User talk:TheMovieGuy

Hello, TheMovieGuy! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:50, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

How do you know this? "Jerry Olshove" was my grandfather so I am very interested. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.76.184.149 (talk) 18:12, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is always a chance that this could just be a groundless rumor but, sources say that is who he is playing. You say he is your grandfather, perhaps the source of this piece of filmmaking has approached you and your family about the portrayal of your grandfather - perhaps the actor himself. TheMovieGuy (talk) 19:40, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No one has approached us - I only know about this from your uncited edit here on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.76.184.149 (talk) 19:50, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I brought the Ken Watanabe casting issue on the MonsterVerse talk page. Your two cents would be greatly appreciated. Armegon (talk) 01:57, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the update with release information. I've been trying to keep track of roughly 100 or so films that may or may not be released this year. Obviously, you should cite information like that when you update. But I didn't mind citing it for you. After all, you did a mobile edit, and I'm sure that must be a bitch to format on a phone. (I won't even bother attempting!) Thanks again though. Now I can scratch that off my upcoming 2017 film list. Can't wait until all these release dates are finally decided, ugh. They take forever.--Cinemaniac⁸⁶_{Dane_Cook_Hater_Extraordinaire} 02:33, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:45, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor moved the draft into mainspace and turned Godzilla: King of the Monsters (2019 film) into a redirect. I have undone this and started a discussion at Talk:MonsterVerse#Article_updating_of_Godzilla:_KOTM. Alaney2k (talk) 04:47, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Warner Bros. films, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:19, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• I can't help but notice you made the same disruptive edit as a blocked editor. You wouldn't happen to be a sock puppet, would you? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:23, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • What are you even talking about buddy? You make no sense. What does that mean, a sock puppet? No, I'm not a sock puppet? Also that link you provided that you called a disruptive edit, wasn't from me. I did it today because "The Flash" was REMOVED FROM THE RELEASE SCEDULE several months ago, so yes it is very constructive considering that the information present is false. TheMovieGuy
    • You made the same edit as someone who was blocked for disruption. What is your source that it has been removed from the release schedule? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:27, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • No, I did not make the same edit as someone who was blocked for disruption. Whoever made that edit was trying to do exactly what I am trying to do and that is provide updated and relevant information and to unfalsify false info. My source was added as an explanation when I undid your reversion. Just check those logs.TheMovieGuy
        • Yes, you made the same edit as someone who was blocked for disruption – I blocked that person myself. You still haven't provided any proof that this film has been "removed from the release schedule". We have a source that says this film is under production. You are claiming that it is not. You have not provided any proof for your claim, yet a trade magazine says it is still on the release schedule. Unless you can prove it, stop blanking sourced content. This source from June 2017 says the film is still under production. So, please, stop being disruptive. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:25, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
          • Prove that that person you blocked is me. It would have the same IP address, wouldn't it? It is not me and you should stop making accusations you cannot back up. Here is my reference for removing The Flash. This source. Take a look and lemme know what you think buddy. I won't revert the page unless you find the source appropriate. Lemme know friend. TheMovieGuy

@NinjaRobotPirate: FYI, I filed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DisneyFanatic24 a little while ago, and User:Bbb23 found that User:TheMovieGuy is unrelated to User:DisneyFanatic24. 172.58.40.167 (talk) 19:53, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• • THANK YOU. TheMovieGuy

Interesting CU result. Anyway, a self-published blogger on Forbes.com only speculates that the film was delayed – it says nothing about the film being canceled. Variety Insight, a database maintained by the trade magazine Variety, says the release date hasn't changed from March 2018, and they get their data directly from the studios. Deadline.com, in the above link, also still has it slotted for a March 2018 release. As far as I can tell, reliable sources agree on a March 2018 release date and that it's still under production. If the only source you have is a blogger who doubts it will make its release date, I don't see any reason to take it off the list. By the way, Forbes.com publishes pretty much anyone on their blogger network, and there's no editorial oversight. Their bloggers are usually not journalists, though some of them are. Films should not be removed just because a self-published blogger speculated that a film may not meet its release date – not when we've got multiple reliable sources that say the release date has not changed. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:21, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I won't touch it. also, next time, it'd suit you well to follow your own instincts and not make an accusations without any reliable backup. I bid adu, NinjaRobotPirate! TheMovieGuy

