User talk:Skuld

Welcome!

Hello, Skuld, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! , SqueakBox 01:47, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

Hello Skuld, I saw you left a message at Talk:Tony Blair saying you don't know how to revert. Admins can quickly revert by just clicking rollback, however you aren't an admin. The way you do it is you look at the history and click on the date/time (not the user) of a version without vandalism and then click "edit this page" then click save. In the summary write "rv". If you need any more help leave a message at my talk page. Redwolf24 (Talk) 23:40, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that clears that up =D Skuld^{‡ insult} 16:27, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As above. -- Illwish (talk) 13:18, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Haemo 22:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jerkishness deserves a mirror. Skuld^{‡ insult} 21:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Mat Sinner. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:12, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mat Sinner has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mhiji (talk) 00:56, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re your deletion of the British Gazette blog. It is related as it shares the title and I own the domain name http://www.british-gazette.co.uk. That means I have taken over the use of that "brand" for want of a better word. I will keep on undoing your deletions. This of course will get repetitive. I suggest you going onto the British Gazette website at http://www.british-gazette.co.uk/contact-us/ and let us discuss this sensibly.

Peter H. Rogers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Britishpatrioticindividual (talk • contribs) 11:33, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The statement that the British Gazette website is unrelated to the British Gazette newspaper is wrong. The relationship was created on the 20th October 2009 when I registered the domain name. The nature of the relationship is one of commonality of name. The British Gazette blog possesses the same name as the British Gazette newspaper. What the inclusion of the text about the British Gazette blog in the Wikipedia article does is to simply describe – in a neutral non promotional manner – the existence of the British Gazette blog. The text is merely informative and not promotional. Issues such as should an individual such as me be allowed to register such a domain is an altogether different matter. Like it or not, the British Gazette exists as a blog. The only reason why the blog can exist now is because the British Gazette newspaper has ceased to exist. Were, let us say someone minded to set up a blog by registering the domain http://www.thetimes.uk.com, they would very quickly find themselves in trouble with the Times newspaper. The facts are simply these: the British Gazette exists today and exists as a blog. The British Gazette existed in 1926 as a government run newspaper. The two entities possess the same name. That is the sole extent of the relationship. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Britishpatrioticindividual (talk • contribs) 18:34, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Axenstarafter.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Axenstarafter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Cyprus Confidential. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:07, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Skuld. Thank you for your work on Cyprus Confidential. Philipnelson99, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This article could use some work but it's a good enough state to pass the new page review process. If someone could pull in more secondary coverage of the investigation that would help this article tremendously!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Philipnelson99}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]