User talk:Tw3435

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
If you move a page maliciously again, as you did to Vietnam Television, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Boing! said Zebedee 23:25, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Very Terrible Video (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. -- Boing! said Zebedee 23:27, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just show you that Tw3435 is the computer bot (NOT Wikipedia bot like Thjis!bot or Miszabot, these are controlled with script on Wikipedia, but Tw3435 is controlled by his computer.). You can delete it now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.180.108.170 (talk) 00:41, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to China Central Television, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. We have some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Harley Hartwell (talk) 09:31, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for page-move vandalism after final warning. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tw3435 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I haven't say I'm a bot, if you ever noticed, it was written by anonymous IPs. And all of these aren't my IPs and not even close to mine. Talk to me if you want.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Kuru (talk) 21:16, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why have you move some pages SO FAST like a bot? Or are you half bot?--125.25.236.126 (talk) 10:50, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a new ANI notice. Come and discuss --125.25.251.159 (talk) 15:38, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adding link. My fault for not adding link. Link:Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Problem_is_not_yet_finished.2C_even_5_months_now._Clear_this_problem_as_soon_as_possible--125.25.251.159 (talk) 15:41, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of news anchors on Channel 7 (Thailand) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Zero references for these not notable TV news anchors. In addition, this list violates WP:NOT because Wikipedia is not a list of run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL) people that do not stand out from the rest.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoeNMLC (talk) 14:36, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]