Steiner system

In combinatorial mathematics, a Steiner system (named after Jakob Steiner) is a type of block design, specifically a t-design with λ = 1 and t = 2 or (recently) t ≥ 2.

A Steiner system with parameters t, k, n, written S(t,k,n), is an n-element set S together with a set of k-element subsets of S (called blocks) with the property that each t-element subset of S is contained in exactly one block. In an alternate notation for block designs, an S(t,k,n) would be a t-(n,k,1) design.

This definition is relatively new. The classical definition of Steiner systems also required that k = t + 1. An S(2,3,n) was (and still is) called a Steiner triple (or triad) system, while an S(3,4,n) is called a Steiner quadruple system, and so on. With the generalization of the definition, this naming system is no longer strictly adhered to.

Long-standing problems in design theory were whether there exist any nontrivial Steiner systems (nontrivial meaning t < k < n) with t ≥ 6; also whether infinitely many have t = 4 or 5.^[1] Both existences were proved by Peter Keevash in 2014. His proof is non-constructive and, as of 2019, no actual Steiner systems are known for large values of t.^[2][3][4]

A finite projective plane of order q, with the lines as blocks, is an S(2, q + 1, q² + q + 1), since it has q² + q + 1 points, each line passes through q + 1 points, and each pair of distinct points lies on exactly one line.

A finite affine plane of order q, with the lines as blocks, is an S(2, q, q²). An affine plane of order q can be obtained from a projective plane of the same order by removing one block and all of the points in that block from the projective plane. Choosing different blocks to remove in this way can lead to non-isomorphic affine planes.

An S(3,4,n) is called a Steiner quadruple system. A necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of an S(3,4,n) is that n ${\displaystyle \equiv }$ 2 or 4 (mod 6). The abbreviation SQS(n) is often used for these systems. Up to isomorphism, SQS(8) and SQS(10) are unique, there are 4 SQS(14)s and 1,054,163 SQS(16)s.^[5]

An S(4,5,n) is called a Steiner quintuple system. A necessary condition for the existence of such a system is that n ${\displaystyle \equiv }$ 3 or 5 (mod 6) which comes from considerations that apply to all the classical Steiner systems. An additional necessary condition is that n ${\displaystyle \not \equiv }$ 4 (mod 5), which comes from the fact that the number of blocks must be an integer. Sufficient conditions are not known. There is a unique Steiner quintuple system of order 11, but none of order 15 or order 17.^[6] Systems are known for orders 23, 35, 47, 71, 83, 107, 131, 167 and 243. The smallest order for which the existence is not known (as of 2011) is 21.

An S(2,3,n) is called a Steiner triple system, and its blocks are called triples. It is common to see the abbreviation STS(n) for a Steiner triple system of order n. The total number of pairs is n(n-1)/2, of which three appear in a triple, and so the total number of triples is n(n−1)/6. This shows that n must be of the form 6k+1 or 6k + 3 for some k. The fact that this condition on n is sufficient for the existence of an S(2,3,n) was proved by Raj Chandra Bose^[7] and T. Skolem.^[8] The projective plane of order 2 (the Fano plane) is an STS(7) and the affine plane of order 3 is an STS(9). Up to isomorphism, the STS(7) and STS(9) are unique, there are two STS(13)s, 80 STS(15)s, and 11,084,874,829 STS(19)s.^[9]

We can define a multiplication on the set S using the Steiner triple system by setting aa = a for all a in S, and ab = c if {a,b,c} is a triple. This makes S an idempotent, commutative quasigroup. It has the additional property that ab = c implies bc = a and ca = b.^{[note 1]} Conversely, any (finite) quasigroup with these properties arises from a Steiner triple system. Commutative idempotent quasigroups satisfying this additional property are called Steiner quasigroups.^[10]

Some of the S(2,3,n) systems can have their triples partitioned into (n-1)/2 sets each having (n/3) pairwise disjoint triples. This is called resolvable and such systems are called Kirkman triple systems after Thomas Kirkman, who studied such resolvable systems before Steiner. Dale Mesner, Earl Kramer, and others investigated collections of Steiner triple systems that are mutually disjoint (i.e., no two Steiner systems in such a collection share a common triplet). It is known (Bays 1917, Kramer & Mesner 1974) that seven different S(2,3,9) systems can be generated to together cover all 84 triplets on a 9-set; it was also known by them that there are 15360 different ways to find such 7-sets of solutions, which reduce to two non-isomorphic solutions under relabeling, with multiplicities 6720 and 8640 respectively.

