User talk:Ætoms

[talk] ^Ætoms

If you find time for it, please take a look at Samira Efendi. Thanks.BabbaQ (talk) 12:21, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@BabbaQ: I expanded the article. Thank you for notifying me! ― Ætoms ^[talk] 18:02, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I created a stub for VAL that will represent Belarus.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:15, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

&#8213; [[User:Ætoms|<font face="Times New Roman" color="Black">Æ'''toms'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Ætoms|<font face="Times New Roman" color="Black">[''talk'']</font>]]</sup> : ― Ætoms ^[talk]

to

&#8213; [[User:Ætoms|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman; color:Black">Æ'''toms'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Ætoms|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman; color:Black">[''talk'']</span>]]</sup> : ― Ætoms ^[talk]

—Anomalocaris (talk) 00:13, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mrs. Einstein has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NBAND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Base (political party) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Base (political party) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MatryoshkaNL (talk) 12:46, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NLBeter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NLBeter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MatryoshkaNL (talk) 12:50, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Mississippi flag referendum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:02, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry to say that your edits on Template:Netherlands Antilles elections are completely wrong. The Antilles were governed by the Estates of the Netherlands Antilles. The separate island each had there own Island Council, not only St. Maarten and Aruba. Could you please fix that? The Banner talk 08:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@The Banner: What do you mean? I never wrote that Aruba and Sint Maarten were the only islands with an island council. Articles about the island council elections on the other islands may simply be lacking. ― Ætoms ^[talk] 21:47, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The situation is more complex then you state here. But for starters, it is way better to give every island its own section. And rename the general elections in such a way that it makes clear that voting was for the Estates of the Netherlands Antilles and not for the Dutch parliament. The Dutch Parliament (lower house) gets votes from the BES-islands. For the Senate there is Electoral colleges for the Senate. All parts are still part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. The Banner talk 22:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@The Banner: You are aware that the Netherlands Antilles no longer exist? When they still existed, general elections were held to elect the members of the Estates of the Netherlands Antilles. Now that they have been dissolved, Curaçao and Sint Maarten have their own general elections and the BES Islands vote for the Dutch general elections (see Template:Dutch elections). I still don't understand what you think was wrong with my edits, could you please clarify? ― Ætoms ^[talk] 22:12, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(e/c) Sorry to butt in, but each island already has its own template, which lists its individual island council elections (these are linked at the foot of the template). The 'Island Council' row currently links to a set of newly-created DAB pages that Ætoms is proposing to merge the existing election articles for each island into (which would mean there are no longer any separate articles for different islands, and no individual rows would be needed anyway). I have changed 'General election' to 'Estates election' though, although I did wonder (as Ætoms has confirmed) whether the BES islands voted in Dutch general elections prior to the dissolution of the Netherlands Antilles, so 'General election' would have also been correct. Number 57 22:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ætoms: I am Dutch.. The Banner talk 22:31, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Island council elections in the Netherlands Antilles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:23, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for reverting more of your edits, but it would be far better to use the WP:RM process than try to bundle the moves into the (already exremeley large) request at WP:E&R. Also, the 'disputed title' tags tend to be used for WP:NPOV matters rather than situations like this. You can bundle multiple requests into one RM though.

I'd also suggest that the title should be 'Aruban Island Council election', not 'Aruban island council election', as the 'Island Council' refers to a specific body being elected, like 1919 Austrian Constituent Assembly election or 2017 Marshallese Constitutional Convention election. Cheers, Number 57 20:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57: I don't think it would be appropriate to use the RM process, as this would lead to two separate discussions on the same topic. Why do you think starting a discussion at RM before a consensus is reached about the proposed article mergers is more appropriate? I can remove the addition to my proposal, but then I'll just boldly move the 4 stand-alone election articles once there is a consensus to merge. Thought it'd be better to be transparent about what my proposal would entail...

