User talk:Moosh88

/Archive 1

Can you revert him, he removed "possibly Proto-Armenian language" from the Urartu article, and added Kurdish language in Armenians article of the languages. It use to say only Armenian language, in the Armenians page, below the list of countries that Armenians are in. Now it says Turkish and all these other languages that says we speak, it said only Armenian language. If you check Greek_people, and other people in their language just says their own language they speak. 76.237.10.157 (talk) 23:36, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moosh, can you revert the Azeri Turks removal of Armenians had a presence in the Armenian Highlands over 4000 years , since the time oF Hayk... etc.. He removed this from the Armenain article, the part where it says Diaspora 75.51.165.51 (talk) 22:12, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you remove the new map added on top? You notice Artsakh is put inside Azerbaijan, outside of the true location of Artsakh for there agendas. Also, they removed Armenian Highland from the sentence above, another agenda to remove these terms. 76.237.9.7 (talk) 19:42, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you remove the Armenian Catholic Church and Armenian Evangelical Church mentionings from the sidebar of the Armenians page, its below the language info and the populations of the countries that Armenians are in. In the Religion section it already covers all this info in detail, and there is no need to mention on the top at the bar there. Also, if you notice the Greeks page, there is no other denominations mentioned in there sidebar, just says Greek Orthodox. It should just say the same way for ours, Armenian Apostolic Church, and thats it. Another point, and I can go on and on with more points on this, but its that it shows weakness, and an identity crisis for Armenians roots and strong foundations. So its not needed to mention on the above Armenian sidebar. Thanks for your help. 75.51.164.246 (talk) 07:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know which part Im talking about? Its the same sidebar that you removed the extra languages, right below that. 75.51.172.94 (talk) 08:06, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt get your response on this above yet. Also, can you revert the Kurdish user's edits in Mitanni, he put the Kurdish history template there again. Thanks. 76.237.11.72 (talk) 21:11, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Do you know a source for the 2009-2012 Wrestling European Championship medalists? --TheShadowCrow (talk) 18:43, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user who goes by the name of Kentronhayastan [1], Ive noticed his edits for a while now, and they are not exactly describing who he really is. I mean to clarify to you, what im saying is if you notice his edits on the Armenian articles, he pretends he is doing good to the Armenian history, but in fact, he is corrupting it in a clever way. He is an imposter actually. I noticed for example he added a whole bunch of foreign languages to all the articles on our history, and someone else did a good job of reverting those. He basically is POV pushing just about any time in our history articles of foreign rule. He tried to put Islam in all the history articles, hah, and included like 10 other languages, where it says languages. The person that reverted him did a good job and restored the native language Armenian to be the only main language of those times. Specially the Kingdoms of Armenia , whether they were Ancient, or the Modern kingdoms like Bagratuni, and the Antiquity. He also had purposely removed the Marzpanate Mamikonian period, and the other person asked him to restore it back from the History of Armenia template. Also if you can help out please restore back where it says "Armenia Major" in the Antiquity, to "Kingdom of Armenia", this is what it said earlier and this guy Kentronhayastan reverted it back to Armenia Major in the Template:History of Armenia. Its suppose to say Kingdom of Armenia, because the only Kingdom of Armenia mentioned first is in the Middle Ages. Its showing that there was no Kingdom of Armenia in ancient times? If you notice he recently also changed Commagene to "Kingdom of Commagene", but didnt change Armenia Major to "Kingdom of Armenia". Please put back the name "Kingdom of Armenia", in our antiquity. Thank you. And if you can also remove Armeno-Phrygian from the History template also, "because that was never there", and this imposter which im suspicious of is trying to ruin our history. Also he tried to change the language of the Orontid period, by saying it was Proto-Armenian, it was never Proto-Armenian, and everyone excepts that that was earlier than that time. 66.53.220.183 (talk) 06:25, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moosh, here is the discussion regarding Hayk/Orion I was trying to explain to Ian.thomson:

The previous person with the 166.x.x.x is not me. He readded the correct information, by the way which was already there a long time before Ian.Thomson removed it 2 days ago. I was adding info to the Hayk article, what was "already" here a long time ago in the Orion constellation article. It is a fact, in the Armenian pantheon there were more than one god worshipped as a Sun god. Ian.thomson is not an expert on Armenian mythologies and Armenian astronomical knowledge. At different periods of Armenian history, it was a different god worshipped as a Sun god. Also at different locations of the Sun's path, was still referred to as a Sun god. As I mentioned to him earlier when Orion rises with the Sun in the East, this Sun god is Hayk/Orion, which is also known as the "Heliacal Rising" of Orion, which is mentioned in Hyeetch's site [2] of the Solar Calendar of Hayk/Orion of the Armenians. The other Sun god is when the Sun is at the Highest place in heaven, that was also worshipped as a Sun god under a different gods name, not the Hayk/Orion god and star(s). The astronomical side of this is that Orion aligns with the Sun once a year, where Orion's arm is located, the Sun passes it, and thats where the ancients coined the term "Solar Hero" Orion. Also check the Orion (mythology), page. Orion is associated and in conjunction with the rising Sun. He is also mentioned there as the example of the Solar Hero.

