J. Michael Luttig

J. Michael Luttig
Luttig in 2005
Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
In office
August 2, 1991 – May 10, 2006
Appointed byGeorge H. W. Bush
Preceded bySeat established
Succeeded byG. Steven Agee
United States Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel
In office
May 26, 1990 – August 2, 1991
PresidentGeorge H. W. Bush
Preceded byWilliam Barr
Succeeded byTimothy Flanigan
Personal details
Born
John Michael Luttig

(1954-06-13) June 13, 1954 (age 70)
Tyler, Texas, U.S.
EducationWashington and Lee University (BA)
University of Virginia (JD)
This article is part of a series on
Conservatism
in the United States
Schools
Principles
History
Intellectuals
Politicians
Jurists
Commentators
Activists
Literature
Concerns
Parties
Active

Defunct

Think tanks
Media

Newspapers

Journals

TV channels

Websites

Other

Other organizations

Economics

Gun rights

Identity politics

Nativist

Religion

Watchdog groups

Youth/student groups

Miscellaneous

Other

Movements
Related

John Michael Luttig (/ˈluːtɪɡ/ LOO-tig; born June 13, 1954) is an American lawyer and jurist who served as a U.S. circuit judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1991 to 2006. Luttig resigned his judgeship in 2006 to become the general counsel of Boeing, a position he held until 2019.

An influential conservative legal figure, Luttig gained broader prominence after the presidency of Donald Trump, characterizing him as "a clear and present danger to American democracy," and advocated invoking the Fourteenth Amendment to render Trump ineligible to serve a second term as president.[1][2][3][4]

Early life and education

[edit]

Luttig was born in 1954 in Tyler, Texas. He graduated from Washington and Lee University in 1976 with a Bachelor of Arts with Omicron Delta Kappa honors. From 1976 to 1978, Luttig worked for the U.S. Supreme Court's Office of the Administrative Assistant to the Chief Justice, where he became close friends with Chief Justice Warren E. Burger.[5][6] Luttig then attended the University of Virginia School of Law, graduating with a Juris Doctor degree in 1981.

Career

[edit]

After law school, Luttig spent a year in the Reagan administration as an associate with the White House Counsel, Fred F. Fielding, who hired him on Burger's recommendation.[5] Luttig's duties included reviewing potential judicial appointments and vetting them for ideological consistency with the administration's policies. From 1982 to 1983, Luttig served as a law clerk to judge (later Supreme Court justice in 1986) Antonin Scalia of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, one of the potential judges he had vetted in his prior job. Luttig then clerked for Chief Justice Warren Burger of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1983 to 1984.[7] After his Supreme Court clerkship, Luttig continued to work for Chief Justice Burger as a special assistant until 1985. Luttig later served as co-executor of Burger's one-page will, which gained notoriety for Burger's failure to dictate how estate taxes should be paid.[8][9][10]

In 1985, Luttig entered private practice at the law firm Davis Polk & Wardwell. He returned to government service in 1989, holding various positions within the United States Department of Justice until 1991 under President George H. W. Bush, including assistant attorney general in charge of the Office of Legal Counsel.[7][11] His duties in the Justice Department included assisting Supreme Court nominees David Souter and Clarence Thomas through the nomination and confirmation process, including their Senate confirmation hearings. Luttig's help to Thomas in his highly contested confirmation hearings and their aftermath was somewhat controversial because Luttig's own appointment to the federal bench had been approved by the Senate, but he delayed taking the judicial oath of office, presumably because he could not credibly serve as a federal judge, who is supposed to be nonpartisan, while fulfilling the task of ensuring that Thomas got a Supreme Court seat.[11][12][13][14]

Federal judgeship

[edit]

On April 23, 1991, President George H. W. Bush nominated Luttig to fill a newly created seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. He was confirmed by the United States Senate on July 26, 1991, and received his commission on August 2, 1991.[15] He became the youngest judge (at age 37) on a federal appeals court at the time of his appointment.

On the bench, Luttig was compared to Justice Antonin Scalia for his analytical rigor and for criticizing his colleagues for inconsistencies or embellishments in their judicial opinions.[16] He was also similar to Scalia in that his judicial philosophy sometimes led to opinions that were at odds with conservative legal orthodoxy.[7][14]

Luttig was mentioned frequently as being near the top of George W. Bush's list of potential nominees to the Supreme Court of the United States despite opposition from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a dispute between Luttig and the Bush administration over the handling of the case of alleged "dirty bomber" Jose Padilla (see below).[17][18] Bush interviewed Luttig, but ultimately did not choose him to fill either of two Supreme Court vacancies in 2005; those two seats were filled by John Roberts and Samuel Alito.

