User talk:Tompw

This user has asked for Wikipedians to give him/her feedback at an editor review. You may comment on his/her edits at Wikipedia:Editor review/Tompw.

Hi Tompw,

I've used the Timeline of Canadian Elections page many times and I'm profoundly grateful. However, for economic analysis it would be even more helpful to have a timeline of Canadian budgets, at the very least from 1981, to correspond to the RBC Fiscal Tables (http://www.rbc.com/economics/economic-reports/pdf/provincial-forecasts/prov_fiscal.pdf).

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Red456789 (talk • contribs) 21:47, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tompw. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for updating several GO Station articles with 2018 ridership. I just want to point out that the ridership from your source is only from the period of April–November 2018, and not for the whole year. Would it be possible to indicate that in the station infoboxes? BLAIXX 22:20, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Railway line header has been nominated for merging with [[Template:]]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk) 17:33, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canadian election images has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Football League Two teamlist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:57, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Football League One teamlist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Mathematical analysis, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Mathematical analysis and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Mathematical analysis during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:30, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Algebra, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Algebra and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Algebra during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:50, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Discworld, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Discworld and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Discworld during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ToThAc (talk) 19:23, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Discworld portal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:09, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of census divisions of Canada by population is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of census divisions of Canada by population until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 19:00, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tompw! I'd love to transclude your bookshelf to Help:Introduction to navigating Wikipedia/1, but it's a bit large; is there any way to transclude it at a smaller size? {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 20:08, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated List of counties in Kentucky for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 02:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect High-speed rail in Spain. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 25#High-speed rail in Spain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:03, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Timeline of Canadian elections for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:18, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Tompw. I'm just posting to let you know that List of counties in Wyoming – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for November 22. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hey Tompw, think there's an issue with your famed bookshelf viz. Would love to buy you a beer if you're in Toronto. Let me know if I can help. cheers Spencerk (talk) 19:48, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EFL Championship teamlist has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 12:11, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tompw. Thanks for your efforts updating all census info. Note though that the field "2021_total_pvt_dwell" in {{Canada census}} calls for total private dwellings, not private dwellings occupied by usual residents. If you use this latter value, the data will no longer be comparable, since the different years show different data. Thanks for your diligence in this matter. P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tompw. Again, thanks for updating the census info. I see you started using the new parameter I added for "occupied dwellings".
Just wanted to make you aware that you should not add the dollar sign ($) when adding household income. This is already done by the template. So, it is now displayed twice at all your edits. Regards, -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:01, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's a good thing I only did ~100 in the first trance! Thankfully, AWB has a find-and-replace function that made this easy to fix. FYI, I have a long-term aim of using WikiData for this info, so that I won't have to go through all this again in five four year. There's a bunch of stuff I need to do over there before that can happen; so in the meantime I'm updating existing uses of the template. Tompw (talk) 14:23, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that has been my goal as well. I fully support the linking to WD! It is so tedious and slow updating all 3500 municipalities (not to speak of higher level jurisdictions) after every census. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help with that. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've figured out how to do bulk data uploads to Wikidata, but one of the intermediate steps is tagging the various Census (sub)divisions with the relevant Q-code in Wikidata. If I left a list on my userpage there, would you be willing to add those? There's ~50 CDs that need it. 19:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC) Tompw (talk) 19:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Your calculations on how many encyclopedia volumes Wikipedia would take up are quite intriguing! I think you've earned this. 1MM0R7AL5 (talk) 16:24, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you! Tompw

Template:Railway line header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 17:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BS-any has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:20, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:36, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you mistakenly assessed Curling at the 2022 Winter Olympics as an A class article. It is at best C. Schierbecker (talk) 03:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I see you were WP:BOLD and updated the rating. I'll start a discussion on the talk page of the article. Tompw (talk) 15:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Please note that the edit I put into the lede followed referenced material I added to the GE 2024 subsection. You said "fell back to 9%…" which while true in a case or two isn’t supported by a reference anywhere, and of course there are other polls without that much fall back and lead over the Conservatives. What I’m trying to say is, although maybe I’m not putting my point across very well, apologies for that, is that I don’t reckon one should just pluck figures from a table elsewhere and editorialise with them. All the best. Boscaswell talk 07:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just stop, please, Tompw, removing from the lede the rather soft words that had been included about pollsters reporting an increase in support for Reform following Farage's resumption of the leadership. Have you looked at and absorbed the information shown on the Opinion Polling article? You’ll note that one of them, the esteemed YouGov, is now reporting a 1% deficit cf. the Cons. Redfield and Winton surveyed 10,000 people and came up with 2%. Others have a different result, that is always the way with opinion pollsters, and indeed one has a figure of the deficit cf. the Tories of double figures. But look at the graph! The polling line for Reform shoots up. So it is clear that the words which you deleted and said were now countered are clearly correct, notable, and current. Just stop, please, your edit warring. I’m going to edit in something similar and trust you to the decent thing and leave the new words as they are. All the best. Boscaswell talk 20:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]