User talk:Reconrabbit

This is Reconrabbit's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them pseudoscience and fringe science They should not be given alerts for those areas.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

The article Radium you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Radium and Talk:Radium/GA4 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:43, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Reconrabbit, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Recon, you had a good question I corrected the access-date. I simply copy-pasted the info already known on the plan of establishing the stable, I didn't thought of the date coherence. Cheers ! :) - OtharLuin (talk) 17:08, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Reconrabbit 17:12, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wan to publish a page called Nepal In Data, this organization has been used as reference in many wiki pages like Falgunanda Highway, can you help publish my draft. Draft:Nepal In Data. Straw Holdings (talk) 17:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The way it is written now it is not clear why Nepal in Data should have a Wikipedia article. Maybe you can use information from other sources to make this more clear. As it is now it isn't any more distinct than any other Nepal related source of data (like those listed in this article: [1]). You can look on Google to find more sources like this one [2] or this [3]. Reconrabbit 18:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thank you again for reviewing my Draft: Thriveworks Article. I appreciate your feedback and want to ensure I fully address the concerns regarding notability.

I believe Thriveworks meets Wikipedia’s notability criteria, and the sources I provided are in-depth, reliable, secondary, and strictly independent of the company. However, I would value your insight on why these sources may not be considered sufficient, and how I can ensure the article meets the necessary standards.

According to Wikipedia's guidelines, a primary test of notability is whether independent, unrelated individuals have published non-trivial works focused on the subject. I believe the sources provided meet this standard, as they are unbiased news outlets with no vested interest in Thriveworks. Additionally, Wikipedia requires independent content to include original opinion, analysis, and fact-checking, which I feel is evident in our sources.

Given this, can you reconsider your position? Else can you advise what I can do in the article to adjust it. Please know I'm committed to making any necessary adjustment to meet Wikipedia’s guidelines given my COI.

Thank you for your time and guidance. Mfunderburk (talk) 13:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reaching out. I will admit that the structure of the draft is rather bare after restructuring it according to Bonadea's instructions. I will also note that editors including myself are cautious about the provenance of extremely local news sources like Patch Media and articles like those from Behavioral Health Business that describe business transactions in the organization's own words. I will make some small changes - as I feel like more can be drawn from each of these sources while maintaining neutral point of view - and request a third opinion from the Articles for Creation reviewers. Reconrabbit 13:40, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Mfunderburk, I'm another AfC reviewer and have taken another look at your draft. @Reconrabbit was correct to decline it based on the sources: I agree that every source is reliable but what I am not seeing is independence. Every source is based off a press release or interview with the CEO, and there is not enough independent analysis and discussion to quite put us over the edge of notability yet. I would class quite a few of the sources you've used as churnalism and therefore we can't use them to establish notability.

If you can give me three, just three, really strong sources that each meet the following requirements: reliable, independent, significant coverage. We really want to see in-depth independent analysis separate to a regurgitated press release or interview.

Let me know if you have any questions. Qcne (talk) 15:55, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Qcneand @Reconrabbit, Thank you both for the detailed feedback—it’s truly helpful, and I appreciate the time you’ve taken to help me navigate this process. I completely understand your points about the need for reliable, independent, and in-depth sources that go beyond interviews or press releases. I’ll keep that in mind for future drafts.

For the ‘top three’ sources, following the additional instructions provided at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RoySmith/Three_best_sources, I’d recommend these as our strongest:

-https://medcitynews.com/2024/08/eleanor-health-thriveworks-launch-partnership-to-support-patients-with-sud/

-https://www.phillyvoice.com/happiness-america-mental-health-attitudes-counseling/

-https://www.buyoutsinsider.com/regal-hcp-earns-healthy-returns-with-thriveworks-dental365/

Additionally, I had a question about sources that reviewed our company completely unprompted and independently—no conflict of interest exists with these. However, I was cautious about including them since they sometimes read like a marketing piece. These sources are:

-https://www.forbes.com/health/mind/thriveworks-review/

-https://www.everydayhealth.com/emotional-health/thriveworks-counseling-review/

I've seen similar pages sourced in articles on other mental health companies, so I wanted to confirm if these might be acceptable. If they qualify, I believe they could provide additional independent analysis needed to strengthen our case for notability.