The corresponding question for finding thirteen different disjoint S(2,3,15) systems was asked by James Sylvester in 1860 as an extension of the Kirkman's schoolgirl problem, namely whether Kirkman's schoolgirls could march for an entire term of 13 weeks with no triplet of girls being repeated over the whole term. The question was solved by RHF Denniston in 1974,^[11] who constructed Week 1 as follows:

Day 1 ABJ CEM FKL HIN DGO Day 2 ACH DEI FGM JLN BKO Day 3 ADL BHM GIK CFN EJO Day 4 AEG BIL CJK DMN FHO Day 5 AFI BCD GHJ EKN LMO Day 6 AKM DFJ EHL BGN CIO Day 7 BEF CGL DHK IJM ANO 

for girls labeled A to O, and constructed each subsequent week's solution from its immediate predecessor by changing A to B, B to C, ... L to M and M back to A, all while leaving N and O unchanged. The Week 13 solution, upon undergoing that relabeling, returns to the Week 1 solution. Denniston reported in his paper that the search he employed took 7 hours on an Elliott 4130 computer at the University of Leicester, and he immediately ended the search on finding the solution above, not looking to establish uniqueness. The number of non-isomorphic solutions to Sylvester's problem remains unknown as of 2021.

It is clear from the definition of S(t, k, n) that ${\displaystyle 1<t<k<n}$. (Equalities, while technically possible, lead to trivial systems.)

If S(t, k, n) exists, then taking all blocks containing a specific element and discarding that element gives a derived system S(t−1, k−1, n−1). Therefore, the existence of S(t−1, k−1, n−1) is a necessary condition for the existence of S(t, k, n).

The number of t-element subsets in S is ${\displaystyle {\tbinom {n}{t}}}$, while the number of t-element subsets in each block is ${\displaystyle {\tbinom {k}{t}}}$. Since every t-element subset is contained in exactly one block, we have ${\displaystyle {\tbinom {n}{t}}=b{\tbinom {k}{t}}}$, or

${\displaystyle b={\frac {\tbinom {n}{t}}{\tbinom {k}{t}}}={\frac {n(n-1)\cdots (n-t+1)}{k(k-1)\cdots (k-t+1)}},}$

where b is the number of blocks. Similar reasoning about t-element subsets containing a particular element gives us ${\displaystyle {\tbinom {n-1}{t-1}}=r{\tbinom {k-1}{t-1}}}$, or

${\displaystyle r={\frac {\tbinom {n-1}{t-1}}{\tbinom {k-1}{t-1}}}}$ =${\displaystyle {\frac {(n-t+1)\cdots (n-2)(n-1)}{(k-t+1)\cdots (k-2)(k-1)}},}$

where r is the number of blocks containing any given element. From these definitions follows the equation ${\displaystyle bk=rn}$. It is a necessary condition for the existence of S(t, k, n) that b and r are integers. As with any block design, Fisher's inequality ${\displaystyle b\geq n}$ is true in Steiner systems.

Given the parameters of a Steiner system S(t, k, n) and a subset of size ${\displaystyle t'\leq t}$, contained in at least one block, one can compute the number of blocks intersecting that subset in a fixed number of elements by constructing a Pascal triangle.^[12] In particular, the number of blocks intersecting a fixed block in any number of elements is independent of the chosen block.

