User talk:PlanetStar

Archives

Archive 1 (2007) Archive 2 (2008) Archive 3 (2009) Archive 4 (2010) Archive 5 (2011) Archive 6 (2012) Archive 7 (2013) Archive 8 (2014) Archive 9 (2015)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 13 (number), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Six Feet Under. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Carved Inside.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected the article where this image was displayed. I uploaded this image just after I created the article. PlanetStar 02:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Downstroy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected the article where this image was displayed. I uploaded this image just after I created the article. PlanetStar 02:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Frontlines song.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected the article where this image was displayed. I uploaded this image just after I created the article. PlanetStar 02:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jumpdafuckup.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected the article where this image was displayed. I uploaded this image just after I created the article. PlanetStar 02:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Master of Savagery.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected the article where this image was displayed. I uploaded this image just after I created the article. PlanetStar 02:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rise of the Fallen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected the article where this image was displayed. I uploaded this image just after I created the article. PlanetStar 02:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Seek 'n' Strike.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected the article where this image was displayed. I uploaded this image just after I created the article. PlanetStar 02:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Soulfly-Archangel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected the article where this image was displayed. I uploaded this image just after I created the article. PlanetStar 02:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SoulflySodomites.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected the article where this image was displayed. I uploaded this image just after I created the article. PlanetStar 02:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Exoplanet for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. DrKay (talk) 08:30, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can't quite fathom the reason a nine-year veteran of the project would leave such a comment as this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Science&diff=732445137&oldid=732443076

Have you been hacked? Did you forget to log out? If you post disruptive material like this again, it will be reported to WP:ANI for administrative action, which may include blocking. μηδείς (talk) 02:02, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't hacked, I didn't forget to log out, I intended to leave that comment. I wouldn't post an abusive comment or anything, but I didn't realize that the one I just posted was disruptive (but not abusive). I was just asking for the tip and the reason behind it. PlanetStar 03:03, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding. μηδείς (talk) 15:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leukophobia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leukophobia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:44, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Run differential has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to be a Content Fork of Run (baseball), where this should probably be merged.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  06:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I was going off the discography page hence why I only counted 22. Lukejordan02 (talk) 00:34, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Health effects of sugar, PlanetStar!

Wikipedia editor Hydronium Hydroxide just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Note left on Talk:Sugar re contentfork

To reply, leave a comment on Hydronium Hydroxide's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 07:30, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I only created a redirect page back in 2013 and then another had just turned into an article. PlanetStar 04:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Roswell UFO incident, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. There is considerable disagreement as to the exact date of the crash - please see extensive Talk page discussion and archives. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 21:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Antlophobia. Since you had some involvement with the Antlophobia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ... discospinster _talk 20:24, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. You are encouraged to change

[[User:PlanetStar|<font color="blue">Planet</font>]][[User talk:PlanetStar|<font color="yellow">Star</font>]] → PlanetStar

to

[[User:PlanetStar|<span style="color: blue;">Planet</span>]][[User talk:PlanetStar|<span style="color: yellow;">Star</span>]] → PlanetStar

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 05:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. PlanetStar 06:39, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! —Anomalocaris (talk) 18:47, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Remains movie.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:54, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There can also be secondary reasons, having nothing to do with comfort, instead having to do with preservation of the facility and stock:

• Grocery stores: Produce lasts longer when cool.

• Other stores: They don't want sweat on the stock. For example, sweat stains on book covers can make them unsellable.

• Theaters: They don't want sweat on the seats. There's also an interesting history here, as A/C is what originally led to the rise of movie theaters. When homes lacked A/C and theaters had it, they were THE place to go on hot days.

• Museums: Organic matter (like stuffed animals) and paintings tend to last longer under cool, dry conditions.

• Restaurants: Food lasts longer when cool, especially in salad bars.

Keep in mind that people vary, so to guarantee that just about nobody sweats, you need to keep it quite cold. Also, some may have had a long, hot walk from the parking lot, or up stairs, so need to cool down.

Then, when we are talking about comfort, there's the issue that being too cold is so easy to fix (just bring a sweater) while being too hot is not (strip down to your underwear ?).

Another factor is that it's difficult for a business to maintain a constant, uniform temperature, due to varying sunlight in windows and varying crowd density. So, to prevent any one spot from ever getting too hot, they tend to keep the average temperature quite low. You might find, for example, that a movie theater is cold when you first enter, but warms up after a couple hours, if packed full. SinisterLefty (talk) 14:15, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I learn ya! The reason given above is beneficial. I was thinking for a while that keeping stores real cool would make non-refrigerated foods last longer. I experience that many restaurants I go to are comparatively warm, either from hot cooking area or not having A/C up so high so served foods can stay warm longer.

You mentioned stores, theaters, museums, and restaurants. What about schools? PlanetStar 03:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Schools would suffer from two of the problems mentioned above, inability to precisely control the temp based on variable sunlight in windows and variable density of people in each room. So, as above, to avoid becoming intolerably hot anywhere, they keep the average temp low. Now, it would be possible to control temps more precisely, if every room had it's own fans and dampers it could turn on and close when the thermostat there indicates it's needed, with both building heat and A/C on all the time, so it could tap into either. Alternatively, each room could have completely independent powerful heat and A/C. Why don't they do this ? It would be very expensive and/or wasteful of energy. Better to just keep it cool everywhere and ask people to wear a sweater if they get cold. SinisterLefty (talk) 13:06, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the article Ritual (Soulfly album) . However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). Thanks! P.S. If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:32, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. According to this RfC, Last.fm cannot be used as a source. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 21:34, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dol Ammad ocean dynamics.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I created the article Ocean Dynamics then I uploaded and included the image in there. Then somebody redirected the article to the artist's page because it's lacking reliable sources and notability. PlanetStar 01:43, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 13 (number), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Six Feet Under. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article HD 24496 Ab has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I could find no evidence that this planet exists; it is not mentioned in Howard et al. (2009).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Praemonitus (talk) 04:17, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect HD 24496 Ab. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 18#HD 24496 Ab until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay ^(Talk) 05:59, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dronebogus (talk) 11:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dark concepts has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:39, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Negative concepts has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Recharger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There was an article on this I wrote before somebody redirected it to album page 6 days ago because the article doesn't meet criteria for notability, so go ahead and delete the image. PlanetStar 01:59, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Francium fluoride and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 31#Francium fluoride until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:23, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

-- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 00:02, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Curse of Bob Short has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Either not notable or needs a rename. For example, the ESPN source[1] doesn't even mention Bob Short, while the first source, Defector[2] doesn't mention a "curse". Looking for better sources gave only 6 Google Hits in total[3] (!), which for such a high profile sport in the US is ridiculously low.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Habitable exoplanet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely overlaps with Planetary habitability. This article is too short, and the other a well-written and comprehensive one, so merging is not really needed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 08:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Epsilon Eridani c has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 18 § Epsilon Eridani c until a consensus is reached. GTrang (talk) 13:51, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dark music genres has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 16:26, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Powershifter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of exoplanets detected by radial velocity has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

With the number of planets detected by radial velocity growing more and more every month, it will be very difficult to maintain this list. It barely get updated and views and has little utility, anyone searching for radial velocity planets could search the NASA Exoplanet Archive instead.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• List of transiting exoplanets

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of exoplanets detected by radial velocity, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of exoplanets detected by radial velocity until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]