Thanks for uploading File:TheHappytimeMurdersConceptArt2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:38, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TheMovieGuy. The licensing of each image you see on Wikipedia is determined by it copyright status and not every image file you see on Wikipedia is licensed the same. Some files are licensed as public domain or licensed under a free licensed suitable for Wikipedia and these are often collectively referred to as "free images". Other files are licensed as non-free content because of their copyright status and these file are commonly referred to as "non-free images". Non-free image use is highly restricted and each use of such an an image must satisfy Wikipedia's non-free image use policy. One of these restrictions is WP:NFCC#9, which says that non-free content can only be used in the article namespace. For this reason and as explained in WP:DRAFTS#Preparing drafts, non-free content cannot be used in Draft:The Happytime Murders. Perhaps you did not notice the edit sum I left the previous time I removed the images; therefore, I'm posting this here to provide more explanation. Please do not re-add these files or add any other non-free files to this draft because doing so is clearly in violation of relevant Wikipedia policy, and continuing to do so will eventually lead to an administrator being asked to intervene. Once the draft has been approved and moved to the article namespace, it may be possible to re-add the images as long as their respective uses comply with Wikipedia's non-free content use policy. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask as WP:MCQ or WT:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• OK. That is fair.

Thanks for uploading File:HappytimeMurdersConceptArt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teen Spirit (2018 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teen Spirit (2018 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:03, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello with the username TheMovieGuy! I appreciate your help to the film articles, but I saw that you have linked a draft The Happytime Murders at STX Entertainment. Please don't link drafts in the mainspace. They are drafts, man, they are like sandboxes so keep those in their space. Thanks. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 19:06, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I hear you buddy. Thanks for messaging me. TheMovieGuy

Dumbo (upcoming film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jupitus Smart 03:52, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete edit containing the name you added in Detroit movie on July 16 as it could be consider libel. The lawyer for the named person already contacted the film producers regarding libel and defamation prior to your addition. If you are working for the filmmaker, then it is additionally a conflict of interest for you to add the person's name after the fact. Telltheteuth (talk) 04:34, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's already been deleted. This is coming some ten days after the edit was made and delete. I don't get this. Are you working for the studio? TheMovieGuy

I Feel Pretty (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jupitus Smart 04:52, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On the Sundance website and press releases, they made a point of clarifying that there were only 17 premieres. Are you sure you have the films correct that you added? DARTHBOTTO _talk•cont 19:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes sir. It's been awhile since I made that edit, do you think you can link me to it?

It looks like it was a series of the most recent revisions to the page, from June onward. I just wanted to check, as most of those films weren't discussed by Sundance, which was talking about only 17 premieres. DARTHBOTTO _talk•cont 03:55, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
I restored the plot section, as I think it's sufficient. Your opinion? The IP deleting before, posts such claims also in other articles (the reason, I looked after it). AVS (talk) 16:39, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What are you even talking about? TheMovieGuy

Hi. My problem with the section is that it really doesn't add anything to tell us anything about how the production occured, and the paragraph is almost entirely about the revelation about what the plot is. This not only strikes me as unencyclopedic but also will be redundant fairly quickly, once the movie comes out. I think it'd be appropriate, to tell, how Henson came up with the idea but just a plot info dump seems excessive. --Deathawk (talk) 03:56, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good point Deathawk - TheMovieGuy

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gerard Butler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Den of Thieves (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"also on board" is not a confirmation. This was discussed before, we need something more concrete. Please revert your edit. Rusted AutoParts 19:48, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"also on board" IS a confirmation Rusted AutoParts. This could be all we get unless a press release is issued. Until then, I think this is evidence enough that these performers have signed on my internet editor friend.TheMovieGuy

