User talk:Rhodospirillum

Hello, Rhodospirillum, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Yobol (talk) 22:21, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that there are problems with the amitosis article - for a start it reads as an advocacy piece (fails WP:NPOV), but I am not sure your alternative was correct. While perhaps part of the problem is imprecise usage of the term amitosis, on a quick perusal of Google Scholar amitotic division of (most) ciliate macronuclei seems to be well substantiated. The same applies to endopolyploidy in some tissues in some taxa. And then there are things like pachytene chromosomes, the parasexual cycle and coencytic organisms like Caulerpa and aseptate fungal hyphae. A lot of stuff this be better considered as modified or irregular mitosis.

I don't know personally know enough to do a proper rewrite of the article.

You can add your concerns to the article talk page - this may not be any more effective than your appeal to the project, but it at least places your concerns where they're more visible. You have the option of adding the POV and/or disputed template to the articles.

Some bacterial species have two or three chromosomes, so they presumably have the same problem of including a complete genome in each daughter cell that eukaryotes have. Lavateraguy (talk) 10:46, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]