User talk:xDanielx

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives

August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Hey there! I'm xDanielx (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • email).

Click there to open your card! → → →

Dearest XDanielx,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 96 supports, 1 oppose, and 3 neutrals. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm a new admin remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them. I would like to give a special shout out to Hirohisat, Wizardman, and Husond, for there original co-nominations. Thank you once again and good day.

Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor

Credits

[edit]

This RFA thanks was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunatly this is not entirely my own design.

Click there to open your card! → → →

My dear Wikipedian XDanielx,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 29 supports, 1 opposed, and 3 neutral. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, or even if you just stopped by to make a comment, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. Since I am a new admin, if you have any suggestions or concerns, feel free to inform me of them. Special thanks to Carlossuarez46 for encourage me and nomination. Thank you and good day.

Carlosguitar

Credits

[edit]

This RFA thanks was inspired by The Random Editor, who in turn was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunately this is not entirely my own design.

This end the usual RFA thanks spam. You may return to your regular editing now.

Hello, XDanielx. You have new messages at Mendaliv's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Issue 1 (September 2009) Content News and announcements Want ads Feature: Article rescue as a team effort Featured editor: MichaelQSchmidt

The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Issue 2 (January 2010) Previous issue | Next issue

Content

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Volume I, Issue III February 2012 Front cover | Feature | News and announcements | Humor | Want ads To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the Newsletter draft page. ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the recipients list.

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hi xDanielx, hope you're doing well. I noticed that your user page and user talk page still mention that you're an admin on the English Wikipedia, mind updating those when you get a chance, to clear up any confusion? Not sure if you are planning to request restoration at some point but it would probably still be helpful in the meantime. Thanks for all you do around here. DanCherek (talk) 13:51, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dan - thanks for pointing that out, I'll fix it now, along with a few other things that are 10-15 years out of date :) — xDanielx ^T/_C\^R 14:16, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Levivich's view is that the casualty figure is properly sourced -- I think you forgot a "not" in there? Levivich (talk) 15:39, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hm sorry I didn't word that well, I meant to say that proper sources (like the ones you provided) exist to support the inclusion of the casualty count (or a similar one). — xDanielx ^T/_C\^R 01:53, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]