User talk:Taram

Thought you would like this:

An editor says that something's wrong with this page. That editor can't be troubled to fix it, but can sleep easy knowing that they stuck on a tag. Please allow this tag to languish indefinitely at the top of the page, since nobody knows exactly why it's there.

Stolen from Gigs' via Carrite's user page.

I have added the court case re Linda Lukens but no episodes have I seen her credited ie: On TV, on DVD, on youtube. Am I missing it. Also I do not know who has wriiten about Tessie Santiago only doing close ups but De Longis did train her for two months and said on his website she was very good and that she was nearly injured fighting Raul in Honor thy Father when the director let it get out of hand. The bullwhip was used by The Queen in The Serpent, Takes a Thief The Uncle, The Return, The Hanged ManREVUpminster (talk) 17:34, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I am still not happy about her being credited on the episodes as I can't find one. Good work with all the court info detail as it took me months before I found something I could cite. I think Xena is a bit of a red herring because if you look at Jay Firestone output he always had a strong female from La Femme Nikita, Highlander The Raven, Adventure Inc, Relic Hunter, Andromeda, Mutant X REVUpminster (talk) 21:53, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: It does not matter if you are happy or not. She is a part of the history of the series and to leave her out of an encyclopedic work would be irresponsible to future readers. That is called pretending the ugly matter never happened, which it did.

• • Colonel Montoya often called her Dona as in this example "Dona Alvarado" [1] at aprox 7 mins REVUpminster (talk) 10:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • The info on Japanese DVD was interesting. I've ordrered one to check it out. Europe is region 2 but I notice the format is NTSC 4/3. I think it maybe a copy of the bootleg. Much of the artwork is from QoS wallpaperREVUpminster (talk) 11:33, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Andrew Helm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP that appears to be a hoax. Fails WP:V, at the very least.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 20:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding sources to the article. I know I tagged it for speedy deletion and then proposed deletion, but I'm not a mindreader. Anyway, the sourcing of the article is obviously the better outcome, so thanks and keep up the good work. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 15:52, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The Hunted" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jarkeld (talk) 00:27, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response: Agreed! Taram (talk) 00:41, 7 December 2009 (UTC)TaramTaram (talk) 00:41, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Taram! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Literaturegeek | T@1k? 08:36, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply] Welcome!Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made to Frederic Baraga. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead. |} In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (Taram (talk) 15:04, 4 June 2012 (UTC)); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Max Viwe | Viwe The Max 22:55, 20 May 2012 (UTC) |}[reply]

|}

The article J.R. Damron has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jihadcola (talk) 05:09, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks!

Keeping this on my page to show the lack of sensitivity some editors show to others seeking help. If one editor indicates something is unclear and if another editor chooses to reply, that second editor should be using words of kindness not words of superiority and insult. We all need to remember this for this is what brought about the real-life notoriety and downfall of the editor who used the pseudonym Qworty. As many mothers have told their children (though sadly not all), "If you can't say anything nice, then don;t say anything at all." Taram (talk) 16:06, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Incarnate Word, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Divine Word (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:34, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am just a regular person with knowledge on a subject, The vocabulary you have used here makes no sense to me; hence, I do not know what you are trying to tell me. I tried checking all the links you sent to me and nothing led to anything in plain English. Phrases making no sense = 1) link pointing to the disambiguation page 2) since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles 3) Read the User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ • 4) Dablink

If Wikipedia is going to accept free help from experts in a field in order to have a current and up to date encyclopedia, then those with in depth knowledge of the computer science that Wikipedia wants will have to start sending emails in PLAIN English. Thank you.

Hello. Do you understand the part that says you edited the page Incarnate Word?

Yes.

And do you understand the part that says that your edit included a link to the page Divine Word?   

Yes.

If you are editing pages on Wikipedia, I hope you at least understand what a "link" to another page is.

If wishes were fishes we'd all live in the sea. And if hopes were ropes we'd all be a great big family.

If so, I'd be happy to help you understand the rest of the message.

Thank you, RnB Russ.

A good place to start might be for you to click on that link to Divine Word and see what that page says.

Saw it. Thank you.

--R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:09, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply] 

Hello, Taram. You have new messages at R'n'B's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roberta Brown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberta Brown until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Whpq (talk) 17:58, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

History: This article was found to be suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia with work by Brown added through the years after it would happen. Taram (talk) 16:09, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:06, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1) Wikipedia’s Sexism Toward Female Novelists April 24, 2013, New York Times Op-Ed article

2) Wikipedia’s shame April 29, 2013, Salon.com

3) Original sources

4) Wikipedia's sexism

5) Wikipedia’s culture of sexism – it’s not just for novelists.

