User talk:Miserlou

Despite recent allegations, it remains to be true.

Sorry it's been forever since I've logged in. Sorry sorry. OK, so you want some Bromo-DragonFLY?

I've been real busy. It's not hard for me to model one, the hard part is uploading a pic to wikipedia. Ironic isnt it? If you think it needs a better 3d pick than the current one I can come up with one. I'm busy this week, so it may have to wait till the weekend. What say you?

Microswitch 03:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Microswitch 23:13, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy: There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Do not make them. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that you may be blocked for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thanks. Mrtea (talk) 05:07, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page nor replace it with offensive content. Blanking your talk page will not remove the warnings from the page history. If you continue to blank your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. Mrtea (talk) 05:12, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you add some text to the Talk page for Thizzle explaining what you think needs cleanup. It is, of course, much easier to clean an article up when one knows what was lacking. Thanks. -- Joebeone (Talk) 17:41, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please don't modify User Pages for other editors. If you have something you wish to ask, you can use the User_talk: pages. Thanks! --Bill.matthews 00:43, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I regards to removing those sentences after the citation was removed, good call. Keep up the good work. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 18:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This was not productive. Please refrain. Thanks. Chick Bowen 06:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked for disruption. --LBMixPro ^{<Speak|on|it!>} 21:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Vomitingtoiletman.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:11, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Hey Rick, thanks for the email. Actually, I can make rotating images for that stuff. LOL, it's kinda of a process but don't let that scare you. Basically I use two programs. The first is Accelery's chemical software (free) to input SMILE formulas, then I save that file to a .png so Qutemol (the second program, also free) can render it with it's rendering functions (such as a rotating molecule).

Hope this helps, let me know if I can get you started. Im one person working on chemistry articles constantly. If we get more people on board we can really clean house and make those articles shine!

Microswitch

Thanks for such a quick edit to mdma, i copy/pasted the image code and discovered it - what must have been a moment after you. Ashame that gif doesn't render perfectly in firefox (it kinda overlaps a bit of text), W3 non-standard CSS support, meh. Hum, I might wanna try what Microswitch has done. I'll fire up my desktop - it has a card supported by qutemole. --x1987x^(talk) 01:29, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My laptop wont render qutemol either. --x1987x^(talk) 04:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I love chemsketch, [[1]] it's free for personal use (you can register by filling out the form with fake info, then they give you a link, doesn't matter). I save the chemical as a MOL, and use OpenBabel [[2]] to convert it into a PDB for QuteMol. Three step process, but I just couldn't download Accelerys whichever program. --x1987x^(talk) 05:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

REALLY need to go to bed, but your wish: Tetrahydrocannabinol --x1987x^(talk) 05:36, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm just wondering if you have any other sources for a precursor of MDMA being in saffron (safrole I presume?). The reference you used in the saffron page is unreliable, is there any scientific evidence that safrole is in saffron? I can't find any at the moment. --Mark PEA 12:17, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I realized that was a fuck up and didn't change it back yet. I'm glad you caught that though. Miserlou 23:44, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Skyballaghostridesthebenz.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:54, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I was wondering how I could join WikiProject Psychedelics, Deliriants, and Dissociatives... do I just put the userbox on my page or what? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Use the force (talk • contribs) 03:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mother2front.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 09:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Octooo.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:08, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll do them right after I finish the Phenethylamines. And if you need any more, just ask. --Sbrools ^{(talk . contribs)} 22:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Miserlou,

