User talk:Abhishekitmbm

Welcome!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Chzz  ►  10:11, 19

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:06, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please correct these errors by giving name to links and title tag correctly. ..असक्तः सततं कार्य कर्म समाचर | असक्तः हि आचरन् कर्म.. Humour Thisthat2011 10:07, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done--abhishek (talk) 12:58, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps if you had the patience to read the whole article before editing, you could find out that your additions were already there in an earlier section, where the circumstances of forming P B Sawant Commission and its indictments are mentioned. I have already initiated a section in the talk page of the article about your edits. You are welcome to participate there. Joy1963^Talk 07:26, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Read talk page before reverting anything. There's already a consensus on talk page. Thanks. Scieberking (talk) 19:31, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I read posted two edits regarding Critical response section and gave a proper reason for what I did--abhishek (talk) 10:22, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Abhishekitmbm, The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions. We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

Please do not insert POV into the titles of infoboxes, as you did at 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement. I do realise that the previous title was equally poor, btw. - Sitush (talk) 12:42, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okays will try not to do this again.Thanks.--abhishek (talk) 12:45, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revolution 2020: Love, Corruption, Ambition is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revolution 2020: Love, Corruption, Ambition until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:34, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	To Wikipedia's 11th Anniversary Celebrations!
	An invitation for you to come and join us for Wikipedia's 11th Anniversary Celebrations in Delhi on the 15th Jan 2012: Click here for more details. Will be great to see you! :) Nitika.t (talk) 13:20, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was so eager to attend my first meeting with wikipedians specially on the occasions of 11th anniversary.But I am unfortunate date 15th January is already scheduled for some personal and unavoidable work!!!So nice of you for inviting me,please keep sharing this kind of meting details.--abhishek (talk) 15:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you hadn't noticed that the FIGURES IN THE ARTICLE DO NOT CORRESPOND TO THE FIGURES ON THE SOURCES! I AM ADDING THAT WARNING IN AGAIN. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashermadan (talk • contribs) 10:23, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.I checked all refs from 32 to 35.Text on wiki page is exactly same as in citations(on BOI). Would you please elaborate what makes you say FIGURES IN THE ARTICLE DO NOT CORRESPOND TO THE FIGURES ON THE SOURCES!--Sandy (talk) 10:30, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When using the WP:PROD procedure, as you did at Thakur Arjun Singh, please provide a reason for deletion in the template, for example {{subst:PROD|reason for proposed deletion}}. I have added a reason to that article, but please bear this in mind in the future. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:53, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

--Sandy (talk) 10:41, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FYI your repeated deletion of the Indian Idol comments is ridiculuous. At first, I did not remember Raghu coming, but I clearly remembere there was a person who did stretching exercises and was rude and did a "gun" gesture after he was rejected. This was one of the standout auditions of the first season. Later, I saw a tape of the whole episode belonging to a friend. I suspect you are a chamcha of Raghu's. I will shortly upload the whole episode and request Wikipedia to ban you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JICKY999 (talk • contribs) 09:19, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well as I've already said I am neither of favoring of deleting or in posting this video detail,but the information is provided is ill cited an doesn't worth of mentioning on wikipedia.I've already watched video published by official channel and even they didn't mention that he was in audition.Well if want to update a page,go ahead,respect policies.And one last thing.Its second time you are threatening to blocking me,go ahead and read Wikipedia:Blocking policy first.--Sandy (talk) 10:30, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- @sandy: whatver. @abhishek: "I've already watched video published by official channel and even they didn't mention that he was in audition " WTF? Why will the channel mention Raghu auditioned if he was nto famous at the time? Someone has dug out old footage of an incident that happened when raghu was not there. I remember the incident vividly and can provide links to old orkut groups where people discuss about a rude contestant to did stretching exercises and pointed a gun at the judges. Nobody remembered the guy's face coz he was a loser and it happened a long time ago. Turns out the guy was Raghu. And bt pal, maybe you should watch this. So many computer special effects wizards faking footage, eh??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ld-a7DYz-cs

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1362622/Jay-Leno-embarrasses-Simon-Cowell-digs-footage-X-Factor-boss-Sale-Century-quiz-90s.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by JICKY999 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did you just mention about orkut groups...lol..well I can give you hundreds of groups on web where discussion of this link is considered as fake.remember buddy its wiki and not user discussion group.--Sandy (talk) 10:41, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You moron, I was referring to orkut groups dating back to 2003 or whenever the first season took place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JICKY999 (talk • contribs) 04:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

watch your words carefully you stupid creature,your kind of ppl shouln't be allowed to even read on wiki..next time u abuse me,and will knock u out.--Sandy (talk) 12:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Housefull 2: The Dirty Dozen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Shaan and Wajid