Luttig was among the leading feeder judges on the U.S. court of appeals, with more than 40 of his law clerks going on to clerk with conservative justices on the Supreme Court.[19] Of those, 33 clerked for either Justice Thomas or Justice Scalia.[20] Luttig's clerks have nicknamed themselves "Luttigators".[21]

Father's murder

[edit]

Luttig's father, John Luttig, was fatally shot in 1994 in a carjacking by Napoleon Beazley, who at the time of the crime was a seventeen-year-old minor.[22] Luttig testified in the sentencing portion of the trial, supporting imposition of the death penalty.[22] Beazley was convicted, condemned to death, and eventually executed after twice appealing to the Supreme Court.[23][24] Justices Antonin Scalia, David Souter, and Clarence Thomas recused themselves because of past association with Luttig. Scalia recused himself because Luttig had clerked for him; Souter and Thomas recused themselves because Luttig led the George H. W. Bush administration's efforts to win their Senate confirmation.[25]

Cases

[edit]
Padilla v. Hanft
[edit]

In September 2005, Luttig wrote the opinion for a three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit that upheld the government's power to designate José Padilla, the alleged "dirty bomber" who was captured at a Chicago airport, as an "enemy combatant" and to detain him in a military brig without charge.[26] In December, the Bush administration, anticipating a reversal in the Supreme Court, petitioned the Fourth Circuit for approval to transfer Padilla to civilian custody for a criminal trial. The move set off a dispute between the Bush administration and Luttig.[27] Luttig's panel refused to grant the transfer and castigated the government for potentially harming its "credibility before the courts."[28] The government petitioned the Supreme Court to allow the transfer by arguing that the appellate court's refusal encroached on the power of the President. The Supreme Court granted the government's request.[29]

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
[edit]

In the case of Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, Luttig disagreed with the majority opinion of his colleagues on the Fourth Circuit and argued that Yaser Esam Hamdi, an American citizen captured in Afghanistan and held as an enemy combatant, deserved "meaningful judicial review" of his case.[7] The Supreme Court eventually reversed the Fourth Circuit's judgment.

[edit]

On May 10, 2006, Luttig resigned his federal judgeship to become general counsel and senior vice president for the American airplane manufacturer Boeing,[15][30][31] replacing Douglas Bain.[32] In his resignation letter, Luttig wrote, "Boeing may well be the only company in America for which I would have ever considered leaving the court."[33] He also mentioned his two children's upcoming college education; the position at Boeing paid more than the federal judgeship. At the time of his resignation, federal appellate judges were paid US$175,100 annually.[34] According to Boeing's 2008 Annual Report, Luttig's total compensation for 2008 was $2,798,962.[35] In 2015, Luttig was named the 7th-highest paid general counsel in the United States by Above the Law, with a salary of $4,236,580 (~$5.32 million in 2023).[36]

Luttig resigned as general counsel to Boeing in May 2019, and was replaced by Brett Gerry.[37] Luttig's resignation coincided with the terminations of former CEO Dennis Muilenburg and former Commercial Aircraft Executive Kevin McCallister that year, during the Boeing 737 MAX groundings crisis.[38] In January 2021, he was hired by Coca-Cola Company to be counselor and senior advisor for tax matters.[39]

Role in aftermath of 2020 presidential election

[edit]

On January 5, 2021, John Eastman, an attorney representing president Donald Trump, and who had clerked for Luttig, met with vice president Mike Pence in the Oval Office to argue that the vice president had the constitutional authority to alter or otherwise change certified electoral votes for the presidential certification in Congress the next day. According to Eastman, he told the vice president that he might have the authority to reject electoral college votes, and he asked the vice president to delay the certification, a proposal which came to be known as the Pence Card. Pence rejected Eastman's argument and instead agreed with Luttig and another conservative scholar, John Yoo, that a vice president has no such constitutional authority. Pence released a letter on January 6 stating he would not attempt to intervene in the certification process, citing Luttig by name, who later said it was "the highest honor of my life" to be involved in preserving the Constitution.[40][41][42][43][44]