No it isn't confirmation. Please remove all four from the cast section, as you've now linked in Variety for Scott which says he's only in talks. We need to be 100% accurate. "On board" is not a measure of accuracy. So please revert. Rusted AutoParts 20:00, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"On board" IS a measure of accuracy when it comes to casting. And, like I said, this could be all we get unless a press release is issued. This is sufficient enough confirmation. Take it to the talk page if you have an issue with it friend. Btw, completely off topic but I've gotta ask, what are your thoughts on this whole Weinstein scandal? It seems like it is the ONLY thing Hollywood can discuss now. TheMovieGuy

Firstly, since Deadline and Variety were the first to make the announcements they were in negotiations for roles, we cannot then take them saying something like "on board" to mean it's an official thing considering they themselves were the ones reporting it. It's too vague a term to use as confirmation. So it's only correct to leave them as bein in negotiations until a press kit like you said is available. Secondly since Weinstein was a big player in Hollywood it makes sense there'd be a massive impact in Hollywood. Rusted AutoParts 20:56, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Something that you said there worked for me, only because I don't want to argue this matter with a friend anymore..TheMovieGuy

You recently reverted a bunch of edits to The Happy Time Murders seemingly alarmed at the ammount of content missing. The content is still there, I just changed it, from Proselines, to Prose. T was actually very careful with it, and the only things I outright deleted for the most part was repetitive info. The section may look smaller, but it actually provides the same info although much easier to read. It's easier for a reader to grasp for instance that the film went through multiple studios. I know that you put a lot of work into the page, and that work is mostly still intact, it just is more readable.---Deathawk (talk) 20:38, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I hear you and thusly, I have, in my opinion, crafted a satisfactory cure to the bloated production tab. TheMovieGuy

Hey I'm doing some brief touch up work on the article. Mostly just basic copy editing stuff. I'm really going to try to not to mess to much with the structure. Most of it is basic stuff like not repeating the year after each month and that sort of thing. --Deathawk (talk) 05:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, me and a couple other editors are currently drafting up production section guidelines for the Film Manual of style, and I thought you may be interested in commenting on it. You can find the discussion Here --Deathawk (talk) 00:49, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking this on. I just saw the 2,000 word "novel" that someone added as a plot summary(!) earlier today and was thinking through which 1400 words to cut. Thanks again. Jmg38 (talk) 00:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Yeah, it was huge, and still is sort of. Mysteries are tricky plot summaries to write short and sweet. I suggest you look at my revised version and take a stab at it if youd like Jmg38. - TheMovieGuy

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Film Fan 11:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheMovieGuy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have zero authority to block people, and you're treading on thin ice with edit summaries like this. If you are reverted, make your case on the talk page. Don't get into a pointless edit war that gets you blocked. Primefac (talk) 19:26, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I know i don't and so do they, but when im pissed off i say it anyway. I just dont appreiciate this guy, coming on my talk page and threating ME with a block when the user does not do their own research to back up their claims that i am disrupting or whatever. Good case in point in on Annapurna Pictures. TheMovieGuy

I hear ya. There have been a few times where I've been reverted when I know I'm right, and it gets my goat to take it to the talk page and discuss the matter for a few days while the "wrong" version sits on the article in the meantime, but that's about the only way Wikipedia keeps from imploding on itself. Primefac (talk) 19:37, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are absolutely right, sir. My apologies for my comments in editing. Frustrations be damned, it is still wrong to write such things, i know. What frustrates me more, is that instead of simply reverting my edits, he/she threatens to block me? I consider that to be a harsh measure of action considering all the good work ive done here - and considering the fact that i ended up being correct in my edits. So thats just why i said what i said, but it is wrong, i know. Thank you sir. TheMovieGuy

I'd advise you to check out WP:CIVILITY before you continuing making edits like this and this. It also doesn't seem wise to threaten an administrator with a block for following guideline and policy, particularly when you aren't even an admin yourself. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:27, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I know it is not wise, i am a bit crazy when im angry. The user him or herself knows it and we’ve mostly gotten along well. I just dont understand why he/she is threatening me without doing the research as i have. So i expressed to him such things. I dont take kindly to threats of blocks when my edits can be proven to be fact most of the time. Sometimes i forget to put refs but you could just as easily back it up yourself if you wanted to try to verify it. Sometimes i dont considers refs necessary when the info can easily be verified by a simple google search. Like i told the gentlemen above, he knows and i know i have no authority but its my way of expressing my angst with him instead of using curse words. Good day, sir. TheMovieGuy

