User talk:Sideriver84

Hi Sideriver84! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Whisperjanes (talk) 09:09, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and also, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you ever have any questions or need any help (and I'll try to help if I can :) Again, welcome! - Whisperjanes (talk) 09:13, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Sideriver84 (talk) 09:13, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sideriver84, please don't simply dump links to orphaned articles in the "See also" section on some relevant article. Try to work it in somewhere in prose, where context can be added. Also consider if the subject is important enough related to the article you are adding the link to. Thanks! intforce (talk) 09:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, regarding this edit - I would strongly suggest reading Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion (I know, it's a long, boring read). I've removed the page from that category for now, as I'm not sure what the rationale is for deleting it. SQL^{Query me!} 18:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Michael S. Hopkins, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 19:12, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@BilCat: Hi, this is not an English variety change, but a correction of religious language. In Catholicism, priests are ordained men who administer Catholic sacraments (ie. Hopkins' communication). A "pastor" in Catholicism is an admin role, typically held by a priest of the parish. Unless there is a reliable source specifically stating that Catholics in America refer to their priest as their pastor, the correct term for the person who gave Hopkins communion for his space flight should be "priest". Sideriver84 (talk) 19:43, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While I'm not Catholic, I actually did research this before reverting you. The actual source used in the article, which is from a Catholic news service, uses the term "pastor", not priest. Catholics in the United States do refer to their parish priest, not just any priest, as "pastor". See Pastor#Catholicism, and the cited quote there. So yes, this is an Engvar issue. BilCat (talk) 20:54, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@BilCat: I appreciate your research. I respectfully still disagree that the term "his pastor" should be used. There is no citation for the statement "In the United States, the term pastor is used by Catholics for what in other English-speaking countries is called a parish priest." The cited quote states that parish priests exercise pastoral care; it does not state that American Catholics refer to their priests as pastors. I did look at the source cited in Hopkins' article and the associated parish's website; the priest (named as Father James Kuczynski, not Pastor James Kuczynski) is the pastor (ie. administrator role) of Hopkins' church. Is the phrasing "On his first mission to the ISS, Father James H. Kuczynski, pastor of Mary Queen Catholic Church (Hopkins’ parish), arranged for him to bring the Eucharist, so that he could have Communion once a week." acceptable to you? Sideriver84 (talk) 21:06, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We don't generally need to mention the identity of non-notable people in articles that aren't specifically about them. I'd still prefer to stick with the term in the cited Catholic news source, which is "pastor". Feel free to raise the issue on the article's talk page, or elsewhere at a relevant project page. BilCat (talk) 21:23, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will do that Sideriver84 (talk) 21:24, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if this is enough for you, but see "Pastor" at Catholic Terms. It explains why "Pastor" is not used as a title before a name, as on the parish's website. But American Catholics do talk refer to "my pastor", meaning their priest. I was surprised the first time I heard this used, and asked if they meant their priest, which they did. This is probably due to the strong Protestant influence in the US. BilCat (talk) 21:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@BilCat: Thanks for looking into this - appreciate the research. Sideriver84 (talk) 21:51, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, E02162 here! I was wondering where you found that Gordon Sanderson was identified in January '21 when every source I've checked states that he was identified on June 30 '21.

Hey there, this CBC article dated "Jun 30, 2021 2:27 PM MT | Last Updated: 1 hour ago" states "Police said they identified Sanderson in January 2021 and that the case became an active homicide investigation after that." My understanding is that although he was identified in January, the police only released the information that he was identified in June 2021. The news I've seen is that on 29 June, the police stated that the remains had been identified, and on 30 June, his name was released. Sideriver84 (talk) 01:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. Updating Wikipedia to reflect his identification has been a mess and I just wanted to make sure that was accurate since it didn't say that date in the cited source. E02162 (talk) 1:24, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

No problem - I'd do the same thing if the situation was reversed. Sideriver84 (talk) 01:36, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of controversial deaths in the military is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of controversial deaths in the military until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 04:28, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

Request for inputs: A Peer review request has been made for the article Women's shelter to brainstorm and understand information gaps and uncovered areas and to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved, please do share your inputs at the review page.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 10:48, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sideriver84! Thank you for your contributions. It looks like you've copied or moved text from Russell Williams (criminal) into another page, and while you are welcome to re-use the content, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 03:22, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DanCherek: Thanks! Have edited and made a note.

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Alexei Navalny, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. --Renat 01:03, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RenatUK: Thanks! Noted.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Bassel Khaiat instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bassel Khaiat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bassel Khaiat, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:11, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sideriver84! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:11, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you describe how you edited the Zac Stacy page? Are you using any special editing tools? What browser are you using?