The number of blocks that contain any i-element set of points is:

${\displaystyle \lambda _{i}=\left.{\binom {n-i}{t-i}}\right/{\binom {k-i}{t-i}}{\text{ for }}i=0,1,\ldots ,t,}$

It can be shown that if there is a Steiner system S(2, k, n), where k is a prime power greater than 1, then n ${\displaystyle \equiv }$ 1 or k (mod k(k−1)). In particular, a Steiner triple system S(2, 3, n) must have n = 6m + 1 or 6m + 3. And as we have already mentioned, this is the only restriction on Steiner triple systems, that is, for each natural number m, systems S(2, 3, 6m + 1) and S(2, 3, 6m + 3) exist.

Steiner triple systems were defined for the first time by Wesley S. B. Woolhouse in 1844 in the Prize question #1733 of Lady's and Gentlemen's Diary.^[13] The posed problem was solved by Thomas Kirkman (1847). In 1850 Kirkman posed a variation of the problem known as Kirkman's schoolgirl problem, which asks for triple systems having an additional property (resolvability). Unaware of Kirkman's work, Jakob Steiner (1853) reintroduced triple systems, and as this work was more widely known, the systems were named in his honor.

In 1910 Geoffrey Thomas Bennett gave a graphical representation for Steiner triple systems.^[14][15][16]

Several examples of Steiner systems are closely related to group theory. In particular, the finite simple groups called Mathieu groups arise as automorphism groups of Steiner systems:

• The Mathieu group M₁₁ is the automorphism group of a S(4,5,11) Steiner system
• The Mathieu group M₁₂ is the automorphism group of a S(5,6,12) Steiner system
• The Mathieu group M₂₂ is the unique index 2 subgroup of the automorphism group of a S(3,6,22) Steiner system
• The Mathieu group M₂₃ is the automorphism group of a S(4,7,23) Steiner system
• The Mathieu group M₂₄ is the automorphism group of a S(5,8,24) Steiner system.

There is a unique S(5,6,12) Steiner system; its automorphism group is the Mathieu group M₁₂, and in that context it is denoted by W₁₂.

This construction is due to Carmichael (1937).^[17]

Add a new element, call it ∞, to the 11 elements of the finite field F₁₁ (that is, the integers mod 11). This set, S, of 12 elements can be formally identified with the points of the projective line over F₁₁. Call the following specific subset of size 6,

${\displaystyle \{\infty ,1,3,4,5,9\},}$

a "block" (it contains ∞ together with the 5 nonzero squares in F₁₁). From this block, we obtain the other blocks of the S(5,6,12) system by repeatedly applying the linear fractional transformations:

${\displaystyle z'=f(z)={\frac {az+b}{cz+d}},}$

where a,b,c,d are in F₁₁ and ad − bc = 1. With the usual conventions of defining f (−d/c) = ∞ and f (∞) = a/c, these functions map the set S onto itself. In geometric language, they are projectivities of the projective line. They form a group under composition which is the projective special linear group PSL(2,11) of order 660. There are exactly five elements of this group that leave the starting block fixed setwise,^[18] namely those such that b=c=0 and ad=1 so that f(z) = a² z. So there will be 660/5 = 132 images of that block. As a consequence of the multiply transitive property of this group acting on this set, any subset of five elements of S will appear in exactly one of these 132 images of size six.

An alternative construction of W₁₂ is obtained by use of the 'kitten' of R.T. Curtis,^[19] which was intended as a "hand calculator" to write down blocks one at a time. The kitten method is based on completing patterns in a 3x3 grid of numbers, which represent an affine geometry on the vector space F₃xF₃, an S(2,3,9) system.