6) Worrying About Wheel-Warring in Our WikiWoe

7) Originator of all the concern = Qworty

7a) Wikipedia response regarding the event

8) Revenge, ego and the corruption of Wikipedia The unmasking of a writer who took extraordinary advantage of online anonymity to pursue old vendettas] May 17, 2013 Salon.com article by Andrew Leonard in which User_talk:Qworty is revealed to be a very non-notable author of one novel, Robert Clark Young

9) Anonymous revenge editing on Wikipedia – the case of Robert Clark Young aka Qworty May 17, 2013 Wikipediocray editorial uncovering of who the vicious editor Qworty is (no-name, one-time, novelist Robert Clark Young)

10) Qworty Who is this tool? Wikipediocracy investigation into the sockpuppetry of User_talk:Qworty who so vehemently accused and harmed other Wikipedia users while propelling his own agenda

11) What is the best way to deal with combative or condescending editors on Wikipedia? Intelligent Quora writers explain why cruel and combative Wikipedia editors exist and how to deal with them.

12)How is the WMF foundation dealing with bullying on Wikipedia? More questions and answers from Quora regarding why infantile and cruel editors are allowed to stay on Wikipedia. Comments also explain what to do with these fools.

Hello, Taram. You have new messages at PBASH607's talk page.
Message added 04:49, 15 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

The Grand Cenobite (talk) 04:49, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Missouri! If you have any questions or need any assistance don't hesitate to ask. Grey Wanderer (talk) 08:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Grey Wanderer

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:49, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to 3 exciting events Wikipedians are planning in your region this June—a tour and meetup at the National Archives in Kansas City, and Wiknics in Wichita and St. Louis:

Kansas City Saturday, June 16, starting at 9 a.m. — National Archives in Kansas City This full-day event will include a tour of the facility; presentations from National Archives Wikipedian-in-Residence, Dominic McDevitt-Parks, and Exhibit Specialist, Dee Harris; and time in the research room to work on projects. The focus of the projects will be scanning, writing articles, transcribing, or categorizing images on Commons. Wikipedians from St. Louis and elsewhere in the region are encouraged to make a day-trip of it and come to Kansas City for this special opportunity!
And two local editions of the Great American Wiknic, the "picnic anyone can edit." Come meet (and geek out with, if you want) your local Wikipedians in a laid-back atmosphere: Wichita Saturday, June 23, starting at 1 p.m. — Central Riverside Park Join the 1st annual Wichita Wiknic: The Sunflower State blooms Free Knowledge! St. Louis Saturday, June 23, starting at 11 a.m. — Forest Park Visitors' Center Join the 2nd annual St Louis Wiknic: The Gateway to the West is now The Gateway to the Wiki!

Hello, Taram. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 16:59, 19 May 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

The list article List of people from Missouri exists. Seems your recent addition of a new Famous Missourians section to Missouri is rather redundant. I have suggested on talk:Missouri that the contents of the section be transferred and merged into the list article. Please comment there. Thanks, Vsmith (talk) 11:51, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Taram. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by TechFilmer - Please reply on my talkpage 16:01, 21 May 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Steve Hodges for Congress, 2013.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 04:32, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ESkog, Thank you. I have a question as follows: Where do I insert the notation "di-replaceable fair use disputed?" Should that be placed above the admin warning or somewhere in the license? Also, I will call tomorrow to see if we can use the photo on WIkipedia. If they say yes at the office, what do I write on the page and where should that new notation be onthe page? Thank you! Taram (talk) 04:38, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Andrew Helm, 2003.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 04:33, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ESKog, The copyright owner has given me clear and free permission to have the photo placed at Wikipedia; however, since Qworty got the article removed, there is no real reason for Wikipedia to have it any more. Who disputed the the copyright? That is easily taken care of with a negative. More information is given at the photos talk page, File:Andrew Helm, 2003.jpg Taram (talk) 05:17, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar.

I posted the following on my user talk page and also put it here to be sure you see it.

Disruptive vandals can be reported and blocks or sanctions requested at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism.

In this case, the vandal has only one recent vandalism and warning. He has only three vandalisms overall. The following guidelines are shown on the AIV page:

Important! Please remember the following:

1. The edits of the reported user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.

2. The user must have been given enough warnings to stop their disruptive behavior.

3. The warnings must have been given recently and the users must be active now, especially for unregistered users.

4. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should go to AN/I, as a bot automatically removes accounts here that are blocked.

