User talk:Szqecs

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taiwan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm General Ization. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Formosa Fun Coast explosion, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 04:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I had the File:NT500.png specifically uploaded with the holographic strips; I have reverted your uploads on commons as well as updated the images in the table at New Taiwan Dollar page. - Penwhale | ^{dance in the air and follow his steps} 07:59, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Penwhale You might want to make the same change for the NT$1000. Szqecs (talk) 11:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have the version w/o the holographic strip. Feel free to do so, though. If not, I'll get to it later today. - Penwhale | ^{dance in the air and follow his steps} 17:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NewTaiwanDollar100-2000.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:00, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the 921 event is one of our articles that doesn't fit the standard year + location naming convention, but we can probably just leave it as it is for simplicity. That's one thing I'm always aiming for around here. ;) Dawnseeker2000 17:26, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kaohsiung Rapid Transit logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of countries by national capital, largest and second-largest cities page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of countries by national capital, largest and second-largest cities  with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:17, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Ys: Memories of Celceta page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Taiwan does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! bojo1498 talk 17:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You made a cut and paste move from Interchange Association, Japan to Japan–Taiwan Exchange Association which is not allowed per WP:MOVE. I requested move to WP:RMT. Please do not move the page again until the page is moved by an administrator.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 09:18, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of metro systems by fares is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of metro systems by fares until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KAP03^{Talk • Contributions} 16:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taixi, Yunlin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taitung. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/China, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/China and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/China during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your moves of History of Taiwan and Taiwan after World War II, because I believe the extra precision is superfluous. I was surprised to see that shortly after you had opened a discussion on naming policy in this topic area, that you were undercutting any discussion by making unilateral moves. Kanguole 22:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kanguole: I moved the pages on the grounds of WP:D. I don't know if you've noticed but that discussion is being deleted and I don't see you backing it up. The discussion I opened is going nowhere. It's all "I think this should be like this", with no clear rationale. No one is following the procedure similar to a successful attempt, or even talking about that. If you have beliefs about the issue but are not willing to discuss them what's the point? Szqecs (talk) 02:23, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to lose your centralized discussion, if that dispute continues, we can take this case here to the Arbitration committee. Supreme Dragon (talk) 15:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article History of Taiwan (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

per WP:2DABS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 06:31, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For attempting to create order in the chaotic Chinese naming conventions of ROC vs Taiwan Vs PRac vs China. Sunshine Alexi (talk) 13:54, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Taichung#No mention_of_population_in_lead".The discussion is about the topic Taichung. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --Multivariable (talk) 08:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, a reminder to respond to the second statement by editors to clarify your position when you get the chance. Thanks! Multivariable (talk) 04:51, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Flag of the Republic of China—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Wrestlingring (talk) 19:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some editors have been raising the issue of Taiwan's political status again in recent edits to visa-related articles, particularly Visa policy of China. I have opened a discussion on the NPOV noticeboard here to see what we can do when issues concerning Taiwan arise in non-political articles. Looking forward to your input. C-GAUN (talk) 13:12, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Taipei Metro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dingpu Station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please check this edit at Taiwan High Speed Rail#Ticket fare and discount. It is currently showing "Lua error in Module:New_Taiwan_dollar at line 37: attempt to perform arithmetic on local 'a' (a string value)." Johnuniq (talk) 04:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks. Szqecs (talk) 04:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:MRT station and Template:Mrtl requesting that they be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because they are unused duplicates of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if they are still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the templates will be deleted.

If the templates are not actually the same as the other templates noted, please consider putting a note on the templates' pages explaining how they are different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think the pages should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Useddenim (talk) 13:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I've updated Template:Kaohsiung MRT Red line map to use {{mrt}}. Please feel free to revert if you think this is a backward step. In particular, does Zuoying have the right article link and label? I didn't deliberately change it, but I know Zuoying HSR/Xinzuoying is easily confused with Zuoying TRA. Thanks, Certes (talk) 12:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have just restored the content you removed in the Taiwan article given that your rationale that those are controversial edits simply cannot be justified. Feel free to let me you know your opinion. --Aisakano (talk) 13:57, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not use AWB to make mass edits that are not supported by consensus, for example your violation of WP:ENGVAR in Taiwan-related articles. There is zero reason to use British spelling in Taiwan-related articles, and slightly more reason to use American spelling. If you want to propose a general change of the variant of English used, please propose it at a relevant WikiProject talk page. Do not use AWB again for edits like this, or your AWB access may be revoked. I have reverted some of your recent edits. —Kusma (t·c) 09:40, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Why do you have two accounts ?

