Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Isle of Wight

This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Isle of Wight This page is within the scope of WikiProject Isle of Wight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of the Isle of Wight in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Isle of WightWikipedia:WikiProject Isle of WightTemplate:WikiProject Isle of WightIsle of Wight-related articles

Hello fellow Project members! I thought it was about time we had a better way of organising our efforts at improving the Isle of Wight articles than this, so that's why this project exists. As to its actual aims, I would suggest

• Assess the importance and quality of IW articles (for inclusion in any future release version)
• Improve the quality of IW articles.

I've put up what I think is a fairly modest target of assessing 100 articles - if you have a better idea then please add it below. Let's get talking and keep editing! --Peeky44 (talk) 13:04, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know that in many ways its a controversial issue, and leads to endless debates on AFD, but do we need articles for any or all schools? The article Education on the Isle of Wight already exists, and probably covers many of the encyclopaedic details already. My opinion upon churches is the same; unless a church is independently notable (for instance being the site of the Marriage of King William V), it merits at best a paragraph in the page of the town/village itself. --Neil (talk) 17:54, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that if a school or church (or anything else for that matter) has a certain level of information about it available on its page, or the potential for a critical amount to be added, it should stand as an article - beyond a certain point, information about a particular school should not be on a general education article. For example, Medina High School, Newport has a good amount of information and more could be added (history for example) if appropriate sources can be found. The other high schools are probably in a similar situation, but it has to be done on an individual basis. Carisbrooke High School seems to be an article in need of major revision before we can declare it neutral, but if advertising-style language can be restructured and the article properly sourced, it should be quite useful. --Peeky44 (talk) 12:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone know of any sources of information i can use to write an artcle on the Wonders? Simply south (talk) 18:25, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, try this [1] Naturenet | Talk 10:51, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Actually, do you also know how to introduce the article? User:Simply south/Wonders of the Isle of Wight.

Simply south (talk) 21:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've just added the banner to a load of page, including a number (all) of the former MPs of the Island, so when a load of random people show up on the list of articles this is why. It is cool to add the banner to pages we consider relevant, isn't it? --Neil (talk) 13:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it is! Remember one of the core guidelines of Wikipedia:Be bold. If there's something controversial, there'll be a discussion but in the meantime, keep adding those headers, preferably with the class and importance fields filled in. We're starting to get a really good picture of what needs to be done (see table below and assessment table on main project page). Keep going! --Peeky44 (talk) 10:08, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently assessing many IoW articles that are virtually on the boundary of two quality classes. I'm going to list them here for now (excluding stubs), but perhaps we should have a section on the Project page for things like this. Feel free to edit this table when any of the articles is upgraded or you spot another that should go in! --Peeky44 (talk) 02:05, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so I listed a few stubs as well. There's probably quite a lot that are on the borderline of Start-class, so take those listed below with a pinch of salt and maybe look at Category:Stub-Class Isle of Wight-related articles if you're feeling adventurous... --Peeky44 (talk) 10:12, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article	Class	Notes
Puckaster	C	only needs some form of diagram or photo to go up to B-class.
Osborne House	C	minor grammar corrections and expansion of lead would get this to B-class.
Carisbrooke Castle	Start	A few references would easily make this a C-class article, if not better.
Binstead	Start	A little more content would get this up to C-class, although the addition of enough and it could go straight to B-class.
Brook, Isle of Wight	Stub	One single reference is all that's provided - a couple more and this would be Start-class.
Newport (Isle of Wight) bus station	C	Referencing again - a little work on references would make this B-class. More general expansion needed to get beyond B-class though.
Southern Vectis route 6	C	Usual problem, not quite enough references and not all referenced in the main text where they need to be.
Isle of Wight Festival	Stub	This article is a bit of a mess. There's some good info there, but its almost completely unsourced. Just a few more references would get this to at least Start, and C- or even B- shouldn't be impossible for long. Given the event's importance to the island, it's a bit of a disgrace.
Isle of Wight (UK Parliament constituency)	Stub	Same as the Festival, it's got plenty of information but no references to back it up.