Despite of being approached by NinjaRobotPirate, Primefac, Chrissymad about what you are doing wrong with your edits, your subsequent edits shows no indication that you understand what other editors are trying to tell you. Wikipedia:Verifiability is not optional. Persistent addition of unsourced claims is subject to indefinite block. If you are unwilling the follow this policy, you may want to consider alternative outlets as you have been suggested. This is a collaborative project, so if you are going to resort to gross incivility whenever other editors are telling you what you are doing wrong, this may not be the place for you. With that being said, if you are confident that you have understood what it is being said, please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks to appeal for this block. Alex Shih (talk) 20:21, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

TheMovieGuy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand I need to cite sources and I disagree with Alex’s reasoning behind my blocking. I think i have come to an understanding with Ninja and the others i was onyl in agreement with from the get-go. TheMovieGuy (talk) 20:25, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Unblocking as the user agrees to adhere to sourcing policies. Please make sure to take the two points I have raised into your consideration, and happy editing. Alex Shih (talk) 20:42, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• I can understand getting heated and being "in the moment", and I think the last few posts you've made have shown that you recognize that. I have seen some concerns expressed about a lack of referencing in your edits, and possibly the reason for your mini-edit war. If unblocked, I would like to see you abide by our sourcing guidelines and to make sure any controversial change (e.g. "you get reverted for unsourced material") is either discussed on the talk page or supported by reliable sources. Does that seem reasonable? Primefac (talk) 20:32, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) I will unblock this account myself if you can address the following two points. 1) Having received legitimate warnings is not a reason to resort to personal attacks 2) Having done a lot of good here is not a reason to add poorly sourced content, with the rationale of other users should just look up the claims in Google search ([1]). Thank you. Alex Shih (talk) 20:38, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes sir, very reasonable. I promise that i will hereforth abide by Wikipedia’s sourcing guidelines and I will make sure that any change i consider to be controversial is either discussed on the talk page or supported by reliable sources. TheMovieGuy TheMovieGuy (talk) 20:37, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked. Alex Shih (talk) 20:43, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am in understandment that legitimate warnings do not provoke personal attacks. To have received a warning, thinking about it now, is actually a generosity on NinjaRobotPirate’s part. I guess i couldve just been blocked with no warning at all.

I also admit that, despite all the good of done for Wikipedia, this is not forgive me for adding poorly sourced content, with the rationale that other users should pick me up when im slacking up. That is NOT responsible editing, it is lazy editing. I promise no longer to partske in lazy editing and to source everything i add MYSELF instead of expecting others to do it for me. TheMovieGuy (talk) 20:48, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for this generosity. I will NOT take it for granted. TheMovieGuy (talk) 20:51, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Still says i have been blocked from editing,a nd that is why i will thank you on my own talk page instead of your own. Do i have to wait 24 hours, for the unblock to be effectively in placed? Even so, i want to thank AlexShih for unblocking me as well as Primefac for supporting my unblocking. Thank you gentlemen so much, i wont take your generosity for granted! TheMovieGuy (talk) 20:59, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, I forgot to press the button. Have a good evening. Alex Shih (talk) 21:03, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You too sir! Thank you again! TheMovieGuy

Where is the names of the characters that the cast play on the poster? All I see is the actors names and it's translation to Japanese. Please, either provide a reliable source that state their characters names or leave the article as it is until the characters names has been reveal or confirmed by reliable sources. Thanks. TheDeviantPro (talk) 23:02, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. My apologizes TheDeviantPro, i was referring to another poster for the film. I will provide a link here and on the page as well. (Link -> https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t31.0-8/25587058_534078636950683_2043681713593874091_o.jpg?oh=9242c81e1429eaab04a703ae25ba182d&oe=5ACA63BF) TheMovieGuy

