User talk:Mike Christie

Archives

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14  · 15  · 16  · 17  · 18  · 19  · 20

story · music · places

You may remember Maryvonne Le Dizès, my story today as on 28 August. Some September music was unusual: last compositions and eternal light, with Ligeti mentioned in story and music. - I don't know why BWV 130 was approved as GA, but has no icon in the article and no credit, - perhaps related to the above? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for Tomorrow Speculative Fiction, "about a science fiction magazine edited by Algis Budrys in the 1990s. It began as a print magazine and was one of the first to attempt the migration to an online format, but Budrys could not get enough subscribers to make the magazine profitable. It was never a major force in the genre, but it published material by some well known writers, including Ursula Le Guin and Harlan Ellison."! - I remember an organist who was pictured on the Main page on his birthday ten years ago, and I found two recent organ concerts to match, - see top of my talk ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made Leif Segerstam my big story today. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to the GA review and the talk page, Was Gott tut, das ist wohlgetan, BWV 99 became GA today, but not for the list and the article and the credit. Bot or something else missing? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It can take a day or two for the new GAs to show up in the stats. If it's not there in a couple of days, let me know and I'll take a look. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know, thank you. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone added the icon manually, and I just added it to the list. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:14, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I misunderstood what you were asking about -- the bot never adds the article to the list; that always has to be done by the reviewer. It should add the icon, but I think what probably happened is that the bot stopped partway through a run. If the system gets busy, it can refuse to let the bot continue. The bot is written to try to pick up where it left off when this happens, but it doesn't handle every possible case. If you see that happen again, once the bot runs and doesn't add the icon, then you can be sure it isn't going to try again and you can just add it yourself. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, always learning! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy whatever you celebrate today, - more who died, more to come, and they made the world richer. Greetings from Madrid where I took the pic of assorted Cucurbita in 2016. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hi Mike, just saw your comment at one of the RFA votes on old checklist reviews, where you noted checklist reviews were not discouraged six years ago. I can't say I remember off the top of my head the culture six years ago, and we have tightened up on reviewing reviews over the past few years, but checklists reviews have been discouraged since at least 30 March 2007[1]. CMD (talk) 09:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -- I should have been more careful, and of course it's too late to change my comment since the discussion phase has closed. I have the impression that the last few years have seen more discussion about tightening up standards than before -- DCGAR for instance alarmed many of us. But next time I make a comment like that I'll try to be more precise. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no need to change, just noting as I came across it for the future. I'm still a bit sad about DCGAR. CMD (talk) 15:03, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I actually lost sleep over it at the time, thinking about how overwhelmingly hostile it must have felt to Doug, who had put so many hours into those articles. The saddest part to me was that he really seemed genuinely unable to see what the problem was. I don't think he could ever have been one of our best content contributors, but there was a place for someone willing to work that hard and read old sources, if he'd understood how to make the work he liked doing fit with the project's goals. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was not a fan of the process, but I wasn't able to come up with an effective alternative path, and I suppose no-one else could either. Relatedly, feel a bit down about the current GAN drive. I reviewed two, and ended up failing both. Not the ratio I hope for. CMD (talk) 15:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike. I added the Planet Stories cover to the Planet Stories article because I'm trying to get it promoted as a featured image over at WP:FPC (you can see its nomination here) and a couple of people have said they'll support it only if it's in the Planet Stories article. I think your point about sandwiching is fair, but is there someplace else in the article it could go? It's by far the highest-resolution copy of a Planet Stories issue we have. My first instinct was actually to replace the article header image, but since it's a Featured Article I thought that might cause umbrage. Moonreach (talk) 18:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's an unnecessary requirement -- it's easily possible to imagine a set of top quality images all suitable for an article to small to include them. And it presumes that the image has no value to a reader unless it's in an article, which is not true. Anyway, why don't you replace the Ingels image with the new one? That one is already in Ingels' article and is more of interest to comic aficionados than pulp readers. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 19:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm with you on the idea of merit existing outside of context, but I'm trying to please people who are on the fence. I'll replace the Ingels image, thank you. Moonreach (talk) 19:34, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 65, September – October 2024

• Hindu Tamil Thisai joins The Wikipedia Library
• Frankfurt Book Fair 2024 report
• Tech tip: Mass downloads

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Your bot account just posted a GA review notice on a redirect page; I’ve moved it to the correct page. Might suggest reprogramming it so it doesn’t post to redirects?? Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 03:52, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll look into doing that. EF5, see above -- do you want me to move your GA statistics under your old username to your new name? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 09:48, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. E_F⁵ 18:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. The next time the stats update they should show your new name instead of the old one. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:10, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Martha Hughes Cannon has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to have ceased operations. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I see the crashes but can't look at the error file or connect for about eight hours. Hawkeye7, you were kind enough to post the tail of christiebot-gan.err for me a while back, can you (or any TPS with toolforge access) do so again? The tool is called ganfilter. If we're lucky it'll be a malformed GAN template that is causing the crash, meaning it can be fixed without waiting for me to connect to toolforge tonight. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The part from "During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred" then repeats over and over. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 17:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Hawkeye; I will have to look at this tonight. I've no idea what's causing this. I will probably have to post to VPT to see if anyone knows if something has changed in the environment. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, a year ago you reviewed my article Charles Brenton Fisk. Since then, my English has improved, and, per the review, I copyedited the article heavily, as well as performing spotchecks. Accordingly, I have resubmitted it for GA review. In addition, your feedback was helpful on writing another article of mine, which became my first Good Article. This is more of a note on re-submission than a request for review, though I would still certainly appreciate it if you reviewed it. Much thanks, Ca ^{talk to me!} 05:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on getting your first GA promoted! I am busy at the moment and not currently doing GA reviews, but when I do start doing them again I'll have a look to see if your nomination is still waiting for review. Good luck with it. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike, This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 2025. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 2025, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/January 2025. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by user:JennyOz, who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! SchroCat (talk) 11:30, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]