive pictures, let me think something about it. (Gunkarta (talk) 18:16, 20 January 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

IMO the Jakarta top picture is okay, maybe adding another good picture will help, but I think Bangkok and Manila picts have waaay too many images, and I think it's too much and unpleasant to the eyes. (Gunkarta (talk) 11:37, 29 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

I made this one:

(Gunkarta (talk) 14:28, 29 January 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

Please use the talk page to discuss. If not, I will ask for administrator advice. You've already been blocked for lying and disruption. --Merbabu (talk) 11:26, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PS - the pic is not smaller, you seem to be clueless about what makes a good photo, and your limited English means you have trouble communicating and the text you add to wikipedia is poorly written. And, people haven't forgotten that you lied about your identity. --Merbabu (talk) 11:32, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This picture is now the worst of them all. It's overexposed, blurred, and poorly composed. The only reason I don't remove it is because of the WP:3RR rule. And this edit summary suggests you view editing wikipedia as a competition. It's not, it's about improving it, and I think most of your edits do not improve wikipedia.--Merbabu (talk) 11:37, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thanks but tell me the reason why it is worst, i'm okay with that, and if you think that the small jakarta picture Skyline Part 2.jpg you put is superior , then why did i consider it as inferior? especially its small size. You are to recognize that people look something in different way, if you put the more appropriate picture in its size, i will definitely agree, that Jakarta picture was too small, that's why i changed it. and please i never use wikipedia for competition, maybe you? --Mikael07 (talk) 11:41, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ok merbabu, i understand what you meant. I've recently replaced the picture that you dislike with the new one, i guess it's my final change. thanks for your attention --Mikael07 (talk) 10:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ada.. tapi saya jarang facebook-an.. mulai bosan... (Gunkarta (talk) 11:02, 25 February 2011 (UTC))[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jakarta. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bidgee (talk) 10:45, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued edit warfare and disruptive editing despite your lengthy blocks earlier this year. Due to this behavior it seems that you're not here to edit productively in cooperation with other editors. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nick-D (talk) 11:28, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mikael07,

This is an automated friendly notification to inform you that you have been reported for Violation of the Edit warring policy at the Administrators' noticeboard.
If you feel that this report has been made in error, please reply as soon as possible on the noticeboard. However, before contesting an Edit warring report, please review the respective policies to ensure you are not in violation of them. ~ NekoBot (MeowTalk) 11:14, 18 June 2011 (UTC) (False positive? Report it!)[reply]