Thanks for uploading File:ProudMaryTeaserPoster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Maze (2018 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Innisfree987 (talk) 20:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ready Player One (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Say Anything (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Ready Player One (film), but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 13:50, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Snuggums, do you mind telling me specifically what contribution has been reverted/removed, so i can understand with context and not repeat the same mistake. Thank you! TheMovieGuy

Hi TheMovieGuy how does one go about to having a wikipedia page approved for an actor, I have a client in the 15:17 to Paris and we need his Wiki page to be linked on the original page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ppr2018 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You see, youve linked a draft. The page must be published into the main space to be linked to his name. You’ll need to have plenty of sources and then oyu can submit your draft for the actor, and in a short while, it will either be approved or declined based on the quality of the page. If it is approved, then the page is in the mainspace and can be linked to the actor’s name. TheMovieGuy

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ansel Elgort, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Schwartz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Anastasia (2018 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nicholas Romanov

The Titan (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to CAA

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Voyage of Doctor Dolittle (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Craig Robinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is no point to saying what the name of the character was, outside of the film article itself. It does not mean anything until a reader goes to that film article, at which point they can learn the role name. There are many simple filmography list that only need the film name and the year. Not everything has to be tabled. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 02:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not everything has to be labeled, but its how most filmographies are labeled because it looks better.TheMovieGuy

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Excellent work condensing the absurdly-long plot summary of Truth or Dare. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:46, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for this! This makes me so happy! TheMovieGuy

I'm glad! It was great editing. There's something really satisfying about seeing a long, sprawling summary get tightened up into something workable. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:05, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Late Night (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New York and John Early (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you moved Late Night (film) out of draft. Per notability guidelines on films in production (WP:NFF) unless the making of the film itself is notable than an article is not yet called for. If you wish to discuss further or have questions please ping me here or leave a comment at my talk page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:06, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, according to guidelines, being in production fulfills the requirements. The film has plenty of references and is now in production and thusly it is fit for mainspace. TheMovieGuy

Could you explain why you removed my edit of Columbus (2017 film)? Thanks CWBoast (talk) 16:09, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not TheMovieGuy (just came here to see something), but looking at your edit, it seems a little... off for the plot summary. (Granted, one of TMG's later edits strikes me as odd, too, so that might just be me today and not have anything to do with what they thought.) I hesitate to call it cruft (since it's one sentence, the architecture appears to fit heavily into the plot, and you sourced it (though the source doesn't appear to mention the buildings by name, except perhaps the library?)), but at best I think it might have fit better rephrased and put in the Production section were it to be included. Again, I'm not this editor, so that's just a guess at what's going on, but I figured I'd add how I interpreted the edit in case it might be helpful. - Purplewowies (talk) 16:27, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CWBoast i felt it didnt need to be included in the plot tag. However, as the user above suggested, i think placing it in the production tab might be a better decision. Arhetecture is an important aspect of the film. Also, Purplewowies , since you were visting my page, is there anything you’d like to bring up to me, i’d be glad to listen! Thank you! TheMovieGuy

Thank you, both. I'm happy with where the sentence is now. CWBoast (talk) 04:50, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all! TheMovieGuy

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. STOP USING ROWSPANS IN FILMOGRAPHY TABLES! You very well know that this practice is frowned upon yet it's painfully obvious that you deliberately ignore that regardless and quite frankly have no good reason to do so. Please desist. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:48, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nowhere in the guidelines is it explicitly stated that rowspans in filmographies may not be used. It is not disruptive editing. It is clean, clear editing. TheMovieGuy

NinjaRobotPirate, Somethingwickedly, Vmars22, Rusted AutoParts, NathanielTheBold, Captain Assassin! what do you all think about this? Is it stated explicitly in the wikipedia guidelines that users cnanot use rowspans for filmographies? If so, why? If not, then why is it apparently, as far as Snuggums puts it “frowned upon”? Also, it is used fairly often and it is commonpalce as you all should know considering that we all edit actor/actress articles all the time. I favor rowspans with regards to filmographies because, as i said above to Snuggums, it gives it a cleaner and clearer look. Less sloppy, in this user’s opinion. Any thoughts would be most appreciated. Thank you! TheMovieGuy