In this case, we would expect an administrator to conclude that this was one passing act and that the vandal will not strike again, or not do so any time soon. So it is likely that no administrator will take an action against this user address even though the vandalism was egregious. If the vandal comes back about three times in the near future or is threatening or posts especially vicious material about a living person, they may act at that time. I would advise not filing a report based on the one recent incident but do so if you see that the vandal continues his disruptions. Donner60 (talk) 08:07, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your information Donner60. I will be careful to not jump the gu on reporting this user's disruptive editing. Thank you again! Taram (talk) 05:56, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sue Wilson Beffort, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Santa Fe, Torrance and Sandoval (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, got it fixed. Taram (talk) 06:21, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Taram. Actually, I have no idea why there is this difference, but I noticed it and I would be glad if someone could explain to me the reason. Happy editing. --Mauro Lanari (talk) 01:13, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mauro Lanari, Thank you! This is a very interesting subject (for me at least). I have been in contact with the gentleman who writes the page at http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/bishop/bcongar.html. He thinks it might be an error that has spread across many Internet pages. He said that he would be correcting that tomorrow. Elizabth T. Groppe is credited with much of the Encyclopedia Britannica article you mentioned, so I will contact her tomorrow and see what she thinks about the spelling. I wanted to mention that I found Congar's obituary in the New York Times, printed two days after he died. It is at http://www.nytimes.com/1995/06/24/obituaries/yves-congar-french-cardinal-dead-91-vigorous-ecumenist-promoter-laity.html In the 10th paragraph, Congar is referred to as "Yves Marie-Joseph Congar." My feeling is that the article was printed so close to the time of his death as well as pretty close to his time of appointment as a cardinal, that that is the more accurate spelling of his name. Currently, I am reviewing "Yves Congar: Theologian of the Church" a historical monograph edited by Gabriel Flynn to see if his middle name is used anywhere in the text. I can see how using a hyphen between first and middle name may seem confusing since his fellow Dominican, Marie-Dominique Chenu, used Marie-Dominique as his complete first name. So, since it is meant to be one name, Marie-Dominique is rightly hyphenated. I will keep you informed as I learn anything more about punctuation of Congar's first and middle names. Taram (talk) 03:55, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, Mauro Lanari! I did some more research about how Congar's name was printed in original English edition texts. I found that in English, when one puts a hyphen between nouns (including proper nouns), that is called a compound noun (or many nouns to create one word). Congar and those who spoke about him when he was alive would use just the name "Yves" as if it is a noun that stands by itself. I also looked at a first English edition of one of his books. There, his name is given as "Yves M.J. Congar." They didn't even use the hyphen between the two middle names (at least in the acronym form). I did find a reprint of an article which he wrote and in that his name is listed as "Yves M.-J. Congar." In that article, there is a hyphen between the two middle names to create a compound proper noun. I have not been able to find any original works in which there is a hyphen between his first (Yves) and middle names (Marie-Joseph). Again, I think that is because it would have made all three names into one name as in Marie-Dominique Chenu's name, especially when one looks at the idea of a compound noun. Would you feel more comfortable in removing the hyphen between Yves Congar's first and second name at his page with this new information? Thank you for your help and kindness in this matter. I am always so terrified that somebody is going to reply in utter anger, hurtfulness, and disgust about me personally. (That run with Qworty was not comfortable.) I will also post this at your talk page in case you would like to reply there. Thank you, again! Taram (talk) 07:44, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here it is, Taram. Have a nice day. --Mauro Lanari (talk) 07:37, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Mauro Lanari! You are very kind .Taram (talk) 07:45, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Congar. You could edit the article citing both categories of sources and explaining the reasons for your choice. Pro/for your choise: [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] (they have corrected), [8], ecc. Against: [9], [10], [11], [12], ecc. --Mauro Lanari (talk) 08:50, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Mauro Lanari! BTW, thank you especially for the link at http://catholicbooksreview.org/2010/congar.htm; I can certainly use that for my thesis. Taram (talk) 09:26, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have to thank you also for http://prophetesetmystiques.blogspot.it/p/t.html. I have often wondered how Congar got through what he did without some aspect of mysticism. Very interesting!! Taram (talk) 17:04, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Taram, my knowledge is limited to Iowa and Illinois for the NRHPs. Kepper66 (talk) 10:46, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Golden Dragon Museum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Myles Connolly, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Producer and Harvey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Myles Connolly may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• several [[Roman Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]] [[parable]] novels, including ''Mr. Blue'' (originally published in 1928 and subsequently reprinted.<ref name="breslin1">{{cite web|last=

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:43, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Montparnasse Cemetery may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[Marie-Dominique Chenu]] (1895-1990}, Catholic theologian

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:35, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peritus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cardinal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:41, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your files may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 November 1#OTRS pending since June. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Read through the list and I believe you must mean File:Steve Hodges.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs). Please feel free to delete it from Wikipedia as I cannot figure out how to do that. Thank you!Taram (talk)

Hello, Taram. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by StarryGrandma (talk) 03:55, 11 November 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

This was the question and answer for further reference:

Or where do I look up how to do that? Thank you! Taram (talk) 17:54, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Use {{more footnotes}} or {{refimprove}} at the top of the page. A good source for information on such things is Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup. Glad to see you looking at references. You can always add some yourself if the topic is one you know something about. StarryGrandma (talk) 03:55, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you talk

Taram (talk) 04:41, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feast day. You might want to participate in the redirect discussion.

You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Catholicism and/or WikiProject Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 15:42, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Myles Connolly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roxbury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 10:09, Monday, November 4, 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! Always good to see a stub I created get expanded, and esp. to see that the individual is QI outside of the original reason of why the article was created in the first place. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 07:47, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair winds and following seas to you, Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} !!!

