Wikipedia talk:Charitableness

This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Wikipedia essays Low‑impact This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organize and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.Wikipedia essaysWikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia essaysTemplate:WikiProject Wikipedia essaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages Low This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale. The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Heretofore, I have failed repeatedly at this. I call upon all and sundry to remind me when I fail, and to help me regain me feet when I stumble. -- Uncle Ed (talk) 13:01, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)

heartwarming - Xed 17:41, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Poor, you shall not stumble - I know. --Bhadani 12:55, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Charity surely. Kittybrewster ☎ 19:40, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No offense, but this guy Ed Poor confused decency with charitableness. I was actually looking up charitableness because I wanted to see if there was an article that explains why editors never help you when you leave a comment on a talk page, and leave it unanswered for months (possibly forever); and then I find this rubble (no wonder people fall in line to invoke other ethical standards and policy guidelines, and ignore this one!) I'm seriously going to take this up with an administrator; because this is ridiculous! Lighthead ^þ 04:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]