User talk:Volcanopele

Hey there this ionian volcano page needs the attention of an expert like yourself. AmmarBanafea (talk) 21:37, 16 April 2015 (UTC) Thanks for building wikipedia with your efforts.[reply]

Whence the orbital details (inclination, etc.)?

Urhixidur 00:22, 2005 Feb 25 (UTC)

(Copy of answer received through e-mail):

The orbital elements come from C. C. Porco et al. Cassini Imaging Science: Initial Results on Saturn's Rings and Small Satellites. Science, Vol 307, Issue 5713, 1226-1236 , 25 February 2005, http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/short/307/5713/1226

Volcanopele

I've added the reference to the page's links. Thanks.

Urhixidur 02:22, 2005 Mar 1 (UTC)

Hi, similar question to above. It'd be great to include some kind of reference for the improved diameter estimate. If it's not put in, it becomes a bane a year or two down the track because it can become hard to track down where it came from, and doubts appear :-) Deuar 22:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done and Done. I should also note that recent disk resolved images seemed to confirm this size, which I what reminded me to change that number.--Volcanopele 22:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That was fast! By the way thanks for all the excellent research on Saturn's icy moons you Cassini guys have been doing, and the way it's released rapidly to the public. It's really appreciated. Deuar 23:11, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to commend you on the great job you've done on not only the Enceladus article itself, but the pages for its surface features! I think they are an example that the rest of the surface feature pages should be worked on to match. Keep up the great work! --Patteroast 17:34, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on getting this to featured status. Great article, I enjoyed reading it. --BillC 16:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you cropped the Enceladus image even further (which is fine, though I prefer at least some blackness around it), but what strikes me is the image appears much sharper. Did you sharpen it, because I already applied a smart sharpen in Photoshop CS2? This just looks too excessive even for my taste, it's starting to get that Voyager processing feel to it. Ugo 07:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can revert it, no problem. The sharpening is meant to remove some of the smoothing effects caused by the PSF, I'll let you mess with that to your liking. I trimmed it so it would work better as the title image. --Volcanopele 18:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, a new cropped version is up, but without additional sharpening as it was already sharpened (the "smart sharpen" filter used actually does something similar to deconvolution). Ugo 20:35, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on the Enceladus-related articles from me, too. I've been doing a lot of cleanup and reorganization related to planetary surface features lately and I was surprised to find that wee little Enceladus was the most thoroughly written-about of Saturn's moons, at least as far as articles about surface features go. Was expecting Titan to be getting all the attention. :) Bryan Derksen (talk) 04:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you have recently changed some Uranus moons to the names Cupid, Mab, Perdita, Francisco and Ferdinand. Can you please give me a reference for the naming of these satellites, as i was not able to find an official confirmation.

Thanks, --Gunter.krebs 19:41, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/append7.html contains a list of Satellite names provided by the organization that does the naming. Definitely the first place to check for new official names. Volcanopele 17:56, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the info --Gunter.krebs 10:07, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:EN011 Color.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

		The E=MC² Barnstar
		For your awesome drive of Enceladus (moon) to FA status, I hereby bestow you this EMC² Barnstar! Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 16:23, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet!! Thank you so much. Now on to another moon... --Volcanopele 19:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How about Titan? Reyk _YO! 23:56, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• sigh* I might as well. It is on my to-do list. Personally, I'd prefer to start by infusing the other major Saturnian moon articles with Cassini-derived info. The Mimas article doesn't even have some of the best images taken by Cassini of the surface. The Janus article has no image from Cassini. The Titan article is in serious need of rehauling. I have suggested an outline in the talk page, but I haven't had time to implement it. --Volcanopele 00:40, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I saw the Astronomy collaboration of the week you added to Venus. You might like to know that Venus is currently a featured article candidate. Within the last few weeks, Worldtraveller and I have created a new version, which has been nominated for FA status. You might like to add comments on the current article there. Regards, BillC 21:45, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• sigh* okay, ACOTW changed to Mars. Thanks for the heads up. --Volcanopele 22:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if you would be interested in helping me improve the article Eritrea to FA status? I think it already has plenty of content it just needs to have its language cleared up. If you would I would really appreciate it! Merhawie 18:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like the work youve done on Enceladus, and would like for Europa to become a GA, it needs a copy-edit/cleanup... and you seem to do a good job, reckon you could pop over and have an edit? -- Nbound 05:44, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the new names on the Neptune's natural satellites page, so I went to add them onto the Timeline of Natural Satellites... after I did so, I noticed the link to Laomedeia redirected to Halimede, by your edit. I'm quite confused by this point. What's going on? --Patteroast 23:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got confused as to which name applied to S/ 2002 N 1. So I first moved that article to Halimede, then to Laomedeia. When I got an email from the IAU naming group about which names applied to which moons, I moved it back to Halimede. However, because of that incorrect move, Laomedeia redirects to Halimede. For now, use Laomedeia until we can get that fixed. --Volcanopele 23:14, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have submitted a request for an uncontroversial move of S/2002 N 3 to Laomedeia (moon). In the meantime, Laomedeia (moon) now redirects to S/2002 N 3, as it should. RandomCritic 09:09, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The move to Laomedeia (moon) has been completed. RandomCritic 11:37, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You wanted to full text of IAUC 8812. Here it is:

Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams INTERNATIONAL ASTRONOMICAL UNION Mailstop 18, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. [email protected] or FAX 617-495-7231 (subscriptions) [email protected] (science) URL http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/cbat.html  ISSN 0081-0304 Phone 617-495-7440/7244/7444 (for emergency use only)    SATELLITES OF 2003 AZ_84, (50000), (55637), AND (90482)       M. E. Brown and T.-A. Suer, California Institute of Technology, report the discoveries of four satellites of large transneptunian objects from observations with the Hubble Space Telescope High Resolution Camera (+ F606W filter).  Observations of (55637) 2002 UX_25 on 2005 Aug. 26.64 UT detected a satellite that was 2.5 +/- 0.2 mag fainter than the primary at a separation of 0".164 +/- 0".003 in p.a. 153 +/- 2 degrees.  Observations of (90482) Orcus on 2005 Nov. 13.13 detected a satellite that was 2.7 +/- 1 magnitude fainter than the primary at a separation of 0".25 +/- 0".01 in p.a. 128 +/- 1 deg.  Observations of 2003 AZ_84 on 2005 Dec. 2.99 detected a satellite that was 5.0 +/- 0.3 mag fainter than the primary at a separation of 0".22 +/- 0".01 in p.a. 321 +/- 2 deg. Observations of (50000) Quaoar on 2006 Feb. 14.90 detected a satellite that was 5.6 +/- 0.2 mag fainter than the primary at a separation of 0".35 +/- 0".01 in p.a. 110 +/- 1 deg.    V1281 SCORPII       H. Naito and S. Narusawa, Nishi-Harima Astronomical Observatory; and H. Yamaoka, Kyushu University, report that a low-resolution spectrogram (range 410-670 nm; resolution 1600 at H_alpha) of the possible nova reported on IAUC 8810 was obtained on Feb. 21.84 UT with the 2.0-m NAYUTA telescope (+ MALLS).  The spectrum shows a broad H_alpha line with a P-Cyg profile (the FWHM of the emission component is about 1800 km/s), along with many other weaker lines, indicating that the star is indeed a classical nova.  A narrow Na I D absorption feature suggests the existence of considerable interstellar reddening.  Yamaoka adds that Y. Fujita (Kuma-Kogen, Ehime, Japan) made a prediscovery CCD image of the area of the nova with a Nikon D50 camera (+ 105-mm f/2 camera lens) on Feb. 18.850, and the nova was not visible to limiting mag 11.6.      N. N. Samus, Institute of Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences, reports that this nova has been given the designation V1281 Sco.    V1280 SCORPII       C. Buil, Castanet, France, reports that an optical spectrogram of V1280 Sco obtained on Feb. 20.20 UT using a 0.28-m Schmidt- Cassegrain telescope (+ Lhires spectrograph) shows an H_alpha P-Cyg profile and a FWHM of 730 km/s; the intensity of the H_alpha peak intensity is 2.3 times the local 670-nm continuum.  CCD magnitudes by J. D. West, Mulvane, KS:  Feb. 21.467 UT, H = 2.87 +/- 0.06; 21.483, V = 4.73 +/- 0.01.  2007 February 22               (8812)            Daniel W. E. Green

