User talk:Sf46

Strike-through text

Hi. I do not doubt the factual accuracy of the phrase you added, nor do I believe it was vandalism. Rather, as I noted in my edit summary, the source cited does not discuss the issue of race at all. It does not say that SCV consists of only whites, nor does it say that the SCV is open to all races. It just doesn't say. We have to back up claims in articles with reliable sources. If a reliable source, a newspaper article, for example, discusses the racial makeup of the SCV, it would be appropriate to add information from that source to the article. However, aside from citation to a reliable source, the phrase probably should not be in the article per Wikipedia policy. There might also be a question about the placement of the phrase, as well, given that it might be more appropriate to mention it at a different point in the article. Thanks. · jersyko talk 20:08, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're on the right track with this addition, but unfortunately are now bumping up against a different Wikipedia policy: no original research. For example, your addition uses two sources to draw an explicit assumption, thus it is original research. Again, I think you're on the right track. Try, though, to find an article about a black member of the SCV or an explicit statement from the SCV that it is open to all races, for example. I will not remove the material you added that qualifies as original research for now, but do try to replace/reword it in the manner I've suggested. Thanks! · jersyko talk 20:48, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, feel free to send messages through my talk page instead of e-mail unless you prefer e-mail. · jersyko talk 20:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Welcome to Wikipedia! · jersyko talk 22:00, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Please don't include the names of individual people unless you can verify their notability. See WP:BIO. Thanks, Deiz talk 07:18, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Apologies if I'm not making myself clear. Named individuals should have an existing Wikipedia article. You can see how the list of members on the article satifies this requirement. Membership of the organisation, and proof of their membership, does not verify notability. Forgive me for being blunt, but please do not add these individuals names until they have separate Wikipedia articles. Should you edit again without reference to WP:V and WP:BIO, you ability to edit may be restricted until such time as you demonstrate understanding of the relevant policies and guidelines. Thanks, Deiz talk 08:25, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Hey Sf46, it looks like you're trying to create redirect pages for zip codes in Louisiana to go to the appropriate city, but I don't think you're doing it right. I've fixed a few of them (I think). You might want to go and and look at those and see if that's what you were going for. If it wasn't and I screwed up whatever you were trying to do, I apologize. But I don't think that's the case. :) Cheers, faithless (^speak) 05:38, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's what I'm trying to do, maybe I don't know how to do the redirects right. User:sf46 00:41, 2 November 2007 (CST)

Put #REDIRECT [[Such and such, Louisiana]] in the zip code article. Hope that helps. :) faithless (^speak) 05:48, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I think I have it now, thanks. User:sf46 00:50, 2 November 2007 (CST)

No problem. faithless (^speak) 06:26, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:LDWFunit.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:19, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For the barnstar. Mangwanani (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of Rhodesia.png Hi, Sf46, and welcome to WikiProject Rhodesia! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles relevant to Rhodesia. Here are some points that may be helpful: Our main aim is to help improve Rhodesia-related articles, so if people ask for help with an article, please try your hardest to help them if you are able. Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it. The project has several ongoing and developing activities, such as the current collaboration, which you are welcome to participate. If you have another language besides English, please consider adding yourself to our translation section, to help us improve our foreign Rhodesia topics. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We hope you enjoy working on this project.