It's been long-standing practice to use the table format that WP:FILMOGRAPHY. Even if not in explicit words, it's at least very strongly implied that the format shown there is the correct usage. Don't pretend like you don't know that. Using rowspans in filmography sections also actually gives the opposite of "a cleaner and clearer look" by interfering with the ability to sort via year of release and also potentially roles, titles, and miscellaneous notes without making a mess. This means that no filmography articles or sections should use them. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:20, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not understanding your argument. How does it possibly interfere “with the ability to sort via year of release and also potentially roles, titles, and miscellaneous notes without making a mess“? I have never had a problem such as that, nor have i known a user to. Also, “very strongly implied” is an interpretation. If it isn't explicitly stated that one cannot use rowspans, then one could reasonably interpret that it is allowed regardless of “implications”. An implication is a suggestion not a rule and one is not forced to follow a suggestion or hint in any particular direction. At least, this is what I gather.TheMovieGuy

If I were to insert rowspans for years as well as roles and tried to sort items by either field, it could throw things out of order when I try to sort back. The lack of rowspans provides better accessibility by eliminating that unnecessary risk which isn't worth taking. Simple as that. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:14, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You’ve been warned about this before and yet you added rowspans to Saoirse Ronan’s filmography. Why? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 05:18, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Krimuk2.0, I have read through the guidelines, and have found that nowhere within the guidelines does it say that rowspan cannot be used, and, thusly, I am not acting out-of-bounds with my use of them. As for why I like rowspans, I believe that they help keep filmographies tidy and make them look neater and more clear. I hope this answers your question. TheMovieGuy

We must try and make Wikipedia accessible for all reader. Please read the excellent essay at User:RexxS/Accessibility, where it says, "When you're tempted to use tables with rowspans, please consider what it sounds like to our visually impaired readers". I hope you'll keep this in mind. Cheers! Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:30, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Climax (2018 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A24 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Vox Lux, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey TheMovieGuy,

I was hoping you might chime in on this discussion being had in regards to deleting a page for the upcoming Netflix film First Ladies. I created a draft earlier today due to the fact that there is no word that the film has actually begun filming. Noticed later in the day that someone had went ahead and created a article in the mainspace. Hope to get your input in the discussion over at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Ladies (film). Thanks, BoogerD (talk) 01:23, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey-I have tried to fix your edits on Topaz, who is indeed a human character, not a puppet. She is a dancer with Jenny. She shouldn't be listed as a puppeteer in respect to those performers. Thanks. Whambama (talk) 19:14, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. TheMovieGuy

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matt Damon filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Leitch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HapptimeMurdersConceptArt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HappytimeMurdersConceptArt2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:08, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Detroit (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Variety

Dolemite Is My Name (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Billy Fox

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 June 24 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

Thank you. Elisfkc (talk) 01:55, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HapptimeMurdersConceptArt.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Extinction (2018 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emma Booth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Super Intelligence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barry Peterson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! The source is listed on here. [2] "Update: The Highwaymen and Untitled Dan Gilroy have been moved to 2019." Vmars22 (talk) 13:37, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah... Your right. My apologizes Vmars22. TheMovieGuy

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of original films distributed by Netflix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Innocents (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philip Wright (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

Is this original film? It has Blu-ray released in Australia...

Cargo Blu-ray: http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Cargo-Blu-ray/210942/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.141.2.243 (talk) 20:21, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LOOK!
 Next Gen (2018) - has Australia: http://unogs.com/video/?v=80988892 
 Sierra Burgess Is A Loser (2018) - has Australia: http://unogs.com/video/?v=80239639 
 Cargo (2018) - I can't see Australia: http://unogs.com/video/?v=80161216 
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.236.250.158 (talk) 00:28, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]  

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.

This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.

Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!

