User talk:Roamataa

19 October 2024
News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins! Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night Book review: The Editors Humour: The Newspaper Editors Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives

Archives

Archive 1, Archive 2

Thanks for your participation for my RFA bid and for your support.--JForget 23:34, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am responding for Betacommand. First, it was a mistake on my part, not his. I requested him to add the template in all articles that were located in Category:Belarus. I personally do not know how the Romanian articles were tagged with this template. I understand that whoever created the category scheme for Belarus could have caused the error, but not sure how. I will apologize for that. If there is a talk page that needs deletion, let me know and I can perform that for you. Please come see me if you have more questions. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 06:59, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the wishes. In turn, I wish you a Merry Christmas (perchance, a snowy one)! Turgidson (talk) 19:31, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As per the title: a Merry Christmas to you and all your loved ones! Dahn (talk) 20:33, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crăciun fericit! I wish you Merry Christmas! --Koppany (talk) 23:55, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wish you Merry Christmas and perfect New Year, Roamata! --Olahus (talk) 08:08, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the wishes and the same to you! Zello (talk) 08:21, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Multumesc pentru urari. Iti doresc si tie numai bine in 2008. La Multi Ani! Dpotop (talk) 11:55, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A little late, but Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you too! Squash Racket (talk) 08:47, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message, Merry hristmas and Happy New Year to you too! :-) --KIDB (talk) 15:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm very late, but nonetheless thanks a lot and the same to you! :) KissL 15:15, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sarbatori fericite si numai bine in 2008. Mario1987 (talk) 15:50, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Life in Romania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Municipalities and Towns of Maramureş County requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 07:51, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Cluj-Napoca. Thank you. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 07:52, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to User talk:Danutz. Thank you. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 07:52, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iată câteva afirmaţii care ar avea nevoie de citări:

• "The area surrounding the city is covered with forests and grass. Rare species of plants, like venus's slipper or iris, are to be found here, in the two botanical reservations of Cluj-Napoca, Fânaţele Clujului and Rezervaţia Valea Morii." (asta era din ro.wiki cu "păpucul doamnei", "căpşunica"..., caută varianta în română în ro:Cluj-Napoca).
• Ceva despre climă ar fi iarăşi indicat.
• Evoluţia populaţiei (mai ales dacă găseşti ceva dinainte de 1850, pentru că după cum vezi în Cluj-Napoca#Demographics, datele încep din 1850, dar Clujul este mult mai vechi).
• "The banks of Someşul Mic also feature a wide variety of such old buildings. The end of the 19th century brought a building ensemble that fastens the corners of the oldest bridge over the river, at the north end of the Regele Ferdinand Avenue. The palaces Berde, Babos, Elian, Urania, and Szeky consist of a mixture of Baroque, Renaissance and Gothic styles, following the Art Nouveau/Secession and Revival specifics." - asta era într-o vreme într-un ghid turistic, dar eu nu mai deţin acel ghid, deci dacă găseşti ceva despre palatele de pe Someş, ai putea pune nişte surse la această afirmaţie.
• Orice despre presa actuală a Clujului, vezi Cluj-Napoca#Media; acolo nu prea avem surse.
• O sursă pentru istoria Universităţii Francisc Iosif din rubrica Cluj-Napoca#Education: "During 1919, immediately after the end of WW1, the university was moved to Budapest, where it stayed until 1921, being ultimately moved to the Hungarian city of Szeged. Briefly, it returned to Cluj-Napoca, in the first half of the 1940s, when the city came back to the Hungarian administration, but it was again relocated in Szeged, following the reincorporation of Cluj-Napoca in the Romanian territory."
• Şi nu în ultimul rând ceva despre bazele sportive din Cluj-Napoca: "There are also a number of sport teams for rugby union, basketball (with the successful men basketball team, U Mobitelco), handball, water polo and volleyball. Sport facilities for such sports are located in the vicinity of the stadium, including the Sala Sporturilor Horia Demian, a multi-function hall designed for sports like handball, basketball or volleyball, the "Politehnica" Natation Complex, that includes indoor and open-air swimming pools, as well as the Iuliu Haţieganu Park – with tennis and athletism facilities and a new swimming pool in construction. Cluj-Napoca regularly organises national championships in different fields of sport, because of this large concentration of facilities."

