User talk:Therealscorp1an

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Gary Canning, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please read WP:SOAPS and the documentation at Template:Infobox soap character about the inclusion of irrelevant relatives, especially those that hold no significance to the character in question. – JuneGloom07 Talk 17:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Xanthe Canning, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rain the 1 19:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gary Canning, you may be blocked from editing. We do not need to include every single relative going. Please read WP:SOAPS to see what relatives should be included. 5 albert square (talk) 00:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I have been looking at your page and it looks really good so far! I made a few tweaks but I wanted to ask before I change anything more. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:49, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, first thing – since the family was only introduced once, they don't need the (2008) next to the introducer :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:50, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DaniloDaysOfOurLives: Hi! Alright, thank you! And yes, of course, please change anything to make it improved! Thank you so much! I also figured out a few things, so the page should be ready soon hopefully! Please let me know when you think the page can get the all-clear to be released! - Therealscorp1an (talk) 01:52, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DaniloDaysOfOurLives: Do you think I should release it? - Therealscorp1an (talk) 02:09, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!! I was looking at it and I think it is really good!! however, I have some suggestions for it. Are you able to email me ? DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:10, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly not. You can just say it here, I don't mind. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So a few suggestions : 1.) A storylines section for the whole family? 2.) With the sections related to the characters – will this clash with their own pages? I am fine with it but just a thought 3.) Possibly more reception? 4.) I think that the non cannon family members should still be included, but with notes explaining that it is not sure whether it is part of cannon. 5.) Any pictures at all? DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:19, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didn't explain well – for Levi Canning, for example, who doesn't have their own page – perhaps on the "characters introduced in 20xx" we could do "Main article:" and redirect to this page and their section? DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:22, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright! The reception thing may be hard to do, but I think a storylines section would be good (but in there, I'd only include storylines relating to the storylines itself)! And for Levi, Dane and Harley, I could link it to a "main article" or I could just put their storylines in the "Storylines" section I mentioned. What do you think? - Therealscorp1an (talk) 02:27, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DaniloDaysOfOurLives: Hi, I've updated the draft. What do you think? - Therealscorp1an (talk) 05:17, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking at it earlier – I think it is really really good! You should be so proud of yourself – well done ! I think it is ready to be published. Is there anything I can do? DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 05:32, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I forgot to say – regarding the pigeons – maybe you could include them in the Sheila section too? DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 05:33, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! What do you mean by "Sheila section"? - Therealscorp1an (talk) 08:49, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the storylines section or family members section? Just an idea, not essential DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:35, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes, I've done that. Do you reckon it's ready to be released? - Therealscorp1an (talk) 22:12, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes!! 100% – well done! Could we have a picture of the family though? DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:19, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, yeah. Is it okay if you try to do that? (Sorry, I'm not very good with pictures on Wikipedia 😬) - Therealscorp1an (talk) 22:30, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very sorry – I don't know how to do it either...it's okay, we will do it later down the line DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:33, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright! Okay, now time to publish it... - Therealscorp1an (talk) 22:34, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Neighbours characters (2021), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chloe Brennan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, so the character has directly left Erinsborough on-screen now, albeit in a slightly weird way - on 6 September she declared her intention to leave, then on the 7th was off-screen packing at the start of the episode and then mentioned as having departed later on without appearing again! This is backed up by her initial casting announcement, which describes the stint as around two weeks long [1], i.e. unless we hear otherwise in the future her time on the show is ended. U-Mos (talk) 04:05, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@U-Mos: Okay, thank you for the clarification. A bit of an abrupt ending if you ask me, haha! - Therealscorp1an (talk) 04:56, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sooshi Mango, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Neighbours characters (2020), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jane Harris.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Therealscorp1an (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Kontrol34". The reason given for Kontrol34's block is: "Vandalism-only account".</nowiki>

Accept reason:

Autoblock lifted. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:35, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Neighbours characters (2017) into Andrea Somers. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: Hi, there. Thank you for informing me. However, I'm struggling a bit to add the template into the talk page. Is it okay if you could please teach me or help me do it? Thanks. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 01:31, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the template to the talk page of both the source article and the destination article. There's full instructions at Template:Copied.— Diannaa (talk) 04:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 06:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Constant unruly reversions at multiple pages regarding alternative names in lead. Thank you. DriedGrape (talk) 02:18, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Therealscorp1an (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Bonobosforlife". The reason given for Bonobosforlife's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

• Blocking administrator: ‪Jauerback‬ (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: You've been editing after making this unblock request, showing you are not currently autoblocked. Yamla (talk) 10:44, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Hi, there. I was blocked for a bit, but it allowed me to edit after a while somehow. Sorry for the mix up! - Therealscorp1an (talk) 11:48, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all! --Yamla (talk) 12:16, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Hello, again. It says I'm blocked once more for the same reason above. Very odd. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 01:13, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked now. Really odd. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 03:45, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd happy to lend a hand when I can - certainly it's easier to do these things at the time, I really wanted to have a go at a 2016 hotel death trap storyline article a while back but the task was just too overwhelming five years down the line... maybe one day. I have a suspicion promo material is going to all but give away the death in the next week, so I'm not paying too much attention to releases currently, but once it's aired I should be able to help out. Are you watching at UK pace? U-Mos (talk) 21:57, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@U-Mos: Sadly, no. Very upset at 10 Peach ath the moment. Also, if you need a hand with the hotel death trap storyline, I would also be happy to help. I know a few other editors, like JuneGloom07, are also having a go at that storyline. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 21:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All I can think of is Channel 5 negotiated for the upcoming London episodes to be UK-first, and the episodes per week will switch over after that until the two countries align again... madness either way! U-Mos (talk) 22:29, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you missed my edit summaries (or were ignoring them), the infobox in Zara's section was hidden because it was causing a lot of whitespace, which isn't ideal. It was also running into the next section because of the small amount of prose, but I've fixed that issue now. There's no harm in waiting to show an infobox and you never know, it might encourage expansion of the section. - JuneGloom07 Talk 19:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @JuneGloom07: I did not ignore your edit summaries, in fact I made a few edits and kept the infobox commented out. The only reason I re-added it in my previous edit is because I thought the prose was expanded enough and not creating any white space. Kind regards, Therealscorp1an (talk) 20:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I noticed you added the claim "Overtime, the Robinson lineage has slowly expanded, with the soap opera particularly focusing on the descendants of Paul" to Robinson family. You did not actually add sourced information to support this to the article itself. Therefore adding such a statement is original research. Please find sources to support your claims before adding back.Rain the 1 22:58, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Raintheone: I have realised after the fact that the "particularly focusing on the descendants of Paul" part is WP:OR. Also, I plan on working to update the article in the future to get it updated. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 23:40, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Next time you realise you could always add the supporting information or comment it out until you can. Any update sounds good.Rain the 1 18:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Harold Bishop. Rain the 1 23:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Levi Canning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 10 Play.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 July 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tricia (elephant), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 21:06, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well done! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:34, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! - Therealscorp1an (talk) 22:36, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cathedral.Sts.Constantine.Helene.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:33, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: Hello, thank you for the message. This was my first time uploading a file, so it was always going to be a long shot, as I did not really know what I was doing. How would I go about keeping the image on Wikipedia? Sorry, I think I just need the extra clarification. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 12:56, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is a free content encyclopedia. non-free content such as the image you uploaded must meet all of the non-free content criteria. As an existing cathedral, a free image of it could be made even if one currently does not exist. As such, the non-free image is replaceable with a free one and so WP:NFCC#1 is not met. There is no way to keep this image. Whpq (talk) 13:20, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: So, essentially, I would have to get my own image? What if I get permission to use that image and how do I prove I have gotten permission? - Therealscorp1an (talk) 21:24, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Whpq (talk) 01:55, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I hope you are well 😊 Since you are very good at making articles, I just wanted to bring this to your attention: I tend to use "< br >" rather than "< b / r >" (I am spacing them out as otherwise it will hide them and create breaks instead!) as it means that there are less bytes in the article and means that article can load quicker and easier, and it's also much cleaner 😊😊 I wanted to let you know to help you out as I know you make a lot of amazing articles 😊

Yes, I have noticed and thank you for updating all the articles so there are less bytes. I will try to use the first one in future, I am just too used to the latter! - Therealscorp1an (talk) 22:59, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also I am really sorry to hear about the Tim article. I really liked it and I think you shouldn't give up – maybe when the show ends he will get more coverage in books celebrating the show etc and in interviews, documentaries etc. If not, maybe you could expand the 2001 article or make an article like "List of notable recurring Neighbours characters" or something? Or a Wikiprojects perhaps? 😊😊 Don't give up on your hard work!

DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk)

All good, I understand why it needed to go, it would have been better if there was more coverage though. Oh, well. And thank you for the compliments! - Therealscorp1an (talk) 22:59, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to User_talk:Chrisclear, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please don't mischaracterise an editing disagreement as disruptive editing. Chrisclear (talk) 03:03, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at User_talk:Chrisclear. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! Please don't mischaracterise an editing disagreement as disruptive editing. Chrisclear (talk) 03:03, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chrisclear: I am sorry, I must have missed something. What are you referring to? - Therealscorp1an (talk) 03:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On my talkpage, you left a message accusing me of disruptive editing. Hopefully you are aware that there is a difference between an editing disagreement, and disruptive editing. Chrisclear (talk) 03:12, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chrisclear: I'm sorry, I cannot find anything on your talk page and do no recall leaving you a message. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 03:14, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the aforementioned message from my talk page, it can be found here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chrisclear&diff=1101058625&oldid=1099168660 Chrisclear (talk) 03:28, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Saints Constantine and Helene.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:00, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: Hello, this happened last time. How can I avoid it? This is an image I have personally taken and I thought it would avoid the first criterion as it is a real life monument which I personally photographed. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 00:34, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You iploaded the imagecas nonfree. Whpq (talk) 03:00, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: But how did I do that and how do I avoid it? I am sorry, but I have read through all the guide articles and criterion and still do not understand how to avoid it. Every time I have asked for some help, I have been redirected to a complicated page, so could you please explain how to upload an image that I have photographed and make it free? - Therealscorp1an (talk) 03:09, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to release the image under a free license, the preferred location is Commons. Choose "upload file" from the site menu. That will lead you to the upload wizard. Follow the prompts. One of the choices you will have to make is a license. CC-BY-SA 4.0 is the preferred license for images. Whpq (talk) 02:36, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good work on what you’ve achieved but you should try pages for Nicolette, Freya, Zara, Mackenzie & Kiri 2A02:C7E:332F:6800:41E7:DC67:4111:C7A4 (talk) 10:57, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I know there is a certain editor working on an article for Nicolette and one for Mackenzie will most likely be made in the near future. I am just worried there is not enough real-world perspective information for Freya, Kiri and Zara. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 11:06, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Freya has the whole Gareth, blackmail and Levi storyline that could help. Kiri has the whole Glen, Nicolette and Chloe storyline and Zara has the feud with Jane, the fire and her mum with two guys storylines which would help for articles. There is characters of less note with their own articles within Neighbours Gemma Reeves, Andrea Somers for instance. 82.132.246.104 (talk) 11:48, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but what they lack (maybe not so much with Freya, though) is the real-world information and not just the in-universe information. That's the interviews for every storyline, casting details, producer messages and reception. Andrea, for example, did have those things (mainly because it was Madeleine West returning to the serial). - Therealscorp1an (talk) 12:21, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Naomi Canning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 10 Play.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the plot section you added to Naomi Canning. It did not have a one previously and it is a fully sourced article. Plot sections are fan trivia and do not help the general readers understanding of the subject. The fully sourced development sections do that job.Rain the 1 20:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the one from Hendrix Greyson too. I know it must have taken ages and was done in good faith. But please refrain from adding more? Pretty please lolRain the 1 21:04, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It did take quite a while: over a month of watching every single episode of Neighbours from 2014 to 2015, but I understand. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 03:12, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and I know. Aside from that you have been busy creating new content more recently. What is next on your list?Rain the 1 16:02, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, no idea. There are a few articles I want to expand/create that are disambiguated from Neighbours. I would really like to create some more Neighbours articles, but I'm worried we're running out of material. I looked around for some sources for the 2016 hotel explosion, but there's not really much I could find (finding enough sources for the Erinsborough High fire was a fluke!). What about you? Anything on the radar after completing the article for Nicolette? - Therealscorp1an (talk) 21:22, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah okay then. I do have Nicolette to complete but I got a little bored of creating new character articles for recent characters. Like you say though, Neighbours has nearly everything near complete. I might just keep adding to old articles or finish a sandbox because I sure do have a few of those! lolRain the 1 20:22, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Oxford Comma is standard in American English. I am aware that in other countries it is not, but since United States is about the United States, please don't remove it! Thanks! -- Rockstone^{Send me a message!} 19:39, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rockstone35: Understood. Sorry, I was not aware that that is standard practice in the US. I know that British and Australian English is not as so. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 20:31, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! -- Rockstone^{Send me a message!} 20:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Therealscorp1an. I noticed your recent edit at Battle of Brisbane—you changed the hyphens in the titles of 'First night' and 'Second night' to en dashes. I am just wondering why you didn't change them to em dashes rather? I have checked MOS:DASH, and perhaps I am missing something about the use in sub-headings, but it seems that em dashes should be used there. Looking forward to your response. Compusolus (talk) 04:28, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake. Em dashes would be the preferred dash. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 05:31, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Putting more info in the footnote was a great idea, great for clarification - but my original edit was because "Lesbos or Lesvos" isn't clear. You pretty much just worked your way around reverting my edit directly. Amyipdev (talk) 02:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just feel that the gap between "Lesbos" and "Lesvos" in the lead is way too big and with all the information in the footnotes, the extra commas and the long notes in the many brackets still makes the lead way too confusing. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 05:32, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have to disagree, and either way, "or" is NOT the correct way to solve this. "Lesbos or Lesvos" doesn't make grammatical or logical sense unless you already know it's a transliteration clarification. Amyipdev (talk) 14:58, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amyipdev: the correct place to resolve content disputes is the article's talk page, not talk pages of individual users. So I won't continue here further.
Anyway, I made significant edits to the lead and the #Etymology section of the article, which hopefully make your concerns moot. I happen to agree with Therealscorp1an that it is entirely unnecessary to cram the "transliteration clarification" into the very first sentence since it's 1) mostly irrelevant and 2) pretty obvious – many foreign names have multiple English renderings, and that would hardly confuse anyone. No such user (talk) 09:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I hope you are having a lovely day. I wanted to let you know that I removed the years from Beth Brennan's family duration as:

1.) It is not confirmed when she stopped being married to Brad (as the marriage bit does not have the year she got divorced)

2.) It is a bit cluttering and not useful

3.) Just because a couple divorce does not mean that they stop being part of a family. Durations are used for something technically - e.g. the years a couple were married or the years the character/actor appeared in. Just because Beth got divorced does not mean that she automatically stopped being part of the family. This is true of other divorced soap women. For example, Lisa Dingle was still very much considered part of the Dingle family when divorced from Zach, whilst Maggie Horton acts as the head of the Horton family despite being remarried and her Horton husband having died back in 2010, and Sonia Fowler's common name is still Fowler despite her having been divorced for 7+ years from him. The "family" section is just meant to be helpful to let the readers know what families the characters belong in so that they can learn more about the storylines/development/connections etc.

4.) It is inconsistent with other soap articles (e.g. Ronnie Mitchell, Sonia Fowler, Roxy Slater, Susan Kennedy etc.

5.) I think it can be confusing for readers as it could suggest that she legally cut ties with the family or something as it is inconsistent with other soap characters and her marriage duration

I hope this makes sense! Have a lovely weekend! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 05:40, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All good, I understand. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 15:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's a message for you on Talk:Neighbours. 82.19.124.151 (talk) 22:59, 12 November 2022 (UTC) 82.19.124.151 (talk) 22:59, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you edited the first sentence of the page 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine to 'commenced an invasion' rather than 'invaded'. I disagree with the edit, for it does not read as well, and moreover there was nothing wrong with 'invaded'. An invasion isn't exclusively invading and occupying the entire territory; note definitions online:

• (of an armed force) enter (a country or region) so as to subjugate or occupy it.
• to enter for conquest or plunder

etc. And thus 'invaded' means to enter, not necessarily to occupy the entire territory. Compusolus (talk) 09:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable. I just thought it would be clearer for people who are not as knowledgeable on the linguistic specifics. However, I might add that it is curious how you seem to follow me from edit to edit... - Therealscorp1an (talk) 09:22, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Very good. I don't think it is curious as at all—2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine has long been on my watchlist, as is the previous page that I commented on on this talk page with respects—Battle of Brisbane. Compusolus (talk) 11:35, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 12:42, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Therealscorp1an. Thank you for your work on Death and funeral of Constantine II of Greece. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:15, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: No problem. I've been wanting to have the satisfying feeling of creating another article lately, so I knew that Constantine II's passing would be a great opportunity. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 22:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Constantine II of Greece shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DrKay (talk) 18:55, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been involved as much as me. I even explained my changed and you continuously avoid explanations. Not much more I can do... - Therealscorp1an (talk) 21:03, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This edit summary[2] is non-sensical. You are clearly sandwiching text between two images, one on the left side and one on the right side of the page. DrKay (talk) 20:29, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry, that was my mistake. I didn't see the "left" written on the first image. I'll add it back but change the sides later. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 20:52, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Levi Canning you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Theleekycauldron -- Theleekycauldron (talk) 21:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Therealscorp1an,

Please do not manually add your nominations to the WP:GAN page. Once the talk page of an article has the GAN template, the bot will automatically take care of it. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 09:08, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, alright. Thank you for letting me know. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 09:13, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of your GANs, I was looking at the page stats for Constantine II of Greece and I see that you have less than 3% authorship of the page. Are you sure you have sufficient familiarity with the article to be an appropriate nominator? Per the Good Article instructions, nominators must have contributed significantly to articles before nominating them, and I doubt I'd be alone in questioning whether 3% authorship is close to enough. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where exactly does it mention this? - Therealscorp1an (talk) 03:47, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Therealscorp1an: Bolded in the second paragraph of instructions lede, and bolded in the second paragraph of nominations lede. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 03:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with this rule, but I will respect it and take back the nomination. I have also contacted someone with a higher percentage contribution to see if they would like to nominate the article. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 06:35, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Levi Canning you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Levi Canning and Talk:Levi Canning/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Theleekycauldron -- Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Levi Canning you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Levi Canning for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Theleekycauldron -- Theleekycauldron (talk) 23:02, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. livelikemusic (TALK!) 17:34, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, it would be nice if you clarified what you were talking about instead of leaving some vague message on my talk page with zero context. Second of all, after looking around, I see you are regarding my Neighbours edits, changing "Former; regular (returning)" to "Present; regular". Since there has been less than a year's gap, the wording can become the latter regardless. This is how it has always been done. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 20:43, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greek people expressed their will through a plebiscite and got rid of the royals. Why can't you accept that? Why do you support the deposed royals' agenta? 141.237.5.73 (talk) 23:01, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not taking a political standing in my edits. It is just known that Pavlos does not use a last name. That's not a personal choice, that is by law. His passport does not have a last name on it. He is not a Greek citizen either. All of this is explained in his article and in his father's article. Please refrain from these edits or you will be warned and could possibly blocked from editing. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 23:24, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not possible to edit Greeks, i think it is locked. Can you please remove this new material added in Greeks#Diaspora: "The American Hellenic Council's Census 2020 Initiative encourages the Greek American diaspora to identify as Greek when asked about their ethnic origins. Identifying as Greek in the US Census will result in funds being invested to support services in the Greek American community, including funding for Greek education, including Greek language programs and services for government-run programs, as well as funding to support Medicare, aged care, Section 8 housing, and many other services.[190]" It is a small aspect of the general Greek diaspora topic, and already takes 1/3 of the section. It should be moved to Greek_Americans#21st_century. Also, in Greeks#Modern_2 there is: "According to data published by the Federal Statistical Office of Germany in 2011, 23,800 Greeks emigrated to Germany, a significant increase over the previous year. By comparison, about 9,000 Greeks emigrated to Germany in 2009 and 12,000 in 2010.[199][200]" This should be removed, and be moved to Greeks_in_Germany#Demographics. 37.6.166.57 (talk) 11:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for bringing this to my attention. It'd be best, however, to bring this discussion up at the actual talk page so we can gain the opinion on other editors first. Thanks. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 11:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you removed the title King or Queen from the names of some Danish and Greek monarchs after I added it. Are you sure that it is a rule not to include their title before their name? I have seen it used to describe monarchs such as Elizabeth II, Margrethe II and Felipe VI, to give an example. Векочел (talk) 21:36, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Векочел: It's not a "rule set in stone", but I do know that some editors prefer to exclude "King" and "Queen" before their name and instead just add "of country" afterwards. Although in some rare cases, articles may have their titles in front of their names, they usually exclude it. I think the main reason for it is that in monarchs' articles, they usually just refer to them as their first name, so they try to do that for other monarchical names that are mentioned (and linked) within the article. I'm really not too fussed, like I don't want to edit war or anything over anything like this, but yeah, I just reverted it because excluding the title just seems to be the general standard thing on Wikipedia articles. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 22:30, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thank you very much for awarding me the GA barnstar. In fairness, I must also give it to you for having taken the initiative and for having participated with speed and diligence in getting Constantine II of Greece to obtain the status of Good Article. Do not hesitate to count on me to continue collaborating. Thanks for your job! _-_Alsor (talk) 12:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, I didn't expect to get it back! Thank you so much! - Therealscorp1an (talk) 12:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Neighbours 30th Anniversary you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 00:41, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations and good luck!! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:35, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you to both of you! - Therealscorp1an (talk)