The relations between the graph factors of the complete graph K₆ generate an S(5,6,12).^[20] A K₆ graph has 6 vertices, 15 edges, 15 perfect matchings, and 6 different 1-factorizations (ways to partition the edges into disjoint perfect matchings). The set of vertices (labeled 123456) and the set of factorizations (labeled ABCDEF) provide one block each. Every pair of factorizations has exactly one perfect matching in common. Suppose factorizations A and B have the common matching with edges 12, 34 and 56. Add three new blocks AB3456, 12AB56, and 1234AB, replacing each edge in the common matching with the factorization labels in turn. Similarly add three more blocks 12CDEF, 34CDEF, and 56CDEF, replacing the factorization labels by the corresponding edge labels of the common matching. Do this for all 15 pairs of factorizations to add 90 new blocks. Finally, take the full set of ${\displaystyle {\tbinom {12}{6}}=924}$ combinations of 6 objects out of 12, and discard any combination that has 5 or more objects in common with any of the 92 blocks generated so far. Exactly 40 blocks remain, resulting in 2 + 90 + 40 = 132 blocks of the S(5,6,12). This method works because there is an outer automorphism on the symmetric group S₆, which maps the vertices to factorizations and the edges to partitions. Permuting the vertices causes the factorizations to permute differently, in accordance with the outer automorphism.

The Steiner system S(5, 8, 24), also known as the Witt design or Witt geometry, was first described by Carmichael (1931) and rediscovered by Witt (1938). This system is connected with many of the sporadic simple groups and with the exceptional 24-dimensional lattice known as the Leech lattice. The automorphism group of S(5, 8, 24) is the Mathieu group M₂₄, and in that context the design is denoted W₂₄ ("W" for "Witt")

All 8-element subsets of a 24-element set are generated in lexicographic order, and any such subset which differs from some subset already found in fewer than four positions is discarded.

The list of octads for the elements 01, 02, 03, ..., 22, 23, 24 is then:

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08

01 02 03 04 09 10 11 12

01 02 03 04 13 14 15 16

.

. (next 753 octads omitted)

.

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

13 14 15 16 21 22 23 24

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Each single element occurs 253 times somewhere in some octad. Each pair occurs 77 times. Each triple occurs 21 times. Each quadruple (tetrad) occurs 5 times. Each quintuple (pentad) occurs once. Not every hexad, heptad or octad occurs.

The 4096 codewords of the 24-bit binary Golay code are generated, and the 759 codewords with a Hamming weight of 8 correspond to the S(5,8,24) system.

The Golay code can be constructed by many methods, such as generating all 24-bit binary strings in lexicographic order and discarding those that differ from some earlier one in fewer than 8 positions. The result looks like this:

    000000000000000000000000     000000000000000011111111     000000000000111100001111     .     . (next 4090 24-bit strings omitted)     .     111111111111000011110000     111111111111111100000000     111111111111111111111111 

The codewords form a group under the XOR operation.

This construction is due to Carmichael (1931).^[21]

Add a new element, call it ∞, to the 23 elements of the finite field F₂₃ (that is, the integers mod 23). This set, S, of 24 elements can be formally identified with the points of the projective line over F₂₃. Call the following specific subset of size 8,

${\displaystyle \{\infty ,0,1,3,12,15,21,22\},}$

a "block". (We can take any octad of the extended binary Golay code, seen as a quadratic residue code.) From this block, we obtain the other blocks of the S(5,8,24) system by repeatedly applying the linear fractional transformations:

${\displaystyle z'=f(z)={\frac {az+b}{cz+d}},}$

where a,b,c,d are in F₂₃ and ad − bc = 1. With the usual conventions of defining f (−d/c) = ∞ and f (∞) = a/c, these functions map the set S onto itself. In geometric language, they are projectivities of the projective line. They form a group under composition which is the projective special linear group PSL(2,23) of order 6072. There are exactly 8 elements of this group that leave the initial block fixed setwise. So there will be 6072/8 = 759 images of that block. These form the octads of S(5,8,24).