Regarding the capitalization of "island council": normally it is not capitalized, just like "municipal council" and "water board", but I guess when talking about the island council of Bonaire, Saba or Sint Eustatius specifically, it should indeed be capitalized. Thanks! Best, ― Ætoms ^[talk] 21:28, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean two separate discussions? The move request is unrelated to the merger request, so they would naturally be two separate discussions (hence why I thought it was a bad idea to try and combine them, given that the merger discussion is already very large in terms of what it's asking). Number 57 21:31, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57: Sorry, but I really don't get what you want me to do. You want consistency in the article names right? Then how can an RM discussion lead to a decision to move 4 articles, while the merger discussion is still pending? Or do you mean that I should request for all articles to be moved? ― Ætoms ^[talk] 22:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The latter, although probably best to wait until the merge discussion ends, as it may make it irrelevant for many of them. Number 57 14:35, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57: Alright, I've withdrawn the addition to my proposal. I'll make sure to submit a move request once the merge discussion has ended. ― Ætoms ^[talk] 14:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ætoms, I wanted to notify you that the AfD debate The Base (political party) has been reopened to discussion for a "more thorough consensus". See you there! Dswitz10734 (talk) 20:56, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:People's Party for Freedom and Democracy § Party color. Tristan Surtel (talk) 12:29, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you split Fortuynism of main page? It recently made a comeback again. Shadow4dark (talk) 23:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Shadow4dark: Sorry for not responding earlier. I'm a bit busy IRL and the topic doesn't particularly interest me, so I'm afraid I can't be of help right now. Best, ― Ætoms ^[talk] 23:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've started a discussion here about reducing the ideology section in the infobox. If you're interested I'd appreciate it if you can join. Vacant0 (talk) 20:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An update of Article 2021 Dutch curfew riots is needed. The riots in the Netherlands began on January 17, six days before the total escalation. I sent sources (references). A new escalation followed in March. I guess you saw the riots in The Hague on March 14 and in Amsterdam on March 20. It may be necessary to change the title of the article in the Anti-Covid protests in the Netherlands. — Baba Mica (talk) 19:20, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Baba Mica: The article 2021 Dutch curfew riots is about a series of riots that are known as the avondklokrellen in Dutch. These riots only lasted for about a week and were characterized by widespread vandalism, arson and looting throughout the country. The smaller protests on 17 January and on 14 and 20 March are not referred to as avondklokrellen in the media. That's why I think it would be better to create a separate article about anti-lockdown protests in the Netherlands in general. ― Ætoms ^[talk] 19:40, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I edited that article. — Baba Mica (talk) 19:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uit praktisch oogpunt, is het niet beter om Template:Cabinet of the Netherlands een doorverwijzing te houden, maar dan naar Template:Fourth Rutte Cabinet (waar dan de tabel zou staan)? En dan op de pagina zelf door te verwijzen naar die laatste. Op die manier hoef je niet bij kabinetswissel ook nog in artikel te wijzigen. Dajasj (talk) 20:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lijkt me een goed idee! Template:Fourth Rutte cabinet bestaat echter al, dus misschien Template:Members of the fourth Rutte cabinet gebruiken? — Ætoms ^[talk] 21:18, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ik weet niet wat de richtlijnen zijn hiervoor? Is het misschien handig om te vermelden dat het om een tabel gaat? Strict genomen voldoet die ander er namelijk ook aan, alleen dat is meer navigatie. Dajasj (talk) 22:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Misschien is Template:Fourth Rutte cabinet table beter dan? — Ætoms ^[talk] 20:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vind ik prima! Dajasj (talk) 14:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ætoms, I answered you there. Europe2016 (talk) 15:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There was no reason to restore an empty section. It doesn't help users to fill it out. Having a background section is not a requirement on Wikipedia. Users will add it if they have the information and see it missing. Ss112 00:40, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: Oops, I didn't do that on purpose! Must have been the result of an edit conflict. — Ætoms ^[talk] 00:44, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I noticed that on several Eurovision artists' articles you changed the initialism for Lithuania from LIT to the country code LTU. LIT is also a valid ISO country code for Lithuania (even if not as common as LTU), but even if it wasn't, country initialisms do not always match country codes (and to the best of my knowledge, no guideline says they have to either). For example, CH and CHE are the official ISO country codes for Switzerland but that is not used in chart columns on the English Wikipedia as most English-speaking readers would not recognise this at a glance or know the meaning, even if Switzerland were to be linked. My point is we don't always follow the official ISO country code so it doesn't need to be changed. Thanks. Ss112 08:48, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Could you make a small modification on this image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Drapeau_non-officiel_fr_d%C3%A9partement_Manche.svg

The flag taking up the coat of arms of the Manche, drawn by Robert Louis, the separation of the blue zone and the red zone must not be straight, but wavy.