Mangwanani (talk) 20:07, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:NewOrleansRescue.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC) Tags fixed. Sf46 (talk) 00:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's a dirty job, but someone has to do it. Laws can't be broken. I delete them according to policies, and clearly state and link to the policies when I delete them, but most people don't understand US copyright fully. Once they understand, it's a non-issue. нмŵוτнτ 06:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to remember to sign your posts with 4 (~~~~), as I did here. It makes life much simpler on Wikipedia. Thanks! ~ Rock _talk/^sign 17:30, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's generally a bad practice to edit other people's userboxes at the source, since yours isn't the only page it will appear on. I reverted your changes, but feel free to copy the raw code anywhere onto your page if you prefer your color scheme. ~ S0CO^{(talk|contribs)} 06:25, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the WikiProject Firearms. I hope you enjoy being a member.--LWF (talk) 16:59, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the bit about rank insignia color. Note, however, that you marked your recent edit as a minor edit - please keep in mind the criteria for a minor edit "A check to a minor edit box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous version: typo corrections, formatting and presentational changes, rearranging of text without modifying content, et cetera." While your edit is certainly accurate, it also adds substantive material to the page, and thus shouldn't be marked minor. CruiserBob (talk) 04:03, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Airman! Are you ready for this? I have 16 ranks on you, American! Or as I like to say Sergeant, I have 10 ranks on you. I am Canadian, so we have fewer ranks than you, but if you can discern it, I am a Colonel to you, or a Colonel to me. Congratulations on getting as far as you did! Dreamafter ^⇔ 19:40, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I enjoyed flying with the members of the RCAF (both officer & enlisted aircrew) that were detached to the unit I was in. I enjoyed the time spent at BFC Baggotville as well.Sf46 (talk) 19:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm stuck doing paperwork while my best friend another Colonel goes out with his squadron... Damn, he was asked right before I got my application in! So now I have to wait for CFB Winnipeg gets the position open again... Again Damn! Dreamafter ^⇔ 20:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which living ethnic groups, aside from American Indians, are being used as symbols? Vikings, for example, are strictly a historical ethnic group of sorts. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 13:38, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there's Notre Dame Fighting Irish, the University of Louisiana Lafayette Ragin' Cajuns, University of Northern Colorado Fighting Whites intramural team and the Vancouver Canucks to name a few. There's a link to a parallel page that provides a more complete list: List of ethnic sports team and mascot names. Sf46 (talk) 13:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, nearly all of which named their teams after themselves in some sense, as opposed to naming their teams after somebody else who have no political clout to do anything about it. That's the distinction that the Indian mascot apologists keep conveniently ignoring. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 14:07, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well you know that the college Jim Thorpe went to had an almost exclusively American Indian enrollment. Their team was the Carlisle Indians.

Yes, the school itself was the Carlisle Indian School, so it was fitting that the team was the Carlisle Indians. Among current schools, the FSU Seminoles are among the few that actually got permission. Most of them usurped their symbols. I find it funny how some have tried to distance themselves. Like the Syracuse Chiefs using a train, apparently ignorant of the fact that "Super Chief" trains referred to Indians. FYI, I am not on the political train demanding removal of these names. I just think the hypocrisy needs to be pointed out and that this issue will fix itself over time. And also by the way, I can't think of a much worse actually-used nickname than the one formerly used by the Pekin, Illinois High School teams: the "Chinks". Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 14:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To put it another way, "groups" are not offended, individuals in the group may be. Maybe some of Irish descent don't like the "Fighting Irish" name. I've never heard of any being offended, but they have the right to be. That doesn't mean the school should accommodate them. It may be that not all Indians are offended by the use of Indian nicknames. It may even be that some actually like it. But for white folks like Limbaugh to tell them they should not be offended... is offensive. No one has the right to tell someone else how they "should" feel about something. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 14:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 13:29, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For your excellent contributions on Confederate military articles! Octane [improve me] 15.01.08 0333 (UTC)

Thanks for the recognition. Sf46 (talk) 03:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a closer look into it a little bit later. At the moment I am under the influence of pain killers and thus not in a position to make sound judgements. TomStar81 (Talk) 04:42, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the image of the 1st Louisiana Native Guard. I added it to Fort Massachusetts (Mississippi). ALLSTARecho 04:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, that photograph is a known photoshop fake of an unidentified Union regiment. http://people.virginia.edu/~jh3v/retouchinghistory/essay.html Red Harvest (talk) 06:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You would use this code as the very first thing on your page code:

<span style="background:#FFFFFF;position:absolute;top:-35px; left:-250px;z-index:-3">[[Image:Gay flag.svg|250px]]</span>