The article Neighbours 30th Anniversary you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Neighbours 30th Anniversary and Talk:Neighbours 30th Anniversary/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 23:01, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Neighbours 30th Anniversary you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Neighbours 30th Anniversary for comments about the article, and Talk:Neighbours 30th Anniversary/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 03:22, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Therealscorp1an (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. I'm not sure why I cannot edit. Thanks. Therealscorp1an (talk) 11:00, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide the IP address privately. Yamla (talk) 11:02, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page International reactions to the 2023 Israel–Hamas war, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Greco-Australian dialect at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 12:15, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Would it be better to create this Neighbours episode article in your draft space? It would be a simple move over to the main space. I have never used that tool.Rain the 1 20:34, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Raintheone: Hi. Do you think so? Episode 8904 was done through the draftspace and I started this one so editors could collaborate on it and so no one would already start the article themself. Do you think I should edit it on my own draft space instead? - Therealscorp1an (talk) 21:35, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you continued to work on it there. You seem fine editing it alone. I am just not a fan of the AFC process. The template for source no7 is missing Digital Spy. I would suggest try not to have an over reliance on Digital Spy since it is currently used solely for all the content currently added. Where did you get the spelling of Christa Sinclair? I noticed you added it to the 2023 list and this draft. I presumed it was Krista - Radio Times and Inside Soap spell it as Krista.Rain the 1 23:15, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, User:Raintheone. So do you reckon I should move it to be own sandbox and do it there? And yes, don't worry, I've been very weary of all the Digital Spy references and have been trying to find other ones too. Thanks for pointing out the reference error. And as for Christa, I just assumed the spelling, but it could be Krista. We could change it if you really want or just wait until after she's appeared, but I'm not fussed either way. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 23:25, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I only asked since I was going to add information about her to Eden using an Inside Soap source. I will change to Krista since the source states that. We can always revert back to Christa next week if she is credited as such. You already started the article at AFC. In future if you believe you can create an article just do it. By its own admission, AFC is designed for "editors who do not yet have sufficient editing experience."Rain the 1 23:39, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay, thanks. If you want to add anything to the draft, of course feel absolutely free to. Thanks for the help! - Therealscorp1an (talk) 23:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I was thinking of starting an article for Sam Young. This wouldn't be published until early 2024 (as whilst she has had a lot of coverage, she hasn't had too many storylines yet), but I wanted to get it started sometime in the next few days. However, I wanted to check with you and a few other people first, as I'd hate to get started on it and have to abandon it or to tread on your toes. I also wanted to start one for Sadie too, so please let me know. Have a lovely day 😊 DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 07:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DaniloDaysOfOurLives: Hi! Thanks so much for thinking of me as one of the editors to come to! I think articles for each would be great (I'm currently writing one for Byron) and I'm happy to help you in your sandbox on anything you need me to (maybe reception for Sam?). In my personal opinion, I think Sam would be easier to create an article for due to the media coverage, however I think creating articles for both characters would be fine because we know, by nature of soap operas, that they will eventually inherit new storylines and there will be more coverage that will allow us to expand their articles, but there might be some other editors who disagree. But it's a strong go for it and happy to help from me! - Therealscorp1an (talk) 10:09, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I agree about Sam being easier than Sadie. I think I am okay with the help (I am not good with collabs at the moment as my schedule is too unpredictable) but I really appreciate it, thank you! I just wanted to check first in case, because otherwise if we both started articles for them then we'd have to abandon one and that would be awful. Good luck with Byron btw! I'll keep an eye out for sources for him. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DaniloDaysOfOurLives: Alright, thanks. I'll keep a look out for sources on Sam too (I assume you'll be doing her first?). I'll just leave any on your talk page. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 21:34, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Neighbours 30th Anniversary at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 18:43, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Therealscorp1an, there was a reply to your subsequent query; you will need to address the issue very soon if you wish your nomination to be approved. Please respond and make any necessary changes to the article. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:11, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you use {{sfn|Lee|2000|p=40}} in Queen Anne-Marie of Greece but there is no such work defined. This means that nobody can look it up, and the article is placed in Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. If you could supply the missing source that would be great. DuncanHill (talk) 01:36, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DuncanHill: Hi, I just used that reference from the French Wikipedia article, so we may need to find a new reference for it. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 01:38, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can copy it over now I know what it is. DuncanHill (talk) 01:40, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neighbours 30th Anniversary has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:21, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Greco-Australian dialect, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Greco-Australian dialect, a variety of Modern Greek, blends words with English roots into the Greek language? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Greco-Australian dialect. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Greco-Australian dialect), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Prince Félix of Luxembourg, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Princess Claire of Luxembourg, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Harlow Robinson (Neighbours) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OlifanofmrTennant -- OlifanofmrTennant (talk) 00:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Typically, such bulleted lists of attendees of funerals, weddings, coronations, etc. go on separate dedicated pages for the events themselves, not the pages for the individuals they concern, so I'm not sure if this is allowed for a section of his page, given Wikipedia:UNDUE concerns. 2601:249:9301:D570:928:1581:7D4F:E386 (talk) 20:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article George II of Greece you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 08:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Harlow Robinson (Neighbours) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Harlow Robinson (Neighbours) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Harlow Robinson (Neighbours) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Therealscorp1an. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/George II of Greece.
Message added 14:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The nomination has been marked for closure. Please respond if you still wish to pursue it. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 23:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hubertus, Hereditary Prince of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Prince Hubertus is the heir apparent to the head of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, a royal dynasty to which Elizabeth II belonged? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hubertus, Hereditary Prince of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hubertus, Hereditary Prince of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 12:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, - it's also featured on Portal:Germany. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hubertus, Hereditary Prince of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hubertus, Hereditary Prince of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mangoe (talk) 00:20, 28 March 2024 (UTC) on their talk page(s).[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Queen Anne-Marie of Greece you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cplakidas -- Cplakidas (talk) 21:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Paul of Greece you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cplakidas -- Cplakidas (talk) 21:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Where is Kate? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 11:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Therealscorp1an. Thank you for your work on Cruise of the Kings. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thank you! I hope you have a great day as well. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 23:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Paul of Greece you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Paul of Greece and Talk:Paul of Greece/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cplakidas -- Cplakidas (talk) 20:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]