User talk:Nauticashades

I thought maybe you should check my edit2 again which I've remade. Now there's no "lost detail" and there is still the color correction you like to see. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/American_Tree_Sparrow

Thanks --Arad (talk) 17:56, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Spizella-arborea-002.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Spizella-arborea-002.jpg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Spizella-arborea-002.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 13:12, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a moment to examine Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/History/World_War_I. Wikipedia has four featured photographs of WWI, all of which are lower quality files than the image you rejected for quality. I nominated the one that was weakest technically for delisting, and that's being kept for EV even though the battle it describes had less strategic importance than the Battle of Jerusalem. Durova^Charge! 16:20, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I find more of this sort of thing than I have time to restore. If you're interested, though, I'd be glad to coach. Best wishes, Durova^Charge! 18:32, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you had nominated a image of Hurricane Katrina a couple months back and I was wondering if you were interested in this animation: its at this address, http://eobglossary.gsfc.nasa.gov/Newsroom/NewImages/Images/katrina_mod_2005271_lrg.mpg. The animation is very good, and if you nominate it for FPC, please credit me with the discovery. --Meldshal 13:45, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You might find my comments at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Venus Animation useful. MER-C 09:48, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i'll co-nom that second image. Just let me know. Cheers, --LordSunday(₪Scribe₪)♦ 01:10, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. --LordSunday(₪Scribe₪)♦ 01:14, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Spizella-arborea-002 edit2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 10:48, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Anas-strepera-001.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. jjron (talk) 08:43, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Newton North Tiger Mascot Logo .png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:57, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to transclude this? Or are you holding off on purpose? —Ceran^(Sing) 22:03, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know we're almost at 2009, and you gave me this two years ago, but I sorta just noticed it. I don't know how but that page was completely unknown to me until now. But anyway, thanks a huge ton for that! I think the current version is better. ;) Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :D} 09:52, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It has occoured to me that many persons do not trust Wikipedia due to the fact that anyone can edit it. I think we should advertise that we constantly chech sources and cites. Many people think that we do not have the capeablilty to check all edits. We should allow the general public to know of our technologies to prevent and reverse vandalisim and the punishments of offenders. We are not trusted by all but I believe in Wikipedia to make it happen. Someone could start a project to do these things.

P.S. Pass this message to every single wikipedia user starting with the project council. I have chosen you for the "N" and "O" section. Please pass it on to all members under "N" and "O" on the project council. And reply on my talk page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmoc2012tms (talk • contribs) 23:31, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nauticashades,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Roasted coffee beans.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 28, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-12-28. howcheng {chat} 19:02, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NauticaShades,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Image-Schloss Nymphenburg Munich CC edit3.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 17, 2009. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2009-01-17. howcheng {chat} 22:08, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NS,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Spizella-arborea-002 edit2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 14, 2009. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2009-03-14. howcheng {chat} 16:39, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NS,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Anas-strepera-001.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on April 8, 2009. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2009-04-08. howcheng {chat} 04:01, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Steely Dan, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Steely Dan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Steely Dan during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:18, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because you've contributed to FPC either recently or in the past, I'm letting you know about the above poll on the basis of which we may develop proposals to change our procedures and criteria. Regards, Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 00:18, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification. I voted for set 2. Hive001 contact 11:49, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As a contributor to featured picture candidates, I was wondering if you could comment on a potential change to the "Not promoted" instructions for closing nominations. The discussion can be found at Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates#Addition to "not promoted" instructions. I'm asking people to help gain consensus there. Feel free to ask anyone else to comment. Thanks! Jujutacular ^T · C 05:45, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Tamias striatus CT.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Jujutacular T · C 09:11, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Heliconius melpomene 2b Richard Bartz.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Jujutacular T · C 09:11, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:The Garden of Earthly Delights by Bosch High Resolution.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 18:15, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a new edit to consider at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Demetri McCamey signals a play.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:19, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Demetri McCamey signals a play.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:10, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I saw. Tony seems to be after some kind of change in guideline. But this, following his spamming of his own nominations, would seem to suggest he just doesn't quite get the philosophy of FPC. That's fine, but I do hope he takes the point here rather than arguing ad infinitum... J Milburn (talk) 16:25, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, just thought I'd move that long discussion to the talk page, as it was probably being detrimental to the nomination. Jujutacular ^T · C 00:46, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would you consider the additional image placements for MODIS Cloud Cover Map, Saint Paulin Church, and Würzburg Residence and let me know your thoughts on my prospective locations.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:19, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you have been busy editing, but could you take a second to reply to this.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:41, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I responded to your comments on the MODIS Map, and the Saint Paulin Church now has an article. As for the Würzburg Residence, it has been added to the article of its main architect, Johann Balthasar Neumann. NauticaShades 10:55, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see the image in the Johann Balthasar Neumann article. In fact, all that is there is a very pedestrian quality image of another building.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:08, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I am confused. I was looking at the Johann Lukas von Hildebrandt article that is linked in the caption. Can you revisit the FPC discussion and explain the caption where I have noted my confusion.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:27, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You participated in the discussion at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Jesse Jackson 1983 and so I thought I would alert you to a discussion at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Jesse Jackson, 1983 cropped.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:53, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Given your involvement in the recent FPC, I thought I would alert you to Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Wesley Clark.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:31, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Würzburger Residenz, Gartenfront.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 14:55, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Find the range of your patriotism2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Jujutacular T · C 17:11, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:MODIS Map.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Jujutacular T · C 17:11, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Trier Sankt Paulin BW 12.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 07:48, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Maedin\^talk 16:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, :) Maedin\^talk 04:45, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are being contacted because you have in the past participated in the Valued Picture project. The VPC project is suffering from a chronic lack of participation to the point that the project is at an impasse. A discussion is currently taking place about the future of this project and how to revitalize the project and participation. If you're interested in this project or have an idea of how to improve it please stop by and participate in the discussion.