On June 16, 2022, Luttig testified during a televised hearing conducted by the United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack.[45] Before the hearing, Luttig wrote a statement for the record,[46] stating that Trump and his allies "instigated" a war on democracy "so that he could cling to power." He continued, "It is breathtaking that these arguments even were conceived, let alone entertained by the President of the United States at that perilous moment in history" and that January 6 "was the final fateful day for the execution of a well-developed plan by the former president to overturn the 2020 presidential election at any cost." At the close of the hearing, Luttig said:

Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present danger to American democracy. They would attempt to overturn that 2024 election in the same way that they attempted to overturn the 2020 election, but succeed in 2024 where they failed in 2020. I don't speak those words lightly. I would have never spoken those words ever in my life, except that that's what the former president and his allies are telling us.[47]

Luttig co-authored a 69-page report refuting claims of fraud in the 2020 election, published in July 2022.[48]

On August 19, 2023, Luttig and liberal legal scholar Laurence Tribe, published an article that argued that Trump is barred from presidential office pursuant to the Insurrection Clause (section 3 of the 14th Amendment) because of his apparent support for the January 6 United States Capitol attack[49] and, regardless of the riot, "no person who sought to overthrow our Constitution and thereafter declared that it should be 'terminated' and that he be immediately returned to the presidency[50] can in good faith take the oath that Article II, Section 1 demands of any president-elect." This view has been furthered by other legal scholars.[51][52][53] Luttig makes the point that

[Groups that filed lawsuits to bar Trump from the ballot] do not yet understand what disqualifies the former president, namely an insurrection or rebellion against the constitution. They have argued the cases as if he is disqualified because he engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States. That's why they have, unfortunately, focused their efforts on establishing or not that the former president was responsible for the riot on the Capitol. The riot on the Capitol is incidental to the question of whether he engaged in a rebellion against the constitution."[54]

In November 2023, with Donald Trump leading the race for the Republican presidential nomination, Luttig said "I am more worried for America today than I was on January 6. For all the reasons that we know, his election would be catastrophic for America's democracy."[54] Luttig followed up with an essay in The New York Times describing a possible way that lawyers can improve the political landscape.[55]

On July 1, 2024, Luttig was interviewed on MSNBC regarding the Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. United States (2024), which granted Trump and other presidents immunity from prosecution for crimes committed in their official capacity as president. Luttig stated that "There is no support whatsoever in the Constitution or even in the Supreme Court's precedents, for the past 200 years, for this reprehensible decision by the Supreme Court. Needless to say, the decision is irreconcilable with America's democracy, the Constitution, and the rule of law."[56]: 2:58  He stated that "America's democracy and the rule of law are this country's heart and soul. Our democracy and the rule of law are what have made America the envy of the world and the beacon of freedom to the world for almost 250 years. Now, today, the Supreme Court cut that heart and soul out of America."[56]: 1:00 

