User talk:Thealex6789998212

Please do not add crosses to characters in cast sections, if you want to show that a character is dead then write it--Jac16888 ^Talk 21:37, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please stop--Jac16888 ^Talk 02:39, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Look, you have to stop adding †'s to articles. Its not how we show a character is dead, you should write either alongside the character, or else in a prose plot section--Jac16888 ^Talk 21:00, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, its not. Using crosses is like a memorial, and its not how we do things. If a character is dead and you want noted, we use text, not symbols--Jac16888 ^Talk 02:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Jac16888 ^Talk 09:03, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just stop it alright. Its disruptive and very annoying--Jac16888 ^Talk 22:16, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And RIP is just as bad. You need to realise that they are fictional characters and that this is not a memorial site or anything like that.--Jac16888 ^Talk 22:26, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? You think smaller crosses are any better than large ones? I know you speak English so stop ignoring me--Jac16888 ^Talk 22:39, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're kidding right? "DEAD"? Have you not seen that in the next box across it already says that the character is dead? Which is how its supposed to be--Jac16888 ^Talk 22:45, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Televicentro (Canal 2), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages White Collar and Passione (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to El Talismán. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Platinum Star (talk) 07:08, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited El Talismán, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La 1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]