Thanks again for your time and guidance. It’s genuinely appreciated! Mfunderburk (talk) 18:35, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Qcneand @Reconrabbit just thought I'd check back up here! Thank you both so much for your time! Mfunderburk (talk) 15:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I accepted the draft following this analysis. Will be copying these comments to the talk page of the article to keep the record in one place. The article will also be reviewed by a new page patroller so a third (fourth?) opinion will be forthcoming. Reconrabbit 15:57, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Reconrabbit -

Recently, you reviewed a draft article about bioethicist Nancy Neveloff Dubler (deceased), and dismissed it on the grounds that it was overly promotional of Dubler, and had insufficient references.

I am not the original author - but I am an autoconfirmed Wikipedia user and a professional familiar with Nancy Dubler's work and significance. Your criticisms were valid. But since the date of your comment, the author and I significantly edited the draft to

(1) make it neutral, formal and more like an encyclopedia entry;

(2) add criticisms of Dubler's work, with references, and

(3) add far more independent references.

This is now a neutral and thoroughly referenced article - it appears to me far more extensively referenced than many Wikipedia biographical entries of this modest size.

I regarded the revised draft as ready to move to the main space, and I just did so. But I see it still recites your criticism at the start of the article . Could you please look at the article again - I'm sure you will find that your criticism has been addressed. And if so, please remove that comment. Thank you, and thank you for your comments which resulted in an improved article.

User: Rswidler

Rswidler (talk) 18:33, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly, I've taken a second look at the article, and take no issue with you publishing it from a draft manually. The comments and other notices at the top of the article were left over, as an article published through Articles for Creation will normally be cleaned up and all those comments removed by a script.

Do take note that the article is considered an "orphan" for the moment as it is impossible for anyone to reach the page from elsewhere without searching for it. I can add some categories and do further cleanup to make sure it meets the standards of the manual of style here. Reconrabbit 18:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Radium you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Radium for comments about the article, and Talk:Radium/GA4 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:21, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see that you delinked a name in a caption. I was wondering what the MOS basis is for that. Thanks. See here. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alan_Rosen_(restaurant_owner)&diff=prev&oldid=1253912229 184.153.21.19 (talk) 19:11, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I delinked the name as my interpretation of MOS:LINKONCE in that the name of the company is already stated in the text of the section where the image and caption is present. I do not see it as helpful to provide a fourth link to the same location in the article. Reconrabbit 20:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you misread it. It is referring to more than one link in the text of the section. See "Link a term at most once per major section... Other mentions may be linked if helpful, such as in ... image captions." --184.153.21.19 (talk) 21:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't make that connection. I'll keep that in mind for the future. The change was reverted. Reconrabbit 21:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Enjoy the day. --184.153.21.19 (talk) 00:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I was not sure if you were aware that the review for Good Article designation is underway. I have only received confirmation so far, not any comments or requests for alterations. I am watching the article, but if you see anything that needs attention and can do it, please do! BoatnerdJenn (talk) 13:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had missed it on my watch-list, but am now aware. Thanks! I'll keep an eye on it. Reconrabbit 14:06, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added some more to the article and made some other small edits. I should be totally done with it by noon tomorrow. In the meantime, fresh eyes are always good for editing! BoatnerdJenn (talk) 04:17, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see if there's anything in there that i can help with, thanks for helping to make it more comprehensive! Reconrabbit 12:15, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think I have done what I can do for now, hopefully it is enough because finding that information takes a lot of digging. Big Turtle put in some subheadings. I did some edits, but needed to focus on putting in the information. Let me know if I missed anything! BoatnerdJenn (talk) 16:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BoatnerdJenn, when you cited Grant 2017, did you mean Grant 1997 as in the International Directory of Company Histories? Reconrabbit 16:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes, thank you for catching that! BoatnerdJenn (talk) 17:19, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening! Thank you for reviewing my pages! Ricco Baroni (talk) 23:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, you have a very straightforward method of writing! Reconrabbit 23:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is this bad or good? English is not my first language, my apologies Ricco Baroni (talk) 10:18, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is good. The text is easy to read. Reconrabbit 11:24, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, sir! Ricco Baroni (talk) 17:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How can I help you sir --ERNEST99t (talk) 06:34, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. How can I help you? There is a note on your talk page now. Reconrabbit 13:28, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Reconrabbit! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk) 12:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Standard-winged nightjar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:44, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Minor Barnstar
		Your noteworthy contribution (5 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 250 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Standard-winged nightjar you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Standard-winged nightjar for comments about the article, and Talk:Standard-winged nightjar/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:02, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Standard-winged nightjar at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yakikaki (talk) 22:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I've been relatively inactive on Wikipedia recently, and I just wanted to say thanks for your work on improving Group 5 element, and to wish you good luck with the other element articles currently at B. ¹⁴¹Pr -_\contribs/- 20:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, for bringing it to GA. Much of my focus has turned to European rabbit and related articles. I still do my best of course. Radon is next. Once I can get my hands on Inorganic Chemistry by Holleman and Wiberg. Reconrabbit 21:12, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Praseodymium-141 just taking note, based on your inactivity you might want to turn off your mentor status for now, you're getting some messages on your talk page. Reconrabbit 21:36, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding me - I've turned it off for now. ¹⁴¹Pr -_\contribs/- 18:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey ReconRabbit, I've just performed your requested move of Active thermography. However, I don't think I used any page mover powers to do this - I'm pretty sure you could've done this yourself with no additional userrights. Give it a shot next time! Best, Toadspike [Talk] 07:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is that so? I thought to do a WP:SWAP like this there needs to be an initial move to a dummy location that suppresses redirects. Reconrabbit 13:47, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're correct, except I didn't need to do a swap. The edit summary shows Toadspike moved page Infrared non-destructive testing of materials to Active thermography over redirect – as long as the redirect has only one edit, anyone can move a page over it (details at WP:MOR). Technically, the redirect gets deleted, with the cool side effect that it looks like I deleted the page even though I am not an admin. Toadspike [Talk] 14:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know you could do that. Thanks for making that clear. Reconrabbit 14:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There might actually be some trouble - the talk page has to be moved as well, and the target has history from Cewbot maintaining the talk page banner. I can't copy and paste the stuff with attribution because there's a VRT ticket. Reconrabbit 18:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching that! I guess you couldn't have done it yourself after all...Toadspike [Talk] 18:49, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I looked into it since I need to move another page now (Draft:PachiPara)... the page mover user right gives you delete-redirect, which lets you delete single-revision redirects. Extended-confirmed users don't get that normally, that's why I have to ask for G6 when approving AfC drafts that have blocking redirects. Reconrabbit 18:12, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Technically you can delete single-revision redirects, but they have to point to the title you're moving from. Page mover's delete-redirect allows me to delete single-revision redirects with any target.