In August 2024, he endorsed Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election, writing, "In the presidential election of 2024 there is only one political party and one candidate for the presidency that can claim the mantle of defender and protector of America’s Democracy, the Constitution, and the Rule of Law. As a result, I will unhesitatingly vote for the Democratic Party’s candidate for the Presidency of the United States, Vice President of the United States, Kamala Harris."[57] He added "In voting for Vice President Harris, I assume that her public policy views are vastly different from my own, but I am indifferent in this election as to her policy views on any issues other than America’s Democracy, the Constitution, and the Rule of Law, as I believe all Americans should be.[57]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Perez-Rivas, Manuel (August 22, 2001). "Appeals court judge a rising star among conservatives". CNN.
  2. ^ Woodruff, Judy (August 14, 2023). "Conservative retired judge says Trump 'corroded and corrupted American democracy'". PBS.
  3. ^ Pengelly, Martin (June 16, 2022). "Trump a 'clear and present danger to US democracy', conservative judge warns". The Guardian.
  4. ^ Ward, Ian (December 21, 2023). "'The Opposite of Politics': A Conservative Legal Scholar Says Kicking Trump Off the Ballot Is 'Unassailable'". Politico.
  5. ^ a b Hsu, Spencer S. (July 2, 1998). "One Judge and the Shaping of Abortion Law". The Washington Post. p. A1. Retrieved January 8, 2021.
  6. ^ "Boeing: J. Michael (Mike) Luttig". www.boeing.com.
  7. ^ a b c d Bazelon, Emily (July 1, 2005). "The Supreme Court Shortlist". Slate. Retrieved October 22, 2008.
  8. ^ "Famous Will: Warren Burger". doyourownwill.com.
  9. ^ "Last Will and Testament of Warren Burger". livingtrustnetwork.com. Archived from the original on March 7, 2016. Retrieved March 6, 2016.
  10. ^ "Chief Justice Burger: A Better Tax Lawyer Than His Critics". papers.ssrn.com. April 2010. SSRN 1585397.
  11. ^ a b London, Robb (October 18, 1991). "A Question of Ethics for a New Judge". The New York Times. Retrieved May 26, 2020.
  12. ^ Lewis, Anthony (October 21, 1991). "Confirmed: sex, lies and politics". Baltimore Sun. Retrieved May 26, 2020. Luttig has been nominated and actually confirmed by the Senate to be a judge of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. But he has delayed taking the judicial oath, perhaps so that he could make this last contribution to the political process before administering evenhanded justice.
  13. ^ Totenberg, Nina (July 6, 2005). "Possible Successors to Chief Justice Rehnquist". National Public Radio. Retrieved March 6, 2016.
  14. ^ a b "Luttig, J. Michael - Federal Judicial Center". www.fjc.gov.
  15. ^ a b J. Michael Luttig at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges, a publication of the Federal Judicial Center.
  16. ^ Sontag, Deborah (March 9, 2003). "The Power of the Fourth". The New York Times Magazine.
  17. ^ Bazelon, Emily; Newman, David (July 1, 2005). "The Supreme Court Shortlist". Slate. Retrieved August 6, 2006.
  18. ^ Woellert, Lorraine (July 18, 2005). "Full Court Press". Businessweek Online. Archived from the original on October 28, 2005. Retrieved August 6, 2006.
  19. ^ Perez-Rivas, Manuel (August 22, 2001). "Appeals court judge a rising star among conservatives". CNN. Archived from the original on July 23, 2008. Retrieved May 5, 2010.
  20. ^ Liptak, Adam (September 6, 2010). "Clerks Highlight Supreme Court's Polarization". The New York Times. Retrieved September 7, 2010.
  21. ^ Treisman, Rachel (May 9, 2023). "He followed strict rules as a judge and wants Supreme Court justices to do the same". NPR. Retrieved September 3, 2023.
  22. ^ a b "Does Napoleon Beazley Deserve to Die?". Texas Monthly. April 1, 2002. Retrieved August 16, 2019.
  23. ^ "Docket - In re Napoleon Beazley, Petitioner - Supreme Court of the United States". www.supremecourt.gov. Retrieved August 16, 2019.
  24. ^ "Docket - Beazley v. Texas - Supreme Court of the United States". www.supremecourt.gov. Retrieved August 16, 2019.
  25. ^ Bonner, Raymond (August 14, 2001). "Three Abstain as Supreme Court Declines to Halt Texas Execution". The New York Times.
  26. ^ "PADILLA v. HANFT" (PDF). Findlaw.
  27. ^ McGough, Michael (January 2, 2006). "How do you solve a problem like Padilla?". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved August 6, 2006.
  28. ^ "PADILLA v. HANFT" (PDF). Findlaw.
  29. ^ Bravin, Jess; Lunsford, J. Lynn (May 11, 2006). "Breakdown of Trust Led Judge Luttig to Clash with Bush". Wall Street Journal: A1. Retrieved May 11, 2006.