Change the Image:Gay flag.svg|250px to your an image of your choosing from Wikipedia or Wiki Commons and change the size 250px to whatever size suits you but don't remove the | seperator between the image and the size. If you can't figure it out, let me know which flag or image you want to use and I'll edit your pages for you. Good luck! ALLSTARecho 21:12, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see you got it. Good job. ;] ALLSTARecho 02:38, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah thanks for the help. Sf46 (talk) 23:50, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not rate articles such as Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana‎ as Good Articles on your own. They have to have been through the Good Article nomination and review process and have been passed by an independent reviewer. Please ask if you have any questions and thanks for all your work here, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 13:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I notice you've uploaded a PD version of the deleted image Image:Pluto1.JPG. So it turns out there was a PD version of the original, which I have re-uploaded to Image:Pluto2.JPG. I feel this should be exchanged with your own upload, as this image is transcluded on many many pages. It's just my personal opinion, however, so I'll not do it right away in case you object. Someguy1221 (talk) 08:49, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't care which image is used, as long as there is one on the Pluto userbox. Sf46 (talk) 08:51, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		Thanks for participating in my RfA!
		Although it failed 43/27/0, I'm happy because the outcome has been very helpful in many meaningful ways. Your support and remarks contributed so much to this. If you followed my RfA you know what happened. Most of the editors who posted opposing opinions have never edited with me. Some articles I edit deal with controversial topics and with respect to a very few of these, editors who didn't know much about me had some worries about confrontational editing and civility. Since I support their high standards I can easily (and will gladly) address this. The support and ecouragement to run again soon has been wonderful, thanks again. Cheers! Gwen Gale (talk) 05:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rhodesia Flag 1965 - 1979.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:07, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Left over redirect tag blocked license tag. Sf46 (talk) 19:25, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Unfortunately, one of missions here is to foster the growth of free content, and as such non-free images of living persons generally aren't allowed (see WP:NFC, section "unacceptable use"). If you have a line to the governor or have a personal picture, could you please try to get it released under a free license such as the GFDL or CC-BY-SA? Don't hesitate to contact me if you need help. Thanks! east.718 at 04:29, January 26, 2008

Thank you for uploading Image:GovOSimpson.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:GovFuqua.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:34, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you were trying for neutral wording, but some of what you were doing is not the way to go about it. First off, the guy's only claim to notability is a couple of songs he recorded decades ago, which were quite objectively racist (they exalt one race and denigrate others). All of the sources say this or something very close to this. Your changes to the diambig page introduced syntax errors and made it unclear why exactly the guy was notable - what exactly are "racially charged issues"? It's much clearer to note the racist character of his songs. And when I called your changes to the singer's page weasel words, that means a very specific thing - a word used to avoid making a straitforward statement - who are the "many" who deem his music racist? Such words only give the semblance of neutrality. This isn't a statement of opinion, but of fact - he is a racist by the definition of the term, and I imagine he'd want to be known as that. If you want to discuss this further, I suggest you bring it up on the talk page so others may weigh in.--Cúchullain ^t/c 05:03, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I already explained why the adjective is appropriate, and why your changes were not. And the CSB box states that I'm a member of a WikiProject about Countering Systemic Bias, that's a very specific thing.--Cúchullain ^t/c 05:03, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:KateHnidaFootballPhoto.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 00:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC) --B (talk) 00:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:MaryLParkerPhoto.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Yamla (talk) 16:10, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:MaryLParkerPhoto.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 02:56, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox LA Highway

Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles

Color Hex Codes

Userboxes

Thanks for uploading Image:MaryLParkerPhoto.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for putting some references in and cleaning that one up a bit. I've seen the same basic information you referenced in my own searches, but I've been unable to find the actual Confederate Congress act or any detail on those whe were on the AIG's Honor Roll. Have you come across either of these or at least what the primary reference is for each? The actual original wartime list would be great for distinguishing them from later UDC awards. I've seen people posting about award winners (often listed as "Confederate Medal of Honor") but I strongly suspect all those posts are really about UDC awards. Red Harvest (talk) 06:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen a link somewhere to the actual list as awarded by the Confederate Congress, but can not for the life of me remember where. I'm pretty sure it was attached to some individual SCV camp website. Sf46 (talk) 15:18, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:ArleneHowellMissUSA.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 21:55, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was recently reading a discussion you had with the user Asams10 on the magazine page. I think he is an editing Nazi and should be banned from doing so on Wikipedia. He is rude and unreasonable. I would like to thank-you for not putting up with his repeated and unnecessary assaults. It inspired me to do the same. I have enjoyed reading your contributions and wish you the best. --Wallaceburghistory (talk) 22:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I have moved your edits to Wikipedia:WikiProject Law Enforcement/Templates and awards as it is a more appropriate location for such templates. Regards, SGGH ^speak! 00:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 2nd Maryland Cavalry, CSA, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.2ndmdinfantryus.org/cscav2.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I see that you added the above article aback to the CSA regiments category, since, as you wrote, "Needs to distinguish since La had both Union & Confed". However there is a category for Louisiana Union units. The category Ogden's Cavalry is in now is for Confederate units. This is why I removed it from the CSA regiments category. Wild Wolf (talk) 22:36, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Sf46. Thank you for your response. That's what I understood, too, which is why I am of the opinion that the animated GIF is inaccurate and should be fixed. In its current incarnation, the map makes four statements which contradict other Wikipedia pages, and as far as I can tell, are untrue. Those statements:

— October 31, 1861, Missouri secedes

— November 20, 1861, Kentucky secedes

— November 28, 1861, Missouri joins Confederacy but never under CSA control

— December 10, 1861, Kentucky joins Confederacy, but never under CSA control

This information is so far from the truth that anyone who read it (and didn't know better) would come away with a completely incorrect understanding of what actually happened in those states. While it is true (as you said) that rump governments did secede, they didn't represent or control their states, and had no authority to secede or join the Confederacy. On that basis, I think the map should be corrected.

What do you think?

-asx- (talk) 18:36, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From what I've read, the Confederacy may have controlled a few counties in each of these states, and each state did have Confederate Army units. Perhaps for a simple fix for now, a note of "(rump government)" could be added next to each state's secession in each of the articles you talk about. Sf46 (talk) 18:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:StormTrooper-StarWars.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:StormTrooperPoster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:E4ranksa.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:38, 9 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 16:38, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed that storm trooper image from the article because the use of the free image invalidated the non-free's fair use rationale by criteria #1 and #8 from Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. Seraphim♥ ^Whipp 02:28, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Even though the free image you posted does not depict the subject matter as well as the other two, I think you were right to replace the first image with a free image. The second photo is in the history section and depicts the subject with the Star Wars logo thereby demonstrating its significance in the movie as well as the history of the subject. I think it ought to stay unless a free replacement could be found for it. Sf46 (talk) 02:35, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it demonstrates any more significance just because it has the logo in. These costumes are rather well known so they don't really need the logo to help the reader recognise what the costume is. The context is also provided on the page. Another point is that the nuances of the costume depicted aren't discussed in that prose. The free replacement represents the same content of the non-free. Seraphim♥ ^Whipp 02:52, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My post to you was civil and informative. I cannot understand what would have "rubbed you up the wrong way". Seraphim♥ ^Whipp 02:57, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've uploaded a new photograph that I wasn't actually going to use. It has the Star Wars logo in the picture so I hope this satisfies your concerns :). And if you want to oppose me that's fine. I'm actually more upset that my manner was in some way offensive. If you take a look through my contributions and talk page, you'll see that I do my best to be friendly and helpful. Seraphim♥ ^Whipp 03:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:StormTrooperPoster.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Seraphim♥ ^Whipp 14:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the correct link is Wikipedia:User categories for discussion#Category:User enc and all subcategories. VegaDark (talk) 01:22, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Curious about search and seizure powers of AL game wardens

TMS2andGRACE (talk) 02:07, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply] 

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Central_Rebel_Mascot.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:42, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:ArleneHowellMissUSA.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 12:34, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the image to Image:LAplateSonsOfConfederate.jpg, but it's a fully copyrighted image, so you'll have to put a non-templated WP:FUR on it. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 15:15, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Sf46 (talk) 16:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• See: User:Sf46/Userboxes/Cajun English, and the individual templates.

Due to current convention, language templates and such follow the ISO language codes when possible. "enc" is already assigned to a language. Might I suggest that these be renamed to "en-caj" or "en-cajun", or something similar. I felt dropping a note with you would be better than just making the changes arbitrarily. - jc37 18:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's fine, whatever you think is best. Sf46 (talk) 22:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Renames (to en-cajun) performed, and adjusted the links above to match. - jc37 20:43, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:KateHnidaFootballPhoto.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 12:40, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:BallonPilot.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 19:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I see you have included a {{PD-self}} tag with this image. Unfortunately, this is not acceptable, at least not unless Zimbabwe stamps from 1992 are legally in the public domain. As an analogy: if I go into a video shop and take a photo of a DVD cover, that does not allow me to upload said DVD cover to Wikipedia as PD-self. The copyright in the image remains with its original owner. Same here. Since Sally Mugabe is no longer alive, I think there may be a case for a fair-use justification, but you need to provide that in full. As it stands, the picture is not likely to be acceptable. 86.132.139.152 (talk) 19:45, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:Jimmy Davis.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jimmy Davis.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]