User talk:Saviochristi

In response to your question, the novel is not included in the template because it's not notable. EF 09:59, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, very thanks!

Saviochristi (talk)

You have asked your question about comics and "Charge" on about a dozen talk pages, no one has given you a positive answer. Your edit to comics (which was placed in the wrong spot anyway) has been reverted, as were your other mainspace edits related to this concept. You can raise the discussion at Talk:Comics if you like, and see if you can get a consensus for your changes there, but please stop editing the article until you have such a consensus. Your edits are becoming disruptive. Fram (talk) 07:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saviochristi. You have new messages at TheMagikCow's talk page.
Message added 11:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

TheMagikCow (talk) 11:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Charge (humoristic drawing) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 15:55, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. In addition to points mentioned above, please take note of the following.

1. Do not continue to try to make the English language version of Wikipedia conform to your personal view of what the English language should be, which is very different from actual English. For example, the word "Preludie" does not exist in English (nor, as far as I can find out, in any language other than Spanish) and the various meanings of "charge" in English do not include anything remotely resembling the meaning you have claimed the word has. Likewise the distinction you have insisted on between "comic strip" and "cartoon" may or may not accurately reflect differences in the use of related terms in Spanish and Portuguese, as you have stated, but it does not accurately reflect how those terms are used in English. Nor does the expression "humoristic drawing" exist in English.
2. You have continued to attempt to impose your preferred version even after it has been clear to you that there is consensus against your view from other editors. Wikipedia works by collaboration, not by individual editors persisting in trying to force through their own preferences even when they know full well that nobody else agrees with them.
3. You have more than once posted the same message to numerous user talk pages, in at least one occasion posting doing so with a very long message. There are several reasons why doing so is not helpful, including the possibility that you may cause several editors to waste time checking and following up something which has already been dealt with by someone else. You may also find it helpful to read WP:FORUMSHOP.

• Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing by an administrator, so please take notice both of these points and of what other editors have communicated to you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:56, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, ArtStation, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 16:57, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saviochristi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ArtStation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:57, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]