User talk:Xaliqen

Archives

Archive 1. Archive 2.

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:48, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on VF-6 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fleet Command (talk) 19:18, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would be interested in your thoughts on how to address requests for photographs in San Francisco Bay Area? It has been convention for some time now to organize requests for images in the USA via counties. I can understand your argument that there is an active group for the Bay area so having a category for this team would hopefully get more requests addressed. Question is what do we do with all the sub-categories in Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in California. One idea would be to collect all the counties that are in the bay area in a sub-category Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in the San Francisco Bay Area, but should check with other Wikipedias first. --Traveler100 (talk) 12:20, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Response here. --Xaliqen (talk) 07:11, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:54, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Falcon 9 upright on pad.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 16:44, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It did satisfy the criteria and the appropriate fair-use details were given at the time. I guess this is a canned response, but I suppose I don't easily fit into the template. Cheers. --Xaliqen (talk) 10:09, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Xaliqen,

I just wanted to give you a heads-up about the next wiki-meetup happening in SF. It'll be located at our very own Wikimedia Foundation offices, and we'd love it if some local editors who are new to the meetup scene came and got some free lunch with us :) Please sign up on the meetup page if you're interested in attending, and I hope to see you soon! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:46, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Hello. I agree with your recent change to this redirect, but some other editors don't. You may want to read Talk:Republican primaries. Certes (talk) 20:43, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fred Bauder Talk 19:49, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I realized it was all in a sense of fun. It's hard to read the tone when it's text without the context of a spoken voice. No worries and best wishes. --Xaliqen (talk) 20:04, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Children's anime and manga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children's anime and manga until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JoshuSasori (talk) 04:51, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Ancient Tenedos. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Tenedos. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Tenedos – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. E4024 (talk) 20:36, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I created it as a redirect to the Tenedos article. So, yeah, reverting back to the redirect seems more logical than deleting it (and it looks like that's what happened anyway). --Xaliqen (talk) 06:16, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, does anyone pay attention to whether their automated template messages actually correspond to the situation they're using them for? --Xaliqen (talk) 06:24, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had forgotten about that. We have a disambig for it, United States and Canada. Anglo-America is slightly larger than just the United States and Canada, it also includes a number of much much smaller countries, tough at the article notes "term is frequently used in reference to the two countries [US and Canada] together". Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 10:04, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. If it's preferable to link to the disambig, I'm sure users can find their way from there. --Xaliqen (talk) 10:07, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - Sorry for the late notice, but since you have yourself tagged as living in the Bay Area, I thought you might appreciate notification that we’re having an event Saturday! It’ll be held at Hoyt Hall, an all-women's house of the Berkeley Student Cooperative from 3 to 6 pm tomorrow. The main event page is here. Anyone is welcome to show up, but we’re expecting a significant number of people to come who have literally never edited Wikipedia before. If you’re an experienced Wikipedian who would be able to provide useful help to some of the newbies, your presence would be especially appreciated (and it might be a good idea for you to show up at 2 or 2:30 instead of three. Thanks, Kevin Gorman (talk) 02:08, 6 April 2013 (UTC) I’m AWB’ing this message to all Wikipedians who have tagged themselves in the bay area. I’m sorry if the message isn’t of interest to you; feel free to delete it. I’ll be unlikely to send future messages in a similar way, but if really don’t want to receive future messages of this sort, please let me know. [reply]

Hello, Xaliqen. You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:29, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikiproject islam. Since you had some involvement with the Wikiproject islam redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Centrify (f / k / a FCAYS) (talk) (contribs) 16:30, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Medieval doris. Since you had some involvement with the Medieval doris redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Constantine ✍ 13:44, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Doris in the middle ages. Since you had some involvement with the Doris in the middle ages redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Constantine ✍ 13:45, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Medieval syria. Since you had some involvement with the Medieval syria redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. clpo13_(talk) 18:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Do you take pictures for Wikipedia? If so, I am looking for someone to photograph the main entrance of the German School at 310 Easy Street Mountain View, CA 94043 for the Wikipedia article German School of the Silicon Valley. Is this convenient for you?

Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 15:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Smog regulations in california. Since you had some involvement with the Smog regulations in california redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Smog regulation in california. Since you had some involvement with the Smog regulation in california redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Smog controls in california. Since you had some involvement with the Smog controls in california redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Smog control in california. Since you had some involvement with the Smog control in california redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California smog regulations. Since you had some involvement with the California smog regulations redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California smog regulation. Since you had some involvement with the California smog regulation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California smog controls. Since you had some involvement with the California smog controls redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California smog control. Since you had some involvement with the California smog control redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California emissions standards. Since you had some involvement with the California emissions standards redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California emissions standard. Since you had some involvement with the California emissions standard redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California emissions regulations. Since you had some involvement with the California emissions regulations redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California emissions regulation. Since you had some involvement with the California emissions regulation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California emissions controls. Since you had some involvement with the California emissions controls redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:02, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California emissions control. Since you had some involvement with the California emissions control redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:02, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California emission standards. Since you had some involvement with the California emission standards redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:02, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California emission standard. Since you had some involvement with the California emission standard redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:03, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California emission regulations. Since you had some involvement with the California emission regulations redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:03, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California emission regulation. Since you had some involvement with the California emission regulation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California emission controls. Since you had some involvement with the California emission controls redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California emission control. Since you had some involvement with the California emission control redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California air-pollution regulations. Since you had some involvement with the California air-pollution regulations redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:05, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California air-pollution regulation. Since you had some involvement with the California air-pollution regulation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:05, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California air-pollution controls. Since you had some involvement with the California air-pollution controls redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:05, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California air-pollution control. Since you had some involvement with the California air-pollution control redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California air pollution regulations. Since you had some involvement with the California air pollution regulations redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California air pollution regulation. Since you had some involvement with the California air pollution regulation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:07, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California air pollution controls. Since you had some involvement with the California air pollution controls redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:07, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect California air pollution control. Since you had some involvement with the California air pollution control redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:08, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Green bananas. Since you had some involvement with the Green bananas redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 06:37, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of ps3 trophies. Since you had some involvement with the List of ps3 trophies redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The1337gamer (talk) 12:42, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect American financial crisis and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 4#American financial crisis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:16, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]