User talk:Murderbike

Murderbike is semi-retired from Wikipedia so that he can concentrate on real life activities. He'll probably pop in once in awhile, but won't be anything like the contributor he was in the past.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5

The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 10:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it's just the History section, but the first paragraph is maybe problematic or needs expansion/correction anyway; see Talk:Skagit River.Skookum1 (talk) 15:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

link. скоморохъ 18:20, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, I wonder if I could ask a favour. I uploaded Image:Katie Sierra in the Land of the Free.gif to Commons but screwed up the copyright tags and for some inexplicable reason I am unable to edit Commons image pages. Could you possibly copy-paste the copyright info on Image:GlobalIntifada.gif and paste it to the Sierra image? I don't want the copyright mafia to get all trigger happy and delete anything unnecessarily...скоморохъ 23:22, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect, muchas gracias. скоморохъ 07:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's bizarre - when I click "edit this page" over there, the browser won't open the ".php" file and tries to open it with some word processor instead. So I can upload by clicking radio buttons, and strangely enough, comment on talk pages, but I can't edit images. There's probably some blindly obvious technical reason for it, but I am a neophyte at this programming business. скоморохъ 07:32, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, I am lethargic, anti-social and suspicious of authority to the extent that I am massively paranoid at drawing attention to my uploaded images on commons lest they be defeated in one fell swoop on some minor point of Floridian law/etiquette. I mean... скоморохъ 07:46, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, sure. The whole point of that section is that it recognizes some of the more controversial individuals referred to as anarchist. Some of them will be more controversial than others. Add him. He denies it anyway.--Cast (talk) 03:17, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I answered your question at St. James' Parish, Lothian, MD at my talk page. (I should probably mention that I've been answering questions there lately, but I haven't gotten around to that.) --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 18:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You probably noticed I got some of the photos for Clallam county, feel free to rearraige them as you feel, also the articles too. I might go out on a sunny day and try to get more/better ones if weather cooperates and or I have time. I will just have to avoid the gaurd at the old post office that thinks it is illeagal to take pictures of a federal building (will explain the odd angle I ended up with, first and only picture I got) anyways cheers Bigfathairymarmot (talk) 05:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Boy my spelling is bad tonight :> Bigfathairymarmot (talk) 05:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if it came across as intended, but I meaning to be a bit hifalutin' / thot I was being funny with my reply at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places#Fort Cascades. I appreciated your setting a bit of a challenge, and I went looking for archaeological sites that were NRHPs that might fit the bill. Then in my response i thot it was funny to imply i was working on who knows how many WA NRHP articles. In fact i was involved in discussion/development of Good Article advancement of the Hanford site, which happens to involve a couple NRHP archaeological sites. I don't think the humour got acrossssss necessarily, oh well. :( doncram (talk) 01:41, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :-) You've done a lot of hard work on the List of Registered Historic Places in Pierce County, Washington. Is there anything I can do to help with this project? Take care. ∞☼Geaugagrrl^(T)/_(C) 02:37, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have requested this image for deletion, I did a new better version of this map with more info: a new area in Cataluña and several cities. Bye! Gurgut —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.147.231.111 (talk) 15:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Say, if you're around could you rejoin the CFD for Category:Eco-terrorism? It's been relisted under April 4, and I've been pretty much carrying the entire thing all by myself. There had been a solid concensus against the name, but several new editors have jumped in since the relisting who are arguing for Keeping it under this name. Cgingold (talk) 18:21, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pls see Talk:Coast Salish where I posted a summary of old ethno write-ups used by genealogy.com; the link is to Washington but if you click around you'll find stuff on Canada-side peoples; interesting list of villages not seen anywhere else, also some breakdown of languages/groups I haven't seen before; esp. re Interior Salish and lower Columbia peoples.Skookum1 (talk) 14:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting btw in that it says that the Chilliwack-area Salish were originally Nooksack speakers rather than "Cowichan" (which the page uses for the Halkomelem-speaking group(s)).Skookum1 (talk) 15:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Yavapai.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Yavapai.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ante Perkovic (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:Yavapai.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stifle (talk) 19:21, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy/Anarchism#Emma Goldman. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 22:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've heard the stories, but surely real life can't be that good? Skomorokh 23:02, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Agrupacion de Guerrilleros.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Murderbike,

