User talk:Spacemartin

Welcome to Wikipedia, Spacemartin! Thank you for your contributions. I am Zhaofeng Li and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Zhaofeng Li [talk ♦ contribs] 05:01, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You listed 1999 as a prime number.. yes it is, and so are 134 other numbers between 1000 and 2000. We typically don't list prime numbers above 1000 unless they have other properties related to being prime. I didn't revert your changes because I'm mostly an inclusionist, but someone might revert it. Dhrm77 (talk) 20:17, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay. It just seemed incongruous to have 1997 but not 1999. I noticed because it featured on University Challenge this evening. -Spacemartin (talk) 21:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyle Kulinski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Kulinski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Buffaboy ^talk 02:36, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spacemartin. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Kyle Kulinski, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 07:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spacemartin,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Kyle Kulinski should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Kulinski .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 07:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sunderland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Kyle Kulinski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Kulinski (4th nomination) Note to reviewing admin, this also failed a deletion review just two days ago Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 February 26 I know normally we'd allow article to just incubate. But this was resubmitted after a rejection and it looks like they're getting people once again to sign up and run interference on wikipedia processes. Deja vu all over again..]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sulfurboy (talk) 07:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kyle Kulinski, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kyle Kulinski and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Kyle Kulinski during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:41, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kyle Kulinski, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kyle Kulinski (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Kyle Kulinski during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JavaHurricane 15:28, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]