User talk:YoungForever

This is YoungForever's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 30 days

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. Please click here to leave me a new message.

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Buster7 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

YoungForever has been an active editor since 2018. She edits many TV series articles such as Big Sky and has made over 100K edits with a remarkable 90% to mainspace (where the real work gets done!). She has the rewarding capacity to "keep her cool" in spite of personal attacks and her ability to remain civil despite "heat" thrown her way is an example to us all. A Million Little Things is a favorite.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}

YoungForever

Editor of the Week for the week beginning April 23, 2023

An active editor since 2018. Edits various TV series articles such as Big Sky. Has made over 100K edits with a remarkable 90% to mainspace Has the ability to remain civil despite "heat" thrown her way. An exemplary editor.

Recognized for

staying cool under pressure

Notable work

A Million Little Things

Submit a nomination

Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 20:36, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the nomination and recognition, Buster7. And thank you for this project. I am truly honored. — YoungForever^(talk) 21:22, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for help over at Knuckles (TV series). I just started a discussion at over at WP:WikiProject Television, you can see it here. Given your extensive history of editing TV articles, thought you might want to take a look. Thanks in advance! --Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 05:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, didn't notice that there was a new formatting when it comes to series changing networks implemented. Rusted AutoParts 20:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rusted AutoParts: I think the formatting was implemented in late 2023. — YoungForever^(talk) 22:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tweak and advice on Raised by Wolves. That first summary used up all my spoons, lol. Vorik111 (talk) 15:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi YoungForever, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! —Ganesha811 (talk) 19:42, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello! you added a one source box to the article i made, i added another source (IPNI), where there was only POWO. does this mean that the box goes? also, the article is pretty small at 2 lines, just a statement of where it is on the tree of life, and its native range, why is another source needed, since POWO is a good source? thanks! Bright (talk) 14:49, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Just some student on the web: Please see WP:ONESOURCE which states: a subject for which only one source can be cited is unlikely to merit a standalone article. — YoungForever^(talk) 18:24, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]