I sure hope you had a great time while you were away. I see you have put up a semi-retired sign on your page. Hopefully we will see you back very soon. I bet after the rains return in the November? You have contributed a great deal! I feel bad I have not helped you as much I have wanted to with the Washington projects. RL keeps getting in my way. Top it off I am soon to own an Electra Cruiser Huli Huli which will mean even more to have IRL. Stay safe on the road! ∞☼Geaugagrrl^(T)/_(C) 06:15, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd be so kind to go over to the Anarcho punk talk page and at your two cents, I'd be pleased. There is now discussion IF it is a genre at all (sigh). See also the Crass talk page.  Channel ®   00:52, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Milton_William_Cooper#Talk:Milton_William_Cooper.23Behold_a_Pale_Horse

It was after I created the article that I noticed that it was on your to do list. Ooops. If you want to use your version (much more detailed and better than mine) or merge the two, I have no complaint. I have other things I'm working on, so I probably won't have time to get to it any time soon. Einbierbitte (talk) 20:29, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I like what you did with the article! Thanks. Einbierbitte (talk) 20:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! -- See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places#June 30 email deadline for 2008 NPS NHL photo contest. I didn't know about this contest before. You should submit a couple pics! Ten percent of submissions last year (12 / 125) were winners. You'd be a leading contender for the Pacific West region! cheers, doncram (talk) 20:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Got ur message back. FYI though, at the NHL webpage posted within the thread at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places#June 30 email deadline for 2008 NPS NHL photo contest, there's news that the deadline has been extended to July 7. I just noticed. Go for it? I don't know of any other wp:NRHP submissions from the western region. I didn't submit any though i have 4-5 California NHL photo sets yet to upload, maybe i will. But I am sure anyone's pics are better than mine, so i would rather see u submit and win than someone else though. :) Cheers, doncram (talk) 07:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Murderbike, thank you for your contributions on articles related to Feminism. I'd like to invite you to become a part of Feminism Task Force, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles dealing with gender studies related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the Feminism Task Force page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Participants". Thanks!

--Grrrlriot (talk) 04:25, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for snapping that sweet picture of Adventuress (schooner)! And also for your username, which was a breath of fresh air even if it did get the song stuck in my head. --Fullobeans (talk) 08:06, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was just coming here to say thanks for the pic, and saw that Fullobeans beat me to it. Well, thanks! — JBazuzi (talk • contribs) 01:26, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have just joined the Anarchist Task Force, and I have had some problems with publishing of my Anarchist International Wikipedia page, see my sandbox http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anna_Quist/Anarchist_International for the present version/proposal. This page needs improvements to reach Wiki-consensus, and this should be a somewhat collective project to avoid a "COI"-template. As I am new to editing here on Wikipedia I need help with the page, I hope for your cooperation with this improvement. As an introduction to this cooperation, feel free to read this note on my talk page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anna_Quist#Message_to_all_anarchists_on_Wikipedia_-_Anarchy_is_cooperation_without_coercion.2Fdestruction.2Fdeletion_-_about_the_deletion_of_the_AI-Wiki-page_and_cooperation_to_achieve_an_updated_AI-page_with_general_Wiki-consent .

Any contribution, matter of fact criticism, to give input and advice, or even contribute to new sections, will be helpful, and is much appreciated. Please join in the project...

(Anna Quist (talk) 17:14, 29 July 2008 (UTC))[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Agrupacion_de_Guerrilleros.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 16:04, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ozette Indian Village Archeological Site, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 08:00, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This edit lost the M/V Westward. It is much too complicated an edit for me to readily work out what else it might have lost. Any thoughts on how to make sure nothing else was damaged? - Jmabel | Talk 01:42, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I've mostly been focusing on Oregon, but real life takes me across the Columbia every so often and I'm happy to take NRHP pics anywhere! Ipoellet (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

