User talk:Pinckney2007

Hello, Pinckney2007! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 22:00, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 02:22, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It's been a very long while since I've edited in Wikipedia, so I'm a bit out of the habit. I am concerned that a number of direct quotations need quotations in the Sarah Stein article, as much is derived from Women and the Making of the Modern House by Alice Friedman. Friednman, in turn, states some blunt characterizations sourcing Harriet Levy, a contemporary of the Steins and a person who was on the outs with the Steins by the time of her writing. Given such circumstances the material that is derived from Levin should be leavened with non-involved researchers. I've got several of the source books but not the time right now.

<~Pinckney2007>

Sorry I did not get back to you sooner Looks impressive. Be sure to discuss with the other editors on the talk page. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 03:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pinckney2007 11:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Pinckney2007[reply]

Thanks, Dlohcierekim-

When you say discuss with the other editors, do you mean in my own talk section, or in the discussion section that's related to the entry I've been working with? I'm guessing you mean the discussion section that's part of the Gertrude Stein entry. I'll post some observations there.

Yes, I could have been clearer. Talk:Gertrude_Stein is what I meant. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 13:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Harriet Lane Levy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. User Doe _☻T ^☼C 17:10, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I Have removed the SD tag from the article. See the article's discussion. User Doe _☻T ^☼C 17:31, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, much. I'll follow the guidance on the new templates, but it may take me an extra day, because won't be able to get access to the Levy autobiography until the libraries open on Friday.

Best regards,

Pinckney2007 (talk) 17:33, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Pinckney2007[reply]

I'd like to write a biography for Sarah Stein, wife of Michael Stein, and sister-in-law of Gertrude and Leo Stein. It is difficult to find biographical information about her, but she was a substantial collector of Henri Matisse's artwork, and paintings from her original collection hang in museums world wide. She also was an instigator, with Hans Purrmann, of the Matisse art school in Paris in the early 1900's. Her life has drama and pathos, and she has a story that should be told.

Matisse's American Patrons, Time Magazine, March 30, 1962

Please see Help:Archiving a talk page before archiving your next talk page. Per that page I created Talk:Gertrude Stein/Archive 1 and a link to that page on Talk:Gertrude Stein in the form of a box (template) at the top: {{ archive box|auto=yes }}. That's about all you have to do in the future. Thanks for your work on the article. Hyacinth (talk) 23:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to adopt. I have had a quick look at both articles. Two things, firstly on copyright. Things are pretty strict here about copyright, if in doubt it doesn't get used. you need to prove PD or the copyright holder has given permission. Secondly the Innocents Abroad has some excellent references and research however there is little textual content. Try looking at WP:NOVSTY for guidance on the kind of things to include, even if not all of it applies. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 09:04, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is not the thing to point to other locations in quite this way. Write in your own words based on research in other place and place in-line citations with the text to attribute the ideas. If there is related information on another site point to these in an "external links" section. Wikipedia is not a link farm. Look at other articles and take more of your lead from them. You need to do some of this quite quickly or you work ristks being removed complete by other editors. And don't forget to post to talk pages signing your entry with a final ~~~~ four tildas :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 15:37, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also worth noting that there is little value in giving chapter headings. It is an overview of the plot that is of some interest and also the "out of universe" information such as background to the writing, critical reception, adaptations, popularity, etc. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 16:11, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Richard Banks (artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Lithoderm 16:18, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, someone created the Sarah Stein article; it's very short, and could use the work you've already done on your userpage. I've told the person who created it to contact you, because two people working on an article is always better than one (now if only I could get someone to help me out on the Zoya Phan article...). If you're wondering how I came across you, when the Sarah Stein article was created, I ran a Google search, and the first hit was your userpage. Thought you might be interested. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:08, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know about the Sarah Stein article. I've been out of touch with wiki, so I'm probably not doing this response quite right. I would say that I think the most significant thing that happened to Sarah Stein was the theft of her Matisse paintings from the Gurlitt Gallery in Berlin on the eve of WWI. The paintings that she lent to to the show, at the Gurlitt now mostly are in the Statens Museum, after having been in some a Dutch warehouse I think. It's a rich story. There are some leads though. Jack Flan has studied this. Also, the first director of the New York Museum of Modern Art has a list of the paintings that were lost, in the back of his major catalogue of Matisse's work. J. Alfred Barr.

I see that someone put up a Gurlitt entry and he seems to have made a business out of purloining paintings.

Anyhow, on my home page, I link an article about how Sarah sort of lost her will to do much of anything after those paintings were stolen. Matisse felt a deep grief, and he painted two portraits, one of Sarah and one of Michael (Sarah's husband) to try to fill the void.

Pinckney2007 (talk) 06:56, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Pinckney2007[reply]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:09, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pinckney2007. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pinckney2007. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]