Here are the coats of arms: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manche_(d%C3%A9partement)#H%C3%A9raldique

This flag appears on the bottom left of the cover of this book: https://france3-regions.francetvinfo.fr/image/foZpLNQxl1SvBdfreEv1SzZ8njE/1200x1200/regions/2021/10/16/6169fb3d955a7_livre-drapeaux-de-normandie-photo-5491399.jpg

Cordially, Thank you ! --Oedipe23 (talk) 23:27, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ætoms. Thank you for creating First Wever-Croes cabinet. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:26, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ætoms. Thank you for creating Second Wever-Croes cabinet. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:30, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ætoms. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Coat of arms of Curaçao.
Message added 06:27, 7 November 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:27, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dion Cooper, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dion Cooper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Emblem of Curaçao, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a design competition was held in 2022 to find a replacement for the coat of arms of Curaçao (depicted)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Coat of arms of Curaçao. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Emblem of Curaçao), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why did you revert my edit in The Starlings (duo) yesterday? You didn't write an edit summary so I can't know why. And also, I made this edit 18 days ago (2 weeks and 4 days), why did you only revert my edit now? DSOFOreverTYU ~ talk ~ Eurovision 14:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for not leaving an edit summary. Per documentation, the image parameter in the infobox should contain a single image (just the image name). The Multiple image template also renders the images as a thumbnail, which should not be used in infoboxes according to WP:IBI. You could upload a montage of the images to Commons and add it to the infobox as a single image. Otherwise, it is better to leave the images out of the infobox. — Ætoms ^[talk] 16:43, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ætoms. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ebonique, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 People's Party for Freedom and Democracy leadership election, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 People's Party for Freedom and Democracy leadership election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision News Desk Shortcut WP:ESC/N Dear Eurovision Wikipedian, Our project pages have undergone a full color change and now resemble the Swedish flag . Content and design updates are taking place daily. The new Archive tab will make it easier to find and view just about all of our archived pages. It is a work in progress. Issue 49 of the newsletter is currently pending delivery. While we await that, you can now receive daily and/or weekly Eurovision news updates. Sign up below have a wonderful week. To receive a daily or weekly Eurovision news update please click on the appropriate button. Cordially, News Desk Editor-in-Chief Ktkvtsh (talk)

Eurovision Daily News Update 16 August 2023 Happy birthday to... Marc Moulin who would be 81 today. He represented Belgium 1980 as part of Telex, placing (17th) Happy birthday to... Jari Sillanpää who is 58 today. He represented Finland 2004 placing (14th in the Semi Final) Recently in the news... Patricia Bredin, the first representative to Eurovision from the United Kingdom, has died aged 88. Recently in the news... EasyJet is launching a new route from the United Kingdom to the Icelandic city of Akureyri, near Húsavík. Did you know... The largest number of nations to take part was 43 in 2008, 2011 and 2018. Eurovision entrant... Dave Benton (born 31 January 1951, birth name Efrén Eugene Benita) is a pop musician from Aruba who lives in Estonia. He is one of the winners of the Eurovision Song Contest 2001. At the age of 50 years and 101 days at the time of his victory, Benton is the oldest singer ever to win Eurovision, as well as the first Black winner. Born Efrén Eugene Benita in 1951 on the Caribbean island of Aruba, he was fluent in English, Dutch, Spanish and Papiamento, the creole language of the island. As a drummer and a backing vocalist, he worked with The Drifters, Tom Jones, Billy Ocean, José Feliciano and The Platters. Benton's daughter Sissi participated in Eesti Laul in 2021 with the song "Time", attempting to follow in her father's footsteps and represent Estonia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2021. She qualified to the superfinal, where she placed second.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 07:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ætoms. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dutch West Indies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Water Natuurlijk logo.svg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ætoms. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Regio Songfestival 1995, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox song contest/Eurovision: Europe Shine a Light has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ætoms. Thank you for your work on L1 (broadcaster). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:58, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ætoms. Your map of the 2023 Nederland election is very nice and serves its purpose very well. However I noticed a mistake- the largest party in Ommen, Overijssel was NSC, not PVV. AV85647 (talk) 06:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AV85647, thanks for noticing the mistake and letting me know! I've uploaded a new version. Cheers, — Ætoms ^[talk] 12:50, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]