User talk:Nathan B2

Hello, I have reassessed this as GA. A class requires two impartial reviews. Schierbecker (talk) 04:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Acquitted evangelical leaders has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 19:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We've been back and forth on this several times...again, if you can add a reference to an external source stating that the church is officially identified as Pentecostal and not Assemblies of God, it will be helpful. Thanks! — HelpMyUnbelief (talk) 17:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HelpMyUnbelief (talk · contribs). Thank you for the message. Assemblies of God USA are a Pentecostal association. So, both pieces of information are useful and true. Thanks for your help. My best wishes of peace and love (WikiLove).--Nathan B2 (talk) 18:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Evangelical COVID-19 conspiracy theorists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:09, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nathan B2,

First, you should be proposing renames for these long-standing categories, not turning our standard categories into redirects to these newly created categories you just created today. In the future, go to WP:CFD to the Speedy Rename section and propose the rename. It's the way we preserve the page history when categories are renamed.

Secondly, you can't create a category redirect like an article redirect, they are different. Please look at Category:LGBT churches and use the template you can see on the page for all of the categories that you tried to make into redirects. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan B2, I see you are editing but you still haven't fixed all of these malformed category redirects you botched. Other editors shouldn't have to clean up after your mistakes. Please fix these today. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Liz, User:Nathan B2 has made additional problematic edits today, such as moving the article regarding Christian schools without discussion. I am reverting that move. Please monitor further WP:NOTHERE editing. Thanks, Anupam^Talk 02:10, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nathan B2, you will discuss any major changes that you would like to make on articles rather than deleting and completely revamping articles without discussion. For Christian school, you can use the talk page to discuss your proposal. Thank you for your understanding. Anupam^Talk 02:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saints & Sinners (2016 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keith Robinson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:45, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Emmanuel TV into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. TB Joshua -- mikeblas (talk) 16:52, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to The Covenant Network. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Baptist World Alliance National Fellowships, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page International.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Christian school shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Anupam^Talk 15:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Christian school, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Anupam^Talk 15:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User: Liz, I am pinging you here as you are an administrator who is familiar with this user's disruptive edits, including POV pushing, blanking referenced information, moving articles and renaming categories without discussion. He is currently edit warring to instate changes to various articles across Wikipedia. I would appreciate it if you could kindly warn this user from further escalation. He has received numerous warnings since he has started editing Wikipedia (under the username User:ServB1); please see Exhibit A, Exhibit B, and Exhibit C. Thank you, Anupam^Talk 15:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anupam (talk · contribs) and Liz (talk · contribs). Thank you for the message. The contentious nature of the changes was not demonstrated in the talk page. According to your message, only you have the right to make a cancellation with content you do not agree with, without giving specific reasons on the discussion page? The edit in Christian school is an addition of neutral references and information of good faith. Thanks for your help. My best wishes of peace and love (WikiLove).--Nathan B2 (talk) 18:41, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your WP:IPBE right which gave you the ability to bypass IP address blocks will expire on 14:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC). If your IP is still blocked (which you can test by trying to edit when logged-out), please renew by following the instructions at the IPBE page; otherwise, you do not need to do anything. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 08:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nathan B2,

Please consider using Twinkle to tag pages for deletion, whether it is CSD, PROD or AFD/CFD/RFD/etc.. Twinkle has so many advantages, it remembers all of the templates you might need so that you don't have to search for them. Also, if you go into your Twinkle Preferences and check off the box that says "Notify page creator", then Twinkle will post a notification on the User talk page which is a step you should be taking when you PROD articles. It also leaves an informative edit summary which I don't think you did either. This is very important for PRODs because if someone removes the PROD tag, other editors know that the article has already been PROD'd by looking at the edit summaries in the page history.

Twinkle also does many other things for editors, tag articles for problems, set up AFD discussions, report vandals to noticeboards, welcome new editors, post warnings to editors who may be disruptive, I use Twinkle continuously throughout the day when I'm editing and if you try it out, I'm sure you will find it to be invaluable. But right now, I just want to be sure you are posting PROD notifications to the talk page of content creators. They should be given an opportunity to respond to the tagging. Please start doing this, if you haven't been doing this. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Affirming Pentecostal Church International is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Affirming Pentecostal Church International until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JParksT2023 (talk) 21:12, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anti-LGBTQ Pentecostal activists in the United States has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Web-julio (talk) 11:18, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 01:01, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, how difficult is it? Drmies (talk) 22:28, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Baptist World Alliance National Fellowships, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]