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Erwin McManus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * ''The Artisan Soul: Crafting Your Life Into A Work Of Art'' (ISBN 0062270273) (February 25, 2014

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:43, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Taram. You have new messages at Jab843's talk page.
Message added 04:29, 11 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jab843 (talk) 04:29, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the Magdalen Asylum entry here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Catholicism#Controversial_articles_about_the_Catholic_Church. Just a quick clarification - these places were not Mother-and-Baby Homes, which are the subject of a different Catholic Church abuse controversy in Ireland. As I'm not a project member, I didn't want to make that edit myself. Tnx fr yr help on all this stuff! jxm (talk) 14:39, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, jxm! What do you think a better sentence might be in order to describe the institutions in that case? I freely admit that I am far more knowledgeable about the theological ends of things than what the different groups were. Based on my understanding from an Irish American newspaper, there were 2 or 3 different groups that the Magdalene asylum page either directly talks about or alludes to. Please clarify where I am wrong...I understand that first there were the Magdalene asylums to teach a trade to "fallen women," then the laundries developed almost like workhouses for those who could not care for themselves, and then when the Irish free state developed, the Mother-Baby homes were created in conjunction with a few female religious congregations and that was the subject of the "Philomena" incident, book, and film (with Dame Judy Dench). I do not know if I have that straight or not. I would like to make sure that sentence at WikiProject Catholicism is correct, so if could write a phrase that you think might be more accurate, I could put it there to replace the one there now. Thank you again jxm!Taram (talk) 23:24, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In that sentence, I think I would just replace Mother-and-Baby with 'residential institution'. Y're right, there's no shortage of confusing crud and allusions in the MA page. Regarding the actual distinction, the 20 or so Irish residential-care female asylums morphed into quasi-businesses that received much of their support through laundry contracts with state organizations and private companies. On the other hand, a M&B home was essentially a rather shameful maternity clinic and orphanage, as is depicted in Philomena. I think that some of these institutions had actually evolved from Famine-era workhouses, whereas others simply occupied premises that had previously been workhouses, as in Tuam. In WP, we haven't got a good handle on a general treatment of these homes yet; unfortunately, much of the new material has taken the form of sensationalist blogging about the latest scandal. Cheers! jxm (talk) 23:37, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you jxm (talk)! Your explanation, here, of what everything means is succinct, very interesting, and much easier to read/understand than the actual MA page (at least as it is right now). I appreciate your explanation of everything. The things that happened at the MB homes were beyond sad and truly awful for many. As you do, I look forward to the time when "sensationalist blogging about the latest scandal" (that is a great phrse, btw) no longer muddies how the page flows and explains the situation(s). I replaced the MB phrase with the one you recommended at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Catholicism#Controversial_articles_about_the_Catholic_Church. I think it reads well, but please let me know if there is anything else I should change there. Thank you, again! Taram (talk) 05:23, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi jxm (talk): Thank you for working on the split and getting the rating section clarified. I noticed that our friend has noted what WikiProjects have an interest ion the new Magdalen Laundries page. I wonder if s/he will also rate it him or herself. SHould be interesting.Thank you again!! Taram (talk) 16:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Citation Barnstar
	Great work! W. Stanley Proctor. DYK, and Wikipedia are better for your effort. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 10:41, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you 7&6=thirteen (☎)!! This may be my first barnstar. Doing the yeoman's work on the article for W. Stanley Proctor was really quite fun. Thank you again!! Taram (talk) 17:19, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. Could I ask you to repost it at Talk:Maximilian Kolbe? I would reply there, and it would be the best place for other interested editors to see our discussion. Cheers, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:42, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reposted. Thanks! Taram (talk) 05:27, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Would you like to review the article for the B-class? If you think it meets the Wikipedia:Assessment B-class criteria, you can change the ratings on the talk page (and remove it from the list of requests at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment). You could also start the Wikipedia:Good Article review if you'd like. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:45, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see that you belong to WikiProject Catholicism, I speak Spanish and very little English, have expanded the article La Laguna Cathedral, can correct errors ?. Thank You.--83.52.84.86 (talk) 15:07, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I removed anything that was phrased as "subject" (e.g. "performing arts", "swordsmanship", etc.) instead of "people associated with subject" (e.g. fencers, actresses, magicians, etc.), and anything that was duplicating another more specific category that she was already in (e.g. "Stunt performers" vs. "American stunt performers".) I often used to phrase the former as "categorize people as -ists, not -isms", but people tended not to understand what I meant by that — but it means that a person is an artist rather than art, a musician rather than music, a philosopher rather than philosophy, an economist rather than economics, and on and so forth. Hope that helps a bit. Bearcat (talk) 03:21, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the info, Bearcat! Taram (talk) 03:23, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

COASTIE I am (talk) 01:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cecilia Galante, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King's College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Meetup St. Louis 15