The Miracle Octad Generator (MOG) is a tool to generate octads, such as those containing specified subsets. It consists of a 4x6 array with certain weights assigned to the rows. In particular, an 8-subset should obey three rules in order to be an octad of S(5,8,24). First, each of the 6 columns should have the same parity, that is, they should all have an odd number of cells or they should all have an even number of cells. Second, the top row should have the same parity as each of the columns. Third, the rows are respectively multiplied by the weights 0, 1, 2, and 3 over the finite field of order 4, and column sums are calculated for the 6 columns, with multiplication and addition using the finite field arithmetic definitions. The resulting column sums should form a valid hexacodeword of the form (a, b, c, a + b + c, 3a + 2b + c, 2a + 3b + c) where a, b, c are also from the finite field of order 4. If the column sums' parities don't match the row sum parity, or each other, or if there do not exist a, b, c such that the column sums form a valid hexacodeword, then that subset of 8 is not an octad of S(5,8,24).

The MOG is based on creating a bijection (Conwell 1910, "The three-space PG(3,2) and its group") between the 35 ways to partition an 8-set into two different 4-sets, and the 35 lines of the Fano 3-space PG(3,2). It is also geometrically related (Cullinane, "Symmetry Invariance in a Diamond Ring", Notices of the AMS, pp A193-194, Feb 1979) to the 35 different ways to partition a 4x4 array into 4 different groups of 4 cells each, such that if the 4x4 array represents a four-dimensional finite affine space, then the groups form a set of parallel subspaces.

• Constant weight code
• Kirkman's schoolgirl problem
• Sylvester–Gallai configuration

• Assmus, E. F.; Key, J. D. (1992), Designs and Their Codes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-41361-9
• Beth, Thomas; Jungnickel, Dieter; Lenz, Hanfried (1986), Design Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2nd ed. (1999) ISBN 978-0-521-44432-3.
• Carmichael, Robert (1931), "Tactical Configurations of Rank Two", American Journal of Mathematics, 53 (1): 217–240, doi:10.2307/2370885, JSTOR 2370885
• Carmichael, Robert D. (1956) [1937], Introduction to the theory of Groups of Finite Order, Dover, ISBN 978-0-486-60300-1
• Colbourn, Charles J.; Dinitz, Jeffrey H. (1996), Handbook of Combinatorial Designs, Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/ CRC, ISBN 978-0-8493-8948-1, Zbl 0836.00010
• Colbourn, Charles J.; Dinitz, Jeffrey H. (2007), Handbook of Combinatorial Designs (2nd ed.), Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/ CRC, ISBN 978-1-58488-506-1, Zbl 1101.05001
• Curtis, R.T. (1984), "The Steiner system S(5,6,12), the Mathieu group M₁₂ and the "kitten"", in Atkinson, Michael D. (ed.), Computational group theory (Durham, 1982), London: Academic Press, pp. 353–358, ISBN 978-0-12-066270-8, MR 0760669
• Hughes, D. R.; Piper, F. C. (1985), Design Theory, Cambridge University Press, pp. 173–176, ISBN 978-0-521-35872-9.
• Kirkman, Thomas P. (1847), "On a Problem in Combinations", The Cambridge and Dublin Mathematical Journal, II: 191–204.
• Lindner, C.C.; Rodger, C.A. (1997), Design Theory, Boca Raton: CRC Press, ISBN 978-0-8493-3986-8
• Östergard, Patric R.J.; Pottonen, Olli (2008), "There exists no Steiner system S(4,5,17)", Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 115 (8): 1570–1573, doi:10.1016/j.jcta.2008.04.005
• Steiner, J. (1853), "Combinatorische Aufgabe", Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 1853 (45): 181–182, doi:10.1515/crll.1853.45.181, S2CID 199547187.
• Witt, Ernst (1938), "Die 5-Fach transitiven Gruppen von Mathieu", Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg, 12: 256–264, doi:10.1007/BF02948947, S2CID 123658601

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Steiner systems.

• Rowland, Todd & Weisstein, Eric W. "Steiner System". MathWorld.
• Rumov, B.T. (2001) [1994], "Steiner system", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press
• Steiner systems by Andries E. Brouwer
• Implementation of S(5,8,24) by Dr. Alberto Delgado, Gabe Hart, and Michael Kolkebeck
• S(5, 8, 24) Software and Listing by Johan E. Mebius