User talk:Ryuch

Hello Cheol, welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. You can learn more on the how to edit page. The naming conventions and style guide pages are also useful. There is a sandbox which you can use to experiment in. If you have any questions, see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. Angela

반갑습니다. soax 05:52, 4 Aug 2003 (UTC)

하나하나 배워가고 있습니다. 많이 도와주세요. Ryuch 14:21, 25 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Hi, where did you get Image:Baekjebronzecenser.jpg? If it is copyrighted, please listed list it on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion, because we cannot take others' copyrighted material here. Thank you. --Menchi 04:27, 28 Sep 2003 (UTC)

I got it from Buyeo Museum website, I requested the permission to use. If they do not grant, I will list it on the list. Thanks. Ryuch

I just created wikipedia:images for deletion and moved your image there. Martin 21:52, 20 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Please explain your removal of the sentence relating to 日本海/東海 in the article South Korea. 感射합니다. --Ce garcon 04:51, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I answered at Talk:South_Korea. Thank you. -- Ryuch 05:33, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Hi, Ryuch. Thanks a lot for all the work you've been doing, especially on Baekje.  :-)

As far as the king names go, I think you're basically right: simpler is better. I've just been following the standards at Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(Korean), which were put up by User:Sewing. These standards state that the format should be King X of Y, where X is the ruler's name and Y is the kingdom's name. There hasn't been any discussion of these conventions that I can find.

The current Korean standards do follow Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(monarchs)#Monarchical_titles, which say that we should "pre-emptively disambiguate" the monarch's name by adding the name of the country. This makes sense in Europe, where you have King Charles of Spain, King Charles of England, etc. etc. But as you say, it isn't really necessary in the Korean context, where only a few names (Taejo, Taejong) have been held by more than one person.

I think we could make this change. Here's what I reckon we should do: 1. Start a discussion in Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Korean), to make sure there are no objections. Also mention it on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (monarchs) 2. If there are no objections, change the text of Naming conventions (Korean). 3. Move all of the articles to their new names (and change their text also). There are currently about 40 articles that would need to move. 4. Change all of the links in Rulers of Korea to the new format, so that anyone who adds a new article will give it the correct name. ... That's a lot of work, but can be done pretty quickly after step 1 (give it a week or two).

I'll go do step 1 shortly. As you say, simpler is better.

Cheers, and thanks again for your hard work! -- Visviva 03:46, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Hi again, Ryuch! Thanks again for your contributions. If you have time, perhaps you would like to help out with Wikipedia:WikiProject South Korean counties and cities. It's an initiative with the goal of massively improving our coverage of South Korean geography. Feel free to discuss or change anything on the project page, too, it's still rather unfinished. Cheers! -- Visviva 04:51, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading the image

• Image:Expobridge.jpg

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the image and I'll tag it for you. Thanks, Kbh3rd 05:14, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Hi there, I need help, I just overhauled the Hanjin page, but I can't fix the little table on the right because I do not know what goes there. Can you fill it in correctly? WikiDon 08:21, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Ryuch! I haven't seen you around much lately. I hope you're doing OK. Anyway, I'm posting here to let you know that there is now a notice board for Korea-related topics. This board is a central place to discuss all matters pertaining to Wikipedia's coverage of Coreana. I hope you'll drop by and help the board to take shape. -- Visviva 15:01, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Dear WikiProject South Korean counties and cities member,

Starting this July, we will work to get one article as close to featured article status as possible. Please please please please please help! Below is the information message for this collaboration. Feel free to post it on your user page. Cheers! -- Visviva 06:42, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Dear Korean notice board member,

Starting this July, we will work to get one article as close to featured article status as possible. Please please please please please help! Below is the information message for this collaboration. Feel free to post it on your user page. Cheers! -- Visviva 06:42, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The current collaboration of the month for Korea-related topics is History of South Korea. Please help bring it up to Featured Article standard.

Hello! Currently, there is a vote over the name of Sea of Japan/East Sea in Korean contexts. If you are interested in voting, please go here. Kokiri 12:32, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr Cheol,

Please drop by the Nominations section of the WikiProject notice board (here) and vote or nominate your favorite town. I have gotten us started by nominating three counties and cities from the southwest, in the spirit of countering systemic bias. -- Visviva 13:23, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A Blast from the Past. Are you agreed? Do you have better sources? --FourthAve 02:45, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Korea page as living in or being associated with Korea. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Korea for instructions. Rmky87 15:09, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/South Korea page as living in or being associated with South Korea. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in South Korea for instructions. Rmky87 16:36, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I stumbled across your imjinwaeran article just now. I merged your article into the more informative Seven-Year War page. Just thought I would inform you, hope you take no offense.--A10203040 08:32, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I put the image of the Baekje incense burner [1] for a speedy deletion. I did this because even if permission was given by the museum there isn't any proof of that permission and the image has a fair use rationale. This image: [2] has a creative commons license. I hope this is okay with you. Thanks for your time. Tortfeasor 07:42, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I visited Booyeo National Museum and got the permission to use in Wikipedia. You could checkt it by asking to the museum. No problem to use in Wikipedia! But, if you have better image which has good quality image of the burner you could replace. You don't need to delete [3] - Ryuch