Dear fellow Wikipedian, You are invited to attend the 15th St. Louis Wikipedia and WikiProject Meetup. We are doing a quick touch-base to gather current interest and make a plan for more regular meetups in the future. The meetup is next Thursday, August 16 from 5-6 PM with more structure and from 6-7 PM social time. This all takes part during Venture Cafe's Thursday Gatherings at Cortex in the The District in St. Louis. There are free drinks. Please do visit 15th St. Louis Wikipedia and WikiProject Meetup and add your name if you plan to attend. THANKS :) I hope to see you there! Jon Phillips (talk) - via Jon Phillips (talk) 22:05, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply] Join our WikiProject St. Louis Page and add your name as a participant

Wikipedia Meetup St. Louis 16

Dear fellow Wikipedian, You are invited to attend the 16th St. Louis Wikipedia and WikiProject Meetup. Please join the discussion if you have articles or topics for discussion for our focused meeting time from 7-8 PM in the room Chuck Berry. This all takes place as part of Venture Cafe's Thursday Gatherings at the Cortex Innovation Community in St. Louis. Come early if you want to have social time. Please do visit 16th St. Louis Wikipedia and WikiProject Meetup and add your name if you plan to attend. THANKS :) We hope to see you there! St. Louis Wikipedians Join our WikiProject St. Louis Page and add your name as a participant

Wikipedia Meetup St. Louis 17

Dear fellow Wikipedian, You are invited to attend the 17th St. Louis Wikipedia and WikiProject Meetup. Please join the discussion if you have articles or topics for discussion for our focused meeting time from 7-8 PM in the room Chuck Berry. This all takes place as part of Venture Cafe's Thursday Gatherings at the Cortex Innovation Community in St. Louis. Come early if you want to have social time. Please do visit 17th St. Louis Wikipedia and WikiProject Meetup and add your name if you plan to attend. THANKS :) We hope to see you there! St. Louis Wikipedians Join our WikiProject St. Louis Page and add your name as a participant

Wikipedia Meetup St. Louis 19

Dear fellow Wikipedian, You are invited to attend the 19th St. Louis Wikipedia and WikiProject Meetup. Please join the discussion if you have articles or topics for discussion. This all takes place as part of Venture Cafe's Thursday Gatherings. Come early if you want to have social time. Please do visit 19th St. Louis Wikipedia and WikiProject Meetup and add your name if you plan to attend. THANKS :) When: 2018-12-13, 19:00 (@Venture Cafe) Where: Chuck Berry Room, Cortex Innovation Community, 4240 Duncan Ave., St. Louis More info: Wikipedia:Meetup/St._Louis/19 Discussion page: Wikipedia Talk:Meetup/St._Louis/19 We hope to see you there! St. Louis Wikipedians Join our WikiProject St. Louis Page and add your name as a participant

Hello, Taram,

Thank you for creating Aniceto Fernández Alonso.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This page would benefit from having more references. Look to OP provincial directories, and diocesan directories. These may help.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 02:02, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whiteguru (talk) Thank you Whiteguru, all I have access to are original Spanish historians and histories. Maybe somebody else will come up with the Spanish provicial directory. More likely the Generalate might have information rather than the province. What do you think? I doubt that a diocesan directory would comment on the events in the Order, but it is wort a shot. Do you know anybody who has access to diocesan directories in Spain?

Taram (talk) 02:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors September 2021 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the September GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2021.                  Current and upcoming events September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today! Drive and Blitz reports June Blitz: From 20 to 26 June, 6 participating editors claimed 16 copy edits, focusing on requests and articles tagged in March and April. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. July Drive: Almost 575,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 24 people who signed up, 18 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. August Blitz: From 15 to 21 August, we copy edited articles tagged in April and May 2021 and requests. 9 participating editors completed 17 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Other news June election: Jonesey95 was chosen to continue as lead coordinator, assisted by Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. New maintenance template added to our project scope: After a short discussion in June, we added {{cleanup tense}} to the list of maintenance templates that adds articles to the Guild's copy editing backlog categories. This change added 198 articles, spread over 97 months of backlog, to our queue. We processed all of those articles except for those from the three or four most recent months during the July backlog elimination drive (Here's a link to a "tense" discussion during the drive). Progress report: As of 18:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 468 requests since 1 January and there were 60 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 433 (see monthly progress graph above). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for trying to improve the intro, but Fanny Mendelssohn wasn't known as a composer, - Fanny Hensel was, as she published under her legal married name. It's complex. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:29, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If want to put the article under the name Fanny Hensel, that is great. You need to make sure the reason for having a WP entry is clearly stated in the beginning clause (as in "Joe James was an Indonesian plumber", etc) so it is clear to the casual reader doing a name search. Taram (talk) 23:21, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You do not want to lose the reason for having a WP article in a mishmash of names and pseudonyms. Taram (talk) 23:22, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors December 2021 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the December GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since September 2021.                  Current and upcoming events Election time: Our end-of-year election of coordinators opened for nominations on 1 December and will close on 15 December at 23:59 (UTC). Voting opens at 00:01 the following day and will continue until 31 December at 23:59, just before "Auld Lang Syne". Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. December Blitz: We have scheduled a week-long copy-editing blitz for 12 to 18 December. Sign up now! Drive and Blitz reports September Drive: Almost 400,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 27 people who signed up, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. October Blitz: From 17 to 23 October, we copy edited articles tagged in May and June 2021 and requests. 8 participating editors completed 26 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. November Drive: Over 350,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 21 people who signed up, 14 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. Other news It is with great sadness that we report the death on 19 November of Twofingered Typist, who was active with the Guild almost daily for the past several years. His contributions long exceeded the thresholds for the Guild's highest awards, and he had a hand in innumerable good and featured article promotions as a willing collaborator. Twofingered Typist also served as a Guild coordinator from July 2019 to June 2021. He is sorely missed by the Wikipedia community. Progress report: As of 30 November, GOCE copyeditors have completed 619 requests in 2021 and there were 51 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog stood at 946 articles tagged for copy-editing (see monthly progress graph above). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Distributed via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:03, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Putting this here so I do not have to keep searching for it when I need it: https://refill.toolforge.org/ng/ (aka ref2)