thanks for your contribution Image:Dmt3dd.png. Omitting the hydrogens for such a small molecule does not really make sense and might be confusing. The convention is to add the hydrogen to at least the heteroatoms (the indole-NH). You might also want to use aromatic bonds instead of alternating single / double bonds. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry/Structure drawing for uploading such images to the Commons. Cacycle 13:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for the Image:Lsdballstick.png which is also broken (The one H atom is transparent instead of white). Cacycle 14:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ybor.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you were given a final warning for making personal attacks in December. This may have been your first slip in a while, but calling any editor an "asshole" or something similar again will result in your being blocked from editing. Deiz talk 05:56, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Copowi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 23:50, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you uploaded a file, Image:Flyposting.gif, but it seems to have been messed up. Should I try to reupload the correct file or, because you uploaded a similar image (Image:Flypost.jpg), mark it for deletion. -- kenb215 talk 13:05, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It has been several weeks since I posted here, so I have marked Image:Flyposting.gif for deletion. If you want to save it, feel free to. -- kenb215 talk 08:14, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance of figuring out the guy's name? ←Ben^B4 06:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed that you made this edit a while back (I must have missed it). Could you please comment at Talk:Trade_and_usage_of_saffron#MDMA? Thanks. Saravask 16:42, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Miserlou, the essential part of that edit says "it can be theorized that". This is an obvious indicator of speculation and WP:OR and the whole addition should be removed. If it would be a speculation published in the referenced source, then this had to be indicated explicitly. Сасусlе 13:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please could you look at the Talk page for your 2C-T-7 image? If you have any more information about the image in question, please let me know. Cheers. Turkeyphan^t 14:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ketamine and Ron Paul...... They are both truth tellers  :) Yeah, I uploaded a picture of K from Mexico they are still using for this section: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketamine#Recreational_use

I know you're not supposed to promote your own stuff but I like my http://www.ronpaulvideos.net site I made. I've been trying to add it as an external link on the Ron Paul page. It was up for a while but now they pull it.... whatever. It doesn't matter though, with my SEO skills I've gotten it up to #3 on Google for the search "Ron Paul videos".

Keep it real! —Preceding unsigned comment added by K69 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Image:Yuremamine22ud.jpg. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. The image was taken from the academic paper [3] and modified slightly, though is still copyright of the original author. Freeware programs exist that allow you to create such images easily. If you'd like, I could recreate the image and upload it for you. Cheers, Rkitko ^(talk) 16:06, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Pennsylvania System of School Assessment, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Pennsylvania System of School Assessment is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Pennsylvania System of School Assessment, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Killjoy! I was watching to see if any of them would figure out that they could stop a {{prod}} by simply removing the notice before the end of the 5th day. :) AndroidCat (talk) 01:06, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Abu-ghraib-map.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:12, 19 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:12, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated Chuggo, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuggo and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:00, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:100gket.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 13:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Asboprotest.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 22:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC) --Kelly ^hi! 22:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Teddyboy1959.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [4], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Teddyboy1959.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Kelly ^hi! 03:00, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hamlet-bloom.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. HaeB (talk) 02:36, 1 July 2008 (UTC) Regards, HaeB (talk) 02:36, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Miserlou I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Wikipedia. You are being contacted because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.

Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader, geraldckane. Survey questions can be found at geraldckane/medsurvey. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected!

The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions. Thank You, BCproject (talk) 18:18, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I created an article on the litigation between the MBTA and MIT students over the hack of the CharlieCard system. I note that you previously edited the Charlie Card article on this topic and I would appreciate your help in expanding MBTA v. Anderson. Cheers! Madcoverboy (talk) 20:28, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of OpenBiomind, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://code.google.com/p/openbiomind. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:36, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on OpenBiomind requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 19:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you find the right copyright for this image. The U.S. government tag only applies to the federal level, not the state or town level. Thanks. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:33, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Miserlou! Wikipedia:2008 main page redesign proposal was recently cleared of all design entries. You may want to re-enter your design(s), based on the details here. (You can see the old list of designs here). NOTE: A survey was conducted on what users wanted to see in the new main page, you can see the results here. NickPenguin_(contribs) 02:09, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Sarah Palin appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry that you were offended by my warning, however inserting the word "supposedly" into an referenced fact shows clear POV, namely that you don't believe the fact to be true. A Wikipedia article is not the place to interject your suspicions about the truth of source material. If you had a concern with the source, the talk page was the place to express it, not the article. Thank you --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:54, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lsdballstick.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 17:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll in selecting five proposals before an RFC in which it will be against the current main page. You're input would be appreciated. ChyranandChloe (talk) 04:10, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The devi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -Zeus- 03:22, 6 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by -Zeus- (talk • contribs)