I notice the IWCB website implies the first matches took place on open days at the beginning of the month. Can anyone verify these actually happened? I wasn't on the island at the time and web sources don't seem to have any more info than previews. I've updated the article based on the available information, but if anyone has an old county press or something that might be a good place to check... Cheers! --Peeky44 (talk) 10:30, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Isle of Wight Party has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isle of Wight Party. Thank you. Naturenet | Talk 11:47, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection before December 2008, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 16:14, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like there's about to be a major discussion/argument about the IW's status as a county (again).
Please have a look at the article talk page.

At Wikipedia:WikiProject Geographical coordinates, we are currently working on finishing geocoding several classes of articles where nearly all of the articles have now been geocoded. We would really appreciate any help you could give us with geocoding the articles in Category:Isle of Wight articles missing geocoordinate data. See this diff for an example of how to geocode an article: there's also a quick how-to guide at the top of the WikiProject's home page.

Regards, -- The Anome (talk) 17:18, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:59, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to expand the articles on the island's historical railway companies, and have done quite a bit with Isle of Wight Railway (Ryde-Ventnor/Brading-Bembridge) and a little to Isle of Wight Central Railway (Ryde-Newport-Cowes/Newport-Sandown). I've found in the IWCR article a claim that they took over the Freshwater, Yarmouth and Newport Railway in 1913, yet I have a book that claims the FYN still existed in 1923 and weren't even absorbed into the Southern Railway for 8 months as they

...disputed the proposed terms of the amalgamation...

The text in the article claims a source, I have an opposing source - Tube Trains on the Isle of Wight, Brian Hardy, 2003. Now that source is not primarily concerned with rail services before about 1960, so it could be in error. Anyone got anything else? --Peeky44 (talk) 19:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 09:17, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

Proposed split of Cowes to Cowes and East Cowes. See Talk:Cowes. Simply south (talk) 14:52, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Does your project care about what happens to the talk pages of articles that have been replaced with redirects? If so, please provide your input at User:Mikaey/Request for Input/ListasBot 3. Thanks, Matt (talk) 01:59, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While looking through I have noticed a number of island village have article titles that include ',Isle of Wight' after them when no other article of that title exists, for example: Niton, Isle of Wight. Niton redirects there. So I propose these articles be moved to avoid longer titles. Here is what I have found that could be moved:

• Chale, Isle of Wight --> Chale
• Chillerton, Isle of Wight --> Chillerton
• Niton, Isle of Wight --> Niton
• Bouldnor, Isle of Wight --> Bouldnor
• Hulverstone, Isle of Wight --> Hulverstone
• Norton Green, Isle of Wight --> Norton Green

If anyone else has any views feel free to join the discussion. Editor5807^speak 18:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this needs discussion, its unnecessary disambiguation. I have already done the same for several Worcestershire articles recently. I'll make the move shortly. Jeni ^(talk) 19:04, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All moved :) I doubt it will be controversial. Jeni ^(talk) 19:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) Editor5807^speak 20:05, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:28, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects provides a list, updated daily, of unreferenced living people articles (BLPs) related to your project. There has been a lot of discussion recently about deleting these unreferenced articles, so it is important that these articles are referenced.

The unreferenced articles related to your project can be found at >>>Wikipedia:WikiProject Isle of Wight/Unreferenced BLPs<<<

If you do not want this wikiproject to participate, please add your project name to this list.

Thank you.

Update: Wikipedia:WikiProject Isle of Wight/Unreferenced BLPs has been created. This list, which is updated by User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects daily, will allow your wikiproject to quickly identify unreferenced living person articles.

There maybe no or few articles on this new Unreferenced BLPs page. To increase the overall number of articles in your project with another bot, you can sign up for User:Xenobot_Mk_V#Instructions.