(I'm absolutely not accusing you of any wrong-doing - just curious, thanks.) --BushelCandle (talk) 22:56, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am linking administrator @Kusma: on this because I'm getting tired of reverting your disruptive editing. I'm not sure how many times you've been warned about mass changes using AWB and Taiwan related articles. You are systematically changing all date formats to something not used by Taiwan. I have told you not to do this whether through AWB or not, and so have administrators. Please revert ALL the changes you have made. Examples are here, here, here, and here. It looks like 25 done just today! It was also discussed at the Taiwan talk page so you know darned well it is controversial and non-consensus. I beginning to think you can't be trusted with AWB and perhaps Taiwan related articles. Prove me wrong and revert yourself. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

With date formats, you are the only one against DMY. Phlar doesn't care, nor does anyone else. In that discussion I stated the policies that I base my edits on, and you did not comment further. I don't see how this is controversial. Szqecs (talk) 07:14, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, your edit on NTD made the article have inconsistent formats, going against MOS:DATEUNIFY. Szqecs (talk) 07:17, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Baloney, you KNOW it's controversial and did it anyway. Plus... why are that date inconsistent??? Because once again you personally changed them all with this other edit. You have been asked multiple times not to change the dates, yet you do it anyway. Stop changing all Taiwan date formats. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Guess what, the version before that edit was inconsistent. Szqecs (talk) 11:35, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not use AWB to change date formats without pointing to a consensus. "Cleanup using AWB" is a fairly deceptive edit summary for this practice. I will remove your AWB access if you continue this way. —Kusma (t·c) 14:47, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Fyunck(click): Are you ok with yyyy-mm-dd in lists, tables and infoboxes? That is what East Asia uses. Szqecs (talk) 07:32, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would run it by the Taiwan talk page where it was initially brought up, and the administrator who admonished you. They also use mm-dd-yyyy but my understanding is that your suggestion of yyyy-mm-dd is much more prevalent in Taiwan. I'm not sure if we are supposed to mass change things like that so you might need consensus at talk:Taiwan, but I'm ok with it if everyone else is. Thanks for asking and happy editing. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:54, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits at Module:Adjacent stations have put many articles in the script error category. Also, are you sure it is a good idea to redefine standard Lua type by using Type? Johnuniq (talk) 10:22, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is this script error category and why is this considered error when the module works just fine? Szqecs (talk) 10:30, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The link above shows articles that are in Category:Pages with script errors. That is caused by a module responding with an error. I purged the category and it seems many of the errors were fixed. That sometimes occurs when a couple of edits are made to a module—the first edit might have resulted in an error that was fixed shortly after. However, the system can respond slowly and the error message might stay until a null edit occurs at the article. An example of a problem is at Hankou railway station which currently shows Lua error in Module:Adjacent_stations at line 542: attempt to concatenate local 'color' (a nil value). That might be due to an error in the article wikitext, or a problem in the module. There might not be any other articles with a problem—the system is slow at the moment and it is not responding as it normally does to the purge I did. Hmm, on previewing, that error I mentioned is gone and I see Jc86035 is editing the module. Perhaps that removed some of the errors? Johnuniq (talk) 11:50, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have undone your addition to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/China and Chinese-related articles as there is no consensus for such a change. I see you linked it to this section, but that does not establish consensus; other than yourself there were no participants, so the section just contains your views. If you want to change policies then a clear consensus among editors is needed. A RfC is a good way but it needs to be much better advertised, so multiple editors participate. The guideline is about not just China the country but the use of Chinese in articles, so it clearly covers Taiwan in many aspects. As with all guidelines editors should use common sense when applying it, but that is not particular to Taiwan or any other topic area.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 11:51, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PGCHANGE: It is not strictly necessary to discuss changes or to obtain written documentation of a consensus in advance. If you personally object, bring it up where you think is better advertised and we can talk about it. Szqecs (talk) 12:52, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I have brought it up here before. Also no comment, so it is uncontroversial. Szqecs (talk) 13:06, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In normal English, if there are two words in front of a number in a highway name, and one is capitalized as part of the proper name, then both should be capitalized because the first word is modifying the second, and the two of them are jointly modifying the number. "State Route 1" is correctly capitalized, but "State route 1" is not. So if these roadways are really named as such, "National Freeway 1" is the correct capitalization, but "National freeway 1" is not.