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Snortcocaine.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:46, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Auroramixer.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Aurora 224 2 Channel Open Source DJ Mixer.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Aurora 224 2 Channel Open Source DJ Mixer.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ghbgbl14b.gif is now available as Commons:File:Dangerous dietary supplements.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:40, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Apoe-cortical-thickness-entorhinal.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Apoe-cortical-thickness-entorhinal.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:49, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Icp-lg.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Icp-lg.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:51, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hippolobes.gif is now available as Commons:File:Hippolobes (1).gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Striatumcortex1.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Striatumcortex1.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:P6231133.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Facies inferior linguae.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:51, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Etonitazene.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:34, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:2cepills.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MBisanz ^talk 23:26, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arrrgh. I just noticed some of the images of controlled substances have www.doj.gov/dea/. Thanks for pointing that out.--Monkeybait (talk) 18:08, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join WikiProject Cannabis, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to Cannabis. You received this invitation because of your history editing articles related to the plant. The WikiProject Cannabis group discussion is here. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants.

I have nominated Q Group, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Q Group. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.   bsmithme  05:40, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vomitingtoiletman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JFW | T@lk 22:16, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What were you trying to do with the template on Neil Daswani? --HamburgerRadio (talk) 02:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Namine.lynn. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. snigbrook (talk) 03:55, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. Even if anyone is your real life friend, you can not add any slanderous or defamatory content about them anywhere on Wikipedia. If you do so again, you will be blocked. -SpacemanSpiff 04:07, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Barbrahouse1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:45, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Saynotomethandbareback.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Simon Speed (talk) 00:21, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Miserlou. Just so you know, I've undone your edit where you added the OFFICE tmbox to the TI keys article; while I do appreciate it and understand why you did so, it doesn't seem necessary to me on the article itself. Anyone editing the article will see the edit notice informing them of the same thing, and anyone reading the article doesn't need to know why we don't have the keys; if they are curious, they'd go to the talk page or try to edit the page themselves anyway. Generally OFFICE actions aren't announced on the article itself unless the entire article has to be locked down for some reason. I'm open to discussion on this, but I just wanted to let you know. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 05:43, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied there. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 04:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is that the only picture you could find? I dont think it sums up the situation very well. It doesnt show the protestors and shows an act of vandalism which only some of them engaged in. I dont think it really adds alot and might need to be removed, I'll start a discussion. ValenShephard 19:47, 6 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by ValenShephard (talk • contribs)

I pretty much take that back, because I saw you added one of the protestors. DO you have any pictures of protestors not being violent? Best wishes ValenShephard 19:48, 6 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by ValenShephard (talk • contribs)

I took those from Flickr, I did not take them. I took them from here - http://www.flickr.com/photos/piazzadelpopolo/ Miserlou (talk) 19:54, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have reverted your recent edit to Biological half-life for reasons I highlighted on its talk page. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 07:09, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brugmansiahippy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:39, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:59, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Daviddeutschted.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:14, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, {{stub}} doesn't take parameters, but you can choose a "sorted stub" tag from the hierarchy at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/List_of_stubs. I've changed this one to {{journalism-stub}}. PamD (talk) 10:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Operation Anti-Security. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. It is inappropriate to characterize cited content as "nonsense" and simply remove it. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 17:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded to you on my talk page and begun a discussion on the article talk page; I will not remove it again without discussion, as I certainly don't want to start an edit war or assume bad faith. However, I kindly ask that you do the same for me; I am not stalking you, trying to own a page, or being a "busybody". かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 18:50, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:10, 28 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Open Source Routing Machine, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://project-osrm.org.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 19:42, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Open Source Routing Machine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of third-party coverage by reliable sources, fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Sandstein  19:53, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Open Source Routing Machine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of third-party coverage by reliable sources, fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Sandstein  19:53, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Open Source Routing Machine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Source Routing Machine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Sandstein  20:03, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think you'd find AfD a lot more accommodating if you answered objections on the merits, rather than ranting at the nominator. You're not winning any friends with this and frankly its probably going to raise some eyebrows. I know it's frustrating when an article's nominated, but your first draft apparently took a lot of the webpage verbatim, enough that the bot caught it. Also, there are lots of open source projects that are deleted every week because they don't have widespread notability. Nominations have nothing to do with you: it's not personal. So don't respond to the nominator as though it were. Shadowjams (talk) 21:34, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for creating the new article Open Source Routing Machine and for your efforts to improve the encyclopedia for the public. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:37, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have already been warned about your ad hominem arguments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Source Routing Machine, so I won't beat that dead horse any further. However, this statement is a violation of the user page policy and I ask that you remove it.

