User talk:S8333631

Hello, S8333631! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! -Panser Born- (talk) 22:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

A tag has been placed on Timothy Basil Ering requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Michael White^T·C 19:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ecrater requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. chiefhuggybear (talk) 18:47, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, OBM | ^{blah blah blah} 10:28, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't tell me I can't decline speedy taggings, especially when the tagging is inappropriate. Certainly please don't edit-war with me to re-add said tag. Ten seconds of factchecking would have shown you that Price is a major award winner (even had you not bothered to spend the ten seconds on Google it would have taken to see that she's a Sundance winner, the fact that she's the director of two films which themselves have their own articles should have been a clue). Our deletion processes are not "keep tagging until the admin gets bored reverting and deletes it". If you want it deleted, take it to AFD. – iridescent 20:43, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied to your point here. Ironholds (talk) 20:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I userfied the stub you created to User:S8333631/Edward Starr Judd, because I think you mixed up Edward Judd (the actor) with the Edward Starr Judd (a doctor). At any rate, the reference doesn't support the name you're using. Maybe you should expand the existing article about the actor? - Mgm|^(talk) 08:50, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your change to Talk:Lincoln which modified the comments of another editor. Please do not modify other people's talk page comments. See WP:TALK. —EncMstr (talk) 22:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you had better recheck that, because I only modified my own comment. Hello, My Name Is SithMAN8 (talk) 23:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. The comment was written by 99.13.222.42 whose signature was later changed to your own. Sorry for the misunderstanding. —EncMstr (talk) 23:09, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of animals from "After Man: A Zoology of the Future", suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Fiction; an original essay that does not meet the guidelines for inclusion.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. §FreeRangeFrog 01:13, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rebel Poster.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a happy Birthday message to you, S8333631, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Hi, S8333631, thank you for using the {{rescue}} tag, the main organizing tool for the Article Rescue Squadron! {{Rescue}} tag usage and advice: We are a growing community of Wikipedians who identify and rescue items that have been tagged for deletion but may be encyclopedic. As part of this tag's use please comment at the deletion discussion on why this item should be rescued and how that could happen. Your input should constructively lead the way for other editors to understand how this item can be improved to meet Wikipedia's policies and likely benefits our readers. Some points that may be helpful: Every day hundreds of items are deleted, many rightfully so. But many items concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable and should not be deleted. We try to help these quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated! If someone seeks help, please try to assist if you are able. Likewise feel free to ask for help, advice and clarification. The deletion discussion is where the concerns regarding each item are brought up and addressed. Introduction to deletion process gives a good overview and some good advice for newcomers to deletion. Many times we are asked to help rescue articles by people new to our notability and sourcing policies. If the article is not fixable we can help explain why and offer alternatives. Many of these editors are also new to Wikipedia so may see deleting "their" article as "bitey". Encourage civility and maybe even {{welcome}} them if they have only been templated with deletion messages. Articles tagged for deletion and rescue Category Articles tagged for deletion and rescue not found Our primary work is improving articles tagged for rescue. On this template you can see a drop-down list of currently tagged items. You can install it on your own page by putting {{ARS/Tagged}}. A more dynamic list with article links and description is on our current articles page. It is highly recommended you watchlist it. If you are fluent in another language besides English, please consider adding yourself to the list of translators available. Articles and sources that use non-English languages often need translation. Please feel free to ask for assistance, we are happy to help! Fences and windows (talk) 20:21, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You should add the rescue template to the article page, not to the deletion discussion. Please correct this for any that you added. Fences&Windows 03:50, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Megumi Kanda. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megumi Kanda. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Wetfloor.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:31, 23 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:31, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Wikipedia:Ignore all rules, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. —David Levy 23:32, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Wetfloor.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:28, 26 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 06:28, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't waste people's time by adding {{stub}} to an article such as Future which is not a stub. This is disruptive behaviour. PamD (talk) 08:31, 11 June 2010 (UTC) As mentioned in this essay, the important factor in deciding whether something is a stub depends on the subject matter. It is definitely a stub relative to the enormity of the topic, which is what is important when marking stubs. Sithman VIII !! 18:29, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Josepla.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:41, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Fariña nuñez.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:42, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Measuring cup1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 20:12, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I created it myself, so what template do I need to release under free license? Sithman VIII !! 20:13, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, crap, I just realized you're a bot. Never mind. Sithman VIII !! 00:10, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

The reason I replaced the ref name tags was that they went to the same url. They're raw below:

• Reference 11 http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/PharmacyCompounding/ucm183088.htm
• Reference 57 http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/PharmacyCompounding/ucm183088.htm#FDAsResponsetoWyeths

The only difference is one pops to a subheading, but I don't think that's sufficiently important to have multiple references to the same webpage. They are references 11 and 57 in the version you reverted to. Natch, I'd like to replace the single citation. Thanks, WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 00:59, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, reviewing my edit a bit closer, I realize how it looks like I removed a citation. If you look at the two uses of 57, it was used to reference two sentences in a row:

The FDA stated that they did not take these regulatory actions against compounded bioidentical hormones in response to Wyeth's request, as that is not the purpose of a citizen petition.^[57] They said that they had an ongoing investigation when they received the petition.^[57]

My edit replaced the <ref name = tag to match 11 (i.e. only one citation to the FDA Q&A page on the BHRT page) and only one citation for both sentences. I don't think it's necessary to have both when there are sourcing two sentences in sequence. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 01:09, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note that based on this, I've undone. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 23:13, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Right, thanks. Sorry about all the trouble. Sithman VIII !! 01:25, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries at all, and now I feel bad for reverting before I got this message :( WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 19:02, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It might not have been lame before, but it's certainly lame now that you started edit warring over it. --erachima talk 06:06, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Knorklogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you commented in the pending closure discussion I am notifying you that the Wikipedia:Pending changes/Vote comment is now open and will be for two weeks, discussion as required can continue on the talkpage. Thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 23:45, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Add this userbox to your userpage to advertise your opposition to WP:Pending Changes--Gniniv (talk) 07:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user is against the implementation of flagged revisions in the form of pending changes.

Hi, when you changed Sign to point to a disambiguation page, 220+ links were switched from pointing to an article to pointing to a disambig. These will have to be manually re-pointed to the proper article. Per WP:FIXDABLINKS, could you help with the clean up? Cheers, --JaGa^talk 15:35, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No? Navigation popups can be a big help when you set popupFixDabs to true. --JaGa^talk 19:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:46, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:20, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who think this category should be deleted, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 23:32, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the sentiment here, but it's better to have the bullshit isolated in short bits attributed to reliable sources as "some sources claim" than the way it was before. If it's in there and sourced, it's easy to defend it against unsourced bullshit amplification. Dicklyon (talk) 20:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken. I was venting a bit there, sorry. ☻☻☻Sithman VIII !!☻☻☻ 22:27, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Downtown Montessori Academy is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Downtown Montessori Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:58, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I really have to disagree that this merited the edit summary "fixing vandalised caption". Yngvadottir (talk) 16:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind toning down your signature a bit? In particular, the <big> tags are really distracting, and strongly discouraged by Wikipedia:Signatures. Mr.Z-man.sock (talk) 18:56, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I didn't realize it was a problem. ☻☻☻Sithman VIII !!☻☻☻ 10:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There we go. ☻☻☻Sithman VIII !!☻☻☻ 10:53, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who think this category should be deleted, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. B (talk) 00:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because I have noticed you commenting at the current RfC regarding Pending Changes, I wanted to invite you to the IRC channel for pending changes. If you are not customarily logged into the IRC, use this link. This under used resource can allow real time discussion at this particularly timely venture of the trial known as Pending Changes. Even if nothing can come from debating points there, at least this invitation is delivered with the best of intentions and good faith expectations. Kind regards. My76Strat 09:17, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry I missed your question when visiting the IRC. No you didn't do anything wrong, it just happens that no one was actively watching the channel. If ever you return, you can type the username of someone who is logged in and that will alert them that you have a question or comment to share. I do wish I had not been doing something else when you arrived. Thanks for your willingness to participate. My76Strat 10:26, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pointers! ☻☻☻Sithman VIII !!☻☻☻ 10:28, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've made some category tweeks on the page, and some suggestions on the talk page. Ideally, I'd like to see the page raised to the same level as Shogi and I think Shogi and some of the other Traditional Asian variants would make good models for the page (graphics on how pieces move, etc). I know there is less information out there for Khmer Ouk, but moving in that direction would be better.Naraht (talk) 14:39, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all the suggestions, Naraht! ☻☻☻Sithman VIII !!☻☻☻ 08:33, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A suggestion: have a taskforce that improves one vital article per week, starting with the most viewed:[1]. They'd all be done in time for Wikipedia's 20th birthday. Fences&Windows 01:41, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. I sort of like using the ranking in WP:VITAL, but more importantly, it's pretty hard to make headway in these enormous topics in a limited time frame. I feel like if it's more open-ended, people will be more willing to sign on and do gradual, cumulative things, with occasional WikiOgery giving us boosts. That's my take. ☻☻☻Sithman VIII !!☻☻☻ 01:46, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I spent some time on Bitard, could you have look and comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitard? Thanks, --Anneyh (talk) 10:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day, S8333631, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 00:49, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing S8333631 a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 03:03, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Tifinagh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phoenician (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Gautami Typeface, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Brendon is here 01:20, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Juan de Dios Bosque, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bolivian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:39, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Asymmetric board has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find any sources establishing notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. APerson (talk!) 19:43, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Feature all Vital Articles, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Feature all Vital Articles and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Feature all Vital Articles during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 22:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ouk-Khmer (Hill's version) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ouk-Khmer (Hill's version) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

LukeSurl ^t c 10:31, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]