regards, Chesnok 13:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet, thanks a bunch! Not sure how to turn that info into something for the Quaoar article. I think it at least mentions that Quaoar has a moon. --Volcanopele 18:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed it was languishing in the list of former featured articles and popped over to buck it up a bit, but you seem to have rescued it already. I've given it a bit of a copy-edit and knocked out some redundancy, but it seems in good shape. Are you planning on expanding it further (I don't see that it is lacking anything), or shall we send it back to FAC? Cheers Yomangani^talk 13:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are a few things that can be added. The most important section that needs fixing is the "Interaction with Magnetosphere" section. Right now, it is just copied from the old article that seemed to refer to that interaction, but more needs to be added on the Io Flux Tube, the Sodium cloud, the Io plasma torus, and Io's effects on Jupiter's magnetosphere in general. Being a geologist and NOT as plasma physicist makes this a difficult section for me to write. Once that section gets cleaned up, and maybe the atmosphere section as well, I would like to send this to a peer review first, as well as get some input from some of my fellow Io researchers. --Volcanopele 16:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the "Interaction with Magnetosphere" could stand a tiny expansion but I'd be wary of writing what should be a separate article in there. I'm not sure the Atmosphere section needs anything adding. How do you feel about the cite templates for references? There are a few inconsistencies in the citations that they would iron out but I know not everybody is a fan of them. (and if I haven't made it clear, I think it's an impressive piece of work - halfway through copy-editing I suddenly thought "I bet it is up at FAC already" and was surprised when I didn't see the banner on the talk page). Yomangani^talk 17:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't think we need to go as long as a separate article, though that makes me wary of expanding some of the other section for fear we would be entering that territory. I certainly feel though that "Volcanism on Io" should have an article all its own. --Volcanopele 17:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WRT the cite templates, I don't think they are perfect, and prefer to use my own style, based loosely on the Science magazine format, with article titles included to act as an anchor for links. So one of the things that also needs to get fixed is to use a common citation format. However, I understand the need for them, top maintain some style consistency across Wikipedia, and will use them for that reason. --Volcanopele 17:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello !

At the end of Talk:Polydeuces_(moon)#For_the_Record_..._from_Carolyn_Porco, User:Rebjon21 seems to suggest that the article mention the team only and be unblocked. Do I understand that this satisfies you ? If no objection is made, the article will be unprotected shortly, which is somewhat overdue.

Thank you in advance and good continuation. Rama 18:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The E=mc² Barnstar
		I just nominated Io (moon) for FA status and wanted to give you the recognition you deserved for getting it up to code. Serendipodous 13:34, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet! Thanks. --Volcanopele 22:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to have to ask this, but are you sure that image is from Torola Macula? I got that image from a page claiming it was Genesa Macula, but it could have been wrong. Serendi^podous 19:27, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am 100% positive that that is Tortola Facula :) Ganesa Macula and Tortola Facula The page for Ganesa Macula has the correct image from Cassini RADAR. --Volcanopele 20:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you give Titan another read-though? Let me know if we've addressed your concerns. Thx. Serendi^podous 11:07, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is currently a FA candidate. Since you are an expert in planetary sciences, may I ask you to review Uranus? Comments can be left here. Ruslik 13:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Volcanopele, my name is Oscar and I´m from Mexico. I´m doing an english high school project that consists on doing an essay of the main characteristics of a foreign university. First of all,I would like to know if you are able to help me with the information I could need in this project. By the way, I will really appreciate your help, read you later...ciao. Yacopop 01:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)YacopopYacopop 01:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your name was found on a list of people interested in participating in the "Astronomy Collaboration of the Week", a project which ran for a short time in 2006. This project has been reactivated as a space collaboration of the week. If you are interested, please could you help us with this project. Thanks -- GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 20:57, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've got a frustrating situation over at global cooling where the global warming crowd are denying that there's anybody currently holding that we're in the lead in for a bout of global cooling. Whether we are or not is beyond me but it's rather obvious from even a cursory google search that some people do believe it so. They don't want to talk about it. They don't want to give any reason for challenging. It's the same old run around of asking for sources for everything including where the sun rises and challenging the sourcing until one gives up. Global Cooling is interesting because it's not structured as entirely a science article but rather a combination science and popular press article. They're denying that the popular press has any articles on it. TMLutas (talk) 01:17, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey VP, I forgot to ask this earlier, but would you mind if I co-sponsored the FAC? — Huntster (t • @ • c) 03:06, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, you have helped a lot on this article. --Volcanopele (talk) 04:11, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats VP, Volcanism on Io is now in the Featured Article class! — Huntster (t • @ • c) 22:14, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought I'd throw in my congrats as well. The article looks great! - Yohhans ^talk 19:06, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