If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ralph Breaks the Internet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phil Johnston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve been seeing you filing movies under release years despite them not presently having an established release date. Though a Release year for in this case Antlers (film) could very well be 2019, it’s yet to have been announced as such, and could easily be set for a 2020 release. So for future reference if the release date isn’t established when adding credits to actors or directors wiki page filmographies could you list it as TBA? Thank you. Rusted AutoParts 18:45, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I personally see nothing wrong with listing it in the presumed year of release unless proven wrong - which doesn’t happen to often, - however, since you asked, I’ll go along with your process with regards to it. Let’s give it a go. TheMovieGuy

I feel it's just better to err on the side of caution. That way confusion isn't caused. And I'm not sure if the italicization of the word you is pointed or not, but I'm only asking, not commanding. Rusted AutoParts 18:10, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not pointed in the slightest, I promise. I see where your coming from. TheMovieGuy

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:

• Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
• Country Winners
• Diversity winner
• High quality contributors
• Gender-gap fillers
• Page improvers
• Wikidata Translators

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Can we please leave my cast additions on? They are precise. Menik features a couple of times in the trailer, and it's my first ever edit so I was really pleased! Lol.

Many thanks.

Also, any tips on how to create a new page? I have no idea and would like to make one for Menik :-).

Thanks again. KellanKane (talk) 22:48, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For what page are we talking about? I edit a lot of pages. I’ll double check but if i deleted it, it is most assuredly for one valid reason or another. What was the page KellanKane? TheMovieGuy

Hi mate. Thanks. Says anonymous this time but presume it was you again? Sorry if I trod on any toes. Didn't mean to jus thought it was a public site anyone can add correct info to.

Any tips on how I can start a page for Menik? Love some help from a frequent user.

Thanks again! KellanKane (talk) 17:24, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry. Only just figured this thread out. Ignore my new message lool.

So it was the Mortal Engines page. Been edited again today by an anonymous user, left my additions on just recorded them which is kool. So if it was U, thanks. :-) :-)

Any tips on how I can start a new page for Menik? Would love to have a go but feel very lost. Hehe. Cheers mate KellanKane (talk) 17:26, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry. Only just figured this thread out. Ignore my new message lool.

So it was the Mortal Engines page. Been edited again today by an anonymous user, left my additions on just recorded them which is kool. So if it was U, thanks. :-) :-)

Any tips on how I can start a new page for Menik? Would love to have a go but feel very lost. Hehe. Cheers mate KellanKane (talk) 17:27, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Left my additions on but *Reworded* them* :-) KellanKane (talk) 17:42, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apostle (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Higgins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 21:31, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've noticed you moved The Witcher (U.S. TV series) to The Witcher (upcoming U.S. TV series), and wanted to let you know that "upcoming" is not supported under WP:NCTV. --Gonnym (talk) 23:29, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That’s perfectly fine. I was just doing that as a means of moving the article into the mainspace as fast as possible. TheMovieGuy

Hello, TheMovieGuy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Live Read, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Howard Koch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Farewell (2019 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Li Xiang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:EscapeRoomPoster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are you still an active editor on this page? If so, is it worthwhile to add an "also known as"? When younger, she went by Millie Warren. You can find a few articles from her elementary years that list her by this name [1] [2] [3]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.108.59.142 (talk) 17:45, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think that could be worth noting that she was born Warren, or if Simmonds is just stage name.TheMovieGuy

She's used both. Her earliest stage and film work was as Millie or Millicent Warren, and her more recent work is with the name Simmonds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.108.53.234 (talk) 20:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I had booked tickets 1st day, 1st show. However, now I won't watch it.

I didn’t add the Endgame plot, Surge elec, and, in any case, you can choose not to read it. TheMovieGuy

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited In the Heights (2020 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrew Garfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Marsh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not link well-known place names and common words. See MOS:OVERLINK for an explanation of why this is not helpful. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:58, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tom Hanks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walt Disney Studios (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:05, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use italics for random words such as "filming" and "post-production". WP:ITALICS tells us what needs to be in italics. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:01, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop! Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:44, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

• Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
• Diversity winner
• Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]