Guild of Copy Editors April 2022 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the April newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since December 2021. Election results: Jonesey95 retired as lead coordinator. Reidgreg was approved to fill this role after an 18-month absence from the coordinator team, and Baffle gab1978 was chosen as an assistant coordinator following a one-year break. Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu continued on as long-standing assistant coordinators. January Drive: Of the 22 editors who signed up, 16 editors claimed 146 copy edits including 45 requests. (details) February Blitz: This one-week effort focused on requests and a theme of Africa and African diaspora history. Of the 12 editors who signed up, 6 editors recorded 21 copy edits, including 4 requests. (details) March Drive: Of the 28 editors who signed up, 18 claimed 116 copy edits including 25 requests. (details) April Blitz: This one-week copy editing event has been scheduled for 17–23 April, sign up now! Progress report: As of 11 April, copy editors have removed approximately 500 articles from the backlog and completed 127 copy-editing requests during 2022. The backlog has been hovering at about 1,100 tagged articles for the past six months. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors June 2022 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the June 2022 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since April 2022. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Blitz: of the 16 editors who signed up for our April Copy Editing Blitz, 12 completed at least one copy-edit, and between them removed 21 articles from the copy-editing backlog. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: 27 editors signed up for our May Backlog Elimination Drive; of these, 20 copy-edited at least one article. 144 articles were copy-edited, and 88 articles from our target months August and September 2021 were removed from the backlog. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: our June Copy Editing Blitz, starting at 00:01, 19 June and closing at 00:59, 25 June (UTC), will focus on articles tagged for copy edit in September and October 2021, and requests from March, April and May 2022. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 07:12, 14 June 2022 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 209 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 1,404 articles. Election news: Nominations for our half-yearly Election of Coordinators continues until 23:50 on 15 June (UTC), after which, voting will commence until 23:59, 30 June (UTC). All Wikipedians in good standing (active and not blocked, banned, or under ArbCom or community sanctions) are eligible and self-nominations are welcomed. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors October 2022 Newsletter Hello and welcome to our latest newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Drive: Of the 22 editors who signed up for our July Backlog Elimination Drive, 18 copy-edited, between them, 116 articles. Barnstars awarded are noted here. Blitz: Participants in our August Copy Editing Blitz copy-edited 51,074 words in 17 articles. Of the 15 editors who signed up, 11 claimed at least one copy-edit. Barnstars awarded are noted here. Drive: Forty-one editors took part in our September Backlog Elimination Drive; between them they copy-edited 199 articles. Barnstars awards are noted here. Blitz: Our October Copy Editing Blitz begins on 16 October at 00:01 (UTC) and will end on 22 October at 23:59 (UTC). Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 19:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 303 requests for copy edit – including withdrawn and declined ones – since 1 January. At the time of writing, there are 77 requests awaiting attention and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 1,759. We always need more active, skilled copyeditors – particularly for requests – so please get involved if you can. Election news: In our mid-year election, serving coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Reidgreg and Tenryuu were returned for another term, and were joined by new coordinator Zippybonzo. No lead coordinator was elected for this half-year. Jonesey95, a long-serving coordinator and lead, was elected as coordinator emeritus; we thank them for their service. Thank you to everyone who took part. Our next election of coordinators takes place throughout December. If you'd like to help out at the GOCE, please consider nominating yourself or other suitable editors (with their permission, of course!). It's your Guild, after all! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Reidgreg, Tenryuu and Zippybonzo. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Baffle☿gab 03:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter Hello and welcome to our latest newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since October. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Blitz: Our October Copy Editing Blitz focused on July and August 2022 request months; and articles tagged for c/e in December 2021 and January 2022. Seventeen of those who signed up claimed at least one copy-edit, and between them copy-edited forty-six articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: In the November Backlog Elimination Drive, thirty editors signed up, twenty-two of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Both target months—December 2021 and January 2022—were cleared, and February was added to the target months. Sixteen requests were copy-edited and 239 articles were removed from the backlog. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: Our seven-day-long December 2022 Copy Editing Blitz begins on 17 December at 00:01 (UTC)*. It will focus on articles tagged for copy-edit in February 2022, and pending requests from September and October. Barnstars awarded will be available here. Progress report: As of 22:40, 8 December 2022, GOCE copyeditors have processed 357 requests since 1 January, there were seventy-four requests outstanding and the backlog stands at 1,791 articles. We always need skilled copy-editors; please help out if you can. Election news: Nomination of candidates for the GOCE's Election of Coordinators for the first half of 2023 is open and continues until 23:59 on 15 December. Voting begins at 00:01 on 16 December and closes at 23:59 on 31 December. All editors in good standing (not under ArbCom or community sanctions) are eligible and self-nominations are welcomed. Coordinators serve a six-month term that ends at 23:59 on June 30. If you've thought about helping out at the Guild, please nominate yourself or any editor you consider suitable—with their permission, of course!. It's your Guild and it doesn't coordinate itself. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers and best seasonal wishes from your GOCE coordinators, Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Tenryuu, and Zippybonzo. *All times and dates on this newsletter are UTC. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The GOCE December 2022 newsletter, as sent on 9 December, contains an erroneous start date for our December Blitz. The Blitz will start on 11 December rather than on 17 December, as stated in the newsletter. I'm sorry for the mistake and for disrupting your talk page; thanks for your understanding. Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:31, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors 2022 Annual Report Our 2022 Annual Report is now ready for review. Highlights: Overview of Backlog-reduction progress Summary of Drives, Blitzes, and the Requests page Membership news and results of elections Closing words – Your Guild coordinators: Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia users in the United States Mountain West and High Plains will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, articles, or photographs of our region is encouraged to attend.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors March 2023 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the March 2023 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since December and our Annual Report for 2022. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. We extend a warm welcome to all of our new members, including those who have signed up for our current March Backlog Elimination Drive. We wish you all happy copy-editing. Election results: In our December 2022 coordinator election, Reidgreg and Tenryuu stepped down as coordinators; we thank them for their service. Incumbents Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo were returned as coordinators until 1 July. For the second time, no lead coordinator was chosen. Nominations for our mid-year Election of Coordinators open on 1 June (UTC). Drive: 21 editors signed up for our January Backlog Elimination Drive, 14 of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 170 articles totaling 389,737 words. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: Our February Copy Editing Blitz focused on October and November 2022 requests, and the March and April 2022 backlogs. Of the 14 editors who signed up, nine claimed at least one copy-edit; and between them, they copy-edited 39,150 words in 22 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: Sign up now for our month-long March Backlog Elimination Drive. Barnstars awarded will be posted here after the drive closes. Progress report: As of 12:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 73 requests since 1 January 2023, all but five of them from 2022, and the backlog stands at 1,872 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 9, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, geography, articles, maps, or photographs of the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors June 2023 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the June 2023 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since March. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Election news: Fancy helping out at the Guild? Nominations for our half-yearly Election of Coordinators are open until 23:59 on 15 June (UTC)*. Starting immediately after, the voting phase will run until 23:59 on 30 June. All Wikipedians in good standing are eligible and self-nominations are welcomed; it's your Guild and it doesn't organize itself! Blitz: Of the 17 editors who signed up for our April Copy Editing Blitz, nine editors completed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 24 articles totaling 53,393 words. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: 51 editors signed up for the month-long May Backlog Elimination Drive, and 31 copy-edited at least one article. 180 articles were copy-edited. Barnstars awarded are posted here. Blitz: Sign up here for our week-long June Copy Editing Blitz, which runs from 11 to 17 June. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 03:09 on 6 June 2023, GOCE copyeditors have processed 91 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 1,887 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybongo. *All times and dates in this newsletter are in UTC, and may significantly vary from your local time. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:39, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, August 8, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in articles, history, geography, maps, or photographs of the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. We may try to organize one or more Wiknics. Guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sonja Wigert shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Diannaa (talk) 14:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Taram (talk) 17:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to fix the remaining spelling errors, too. Good job with your work! Taram (talk) 18:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the above was actually an incorrect warning. I meant to tell you about our copyright rules: Please don't add copyright material copied from other websites to Wikipedia. Everything you contribute needs to be written in your own words please. — Diannaa (talk) 20:59, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am afraid to touch it now. You should know that the word "Nazi" is misspelled in the second paragraph of the "Life as a Spy" section. I will not change it. I do not want to trigger another frightening message to me. Thank you for fixing that Taram (talk) 21:15, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors September 2023 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the September 2023 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. David Thomsen: Prolific Wikipedian and Guild member David Thomsen (Dthomsen8) died in November 2022. He was a regular copy editor who took part in many of our Drives and Blitzes. An obituary was published in the mid-July issue of The Signpost. Tributes can be left on David's talk page. Election news: In our mid-year Election of Coordinators, Dhtwiki was chosen as lead coordinator, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo continue as assistant coordinators, and Baffle gab1978 stepped down from the role. If you're interested in helping out at the GOCE, please consider nominating yourself for our next election in December; it's your WikiProject and it doesn't organize itself! June Blitz: Of the 17 editors who signed up for our June Copy Editing Blitz, 12 copy-edited at least one article. 70,035 words comprising 26 articles were copy-edited. Barnstars awarded are here. July Drive: 34 of the 51 editors who took part in our July Backlog Elimination Drive copy-edited at least one article. They edited 276 articles and 683,633 words between them. Barnstars awarded are here. August Blitz: In our August Copy Editing Blitz, 13 of the 16 editors who signed up worked on at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 79,608 words comprising 57 articles. Barnstars awarded are available here. September Drive: Sign up here for our month-long September Backlog Elimination Drive, which is now underway. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 14:29, 9 September 2023 (UTC), GOCE copy editors have processed 245 requests since 1 January. The backlog of tagged articles stands at 2,066. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, November 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

-MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors December 2023 Newsletter Hello, and welcome to the December 2023 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. Don't forget that you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Election news: The Guild needs coordinators! If you'd like to help out, you may nominate yourself or any suitable editor—with their permission—for the Election of Coordinators for the first half of 2024. Nominations will close at 23:59 on 15 December (UTC). Voting begins immediately after the close of nominations and closes at 23:59 on 31 December. All editors in good standing (not under current sanctions) are eligible, and self-nominations are welcome. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term that ends at 23:59 on 30 June. Drive: Of the 69 editors who signed up for the September Backlog Elimination Drive, 40 copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 661,214 words in 290 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed here. Blitz: Of the 22 editors who signed up for the October Copy Editing Blitz, 13 copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 109,327 words in 52 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed here. Drive: During the November Backlog Elimination Drive, 38 of the 58 editors who signed up copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 458,620 words in 234 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed here. Blitz: Our December Copy Editing Blitz will run from 10 to 16 December. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 20:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 344 requests since 1 January, and the backlog stands at 2,191 articles. Other news: Our Annual Report for 2023 is planned for release in the new year. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Message sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 13, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors 2023 Annual Report Our 2023 Annual Report is now ready for review. Highlights: Introduction Membership news, obituary and election results Summary of Drives, Blitzes and the Requests page Closing words – Your Guild coordinators: Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Wracking. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Guild of Copy Editors April 2024 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the April 2024 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since December. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. We extend a warm welcome to all of our new members. We wish you all happy copy-editing. Election results: In our December 2023 coordinator election, Zippybonzo stepped down as coordinator; we thank them for their service. Incumbents Dhtwiki and Miniapolis were reelected coordinators, and Wracking was newly elected coordinator, to serve through 30 June. Nominations for our mid-year Election of Coordinators will open on 1 June (UTC). Drive: 46 editors signed up for our January Backlog Elimination Drive, 32 of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 289 articles totaling 626,729 words. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: 23 editors signed up for our February Copy Editing Blitz. 18 claimed at least one copy-edit and between them, they copy-edited 100,293 words in 32 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: 53 editors signed up for our March Backlog Elimination Drive, 34 of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 300 articles totaling 587,828 words. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: Sign up for our April Copy Editing Blitz, which runs from 14 to 20 April. Barnstars will be awarded here. Progress report: As of 23:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 109 requests since 1 January 2024, and the backlog stands at 2,480 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from Baffle gab1978 and your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Wracking. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 14, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The online meeting of the Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West originally scheduled for May 14 has been rescheduled for 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 21, 2024, at meet.google.com/wbg-wgws-sbj. Please see our new meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors June 2024 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the June 2024 newsletter, a quarterly-ish digest of Guild activities since April. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Election news: Wanted: new Guild coordinators! If you value and enjoy the GOCE, why not help out behind the scenes? Nominations for our mid-year coordinator election are now open until 23:59 on 15 June (UTC). Self-nominations are welcome. Voting commences at 00:01 on 16 June and continues until 23:50 on 30 June. Results will be announced at the election page. Blitz: Nine of the fourteen editors who signed up for the April 2024 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 55,853 words comprising twenty articles. Barnstars awarded are available here. Drive: 58 editors signed up for our May 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive and 33 of those completed at least one copy edit. 251 articles and 475,952 words were copy edited. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: Our June 2024 Copy Editing Blitz will begin on 16 June and finish on 22 June. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 05:23, 8 June 2024 (UTC) , GOCE copyeditors have completed 161 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 2,779 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from Baffle gab1978 and your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Wracking. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Your recent editing history at Robert F. Kennedy Jr. shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently made edits related to COVID-19, broadly construed. This is a standard message to inform you that COVID-19, broadly construed is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:34, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I find it interesting that a grammar fix has created such concern by Firefangledfeathers. It is quite the group trying to control the accuracy or inacc