VP, thought I'd let you know, the Volcanism on Io article [appear on the main page] on November 10, 2008. Yay! — Huntster (t • @ • c) 05:25, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:EN011 Tiger stripes.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Enceladus Tiger Stripes Up Close PIA06247.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Enceladus Tiger Stripes Up Close PIA06247.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Volcanopele, where do the figures for eccentricity and inclination come from that you added to Dysnomia back in June 2007 ? I have just read the reference fully, but there are no figures for eccentricity and inclination included in that reference. --Franklin Demenge (talk) 14:42, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the improvement of your Erdos number! :D — Huntster (t @ c) 00:00, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, wow you caught that. Yeah, just found out that an earlier co-author of mine, Jack Wisdom, has an Erdos number of 4, which is smaller than what I previously used as a reference, Carl Sagan, who I'm two papers removed from. --Volcanopele (talk) 00:15, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious - what body of liquid (if known) is the reflection off, and is there a reference for that? Thanks, WolfmanSF (talk) 09:18, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is at a lake located at 71N, 337W, just west of Kraken Mare, according to the NASA/JPL Press release. This relatively large lake (230x70 km) doesn't currently have a name. The lake can be seen in the USGS/Cassini RADAR labeled map of the north polar region to the lower left of the areas labeled Kraken Mare. --Volcanopele (talk) 10:37, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be interested in updating the dates for the Galilean satellites in Timeline of discovery of Solar System planets and their moons with appropriate references? RandomCritic (talk) 15:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. --Volcanopele (talk) 18:31, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! RandomCritic (talk) 19:38, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thankfully, the issue seems to be resolved, but you were edit warring on what was at the time WP:TFA, with six reverts, so I'm bringing this up at WP:AN3. I'm reporting User:Katydidit as well.--Noren (talk) 23:26, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thank you for the notice. --Volcanopele (talk) 05:26, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm closing both those AN3 reports since they're old enough to be considered stale. I remind you that the beauty and the horror of WP:3RR is that it doesn't care whether you're right - and the article being prominently featured doesn't alter that. dispute resolution (including talk page discussion, as you were doing) is sometimes frustratingly slow, but that's how it is. If a similar thing happens again on a frontpage article, you could post at WP:ANI to get quick input without feeling that you need to breach 3RR. Rd232 ^talk 12:33, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On February 12, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Masubi (volcano), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On February 12, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tupan Patera, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:08, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On February 13, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tawhaki Vallis, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On February 13, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tawhaki Patera, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On February 16, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pele (volcano), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at WT:DYK. Please do fix images. Materialscientist (talk) 23:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying images. Changed the image in Queu 6. Not sure about "Io with Thor pictured", suggestions are welcome. Sorry, I should get to you much earlier on that - just chain of events was such that someone else promoted those hooks and I was then hectically fixing them ;-) The original grayscale image of Thor is fine scientifically, but not appealing for non-specialists. Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with "Io pictured" or what you have "Io with Thor pictured", though I think without a detailed explanation, one too long for a hook, it maybe difficult to tell where Thor is in that image. Regardless, this image I think is more applicable to Thor. --Volcanopele (talk) 05:01, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On March 7, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Thor (volcano), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. My hunband and I drove to Fargo/Moorhead this weekend and I haunted libraries while he was at his meetings. I found very little information about the Saganagan Orogeny. (For some reason their libraries don't focus on northeastern Minnesota. LOL)

I believe it is one of the oldest orogenies. I will continue to search.

Again, thank you for your comments. I do appreciate them. Bettymnz4 (talk) 22:17, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your good work on the above (and other) articles. There's a bunch of issues identified at the FAC for this article. Hope you will be able to drop in to look at addressing them. Regards, hamiltonstone (talk) 02:38, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure why this failed at FAC. The point that some of the writing was kind of stilted an awkward is valid, but I thought we were making good progress fixing the prose. I suspect the fact that work on the article kind of halted for easter weekend may have been what did it in. I will keep trying to copyedit some sections. I suspect it could be made ready to pass in a few weeks. It is hard to copyedit because it is long and technically detailed, but I think it is a great article that merits the work it will take to get it through.Rusty Cashman (talk) 19:45, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 17:17, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Would you be interested in forming WikiProject Jupiter? If so, please show your support by clicking on the link above!--Novus Orator 06:24, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Samarkand Sulci Annotated.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 14:04, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Samarkand Sulci.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 14:04, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EN Peri-Banu crater2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 14:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EN Salih crater.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 14:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EN Samad crater.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 14:10, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samad (crater) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samad (crater) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bulwersator (talk) 14:12, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EN Gharib crater.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 14:13, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EN Sindbad crater.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 14:14, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EN Shahryar crater.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 14:14, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EN Isbanir Fossa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to 3 exciting events Wikipedians are planning in your region this June—a tour and meetup at the National Archives in Kansas City, and Wiknics in Wichita and St. Louis:

Kansas City Saturday, June 16, starting at 9 a.m. — National Archives in Kansas City This full-day event will include a tour of the facility; presentations from National Archives Wikipedian-in-Residence, Dominic McDevitt-Parks, and Exhibit Specialist, Dee Harris; and time in the research room to work on projects. The focus of the projects will be scanning, writing articles, transcribing, or categorizing images on Commons. Wikipedians from St. Louis and elsewhere in the region are encouraged to make a day-trip of it and come to Kansas City for this special opportunity!
And two local editions of the Great American Wiknic, the "picnic anyone can edit." Come meet (and geek out with, if you want) your local Wikipedians in a laid-back atmosphere: Wichita Saturday, June 23, starting at 1 p.m. — Central Riverside Park Join the 1st annual Wichita Wiknic: The Sunflower State blooms Free Knowledge! St. Louis Saturday, June 23, starting at 11 a.m. — Forest Park Visitors' Center Join the 2nd annual St Louis Wiknic: The Gateway to the West is now The Gateway to the Wiki!

Message delivered by Dominic·t 20:24, 24 May 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Thank you for uploading File:EN Musa crater.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:31, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:EN Duban crater1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 09:41, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:EN Peri-Banu crater.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 10:12, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:EN003 Samarkand Sulci.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:22, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:EN003 Sarandib Planitia.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 20:54, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:EN Hassan crater.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 12:45, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:EN003 Degraded Craters on Enceladus.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 02:20, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Come celebrate Wikipedia Day with other Kansas Wikipedians sponsored by Wikimedians Active in Local Regions in the United States (WALRUS) and hosted by the Topeka and Shawnee Public Library. Come chat, hang out and enjoy good company while find out more about Wikipedia in our regional community! RSVP at Wikipedia:Meetup/Topeka/Wikipedia_Day.

If you can't come, but still want to find out about events in the greater Topeka region (which may include KC, Manhattan, Lawrence, Salina, or other places where volunteers are interested) sign up for future notifications at Wikipedia:Meetup/Topeka/Invite list.

Hope to see you there Sadads (talk) 20:21, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there - Just running down the list of peeps who have Arizona userboxes, and was pleasantly surprised to see your familiar handle. My name is Maia and I'm friendly with a bunch of your colleagues. BTW, you may enjoy the Ski Enceladus userbox I created recently :) Anyhoo... I'm organizing a meetup during Spacefest in two weeks as a way to a) honor Sally Ride; b) get some more women in the space sciences represented on Wikipedia; and c) encourage new Wiki editors and meet with experienced editors in the area. I'm a member of the Boston/New England Wiki chapter and have run a couple of successful edit-a-thons within the past year. I'm actually hoping to secure some Wikipedia swag to bring to the event... Anyway, here's the edit-a-thon landing page on Spacefest, and below you can find the event page itself. If you're around and can join us, I'd love to meet you! Even if not, if you know anyone who might be interested, please send them our way. Cheers and thanks. Girona7 (talk) 20:03, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Astronomy and Space Sciences Edit-a-thon - Tucson, AZ - You are invited!

Sally Ride was the first American woman in space and a champion of girls and women everywhere. Ride would have turned 62 on May 26th had the world not lost her to pancreatic cancer last July. To honor her enduring legacy, Arizonans and all attendees of SpaceFest are invited to gather on her birthday to edit and create Wikipedia entries on notable women in astronomy and the space sciences. Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either. Girona7 (talk) 20:03, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Enceladus for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. DrKay (talk) 16:28, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Template:Infobox feature on Mars has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox feature on celestial object. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:53, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello colleague,

I am interested in the Middle Ages too.

I created Category:Medieval civilizations which is part of Category:Civilizations by time. The former is nominated for deletion and at the moment the vote is 2:0 in favor of deletion. I am used to deletions, but this time I am stunned. I do not believe there is no place for such a category. I believe that most people with interest in history would agree that civilizations existed in the Middle Ages. I ask people to contribute their opinion to the discussion. Regards,--Maxaxa (talk) 02:46, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Enceladus orbit top.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:Enceladus_orbit_2.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]