If you can find a reliable source for this, which Ian.thomson seems to reject certain sites like armenianhighland and eutyun.org which has Hayk/Orion the "sun god". They seem to be against the term Sun god or Solar Hero. So, what other word or sentence form can we use to describe Hayk/Orion which is associated with the Sun, and or in conjunction with the Sun. They seem to except the above site Hyeetch, which mentions the Heliacal rising/Sun rising with Hayk/Orion. So I wonder what sentence form we can decribe Hayk as the Solar Hero, or Sun god? Can we just use the astronomical description of the association or conjunction of Orion (Hayk), with the Sun? Ar Astvadz etc? 66.53.220.183 (talk) 06:21, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is the problem on the Hayk article or Orion article? I think Ar Astvadz could work, of course in parenthesis you should put Sun God.--Moosh88 (talk) 21:12, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Both of those articles actually, but if you notice some IP user who tried to explain and put this info got blocked and they locked the articles.

Can you also revert back "Prehistory", from "Ancient" in the Template:History of Iran , the user Kentronhayastan reverted some user who is mainly an Azeri and Turkish article editor, changed it back to Ancient, where someone explained that it should say Prehistory, so Kentronhayastan reverted that user back, but that user put it back to Ancient. To be fair someone let Kentronhayastan know that it should say Prehistory, since the History of Armenia template starts off with Prehistory. In reality both of these should say "Ancient" where it says "Prehistory", in the Armenia history template. If you can also read my previous message to you above this Hayk/Orion message. Please try to remove Armeno-Phrygian in the history template, and restore what else I mentioned there. Thank you. 67.150.126.237 (talk) 02:32, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's me, I'm using my cellphone. When you revert, give the reasons why, because they changed it back. 166.137.209.169 (talk) 20:46, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barda, Azerbaijan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moosh help out, dont let them remove this article 75.51.173.239 (talk) 05:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Moosh88! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editors are welcome! (But being multilingual is not a requirement.) Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 00:03, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moosh, can you please restore back the image on the Template:History of Armenia , which had Ararat and Armenian eternity symbol. Some user removed it and replaced with Zvartnots church. Thank you. 75.51.174.85 (talk) 01:38, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Moosh88, I'm contacting you because we need some Armenian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on hy.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need assistance with a personal message for the Armenian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 16:48, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moosh I need an important favor, can you please put this version [3] for what was changed in the infobox "Formation and Independance". Since I noticed it more properly matches the present day Armenia article. Thank you. They removed the older version that was thet for over 3 years with traditional 2492 in the formation and indepedance infobox. Also, the head paragraph which is trying to explain false history lessons in the Armenia article. This older edit i provided here is much better for the Armenia article, instead of these different versions of the ancient history on the top of the Armenia article.

Formation and independence Democratic Republic of Armenia established 28 May 19 Independence from the Soviet Union Declared Recognised Finalised

23 August 1990 21 September 1991 25 December 1991

If you are not sure what im referring to, its here [4] <-- This is the edit by Yervantsi for that infobox. Please put the above version I provided. Thanks.

Also, this head paragraph in the Armenia page doesnt need an entire history lesson. Please make it brief like the link I provided from the earlier version here: A former republic of the Soviet Union, Armenia is a unitary, multiparty, democratic nation-state with an ancient and historic cultural heritage. The Kingdom of Armenia was the first state to adopt Christianity as its religion 66.214.143.68 (talk) 17:13, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 11:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moosh88. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I think the text at WP:TERRORIST speaks for itself as rationale. It allows attribution to widespread reliable published sources (but not to your own POV). If you disagree with the policy, I suppose you could open a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch. Hertz1888 (talk) 02:13, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moosh88. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mikhail Mishustin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Monastery of Tsar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a supposed monastery with almost no proper information/context about the monastery itself other than when it was built and an unsourced sentence (with a POV-tone) claiming it was destroyed by Azerbaijan. The article also cites zero sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 16:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi pls note that your edit has been reverted. Frist of all no source is provided for the claim. Secondly IG is not a independent or reliable source as per Wikipedia guidelines. Lastly info changed or added needs to be supported by independent, reliable sources such as newspaper inregraless what flag he carried in the past in his fight. Thank you. Cassiopeia^(talk) 00:19, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Newspaper info added for citation purposes. Sort of funny that the man himself has stated his ethnicity a number of times yet you asked for the obvious. Said article even had it sourced that he is Armenian.--Moosh88 (talk) 00:01, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Benik Abrahamyan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Առաջարկում եմ այս էջը գրել անգլերեն https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%8F%D0%BD,_%D0%90%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD_%D0%90%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87 91.215.201.1 (talk) 19:00, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hey, based on your activity i thought i'd let you know that WikiProject Artsakh is being revived due to recent events - thank you for your contributions! Sawyer-mcdonell (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you restore Armenian dynasty on the top first sentence? Since 2006 ever since this article was created, it’s always said Armenian dynasty. Add David Marshall Lang and M. Chahin sources. The user that goes by the name of “HistoryofIran” (who is actually an Azeri Turk based on his edits), is removing almost everything that was Armenian to “Iranian”, specially when it has to do with the Orontid dynasty. There are like 5 sources that state Orontids were an Armenian state or dynasty, that he put under the Iranian sources. Where it says “Some historians say Orontid was Iranian origin”, 5 sources stating Armenian, one of them says it 3 times by David Marshall Lang. He is also cherry picking Cyril Toumanoff, who also states that Orontids were an Armenian monarchy. Explain also that the Orontid dynasty was Armenian because linguists classified Armenian as an Iranian language, the Iranian mentioned doesn’t mean Persians necessarily. 2600:6C50:1F0:9730:8420:CCF8:7B09:8ADD (talk) 14:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]