User talk:1205dz

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:38, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not respond with your next edit to the ANI thread, you run the risk of being blocked from editing. Other editors have concerns about your editing, and you blanked my last message. You would be well advised to heed this at once.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:40, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Feel free. I'd be more concerned about being reported at ANI> Please respond. You can tell them alllll about it.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:48, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again. All content on Wikipedia must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking. Not from some archive only available to you. Thanks-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:50, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to apologize for my inappropriate demeanor. May we all work for the better of Wikipedia. 1205dz (talk) 06:24, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I'm impressed. This is a first. In my decade-plus of editing Wikipedia, I never seen anyone apologize. We have all at times gotten a bit too emotional about our edits – as human being we like our stuff and our work is important to us, it gives us dignity etc., even if it is unpaid. Further Wikipedia can be brutal because it is so impersonal, inter-cultural, and so very brusque, with short comments like so much of the internet. In Wikipedia we are told to WP:BEBOLD but a bold, brutal, cold, brusque edit can cut. We have all been emotional, but few apologize. This is a model for all of us.--Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 13:11, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]