Template talk:Mario franchise

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Video games: Nintendo This template is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles This template is supported by the Nintendo task force. Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks view watch edit history shell vg talk alerts purge AfDs Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants) Purple Francis (8 participants) Gilman Louie (2 participants) Yoshimitsu (3 participants) Dr. Wily (9 participants) First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants) Emote (2 participants) Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted) Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted) Merge discussions Legacy of Kain: Soul Reaver 1 & 2 Remastered (discussion) Pokémon Essentials (discussion) Harvest Moon DS: Sunshine Islands (discussion) Input lag (discussion) Neo Geo Pocket (discussion) Minecraft – Volume Beta (discussion) Other discussions No major discussions Featured content candidates Claire Redfield (nom) Pokémon episodes removed from rotation (nom) Donkey Kong (nom) Good article nominations Tina Armstrong (start) Kim Kitsuragi (start) Miner 2049er (start) Pixel Piracy (start) Dr Disrespect (nom) The Outer Worlds (nom) River Raid (start) The Great Giana Sisters (start) Haunter (Pokémon) (start) Bit City (start) Dendy (start) Dark Urge (start) Pokémon Scarlet and Violet (start) Jeanette Voerman (start) Crono (start) Deathloop (start) Quiver (video game) (start) Regi (Pokémon) (start) Ridley (Metroid) (start) Blast Wind (start) Project Zero 2: Wii Edition (start) Shiori Fujisaki (start) Barry Burton (start) Sea of Stars (start) DYK nominations Bejeweled Sun Haven Tiny Glade Reviews and reassessments A Space for the Unbound (rev) Wild Arms (video game) (nom) Bejeweled (video game) (rev) The Legend of Dragoon (rev) Articles that need... assessment (2) (0) reassessment (0) cleanup (7) infoboxes (12) cover art (238) screenshots (8,921) photos (67) translation from japan (188) creation merging

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

I recently made an edit for this, but was told to discuss it here first. I added a section to the article listing other notable platformer series which have had some connection to the Mario franchise over the years, but are not just spin-off sub-series, e.g. Donkey Kong or Wario. Here's some clarification on why each series I listed was included, for if considering adding it again. What they each have in common (besides being platformers or series with a lot of platformers), is either an official Mario cameo has appeared in its series, or an official cameo of their game(s) have appeared in a Mario game.

1. The Banjo and Conker series were both mentioned for the obvious reason that they made their debuts in Diddy Kong Racing, as well as a number of more subtle Mario references littered throughout Banjo-Kazooie and Banjo-Tooie in particular. It could almost be argued that they're sub-series of Mario (rights being eaten up by Microsoft aside, I mean in terms of their origins).

2. The Sonic series was mentioned because of the handful of Mario and Sonic crossovers, since they started 'getting along'.

3. Kirby, Legendary Starfy, Kid Icarus, Chibi-Robo, Splatoon, Metroid were all mentioned due to the combination of also being owned by Nintendo, and additionally all having had one or two Mario cameos littered throughout them (and/or vice versa).

4. Mega Man, R.O.B. and Skylanders were listed due to several Mario characters appearing in their games and/or vice versa, due to the amiibos. R.O.B. is perhaps more of a grey area as there's only one real 'platformer' in that (brief) series (Gyromite).

5. Battletoads is arguably the most tenuous one. A sort of cameo appeared in the form of the Battle T character in Mario Party 2 and 3. It could be debated whether this was intentional, but the fact the character did not appear in Mario Party 4 (around when Rare switched to Microsoft) and the character's green color do pretty strong imply it was an agreed nod to the games between Rare and Nintendo. Understandable if this is considered too vague to include.

I hope that makes sense of the mentions. Nineteneleven1 19:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The section "Main" is a bit misleading. It's not even clear what "Main" means in this context. This is a list of game series which don't fit into the other genre categories. Sure, Super Mario and Mario Kart are undeniably "main" game series, and possibly even Mario Party. But Mario Artist, really? I am not sure what it has done to deserve being called a "main" game series. Kidburla (talk) 01:15, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I added stuff to this template from other templates, but @Dissident93 has bloat concerns. Any opinions? RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 01:45, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Don't we have navboxes for all the other sub-series you re-added here? Just dumping them all in one template makes it hard to navigate, and defeats the purpose of the other navboxes. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 01:48, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is harder to navigate if you have to click twice to get anywhere. Besides, I will not remove any of the subseries templates. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 02:03, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Okay since he has not responded in nearly 12 hours I am going to readd it. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 13:08, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • No, Dissident93 is right. Having to click twice does not make something harder to navigate. In fact, having all the games in the template makes it harder to read and maintain. Also, wait until consensus is reached before you re-add. People have lives outside Wikipedia and may take time to respond. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 14:57, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
        • Okay RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 15:01, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
          • And not responding in 12 hours doesn't mean anything, at least give it a week before using that as an excuse to revert back to something... ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 18:19, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]