Paan Singh Tomar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Irfan Khan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done--Sandy (talk) 09:52, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Its been clarified that IMDb ratings can't be used as WP:RS. Please do not add it again. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 14:53, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okays.Thanks for the information.Had you provided this information in edit summary,it could have saved some efforts of us.--Sandy (talk) 14:58, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paan Singh Tomar (Athlete), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Pol430 talk to me 20:51, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abhishekitmbm. You have new messages at Pol430's talk page.
Message added 20:48, 13 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Pol430 talk to me 20:48, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, i was just wondering whether it would be convenient for you to update summaries of the episodes on the MTV Roadies (season 9) =) I've seen that you've made some edits on the page, i'd really appreciate if you would help the article grow. Thank you! --Heyhello1234567 (talk) 17:10, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Abhishekitmbm, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Chai Garam to a proposed deletion tag. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:44, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is good that the new page of Gangs Of Wasseypur Part 1 has been created but it would have been better had it been put up at the talk page with the people working on it.Ayanosh (talk) 13:59, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes It may have,but it is quiet evident that every notable movie should have its own page.What information should be where can be discussed in detail at talk page.Thnaks--Sandy (talk) 14:43, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed your AfD tag from Thakur Arjun Singh (renamed after tagging) as you did not complete the nomination process. If you still feel the article should be deleted, please see WP:AFDHOWTO for instructions on the nomination process. Monty₈₄₅ 05:27, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-nominated the article for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thakur Arjun Singh. Please feel free to weigh in on the debate. Hasteur (talk) 11:37, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, Abhishekitmbm! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Yaris678 (talk) 16:59, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've completed your nomination of this article. The debate may be found at the above link, and you'll want to expand on your reasoning there. Remember also to read over WP:AFDHOWTO before posting more AFDs; it's a simple process once you get the hang of it. Best, UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 19:25, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete my content on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manish_Tiwari and put a redirection.

I do not feel this needs to be re-directed to Manish Tewariji's link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manish_Tewari

If you have any questions, i am happy to take those Man tiwari (talk) 14:05, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Day 2

You have again undone my page quoting "removing vandalism", i wonder why? you are re-directing Manish Tiwari to Manish Tewari, That is amounts to incorrect information on Wikipedia, isn't that in direct conflict of Wikipedia's tenet of verifiable information and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons

'Please' send a talk to me before editing it again. (talk) 07:46, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Day3

you have again removed the content, can you please give reason for that, i do not think you have been fair here or being driven by something else.

Man tiwari (talk) 11:24, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

...

Day X

you have again removed, i am not sure of the reasons for you to be so pedantic about it, but Wikipedia's terms are clear and i am adhering to those both on npov http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view and on living persons, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Avoid_self-published_sources i would take this edit to wikipedia forum for discussion

Man tiwari (talk) 12:45, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on First Post(India) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Guillaume2303 (talk) 07:49, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tidy: "First Post(India)" -> First Post (India). --Shirt58 (talk) 10:28, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edits in Template:Corruption in India ? --Ne0 (talk) 10:36, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've mentioned in edit summary that those orags are not as notable.So removed them.If you find that those should be included start a thread on talk page.--Sandy (talk) 04:42, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I re-undid your additions. While your additional sources was helpful, the citations need to be inline the paragraph. See WP:INCITE for more information on that.

That said, I do appreciate you taking the time to work on this article, especially given the sensitivity of the topic. Legoktm (talk) 10:23, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted perfectly appropriate content with the following edit summary:

Please read/contribute on talk page before keep on adding same thing

Read what, exactly? The article on criticism linked by Sandy that has nothing whatsoever to do with the content on controversy that you removed? Content, I should note, which is not criticism: it is a factual recounting of the controversy surrounding this very public figure, just as many biographies and other similar articles have similar sections. Controversy is not criticism, and there is nothing on this talk page that has anything to do with the controversy being cited that you deleted. Also I didn't add the content, I merely cleaned it up, removing that which was not appropriate, fixed formatting, verified the content sources, and added references where needed. Suggestion: try doing some reading yourself, such as the article edit history, and of the content you are removing, before suggesting others do so. Please read WP:EW, and WP:BLP, particularly the section WP:WELLKNOWN, which states,

In the case of public figures, there will be a multitude of reliable published sources, and BLPs should simply document what these sources say. If an allegation or incident is noteworthy, relevant, and well-documented, it belongs in the article — even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it. If you cannot find multiple reliable third-party sources documenting the allegation or incident, leave it out.

• Example: "John Doe had a messy divorce from Jane Doe." Is this important to the article, and was it published by third-party reliable sources? If not, leave it out, or stick to the facts: "John Doe and Jane Doe were divorced."
• Example: A politician is alleged to have had an affair. He or she denies it, but multiple major newspapers publish the allegations, and there is a public scandal. The allegation belongs in the biography, citing those sources. However, it should only state that the politician was alleged to have had the affair, not that he actually did.

Hello, Abhishekitmbm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]