User talk:Schmarrnintelligenz

Hello, Schmarrnintelligenz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GabeIglesia (talk) 22:34, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Its me. I edit anonymously. I only created this account to create this page. I locked myself out after creating it. I made this page while I was in Toronto, but have since taken a flight to Vancouver and from there have come to Surrey. --96.48.244.69 (talk) 22:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome :) I just wanted 234User237 has a chance to confirm. Thank you for your contributions! --SI 11:07, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alejandro Jano Fuentes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Sinai Hospital. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Schmarrnintelligenz,

Ich habe Ihre Änderungen auf Montessori school rückgängig gemacht: es besteht schon ein Artikel über Montessori education, und wenn man eine Liste von nennenswerte Montessori Schulen bilden will, sollte diese eigentlich List of Montessori schools heißen. Eine vollständige Liste befindet sich schon hier

Liebe Grüße, --Slashme (talk) 13:50, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Slashme, thanks for writing in German but I would prefer English so that passers-by can understand what's going on. Could you please write your argument on the talk page because I want to reply to that issues. Yes, I knew the Cat. --SI 20:47, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ninni Laaksonen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ninni Laaksonen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG ^talk 08:51, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donald Trump email controversy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump email controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ¡Bozzio! 09:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I seriously laughed out loud. You have me pegged all wrong. You could have figured this out if you weren't so jumpy. "Disagrees with SI" -> "Politically biased" is logically fallacious. Please, let's at least try to collaborate. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 18:51, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My answer here in context. Please consider that calling fellow contributors "jumpy" is a personal attack. :-) --SI 19:23, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't meant in a derogatory sense; I'm sorry if it came off that way. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 20:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Trump caterpillar. Since you had some involvement with the Trump caterpillar redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Widefox; talk 17:26, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Schmarrnintelligenz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Schmarrnintelligenz for your support about added information by myself on David Hamilton English-wiki page. I am a scientific observer, editor and tries to help on subjects of interest. By the way, you'll see that User:Yintan has cancelled/reverted some contributions to Hamilton's page about allegations of rapes. This was about support of French minister Laurence Rossignol and Flavie Flament (potential victim) statement after Hamilton's death. I think his point of view is not neutral and balanced on this aspect. If you can help... Best regards, --Gabuzomeuh (talk) 19:34, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome :-) Yes, it was a very weak argument to delete the whole thing "only for" wording and formatting issues. Usually a fellow contributor should AGF and help improve such a well-sourced section. I'll look into it again when I have more time later. --SI 20:22, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fylbecatulous has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your kitten must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{subst:Kittynap}}

• Thank you for noticing and brightening my day. All the best Fylbecatulous talk 14:12, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2013 Dallas shooting, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:2013 Dallas shooting and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:2013 Dallas shooting during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Another Believer _(Talk) 00:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Donald Trump's Hair. Since you had some involvement with the Donald Trump's Hair redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 21:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Stockholm attack, Schmarrnintelligenz!

Wikipedia editor NotTheFakeJTP just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for distinguishing these, this dab page was greatly needed.

To reply, leave a comment on NotTheFakeJTP's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:57, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lydia Maria Child, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:00, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beginning on November 28, 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) will be conducting a survey to en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

• https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

• Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Schmarrnintelligenz. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Schmarrnintelligenz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Jackson's Boys is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Jackson's Boys until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:23, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Jackson's Boys is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Jackson's Boys (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TruthGuardians (talk) 16:14, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just for the record, people aren't going around "policing" userpage categories due to a lack of anything productive to do -- people are doing the productive task of cleaning up the Special:WantedCategories list. That list picks up all redlinked (i.e. nonexistent) categories that have at least one page filed in them, regardless of namespace, so that they can be cleaned up or removed from articles -- but because it can only detect a specific set number of redlinked categories before it's full, and any redlinked categories above and beyond that number simply don't get detected at all, it simply cannot have redlinked user categories left on it as "just leave this there and don't do anything about it", because every time we do that we're pushing a redlinked mainspace category into "not getting detected and therefore not getting cleaned up" territory. So no, people aren't just messing with your categories to be dicks: we're actually doing a genuinely important Wikipedia maintenance task that cannot be ignored. It might seem insignificant to you because it's just userspace, but redlinked userspace categories do get detected by the same tool we use to clean up redlinked mainspace categories, and actively interfere with the redlinked mainspace categories, so it's a much more important issue than you seem to think it is. Bearcat (talk) 15:59, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've opened a fresh RfC over at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations#RfC:_Katie_Johnson. I think enough time has passed to merit another discussion. Ordinary Person (talk) 11:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]