If you have any questions or concerns, visit User talk:DASHBot/Wikiprojects. Okip 23:15, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Isle of Wight-related articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Sunday, November 14th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of November, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

If you have already provided feedback, we deeply appreciate it. For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 16:33, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have created together with Smallman12q a toolserver tool that shows a weekly-updated list of cleanup categories for WikiProjects, that can be used as a replacement for WolterBot and this WikiProject is among those that are already included (because it is a member of Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions). See the tool's wiki page, this project's listing in one big table or by categories and the index of WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 20:39, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello i have edited a few pages that i had more information for a created one (Back of the Wight) I thought was needed please help by checking it and articles, Mottistone Manor, Brookgreen and Brighstone Many thanks Xhavnak (talk) 16:34, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also i have created some bad pages that got deleted, ver sorry, quite agree with the deletions I shall try to make any new articles better and more referenced. Many apologies. Xhavnak (talk) 18:38, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Wight/Article alerts has been created; generating Article alerts for this WikiProject. Timrollpickering (talk) 20:23, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone's interested, I just started a main article Undercliff (Isle of Wight), as I think the IoW Undercliff deserves a lot more space than a subsection in The Undercliff.

I'm a little cautious about doing it myself, but The Undercliff#Isle of Wight needs a little work per Wikipedia:Avoid peacock terms for "a semi-tropical environment, covered by lush vegetation". The Undercliff is lovely, but it's not some kind of steaming jungle. Gordonofcartoon (talk) 00:18, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This September the UK is taking part for the first time in the international photography competition Wiki Loves Monuments. Participants will be invited to submit pictures of listed buildings of significant importance (grades I or grade II*), as recorded by English Heritage. The main external website for competitors can be found here, and you can leave a message there if you have queries about competing. Do please join in, and let people in your local area know of this excellent way in which both existing and new Wiki users can help improve the encyclopaedia by contributing photographs of local listed structures. What about organizing a local Wikimeet to attract new people?

In preparation for the start of the competition on 1st September there is still quite a lot of work to do, and we would like to ask for the help of members of this wikiproject. Your local and expert knowledge will be invaluable in ensuring that the lists of eligible buildings are up to date and correctly formatted. If you look at Listed buildings in the United Kingdom you will see how many structures are included. If you then follow the link to Listed buildings in England, you can get to the detailed lists for your area. Alternatively have a look at the WLM planning table. Can you help to ensure that the lists for your area are up to date and well presented?

Some of the lists have been semi-automatically generated from data provided by English Heritage. These use pre formatted templates (eg EH header) which will make it much easier for competition participants to upload their photographs to Commons as an automated process. Please don't change the template structure, as we need to ensure that the templates are properly compatible with the WLM standards that are in use worldwide. The format will allow a bot automatically to collect the information and to put it into the international Monuments Database.

The data still needs the attention of local editors:

• The "title" may need wikilinking to a suitable article name (whether we currently have that article or not). If there are several buildings in one street all of the wikilinks point at an article about the street; however each entry has a separate line in the list.
• The "location" column looks and sorts better if just the parish or town is included (& wikilinked).
• The "date completed" column sometimes has eg "C19" for 19th century, and "C1850" for c. 1850 when the date is uncertain - these need to be corrected manually.
• The "grid ref & lat & long" (which is occasionally missing) may be given to 8 characters — only 6 (grid ref) or 5 (lat & long) are really needed.
• Clicking on the "list entry number" should take you to the data sheet for that entry on the English Heritage database which can be checked if needed for details.
• The image column should have a picture added if we already have a suitable image on Commons. (N.B. if you are going to be taking photos yourself for inclusion in the competition don't upload them until September)
• References may be added according to normal WP practice.

For further information, please see Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United Kingdom.

If you have any queries, please post them not below but on the Organizers' help page on Commons.

Anything you can do to help improve these lists will be much appreciated. The final deadline for cleaning up is 31st August.

--MichaelMaggs (talk) 14:47, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yarbridge

states:

"... accessible only at low tide. It also crosses the railway ..."

Can anyone clarify what is meant?

Megapod (talk) 03:00, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have clarified the ambiguous wording. Naturenet | Talk 23:44, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As you might have seen in the Signpost last week, there's currently a drive to go through the million 19th century images released by the British Library last year, and identify all the maps, with a view to their being georeferenced by BL volunteers, and then uploaded to Commons early next year. After the first week, over eight thousand new maps have been identified, with 40% of the target books looked at -- see the status page for the latest figures, and more information.