— raekyT 11:03, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an important message from WikiProject Wikify. You are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Wikify. As agreed upon by the project, all members will be required to confirm their membership by February 1, 2010. If you are still interested in assisting with the project, please add yourself to the list at this page—this will renew your membership of WikiProject Wikify. Thank you for your support, WikiProject Wikify

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 20:08, 22 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you for the comment at FPC: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Three Little Pigs illustration. I have tweaked the colors a bit, hopefully this strikes a better balance for you. Regards, Jujutacular ^talk 01:14, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:VenusDonMiguel.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 16:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TheOffice Karen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:46, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Encyclopædia Britannica for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Snowman (talk) 13:51, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NS,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:The Garden of Earthly Delights by Bosch High Resolution.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 19, 2011. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2011-12-19. howcheng {chat} 19:59, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NS,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Tamias striatus CT.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 24, 2011. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2011-12-24. howcheng {chat} 16:41, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NS,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:MODIS Map.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 1, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-01-01. howcheng {chat} 21:47, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NS,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Würzburger Residenz, Gartenfront.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 8, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-01-08. howcheng {chat} 21:11, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NS,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Find the range of your patriotism2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 11, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-01-11. howcheng {chat} 18:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NS,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Trier Sankt Paulin BW 12.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 23, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-01-23. —howcheng {chat} 17:40, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this because of your current or past association with the Featured Pictures project. Following on from several cases where closers did not observe the prescribed minimum votes required for a delisting, there is now a motion to entirely dismiss the requirement for a minimum. Please participate in the discussion as wide-ranging changes may arise. Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 13:30, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy link: Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates#Delist procedure changes. Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 14:00, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Stephen Greenblatt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Frankfurt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - At the Greenblatt talk page, I posted a comment about restoring one of the links from your recent cleanup. - Talk:Stephen Greenblatt#Booknotes external link - If you still feel strongly that it is not appropriate for the page, then feel free to discuss. Thanks KConWiki (talk) 17:01, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. The article is about "cisgender", not "transgender". The whole point - and anyone remotely familiar with the subject will know already that it is a highly charged and polemic subject - well the only point of a word like "cisgender" is to identify that which is not "transgender". You mentioned how you were going to replace the sidebar if there were no objections because you thought people would find a link to the two as helpful. That is like linking the mashed potatoes article with a gravy article. They may go together in some peoples minds, but this is Wikipedia, not Pinterest.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.14.175.114 (talk • contribs)

I think this discussion would be better carried out on the talk page of the article in question. NauticaShades 11:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:050817-N-3488C-028.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:55, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Erpert ^{Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?} 19:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TheOffice Andy.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. EditorE (talk) 13:50, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TheOffice Karen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject History of photography has been nominated for merging with Template:WikiProject Photography. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Qono (talk) 01:11, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error, specifically formatting tags that are in the wrong order.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Change the signature as shown below, or make other edits to make the signature appear how you want it to appear.
3. Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Current signature:
'''''[[User:Nauticashades|Nautica]]''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Nauticashades|Shad]]</font><font color="black">[[Special:Contributions/Nauticashades|es]]</font>'''

Fixed signature:
'''''[[User:Nauticashades|Nautica]]''[[User Talk:Nauticashades|<span style="color:black;">Shad</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Nauticashades|<span style="color:black;">es</span>]]'''

More information is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:45, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]