You are generally allowed a great deal of leeway regarding your user space; however, it is not a personal webspace and it may not be used for personal attacks. I see that you have been warned several times in the past regarding personal attacks and/or the civility policy; I suggest you heed them. I see that you have made some significant, good contributions in the past, and I would hate to see a good editor get blocked over something like this. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:46, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I was wondering what would happen about that statement. It is not a personal attack on the man, nor is it particularly uncivil; it is a fact. I despise him. I consider him to be a cancer upon Wikipedia. Deleitionism is a disease which I believe should be diagnosed and treated. Where else besides my own userpage can I address this fact? And how would you have me rephrase my statement in a politically-correct way? Miserlou (talk) 23:28, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Sunitinib, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Genetic sequencing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

25I-NBOMe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Buccally

Hyperloop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Plane

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nexvax2, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Diet and Villi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Shahmac.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 02:43, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit) Get free access to research! Research tools and services Resource Exchange Reference Desk Discover open access Free Resource Guides Book Sources Journal Sources Bibliographies Free newspaper sources Online archives Find Your Local Library tips Find Your Source tips How to find sources Citation tools guide Outreach The Wikipedia Library Bookshelf (meta) Universities and Libraries Archivists Publishers Wikipedia Loves Libraries Wikidata source metadata Get involved Get free access to sources Read the Books & Bytes newsletter Help disambiguate authors of scholarly papers Be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar Teach Library Interns Become a Coordinator Learn about TWL ...Support Open Access...

Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.

Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane!

If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 19:56, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, saw your new article today, thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Just to let you know I started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics#New article today (18/09/2013): Amplituhedron. Best, M∧Ŝc²ħεИ_τlk 08:33, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware your article seems to be WP:OR, and the topic may be too early for WP. Articles should have independent, reliable, secondary sources, please add them if they exist, else the article may risk deletion (websites and youtube videos may be pedagogical but are not sufficient for WP references). Thanks, M∧Ŝc²ħεИ_τlk 08:44, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. If you have any interest in the matter or know any Wikipedian who could help out, a question about Amplituhedron here (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Physics#Amplituhedron.2C_Scattering_amplitude.2C_Scattering_patterns).

Thanks - 186.221.170.80 (talk) 20:32, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Blockingmiserlou.PNG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Doc.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:16, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sovtek, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. I B Wright (talk) 12:48, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Miserlou. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I welcome you input at Talk:Oscar Munoz (executive). Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:35, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Miserlou. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fast and Secure Protocol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TCP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Miserlou. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Miserlou, hope all is well. My username is Ddvandestreek and I found your profile overviewing users that have made edits to Fast and Secure Protocol. I drafted an article titled Aspera on Cloud. Wikipedia is not publishing the article on grounds of G11, or appearing too promotional. I have extensively rewritten the article and still have not been approved to publish. I contacted the user who deleted the post and he recommended having a more established editor publish the article. If I were to send you the article, would you be able to do so? Thank you for your time.

Dvandestreek (talk) 19:46, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, LibrePCB, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 17:57, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Miserlou,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bad Luck 13 Riot Extravaganza for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 16:36, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]