User talk:Satin17

Hello and welcome to my talk page. If you want to post me a message please do so at the bottom of the new section for better formatting and sign your comments with four tildes. Attention-I prefer to keep discussions unfragement so if you post me a message I will most probably reply it at the same page in my talk page and you also do the same thing. Thank you. Satin17 (talk) 15:56, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Satin17, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MPS1992 (talk) 18:07, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvements since previous rejection.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wrestling revolution 3D (video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wrestling revolution 3D (video game), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:18, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping to develop wrestling revolution 3D, I know that its a good game and all, but we dont have much resources to add in order to develop this article... B. N .D | ✉ 16:51, 26 October 2018 (UTC) Hello B.N. Dehigaspage I know there are not enough sources but I am still trying my best to make it an article.Satin17 (talk) 12:45, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

you can join by following the instructions on my user page. B. N .D | ✉ 13:27, 27 October 2018 (UTC) @B.N.Dehigasgaspage When I add {{CVU TOPICON}} in my user page will it give any userboxes?Satin17 (talk) 13:34, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It will give you one of those little icons on the right corner of the page.  B. N .D  | ✉  13:38, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply] 

There... I did it for you... B. N .D | ✉ 13:42, 27 October 2018 (UTC) Thank you very much for doing that B.N.Dehigasgaspage.Satin17 (talk) 13:44, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for improving my article thanks a lot Ekramul 56 (talk) 17:06, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

maybe you should put all your user boxes into a userbox top... It will clear some top space for you. B. N .D | ✉ 13:18, 28 October 2018 (UTC) How can I do it?Satin17 (talk) 13:20, 28 October 2018 (UTC) You can do it by switching to visual edit, then opening the template user top box. Then click on add a template. Then you add your userboxes in it. If it doesn't work, i'll do it for you. And by the way, i don't think wikipedia would allow to add user's into the CVU without their permission as you did at User:Ekramul 56. B. N .D | ✉ 13:23, 28 October 2018 (UTC) I tried but it is not working.Please do it.And shall I remove the CVU template from User: Ekramul56.Satin17 (talk) 13:28, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

He thanked you for it as i think, so dont remove it. I think he will like it. 😉 B. N .D | ✉ 13:31, 28 October 2018 (UTC) Thanks for inserting a Userbox .By the way aren't you on a wikibreak till December.Satin17 (talk) 13:46, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ha ha! Yeah i'm supposed to be, but i cant go away from wikipedia for that long. So i come back from time to time to edit and stop vandalism. B. N .D | ✉ 13:53, 28 October 2018 (UTC) That is like a Wikipedian.Satin17 (talk) 13:56, 28 October 2018 (UTC) I trusted this user but he is a Sock Puppet.Satin17 (talk) 03:41, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

you can add references by clicking cite and adding an external web address that contains information about the article. Then there will be a reference list automatically. To know that you cited correctly, check for a number within brackets in the article. B. N .D | ✉ 13:27, 28 October 2018 (UTC) This user has been blocked as a Sock Puppet.Satin17 (talk) 03:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Satin17! You created a thread called How to improve an article? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

TonyBallioni (talk) 18:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Satin17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

How can you say that I am a sock of Knightrises10.Only because of same userboxes you can't block a user and are the IP same.From my edit history you can see I have only made constructive edits.I have never used multiple accounts.

Decline reason:

The connection between the account has been verified by an administrator with access to the IPs you used. Kuru (talk) 11:30, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

@Oshwah I need to talk to you please visit my talk page.Satin17 (talk) 11:46, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping Oshwah. Sam Sailor 12:08, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please Oshwah,if you came here please let me know.Satin17 (talk) 15:34, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Satin17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am telling you the truth.The truth is that Knightrises10 repeatedly gave warning to his socks and see in ThilsaTest's Sockpuppetry investigation case there also he commented.I was forced by Knightrises10 to create an account but after I started editing I fell in love with Wikipedia.I will never do it again.So please unblock my account.And Knightrises10 never wanted to contribute to Wikipedia and asked all his friends to create an account and vandalise Wikipedia so he can revert it and show everyone what a great editor he is.But I didn't obey his orders and only wanted to contribute to Wikipedia as you can see from my edit history.So please unblock just my account.Satin17 (talk) 16:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't see any particular reason to believe this. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There is about zero chance of this being a false positive. I welcome a review from any other CU, though. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:31, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Someone please review and check it carefully.Satin17 (talk) 16:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Satin17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #23123 was submitted on Nov 03, 2018 13:09:48. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 13:09, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Berean Hunter and BU Rob13: the two of you may be interested in this appeal in regards to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ThilsaTest/Archive based on what the UTRS. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • The two cases are indeed connected technically. Left comments in UTRS.
     — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:11, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Just letting you know here that I had reverted a few of your edits but now I have restored each of them after checking once again. Excelse (talk) 14:38, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]