R: Thanks for the reponse. I don't mean to step on any toes. If you want to remove the tag, that is cool with me. I figured that since we have a better licensed image we could remove the duplicate. Thanks for your time. Tortfeasor 21:56, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the article Korean name is undergoing a Featured Article Review right now. As far as I can tell, it's the only Korea-related Featured Article, and I doubt it can survive the way it is now. I noticed you worked on this article before, so I hope you can help now, and maybe continue on to make one or two more Korea-related Featured Articles eventually. Maybe you can contact others who may be interested, since it's not getting much attention right now. Thanks. Chuniac (talk) 18:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suppose that Takeshima/Sea of Japan task force is created after people find your creation of Dokdo/East Sea taskforce? Wikipedia is not a place for political agenda even though the recent news regarding Japanese textbook controversy is a motivation for you to do this. However, as far as I've known, you have NOT participated in the past naming disputes or votes, so I'm wondering why you unilaterally decided to create the task force? I believe this is required for pre-discussion with members. --Caspian blue (talk) 10:05, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Dokdo and East Sea, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Dokdo and East Sea and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Dokdo and East Sea during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Caspian blue (talk) 17:46, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheol -- You may not have noticed that I relisted the projected move of Eulsa Treaty at WP:Requested moves#Current discussions/August 31. It is only prudent for me to alert all contributors in our discussion about changing the name of this article.

Please consider Talk:Eulsa Treaty#Relisting at WP:Requested moves.

On one hand, this can be construed as an unnecessary delay. On the other hand, this ensures the possibility of wider community input which may bring out any points-of-view which remain unstated or glossed over. --Tenmei (talk) 17:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I sought assistance here — Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-10-04/Eulsa Treaty. I do not know what happens next. --Tenmei (talk) 21:13, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Summarizing the so-called discussion which began at Talk:Eulsa Treaty in early August here:

A. In an attempt to help us start discussion, options were proposed here and refined here.

1. Leave it at its current name?
2. To Japan-Korea Protectorate Treaty?
3. To Japan-Korea Treaty of 1905?
4. To 1905 Protectorate Treaty?
5. Or what?; see the second paragraph of page Eulsa Treaty.

B. Valentim presented the results of a Lexis/Nexis search here. This supplements several Google searches.

In the many weeks of so-called discussion thread development, those opposing the move have either been unwilling or unable to present refutation or counterargument; and therefore, I propose we delay no longer.

In other words, I suggest that there is a consensus to act now on the basis of the Lexis-Nexis search outcome. The time has come for this article to be renamed Japan-Korea Treaty of 1905. --Tenmei (talk) 19:35, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello this is Wahyudi from Wiki id ^_^ I also made some short Korea-related articles here. Regards 02Wahyudi (talk) 08:35, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Wahyudi. I will have a look. Happy editing! --Cheol (talk) 06:11, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ryuch,

I found the slides of your recent presentation about the Korean Wikipedia quite illuminating. Would you be interested in making them into a "Sister project report" for the Signpost? This is an irregular series that presents the basics of a Wikimedia project, its history, characteristics, successes and issues, and current (longer term importance) developments. Considering the Signpost audience (English Wikipedians and other Wikimedians), one can be brief about basics that are similar to other Wikipedias, but assume some interest for peculiarities that are unique to the project.

(You may have noticed that we ran a story concerning the Korean Wikipedia not long ago - based on a Foundation-l posting by PuzzletChung -, which appears to have gone down quite well with readers. But Sister project reports are intended to take up an entire section and have a larger scope, encompassing the whole project instead of one particular news item.)

If you are interested in presenting your project in such a Signpost report, one way to start would be to begin a draft in your user space. As you may know, the Signpost is published on Mondays. It should be sufficient to have a rough version of the story ready by Sunday early afternoon (UTC) before the intended publication date, to allow for subsequent (copy-)editing.

Regards, HaeB (talk) 21:56, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HaeB! Thank you for the attention. It's great to publish about Korean Wikipedia on Signpost. I will start to draft a article but I'm not sure I can make it ready for next issue. You mentioned Sister project reports but I am not sure the coverage of Signpost. If it covers only English Wikipedia, you are right it's a Sister project. If it covers entire Wikipedia projects, it's not a Sister. What do you think? --Cheol (talk) 02:41, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great, looking forward to it! Yes, it doesn't need to be ready for the next (March 21) issue - one of the following weeks is fine too. It's just important to leave some time for refining and editing before the intended publication date.

The name "Sister project report" is indeed somewhat a leftover from the time when the Signpost was exclusively covering the English Wikipedia only. In a discussion last year there was consensus to widen the scope to all Wikimedia matters (that's when it was renamed from "Wikipedia Signpost" to "Signpost", to indicate that reporting about Commons and other non-Wikipedia Wikimedia projects is welcome too). But so far we kept the name, also since some sections ("Features and admins", "Arbitration report") still focus on the English Wikipedia.