Cam asta ar fi la prima vedere. --Danutz (talk) 12:24, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Am scos tabelul din articol, nu concorda cu comunicatele Primăriei. Am folosit în schimb date de pe situl primăriei, pentru a da o statistică în proză (cu procente) care este mai bine indeicată decât folosirea tabelelor. Chiar în discuţia pentru statutul de articole de calitate mi s-a cerut să se folosescă cât mai puţin tabelele, şi chiar să se renunţe la cel din rubrica sport de exemplu. Încă ceva referitor la referinţe. Te rog să introduci de fiecare dată în referinţe şi anul. Deci în loc de "Lazarovici et al., p.20" e de folosit "Lazarovici et al. 2007, p.20", pentru că "Lazarovici et al." (din latină Lazarovici şi al.[ţii]) poate să mai aibă o lucrare scrisă în alt an, care să se refere tot la Cluj-Napoca şi pe care să o folosim la rândul ei în acest artico din Wikipedia, nu? (vezi de ex. Gheorghe Bodea în rubrica Cluj-Napoca#References. --Danutz (talk) 18:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nu poţi să îmi dai citatul din cartea lui Jozsef în care se spune că Palatul Banffy este cea mai reprezentativă clădire baroci din Transilvania, pag. 83 (vezi în articolul Cluj-Napoca: The National Museum of Art is located in the former palace of the count György Bánffy, considered to be the most representative construction built in the Baroque style in Transylvania.) Pentru că ar fi mai multă nevoie de detalii. De exemplu cine spune că este cea mai reprezentativă ş.a.m.d. --Danutz (talk) 14:12, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you just indicated you disagree with the proposed naming convention. Could you write under "discussion" why you disagree, and also indicate which of the 6 modifications to the proposal (A, B, C, D, E and F) you support, and which not? Markussep ^Talk 17:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You might like to know that there's a poll going on about modifications to the Hungarian-Slovak naming convention proposed earlier. Voting is open until 11 May 20:06. Markussep ^Talk 14:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to create all the red linked article listed here. If you'd like to help, go ahead. Basketball110 ^{My story}/_{Tell me yours} 03:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Here is a voting about Bendery/Bender/Tighina: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bender%2C_Moldova#Statement_of_Title_Solution —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.142.252.220 (talk) 18:21, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Villages in Cluj County, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Villages in Cluj County has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Villages in Cluj County, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:48, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roamataa, I have updated all wikEd translations to the latest version 0.9.91. Please feel free to check your translation for changes and new additions. You can find general informations on the wikEd translation project page. Cacycle (talk) 22:52, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, since i saw that you were involved this you are familiar with the problem. We have a similar problem here with templates that contain Hungarian names by Romanian. Can you please review this ? Thank you.iadrian (talk) 15:12, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw that you collaborated on articles related to Dacia and thought this could be of interest: WikiProject Dacia is looking for supporters, editors and collaborators for creating and better organizing information in articles related to Dacia and the history of Daco-Getae. If interested, PLEASE provide your support on the proposal page. Thanks!!--Codrinb (talk) 05:38, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 21:22, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cluj-Napoca companies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is pretty much a somewhat indiscriminate list of businesses in this area. Many of the articles in this list have some pretty serious issues with sourcing as well. This comes across more as a business listing that something that really merits an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:10, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roamataa,

I have updated your wikEd translation to the current version (0.9.119c). It would be great if you could find the time to translate the new additions into English. Please let me know here if you have any questions or suggestions.

Thanks in advance, Cacycle (talk) 14:03, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Life in Romania has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:05, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]