User talk:Pinky Rhino

Hey why are you deleting partners from Miles Morales? He teamed up with them so why are deleting them it doesn't make any sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.106.209.145 (talk) 05:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pinky Rhino, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Pinky Rhino! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:09, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Doctor Strange (2016 film) into List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:15, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Path slopu. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. PATH SLOPU (Talk) 14:11, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Chris Rock filmography

[edit]

Thanks for creating Chris Rock filmography.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

This has been tagged for one issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:00, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Miles Morales & Peter Parker

[edit]

Hey I want to know why are deleting the partners from Miles Morales and Peter Parker, it's doesn't make any sense. He teamed up with them and they should be in that section so stop deleting those partners because others know more about him than you do. If that would have been the case than why is Spider-Gwen and Deadpool in those sections, Wikipedia is about informing people with articles and those partners are not false information. I hope you understand me. ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.106.209.145 (talk) 05:54, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Partners

[edit]

What's you with the partners sections? Why are you deleting true information on these characters? I need to agree with this account, you are being too superficial and ignoring other people's effort. Please stop deleting partnerships that have happened. You can add true content and delete false content but not delete true content. Invicibel321 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Invicibel321 (talkcontribs) 15:19, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong possibility that this user and the above IP are actually socks of User:SuperiorMalkom agreeing with each other? User:Argento Surfer, User:Nightscream and User:Rtkat3, what do you think? I protected Eddie Brock for now since all three have tried to add the same content there, but I am considering if other steps are necessary yet. BOZ (talk) 21:09, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea. I'm not an admin any more, so I don't have the tools to check such things. Nightscream (talk) 02:49, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have checkuser rights either, so I think that may be the next direction, after I get a chance to see if there are any more socks. BOZ (talk) 13:14, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not an administrator, but we'll need more evidence to confirm the socks. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:20, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There's similar activity on Spider-Man. Argento Surfer (talk) 21:19, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Can I just say that I have actually reverted User:SuperiorMalkom edits. I don’t agree with his edits on the pages I reverted. Just to let you know. Pinky Rhino (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
He has been indefinitely blocked due to sockpuppetry. BOZ (talk) 00:09, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This has been discussed before at Template talk:Avengers. Consensus is to limit the members to the initial members as too many members makes the template unnavigable.—TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:48, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The last discussion that took place was 10 years ago. But I do understand though, there are too many members to list on the template, that’s why I was only including main notable members like Black Panther, Spider-Man, She-Hulk, Carol, and others. The X-Men template is twice the size of the Avengers one and have a enormous list of characters. I think we should just mention notable members of the Avengers that are well-known. Just a thought. Pinky Rhino (talk) 20:06, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And who is say who is notable or not. That would just open the doors to a bunch of POV edits. Limiting it to the initial members is a neutral determination. This methodology has worked for the last ten years but if you wish you can re-raise the issue on the template’s talk page for a new concensus.—TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:13, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The templates

[edit]

Look. I don't know why you are removing templates that I especially added. I don't know if it's a coincidence or are you having a grunge against me. I'm not your enemy. You look like a talented User and I don't know why your doing this. If I have done something wrong then please tell me, I don't want to fight like that time with User:Emadjshah. I do think that I have done an error in my previous message, but I think you kinda missed the point. Please let's settle this thing down. Penguin7812 (talk) 13:28, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

He's still erasing the correct stuff? Emadjshah (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:31, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]