That doesn't help you move drafts to mainspace though. Thankfully this one's already been taken care of. Toadspike [Talk] 21:09, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see, that's useful to know. Reconrabbit 21:22, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for accepting HRAC classification. Could you please give credit to User:RustyOldShip, who did most of the work there? I could do it, but might look nicer coming from the acceptor directly. DMacks (talk) 05:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I copied over the acceptance notice to User:RustyOldShip's talk page. Thank you for submitting it for them. If there's anything else I should do please let me know... I'll probably occupy myself with filling out one or two of the red links on that page, starting with Quinmerac. Reconrabbit 14:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Good choices for that next step, given Quinmerac had been used as a specific example. DMacks (talk) 11:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Reconrabbit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rabbit show, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:09, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Reconrabbit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Rumschitzki, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bat-eared fox you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 10:17, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bat-eared fox you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bat-eared fox and Talk:Bat-eared fox/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 00:01, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bat-eared fox you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Bat-eared fox for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 01:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to go through even despite the many issues that I somehow didn't realize were there. I feel like I'm missing something on what a good animal article should be structured like. I put a lot of stock in Pwoli, a user who wrote most of that article, but given that they introduced that copyright-violating statement back in 2020 I don't know how much of this I can trust. I'll follow the guidance you gave in the review before it was failed and keep working on it. Reconrabbit 02:05, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, while Animal Diversity Web may be written by students, it clearly cites sources in the text and articles are reviewed by staff at the University of Michigan prior to publishing. The website is a useful resource and is both accessible and readable. It's considered a reliable source by at least one project though I don't have the link to the discussion that led to that consideration and it's used frequently in (for example) giant eland. Reconrabbit 02:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Cool, thanks for continuing working on it – happy to help out if there are any questions/problems. Regarding the Animal Diversity Web – all right, I was just checking. But remember that it is a tertiary source; I recommend to check with the actual sources when in doubt. (Also note that the above message was automatically delivered by a bot, and this bot does not put your discussion page on my watchlist. If you respond to these bot notices, you have to ping the user otherwise they are unlikely to see your response.) --Jens Lallensack (talk) 13:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Reconrabbit, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 21:10, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you dePRODed YTHT and added some sources to the Talk page. Could you add them to the article or explain to me how the sources show significant coverage? I may send this article to AfD since no sourcing improvements have actually taken place. HyperAccelerated (talk) 20:20, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seemed to me that there was significant coverage present in the sources present in the Chinese Wikipedia article zh:一塌糊涂BBS, though only a couple of the links seem to have substantive material. I looked on Google and found a few hits on 一塌糊塗BBS that looked substantive. It's possible that a lot of this info was copied from the Chinese Wikipedia article though. I added the "sources exist" because these seemed to be substantive and were used on the other Wikipedia but I have no way to read them. If you think this was out of line I will not object to you reverting my removal of the PROD. Reconrabbit 20:55, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, how can I upload Bio pic? --Dan H Barouch (talk) 19:55, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you are free to upload any image that you have the rights to, provided that you release it under an appropriate license. There are clear instructions on the following linked page: Wikipedia:A picture of you. Reconrabbit 14:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glock18 giá bao nhiêu vậy --Bjghkcv (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bjghkcv đây không phải là câu hỏi dành cho Wikipedia. sử dụng Google? (via Google Translate) Reconrabbit 14:45, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I updated a pic of Dan Barouch on Wikimedia Commons, but the article has not changed. I am new here. --Jesssss30 (talk) 20:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see the image here File:Dan Barouch 10-15-24.jpg but it seems that this image is copyrighted MGH Photography 2024 and thus cannot be used on Wikipedia. You would have to ask the photographer or the company to release this photo under a compatible Creative Commons license to use it. Reconrabbit 20:47, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Reconrabbit for collecting more than 27.0 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's NOV24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing over 8,000 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer Alt (talk) 17:52, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, some guy accused me of vandalizing a page when I just made a genuine mistake. I had reverted my mistake by removing only my parts, to try to get the page back to the way it was before I had edited it. It was hours after that the guy messaged my talk page accusing me of vandalizing. --Sarah Momor (talk) 06:30, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the response that you were vandalizing was an overreaction, but it does look like you are making many edits to the same pages quickly, which makes it hard to see what you're trying to do. Rather than continuing to make changes, then undoing yourself, try and use the show preview button to make sure it looks correct. Tables can be hard to work with. If you have any doubts, point out what you are trying to do on the talk page before actually making changes.

