User talk:Takashi Ueki

Hi, Takashi Ueki. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck!  Chzz  ►  20:32, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to read anything - anybody can edit; just go to an article and edit it. Be Bold, but please don't put silly stuff in - it will be removed very quickly, and will annoy people. Ask for help. Talk to us live, or edit this page, put {{helpme}} and describe what help you need. Someone will reply very quickly - usually within a few minutes. Play in your user area. For example, create User:Takashi Ueki/test. Edit existing articles, before you make your own. Look at some subjects that you know about, and see if you can make them a bit better. For example, Wikipedia:Cleanup#2009. When you're ready, read about Your first article. It should be about something well-known, and it will need references. Good luck with editing; please drop me a line some time on my own talk page. There's lots of information below. Once again, welcome to the fantastic world of Wikipedia! --  Chzz  ►  20:32, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Grade sources • Cite sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists • Best articles Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Pages needing attention • Peer review The missing manual

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Yasukuni Shrine, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Yasukuni Shrine was changed by Takashi Ueki (u) (t) deleting 8207 characters on 2009-05-04T00:08:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:08, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note, this was a false positive, so I undid ClueBot  Chzz  ►  01:16, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See user:chzz/help/refs for my own quick guide to referencing. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  01:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:55, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:18, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it is time to put Shinto's status as a "major world religion" to good use. I will protect the article as autoconfirmed because it is a high visibility article. By the way, my wish list for this article-- I hope you give explanations of when different parts of Shinto developed, e.g., what century such-and-such a philosophical term was first used. Shii (tock) 03:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed you aren't giving sources for what you wrote in the article. I just wanted to let you know that if you don't supply references, someone else can come in and delete everything you've written. It's okay to cite Japanese books or videos. (I know the rules are different at Japanese Wikipedia because people don't generally write nonsense there.) Shii (tock) 05:12, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed you started to work on Yasukuni Shrine. I did extensive work on the article about a year ago but then gave up because it was too big of a project. Good luck on cleaning it up and fleshing it out. If you need any help though, let me know! --Torsodog^Talk 23:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I Just wanted to let you know I appreciate all your good work on Shinto and related topics. One thing about your Ise Shrine page move though, currently Wikipedia's MOS on Japan-related articles (here) state that all shrines except "Grand Shrines" (taisha) are to be named XXXXX Shrine. So... that might be kind of a conflict with WP policy. Personally I believe it would be better to have the jingū/jinja/myōjin in the title, but those are the rules as of now. You may want to propose a policy change at the MOS discussion page though. Cheers, ~ AMorozov ^〈talk〉 18:42, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and also, if you do manage to get consensus there, the page title should be "Ise Jingū", with the macron over the u included. ~ AMorozov ^〈talk〉 18:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am aware of the significance of Ise Jingū, I was just pointing out a possible MOS conflict. But if the MOS allows for such an exception, than no problems. Happy editing! ~ AMorozov ^〈talk〉 19:03, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well... it's a sticky issue. I think Wikipedia, as a matter of policy, is tailored to appeal to its readers, ie. English speakers for English Wikipedia, Spanish speakers for Spanish Wikipedia, etc. Other editors have spoken about the shrine page naming conventions before, but no one really pressed anything because it's kind of a hazy area between technicality and popular appellation. You could put the thing to a vote, but I'd guess that the result would be to keep things the way they are. ~ AMorozov ^〈talk〉 21:50, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Urashima Taro here. Since I also do work on Shinto, I noticed all the changes you have been making to the Template:Shinto. Sorry for barging in but, after seeing you can edit templates, I was wondering if you could help me modify the Template:Shinto template to include an optional photo. As you can see from the article Onusa, if one uses the template AND a photo, the results are ungainly to say the least. The solution would be to include the photo in the template, but I cannot do it myself. Can/would you you do it? Please feel completely free to say no.Urashima Tarō (talk) 00:08, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the discussion, I have taken over the Shinto direction - I have recruited several experts in the topic including 2 Shinto Priests (guji), one American, On Japanese, a Japanese linguist, and several photographers that I know travel to Japan regularly. I will be heading up the development of Shinto as a topic as to me me it is a very important topic after 10 years of study. I do find that many people want to make changes but should give me the chance to get all this up to speed. re: the infobox - i think that it might be best to edit the photo, move it to a different location, or resize it rather than changing the infobox as it is a universal infobox and they would all change. I can assist with the photo resizing and moving if that would help, but I would like to keep the infobox as universal at possible. Takashi Ueki (talk) 00:33, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to have any constructive help, please let me know if you want to make changes on a topic so that a consensus can be had.

Hi, and thanks for the reply. The photo and its positioning are not all that important, but in any case I think that such a small change wouldn't be damaging other projects because, if you don't add a photo, nothing happens, and other projects may want to add an image too. And I don't really see where or how else the photo could be added. In any case, thanks anyway, take care and, if you need help, let me know. Urashima Tarō (talk) 04:59, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:52, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking some initiative on the section, moving it to a new page, etc. It has been a bit of a pet peeve/project for me but I haven't had much time lately to deal with it. If you could keep an eye on the section it the future, that would be great too. --Ando228 (talk) 16:27, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, T.U., U.T. here. I took the liberty of adding the nowiki template to the categories in your test user page. The template just makes the enclosed code inactive, turning it into simple text. I did this so that the page wouldn't appear, as it did, in public category pages, which is where I found it. When you finish the article (to which, if I may, there's a couple of things I would like you to add, but this is a subject for another message, if you are interested), remove the template and you are back in business. Take care. Urashima Tarō (talk) 07:46, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 03:05, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Takashi Ueki. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]