  30. ^ Markon, Jerry (May 11, 2006). "Appeals Court Judge Leaves Life Appointment for Boeing". The Washington Post. p. A11. Retrieved May 11, 2006.
  31. ^ Markon, Jerry (May 11, 2006). "Appeals Court Judge Leaves Life Appointment for Boeing". Washington Post. pp. A11. Retrieved August 6, 2006.
  32. ^ Ba (Nyse). "Boeing Senior Vice President and General Counsel Douglas Bain Retires - May 10, 2006". Boeing. Retrieved March 11, 2020.
  33. ^ Luttig, Michael (May 10, 2006). "Letter of resignation" (PDF). Letter to President George Bush. United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 12, 2006.
  34. ^ JUDICIAL COMPENSATION: OUR FEDERAL JUDGES MUST BE FAIRLY PAID (Report). American College of Trial Lawyers. March 2007. Archived from the original on June 26, 2007.
  35. ^ "The Boeing Company 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders". envisionreports.com.
  36. ^ "Who Are America's Best-Paid General Counsel? (2015 Rankings) - Page 2 of 2". July 16, 2015.
  37. ^ Ba (Nyse) (May 1, 2019). "Boeing Names Luttig Counselor and Senior Advisor, Gerry General Counsel - May 1, 2019". Boeing.mediaroom.com. Retrieved March 11, 2020.
  38. ^ Ba (Nyse) (January 1, 2020). "J. Michael (Mike) Luttig". Boeing. Retrieved March 11, 2020.
  39. ^ "Coca-Cola Shakes up In-House Legal Team, Swapping Out Gayton (2)".
  40. ^ Baker, Peter; Haberman, Maggie; Karni, Annie (January 13, 2021). "Pence Reached His Limit With Trump. It Wasn't Pretty". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 14, 2021.
  41. ^ Timm, Jane C. (January 5, 2021). "Fact check: No, Pence can't overturn the election results". NBC News.
  42. ^ "AP FACT CHECK: Trump's false claims, fuel on a day of chaos". Associated Press News. January 6, 2021.
  43. ^ Naylor, Brian (January 5, 2021). "FACT CHECK: What Pence And Congress Can And Can't Do About The Election". www.wnpr.org.
  44. ^ "AP FACT CHECK: Trump's false claims, fuel on a day of chaos". Associated Press News. April 20, 2021.
  45. ^ Treisman, Rachel (June 16, 2022). "A respected conservative judge is now a critic of his party — and former clerks". NPR. via CNN′. Retrieved June 16, 2022.
  46. ^ "Prepared Statement of J. Michael Luttig". CNN. June 16, 2022.
  47. ^ Lizza, Ryan; Daniels, Eugene (June 17, 2022). "Politico Playbook: What Judge Luttig told us about Jan. 6". Politico.
  48. ^ Danforth, John; Ginsberg, Benjamin; Griffith, Thomas B.; Hoppe, David; Luttig, J. Michael; McConnell, Michael W.; Olson, Theodore B.; Smith, Gordon H. (July 2022). "Lost, Not Stolen: The Conservative Case that Trump Lost and Biden Won the 2020 Presidential Election" (PDF). lostnotstolen.org.
  49. ^ Luttig, J. Michael; Tribe, Laurence H. (August 19, 2023). "The Constitution Prohibits Trump From Ever Being President Again - The only question is whether American citizens today can uphold that commitment". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 20, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2023.
  50. ^ Holmes, Kristen (December 3, 2022). "Trump calls for the termination of the Constitution in Truth Social post". CNN.
  51. ^ Beauchamp, Zack (August 11, 2023). "The constitutional case that Donald Trump is already banned from being president". Vox. Retrieved August 11, 2023.
  52. ^ Liptak, Adam (August 10, 2023). "Conservative Case Emerges to Disqualify Trump for Role on Jan. 6". The New York Times. Retrieved August 11, 2023.
  53. ^ Nichols, John (August 4, 2023). "The Biggest Threat to Donald Trump Could Be the Constitution Itself". The Nation. ISSN 0027-8378. Retrieved August 11, 2023.
  54. ^ a b Smith, David (November 13, 2023). "'I'm more worried today than I was on January 6': top conservative's warning to America". The Guardian.
  55. ^ Conway, George; Luttig, J. Michael; Comstock, Barbara (November 21, 2023). "America Needs a Pro-Democracy Conservative Legal Establishment - The Trump Threat Is Growing. Lawyers Must Rise to Meet This Moment". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 21, 2023. Retrieved November 21, 2023.
  56. ^ a b "'SCOTUS cut that heart and soul out of America': Fmr. federal judge blasts immunity ruling". MSNBC (via YouTube). July 1, 2024. Retrieved July 3, 2024.
  57. ^ a b Gangel, Jamie; Krieg, Gregory (August 19, 2024). "Exclusive: Conservative Republican endorses Harris, calls Trump a threat to democracy". CNN. Retrieved August 19, 2024.
[edit]
Wikiquote has quotations related to J. Michael Luttig.
Legal offices
Preceded by
Seat established by 104 Stat. 5089
 Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1991–2006 		Succeeded by
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J._Michael_Luttig&oldid=1255191574"