User talk:Spookyaki

Hey! Assuming you got what you needed, but if you still need that JSTOR PDF I can send it over. Bsoyka (t • c • g) 19:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I still do, actually. Really appreciate it, thanks! Spookyaki (talk) 19:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your time in reviewing the Sarah Geronimo article. I have seen from the results that it fails some of the GA criteria. Do you have any idea how to resolve the issues? I would like to open up another peer review after the issues have been raised. Thank you. ScarletViolet tc 01:14, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rita Cetina Gutiérrez you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 10:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rita Cetina Gutiérrez you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rita Cetina Gutiérrez and Talk:Rita Cetina Gutiérrez/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 20:41, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rita Cetina Gutiérrez you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rita Cetina Gutiérrez for comments about the article, and Talk:Rita Cetina Gutiérrez/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 22:22, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Spookyaki! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Self-plagiarism?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:51, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy, Spookyaki. I messed up the template so the bot did not notify you that I started reviewing your GA nomination of Deolinda Rodrigues. I just completed a full review and I've put your nomination on hold. Please review my comments at Talk:Deolinda Rodrigues/GA1. There are only a few minor issues; the article is looking good. Yue🌙 01:01, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Spookyaki: I added a few more minor suggestions to the review. After you add those bits, the article should be good to go. Yue🌙 22:23, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Deolinda Rodrigues you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Deolinda Rodrigues and Talk:Deolinda Rodrigues/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Yue -- Yue (talk) 06:23, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Deolinda Rodrigues you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Deolinda Rodrigues for comments about the article, and Talk:Deolinda Rodrigues/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Yue -- Yue (talk) 02:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Hope you're okay from your vacation. I have opened a peer review (click here) and feel free to give comments on the article. Thank you. ScarletViolet tc 13:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]