As for "Route nationale 1", that is a French name, and it follows French capitalization and word order. If it were translated to English, it would be "National Route 1", and not "national Route 1" nor "National route 1". Imzadi 1979 → 18:56, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• if there are two words in front of a number in a highway name, and one is capitalized as part of the proper name, then both should be capitalized because the first word is modifying the second, and the two of them are jointly modifying the number. Do you have a linguistic reference for that? Because I've never heard of that before. I am simply following MOS:CAPS, which says Wikipedia prefers lowercase unless sources identify the name to be proper, not based on grammar rules. Two more examples: National road 1 (Poland), National road 1A (Vietnam). Szqecs (talk) 19:05, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Also, who says these titles are proper names? See Proper noun#Proper names. Things can be referred to in either a proper or non-proper manner. Szqecs (talk) 19:20, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, the Freeway Bureau uses "National Freeway" on its website. -happy5214 06:53, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The bureau (and most Taiwanese people for that matter) capitalises everything, proper or not. On the said page, I see 'Contact Us', 'Safe Driving Tips' and 'Related Websites'. If 'National Freeway' is a proper name, the two words should always be used together, which is not the case: 'Freeway No. 1'. Szqecs (talk) 07:05, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Those are link and page titles. Comparing those phrases (which, at least on that page, do not occur in prose) to "National Freeway", or even "Freeway" (which are capitalized in prose), is a flawed argument. -happy5214 10:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, is 'Second Northern Freeway' proper? There are barely any uses of this term on the internet. What about 'Ten Major Construction Projects'? It is not even concrete thing, but an idea. What about 'Director's Mailbox'? Given that aforementioned page has quite a few grammar and style issues, such as no space after full stop, 'the new Freeway Bureau' etc, I would not consider these names to be proper just because they are capitalised. And that is besides the point. There are many instances of 'Freeway No. x' on the website without the word 'National', so claiming these names are proper means claiming they have at least two proper names, which just seems unlikely. Szqecs (talk) 16:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll respond to the points made above when I have more time. In the meantime, I have linked to this discussion from the WikiProject Highways talk page, in the hopes of getting more eyes on this. -happy5214 12:07, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is not unheard of in the US for the same highway to have multiple proper names. For example, Interstate 10 in Texas has the proper names "Interstate 10" and "Interstate Highway 10", the latter being the official style for Interstates in Texas. All numbered highways in California are officially "Route xxx", regardless of type, but we reference state (not Interstate or U.S. Route) routes as "State Route xxx". Highway article naming conventions have been extremely contentious in the past (see WP:SRNC and the related ArbCom case), so this is not a simple matter. -happy5214 11:06, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Railway reconstruction in Taiwan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pingtung (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could you read over MOS:DATEFORMAT .....I dont care if its yyyy-mm-dd or whatever ...but we use words to make it legible off the bat.--Moxy (talk) 20:07, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Moxy: MOS:DATEFORMAT clearly says yyyy-mm-dd is acceptable in infoboxes. Szqecs (talk) 05:35, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Cards84664 (talk) 18:56, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Module:Adjacent stations/example basic. Since you had some involvement with the Module:Adjacent stations/example basic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 20:50, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nearly a year ago I asked you this same question and I would like an answer.

(I'm absolutely not accusing you of any wrong-doing - just curious, thanks.)--BushelCandle (talk) 01:01, 7 May 2019 (UTC):[reply]

Do you intend to answer me - or should I remove this page from my watchlist? --BushelCandle (talk) 11:17, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because I changed my email and I use the same username for everything. Ythlev (talk) 14:56, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the (belated) explanation. --BushelCandle (talk) 15:16, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I presume that you mean "Jiaxian"? ([1]) I have made a change based on that assumption. ([2]) Geographyinitiative (talk) 23:32, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, typo. Ythlev (talk) 04:10, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Taichung Metro Green line stations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:10, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Taichung Metro stations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:03, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AFR color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:39, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/AFR left/Shenmu has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:40, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/AFR left/Zhaoping has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:40, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/AFR right/Chushan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:40, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/AFR right/Shenmu has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:40, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/AFR right/Zhaoping has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:40, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Taipei Metro stations by line has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:33, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rail stations in Taiwan by system has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 迴廊彼端 (talk) 04:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:KMRT line map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:12, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:District has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:55, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:HSR station has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:35, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Sidebar Currency, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:30, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Taiwan rail transport color templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:10, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]