The reason I ask is that in addition to the content that you added, your edit changed some existing refs to repeat the definitions, causing ref errors. It's the second time today that I've seen that happen, and I don't believe either of you did that deliberately, so I'm wondering if there is a problem with the Visual Editor. Schazjmd (talk) 22:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, it definitely seems to be a Visual Editor problem. It's being discussed on WP:Village_pump_(technical)#VisualEditor_duplicating_named_citations. Schazjmd (talk) 22:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed your edit on this article; I'm surprised such an iconic work of literature is so poorly represented on Wikipedia. The terms I would use to describe the quality of the article are too many but, suffice with "horse droppings" Mark^Dask 20:53, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Grupo Extra, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sideriver84. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chalice International, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:44, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sideriver84. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bassel Khaiat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Finance & Investment April 2022 Newsletter Hi! Welcome to the April newsletter of WikiProject Finance & Investment. This is our first regular newsletter and has plenty of exciting announcements. You have received this because you added yourself as a participant to the project, but will only receive future newsletters if you sign up for the mailing list; see below for instructions on how to do so. April Drive: The month-long April Content-creation Drive is now underway. The drive's target is to improve Wikipedia's coverage of financial markets. Awards will be given to everyone who improves or creates at least one article in the topic area. Sign up here! New layout: The layout of the WikiProject has been greatly improved, with a navigation bar being added to the top of every page and separate pages for assessment and edit requests, templates, resources, and news. Come take a look! Signing up for the newsletter: To sign up for future newsletters about upcoming drives, recent promotions, and other miscellaneous topics, add yourself to the list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Finance & Investment/Mailing list. You will then receive them in your talk page regularly. Thank you for participating in the WikiProject. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 22:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply] To unsubscribe to this newsletter please go to the mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sideriver84. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chalice International".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:01, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sideriver84. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bassel Khaiat".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Finance & Investment May 2022 Newsletter Hi! Welcome to the May newsletter of WikiProject Finance & Investment. This is our second regular newsletter. You have received this because you have been added to the mailing list; see below for instructions on how to unsubscribe. April Drive finished: The month-long April Content-creation Drive has now concluded. Our first content drive was a great start for what will be a regular feature of our Wikiproject. We will be doing them every other month, so there's none for May, but I look forward to seeing you sign up for the June edition. The drive's target was to improve Wikipedia's coverage of financial markets. Awards were given to those who participated. June Drive topic for discussion: We're currently brainstorming topics for our June Content-creation Drive. Join the discussion here. Content work: Two articles in our purview have received DYK nominations. Real Estate Bank of Arkansas was created and nominated by Hog Farm and Ranchlander National Bank was created and nominated by Sammi Brie. They're currently running in the WikiCup, so good luck to them! UBS has been nominated for a Good article reassessment. If you wish to help, leave comments in the nomination. Thank you for participating in the WikiProject. — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 10:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply] To unsubscribe to this newsletter please go to the mailing list page.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:06, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure I agree about Led Zeppelin IS vs. Led Zeppelin ARE.

The Rolling Stones (plural) is a band. Mick Jagger is a Rolling Stone (singular). Ergo, Led Zeppelin is a band. So what is Jimmy Page? Because of this conundrum, I'd say that both "is", "were" and "are" are all acceptable. 24.228.103.144 (talk) 01:41, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NCDEATH, articles about deaths that are definitely homicides but where there has been no conviction or guilty plea to a specific murder charge are always titled "Killing of ..." Should the defendant here be convicted of or plead guilty to the murder charge he's facing, then the article can be renamed to "Murder of ..."

Somehow we managed to create duplicate articles while editing, and we will need a history merge, which is unfortunately sort of beyond my capabilities. Daniel Case (talk) 20:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. They seem to have figured out how to make it easy and I did it. Daniel Case (talk) 20:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sideriver84. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Grupo Extra, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Finance & Investment June 2022 Newsletter Hi! Welcome to the June newsletter of WikiProject Finance & Investment. This is our third regular newsletter. You have received this because you have been added to the mailing list; see below for instructions on how to unsubscribe. June Drive: The month-long June Content-creation Drive is now underway. The drive's target is to improve Wikipedia's coverage of stock exchanges. Awards will be given to everyone who improves or creates at least one article in the topic area. Sign up here! Content work: Two articles in our purview have received DYK nominations. Google Wallet was created and nominated by InfiniteNexus and George D. Gould was created and nominated by Ktin. Ktin is currently running in the WikiCup, so good luck to him! UBS's Good Article Reassessment is still ongoing. If you wish to help, leave comments in the nomination. Cheque was selected as an Article for improvement on May 16 for one week. You can see the improvement during that period here. Thank you for participating in the WikiProject. — — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 07:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply] To unsubscribe to this newsletter please go to the mailing list page.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sideriver84. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Grupo Extra".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:07, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NSONG, lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Auf Kreta im Sturm und im Regen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tibet Famine (1960-1962). Thanks! Netherzone (talk) 20:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please make sure that the citations actually lead to sources that can back up the claims, several of the cited links are either home page of institutions or just dead links. Use Web Archive to check for any available archived version of dead links.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tibet Famine (1960–1962) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 19:57, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sideriver84. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Auf Kreta im Sturm und im Regen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sideriver84. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tibet Famine (1960–1962), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:18, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowman304 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Future projections are useless. You might as well say "a bajillion."

Who's leading the coalition? I mean that in terms of groups within it, as well as people within (or perhaps separate from) those groups.

Please also clean up the author lists in the citations. If Mary Smith and John Brown write an article, it would be best to do something like {{cite news ... |last1=Smith |first1=Mary |last2=Brown |first2=John ...}}

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reject AIPAC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowman304|talk 05:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Light of My Lion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 03:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]