In the case of NSYNC discography, I can imagine some people would take issue with Bye Bye Bye being listed as part of a soundtrack when it was also a single that released years earlier. I'm sure NSYNC music has appeared in many films as "needle drops" rather than original music for the soundtrack, as is probably the case for Deadpool and Wolverine. Reconrabbit 14:59, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good day Recon. I hope you are great.

I created an article I believe is great. Do review it Jimmy Rex. Thanks in advance. Cokeandbread (talk) 13:02, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for asking me to look at this. I don't think I can mark this article as reviewed yet, as a lot of the text is sourced to Jimmy Rex's work. He is probably a notable figure, based on recognition from other sources early and later on in the article. I worry about the Controversy section - normally there would need to be a much better source than Vice News to justify keeping this information in the page, especially since Jimmy is still a semi-public figure. Reconrabbit 15:38, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. On it. Cokeandbread (talk) 15:52, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 23 December 2024 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:42, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_W._Hughes&gesuggestededit=1

Under Career

Should "the gem business" be called "the gemstone business"

I thought that was the right term and also for clarity in the title, but just checking if this is correct?

From my understanding a "gem business" could also refer to a good business. --Learner590 (talk) 01:12, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If "the gemstone business" provides a reader with a better understanding of what is being described, that should be used. Since it is clear Hughes works in gemology, either would be fine, but your suggested change seems good to me.

I have never personally heard the term "gem business" . Reconrabbit 03:36, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Reconrabbit, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! – Joe (talk) 10:17, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Reconrabbit, thank you for your notice. JoshuaHeri (talk) 14:26, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025 GAN Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for good article nomination reviews will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age of nominations reviewed. Each article review will earn 1 point; for each 90 days an article has been in the backlog, an additional half-point is awarded; one extra point will be awarded for every 2500 total reviewed words. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Articles for Creation Barnstar 2024 Top Editor
		In 2024 you were one of the top AfC editors, thank you! --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:20, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy holidays!
	Wishing you a Merry Christmas filled with love and joy, a Happy Holiday season surrounded by warmth and laughter, and a New Year brimming with hope, happiness, and success! 🎄🎉✨ Baqi:) (talk) 10:48, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]