• Image:Francisco Ascaso.jpg
• Image:Francisco-sabate-llopart.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:54, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ... I see you attempted to fix the reflist template at the bottom of the Washington NRHP list. The reason it's not working is because there's a limit on the number of templates that can be included and resolved in an article. This also explains why the Whatcom County table looks like it does. When an article exceeds the limit, it is automatically added to . When individual counties are split out into separate articles and the main article is down to a reasonable size, the problem will go away. Thanks for all your valuable contributions and keep up the good work! --Sanfranman59 (talk) 00:01, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What I've done with the Alabama and Michigan lists (two other states with lots of counties) is to break out all of the counties with the most listings (am I allowed to use that term? ;^) into separate articles until the main state article has only the counties with a few listings and is down to about 80k in size. It's probably safe to assume that counties with more than 10 or 15 listings will need to be broken out. It's also been necessary to break out large cities from their county lists (e.g., Detroit from Wayne County). --Sanfranman59 (talk) 00:51, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I encountered the templates-not-resolving issue on the List of RHPs in WI list-article that grew to exceed 200k. I am pretty sure that is the limit. Resolved as Sanfranman59 suggests. doncram (talk) 05:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lind Coulee Archaeological Site, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 17:15, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wishram village, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 15:50, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Murderbike: As someone who has been a helpful discussant and editor of previous biographies of Weatherpeople, you might be interested to know that a set of new or expanded entries will be posted this week for the following individuals: Scott Braley, Brian Flanagan, Linda Sue Evans, Mark Rudd, Ted Gold, Robert Roth, Robby Stern, Susan Stern, Cathy Wilkerson, Mike Spiegel, Dianne Donghi, Howard Machtinger, Diana Oughton, Eleanor Raskin, and Mark Naison. If you should have the time to give these postings the benefit of your review, I heartily invite you to do so.--Historytrain (talk) 00:11, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Murderbike. I just placed a comment on the Mount Baker talkpage asking for what language "Koma Kulshan" would be from, which is the only indigenous name in that article at present, and what other names there might be for it in the various languages. Anyway won't re-phrase all over again, just wondering what you might know....Skookum1 (talk) 04:28, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Murderbike: Hey, sorry about that. I figured it was a typo, apparently it wasn't. Thanks for changing it back! Dictouray (talk) 20:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Ben Armstrong (bass player), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Unusual? Quite ^TalkQu 22:03, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You posted on my talk page about my edits to the page Carbondale, Illinois which I hadn't even heard of let alone edited.

You posted on my talk page about my edits to the page Carbondale, Illinois which I hadn't even heard of let alone edited.

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Durruti_Column.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:28, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

... 'cause it was moved to a better place and whoever moved it requested to delete the remaining redirect. Renata (talk) 02:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yates appears to be a graphic designer, rather than an artist. Hence the removed category.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 23:34, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wherever you are, and whether you're celebrating something or not, there is always a reason to spread the holiday spirit! So, may you have a great day, and may all your wishes be fulfilled in 2009! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 14:37, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, regarding the edits over Stanley Payne's opinion in the Spanish Civil War page, I'm afraid I don't agree with your edit. Firstly although this may be cited material, there is no factual information in this quote. It's entirely opinion and interpretation.

The leftist zone has been variously designated "Republican", "loyalist", and "Popular Front." Of those terms, the adjective "loyalist" is somewhat misleading, for there was no attempt to remain loyal to the constitutional Republican regime. If that had been the scrupulous policy of the left, there would have been no revolt and civil war in the first place. Thus after July 1936 what remained of the constitutional Republic gave way to the "revolutionary Republican confederation" of 1936–1937.

Which is fine in a work by an individual historian who is developing his argument, but citing one, highly partisan view in wp article is not productive. What the author is saying is that, in his opinion the Spanish republicans do not deserve the name republicans. And basically that the civil war was the fault of the left. Arguable, yes but highly pov I think. And it's not as if this is new and cutting edge research, the works cited were published in 1973 so I see no reason why they should be given special prominence in the text.

Nor do I agree with building up citations and counter-citations on the point. This would add nothing factual to the article and only confuse the reader. The debate as to respect to legality in the republican zone is a legitimate one but surely it's better dealt with elsewhere, for example in a historiography section.