Regards, HaeB (talk) 19:03, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How about aiming for publication in the upcoming April 11 issue? I'll be happy to look over a draft or make suggestions. If you are on IRC, you can usually find us in the #wikisignpost channel on Freenode ([4],Webchat). Regards, HaeB (talk) 19:58, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, too late. I lost your proposal already. But I have a news. On coming Saturday, Korean Wikimedian would gather to discuss founding a local chapter in Korea. After that meeting I will post a draft to be published on Signpost. --Cheol (talk) 07:38, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your most recent edit [5] at Liancourt Rocks is in violation of the special editing rules that are in force for that article; see the top of Talk:Liancourt Rocks as well as the html comment at the top of the article itself. Please self-revert and discuss before making further edits. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:23, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your ID on WikiProject and so I thought you might be interested in a debate at Template Talk on the topic of merging Infobox Korean Film into the generic Infobox Film category, deleting the Hangul/hanja/RR/MR information, or keeping it separate (as it currently is). I would appreciate it if you to contribute your thoughts or at least glance over it. The more people looking/thinking about it will give us better ideas as to what should be decided. Thank you. ₪RicknAsia₪ 09:52, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ryuch/Dokdo and East Sea, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ryuch/Dokdo and East Sea and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ryuch/Dokdo and East Sea during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Shrigley (talk) 21:13, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Ryuch! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! 20:05, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

안녕하세요! I'm sorry to write to you like this but I saw your entry at the Wikimania attendees list and I am so happy that finally I see at least one person from Korea attending the conference, as I am learning Korean :)) I also saw your slides about kowiki and I think there are a lot of similarities between our Hungarian Wikipedia and kowiki, in terms of nature and behaviour of editors. Hope to meet you in Hong Kong, I hope we will have some time to chat! Kind regards, Teemeah ^{편지 (letter)} 15:05, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Teemeah. Nice to hear you are coming to Hong Kong. I hope I could meet Wikipedia editor friends from all over the world. It's unusual for me to meet a Hungarian who can speak Korean. See you soon in Hong Kong. --Cheol (talk) 10:11, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that you have several processes running on bastion.wmflabs.org. This host is only meant to be used to log into hosts on the Labs network. The proper place to run bots & Co. is the Tools project which I have added you to.

To get started, check the help page and the migrating from the Toolserver page. You can also ask in our IRC channel at #wikimedia-labs ^connect or send an e-mail to our mailing list [email protected] – thank you, and have fun using Tools! Tim Landscheidt (talk) 02:58, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Tim. It required me a few more steps to use the Tools server. Sorry to bother you, but you gave the information exactly what I wanted to know. My tool was migrated to tools-login, but still I am not sure it is the right server. --Cheol (talk) 04:35, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Annyeonghaseyo, Cheol-ssi! Thank you for your message. I just arrived back home :) I'm glad we could meet at Wikimania. :) By the way, I was thinking about nominating Heritage preservation in South Korea for FA or GA, what do you think? Kamsahamnida :) Teemeah ^{편지 (letter)} 14:34, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to hear your safe travel. The article looks good for me. I would like to add some text if I can afford some time. Good luck. ----Cheol (talk) 01:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. — MusikAnimal ^talk 20:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your pointy edits to the [[Chinese influence on Korean culture article. There is currently a discussion of he MOS in question, and your view is clearly the minority one. But even if this was not the case, you should still not have altered a direct quotation. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 07:34, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's not related. Someone are debating or not. --Cheol (talk) 17:59, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I pointed out to you an example of an article that ran against the current wording, but in accordance with the previous RFC and the current discussion's general consensus. You went to the page and radically altered the romanization system in use solely in order to make a point about the discussion we were having on the MOS talk page, and in the process you mangled a direct quotation.

Do you understand why this is inappropriate? If not, I will have to consider requesting that you be blocked from editing, as changing direct quotations to conform to (your interpretation of) Wikipedia's MOS, without indicating that the quote was altered, is unacceptable.

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 20:19, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You contributed in some capacity to at least one of the recent discussions concerning romanization of Korean for historical topics. Should we use McCune-Reischauer or Revised for topics relating to pre-1945 Korea? If you are inclined, please contribute here. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 06:27, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ryuch. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ryuch. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ryuch, I am creating the video game Dead Secret under Dead Secret over the weekend and have changed your link from Dead Secret to Dead Secret (Novel) on User:Ryuch/famous books I hope you don't mind. Let me know if that is ok? D Eaketts (talk) 11:11, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That looks good. But I don't remember why the list is under mine. --Cheol (talk) 11:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, Strange how you don't recall that page. Anyway I will carry on with it, Hope you figure out what Wikipedian created that list? D Eaketts (talk) 11:45, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, me. But I don't remember how I induced the list. I think I did some queries against the database on a machine of WMF Labs, but I lost the script. --Cheol (talk) 06:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ryuch. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to meet you--Mangon vientiane (talk) 07:52, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyodong Elementary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyodong Elementary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 22:47, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pure in heart 112 wedding.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ryuch,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dasan Machineries Company for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:02, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ryuch. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]