A part that may specifically interest this project is

c:Commons:British Library/Mechanical Curator collection/Synoptic index/England - South East

which currently shows pink templated links for 309 Flickr book pages still to be looked at. (Though there are lots of other parts of England, and indeed of the world, still to be looked through as well).

Any help looking through these would be very much appreciated -- as well as the maps (and ground plans) for tagging, you may well also find other interesting or useful non-map views that may be worth considering or uploading for articles on the Isle of Wight and elsewhere in the South-East. (If uploading, please use the ingestion template described here, which sets up some appropriate image templates and categories).

Thanks, Jheald (talk) 21:32, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   11:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:The Great Britain/Ireland Destubathon is planned for March 2020, a contest/editathon to eliminate as many stubs as possible from all 134 counties. Amazon vouchers/book prizes are planned for most articles destubbed from England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland and Northern Ireland and whoever destubs articles from the most counties out of the 134. Sign up on page if interested in participating, hope this will prove to be good fun and productive, we have over 44,000 stubs!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:31, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article was nominated for GA and has been reviewed (see comments here), but there has been no response by the nominator since it was put on hold on 13 June 2020. The article will fail on 21 June unless the issues I raised are fully addressed. Can anyone help here? if I know someone is willing to pick this up, I'm willing to extend by a week. Amitchell125 (talk) 08:07, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a project for missing civil parishes at User:Crouch, Swale/Missing parishes. The missing parishes on the Isle of Wight are:

• Calbourne, Newtown and Porchfield, draft exists at Draft:Calbourne, Newtown and Porchfield
• Chillerton and Gatcombe
• Havenstreet and Ashey

And these exists as a redirect only but should have separate articles:

• Niton and Whitwell

A total of 4, see User:Crouch, Swale/Missing parishes (2)#Isle of Wight. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Pinging participants to get more input @Peeky44, Naturenet, NeilTarrant, Editor5807, Streona, Simply south, Robwebb, Debnigo, Greengolf17, Dainamo, Xhavnak, Gcman105, Gordonofcartoon, BrayLockBoy, Raggz, MapReader, Corkedwine, and AmethystTalon:. I've struct those that have been created. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:34, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've just created Chillerton and Gatcombe (see above) but it led me to ask: "In or On"? Looking at the two constituent villages, one is described as "in the Isle of Wight" and one as "on the Isle of Wight". Chillerton and Gatcombe.

I thought your project page might have a guideline - but there's a Guidelines section which doesn't mention this. Could you advise, please, for occasional IoW editors? Thanks. PamD 10:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD: The standard for settlements and most other things seems to be "on" as indicated by the title of Category:Villages on the Isle of Wight. The standard for civil parishes seems to be "in" as indicated by Category:Civil parishes in the Isle of Wight. When writing about a village you could say "X is a village in the civil parish of X, on the Isle of Wight, in the county of the Isle of Wight, England" and for parishes "X is a civil parish on the Isle of Wight, in the county of the Isle of Wight, England" but most articles don't appear to mention both county and island. Note that the unitary authority area and ceremonial county are the same and the difference between the island and county is only The Needles, that is to say The Needles are in the county but not part of the island. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello all. I wonder if any project members live on the island? If so, would any of you be able to get some photos of the following cricket grounds: J. Samuel White's Ground in Cowes and the Victoria Recreation Ground in Newport. General pictures of the playing area and any buildings and facilities, such as pavilions or scorers huts, or cricket nets, would be fantastic. Thanks in advance. StickyWicket (talk) 23:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is ongoing at Template talk:Infobox English county#Proposal: remove the ethnicity section which is likely of interest to this project. The original proposal is for straight removal of the ethnicity field from the template; the population field would remain. This and a modified proposal would have the same effect on Isle of Wight. A result of the change, if consented to, is the restriction of demographics, other than population to the local authority administrative sections of the county infoboxes. It has no effect on editors placing reliably sourced statistics in the body of the article. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 16:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Jutish#Requested move 18 June 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. PK2 (talk) 09:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]