Hope to hear from you. Jdorney (talk) 14:53, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll get on it. Jdorney (talk) 12:36, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Behold a Pale Horse (film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Behold a Pale Horse (film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:56, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MB - please see Talk:Native_American_mythology#Name_change.3F. thanks.Skookum1 (talk) 16:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I recently drafted a proposal for an Ethnobotany WikiProject ... check out the project proposal for more details. I thought you might be interested due to your interest in primitivism and edible plants.

Cheers! Jrtayloriv (talk) 06:39, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to sign up as a founding member, at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#WikiProject Historic Sites ! :) doncram (talk) 06:13, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wassaja.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Wassaja.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Wassaja.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yavapai shelters.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Yavapai shelters.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:26, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CNT-armoured-car-factory.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:30, 2 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 07:30, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Freecoasters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article started out as a copyvio, and after the violating parts were removed, it is not much more than a dictionary definition. It does not show notability, and the only external link is to an amateur website. It is extremely unlikely that this article will ever grow to more than a stub.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EdgeNavidad (talk) 16:02, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Theblastcover.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:42, 6 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:42, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, so I was listening to your band today for the first time in a while and it made me want to contact you. I don't think I have your number or email anymore though, which seems like a problem. Anyway, how are you doing these days? Ungovernable Force^{Poll: Which religious text should I read?} 06:59, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See my comment at Talk:Camassia_quamash; this may be something you can sort out. Peter coxhead (talk) 04:22, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Murderbike. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

UOJComm (talk) 05:32, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was recently suggested that WikiProject Washington might be inactive or semiactive and it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States. I have started a discussion on the projects talk page soliciting the opinions of the members of the project if this project would be interested in being supported by WikiProject United States. Please feel free to comment on your opinions about this suggestion. --Kumioko (talk) 01:36, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 02:45, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Northriver.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:13, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:SOFIXIT. Murderbike (talk) 01:06, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 04:13, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tellez 1948.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:17, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Francisco-sabate-llopart.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:43, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Most people are so "21st-centuric" when it comes to POV, I was impressed to see you catch something most people wouldn't have, over at Sack of Rome (455). Good eye, good call, good job. 98.82.22.52 (talk) 01:10, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I'm referring to this edit. 98.82.22.52 (talk) 01:10, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I note you uploaded this media, would you mind expanding the fair use rationale so it addresses ALL 10 points of WP:NFCC?Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:10, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:45 maquis.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:03, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Nihon Go Gakko - Tacoma.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:10, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited

Date Saturday, December 8, 2012 Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m. Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104 Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand. Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki. Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration. Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 03:39, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	WIKI LOVES LIBRARIES 2013! You are invited to attend the upcoming "Wiki Loves Libraries" edit-athon. The event will be held from 2:30–4:30pm on Sunday, November 17, 2013 at the Vancouver Community Library (901 C Street) in Vancouver, Washington. The edit-athon will focus on creating and expanding articles related to Vancouver and Clark County. Details and signup here!

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active member of WikiProjectOregon or WikiProject Washington. This message was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This month, WikiProject Oregon features two photo campaigns:

• PDX Pods
• Christmas in Oregon

The concept is simple: upload photos of these two topics and share your work! Whether you upload one or one hundred, these images will help capture the culture of our state and illustrate Wikimedia projects. Have fun, and happy holiday season! You are receiving this because you are listed as an active member of WikiProject Oregon or WikiProject Washington. This message was delivered on behalf of Wikipedia:Meetup/Portland by EdwardsBot (talk) 19:41, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Murderbike! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:17, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Yates (artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Yates (artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 22:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Federation X has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Aspects (talk) 23:20, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Francisco Ascaso.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

The file File:USN Observatory - Flagstaff.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Behold pale horse score.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Artiquez and Paco.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page Dirt (band) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

G11/A7, repeatedly submitted without improvement to AfC by obviously self-promoting accounts, virtually none of the information in the article is attributable to the cited sources

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:23, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yavapai has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:19, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ¡Tchkung! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/¡Tchkung! (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 10:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Trucks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

doesn't seem to meet WP:NBAND and it doesn't seem sources exist

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]