User talk: Imtitanium

Welcome! Things I'd do to your ASS. Dayumm.

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thanks For adding the elimination table @ masterchef india (season 2) :) :) Tanzeel Ahad 18:58, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Look at my talk page and Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism --Njavallil ...Talk 2 Me 15:37, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Imtitanium. Try not to feel too upset about the noticeboard threads that you've been mentioned in recently. We do value your contributions, really! The copyright thing was unfortunate because we legally can't accept copyright violations on Wikipedia, but that doesn't mean that we don't want you to contribute. On the contrary, now that you understand our copyright rules, you will be a very useful person to have around. :) Let me know if there are any questions you want to ask, and I'll be happy to give you an answer. Best — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 15:04, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I appreciate it.-- I'm Titanium  ^chat 15:11, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Resilient Barnstar
	I have to say I am impressed at how much you have come on as an editor. Since our first clashes over Big Brother you have matured into a good editor. I am very impressed with how you have conducted yourself with this copyright issue. Good luck in your future endeavours here and elsewhere. GimliDotNet (Speak to me,Stuff I've done) 17:56, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You! :) -- I'm Titanium  ^chat 11:39, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW Imt., while you may not appreciate me saying so, I also think you have turned a corner in the last few weeks. Leaky Caldron 11:47, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Like Tito Dutta (talk) 11:49, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Imtitanium. You have new messages at Dharmadhyaksha's talk page.
Message added 06:38, 17 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

— Mr. Stradivarius on tour ^{(have a chat)} 06:38, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Imtitanium. I just saw this comment you made at Dharmadhyaksha's talk page, and it seems that you are treating your relationship with him as a kind of "battle" to be "won". I think you would do well to read the advice at our policy Wikipedia:No personal attacks, and be aware that Wikipedia is not a battleground, but a place to collaborate with other editors. If you disagree with another editor, then we expect that you talk together in a calm and civil fashion, and if talking with them doesn't work then we expect you to follow Wikipedia's dispute resolution system rather than resort to edit warring or incivility. It helps a lot if you focus on the content that you are discussing, and don't mention other editors' personalities or what you think their motives are. If you would like to do some reading to really get to grips with these ideas, I also recommend Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not about winning and all the essays linked at the bottom of Wikipedia:Assume good faith. Again, let me know if you have any questions. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 13:04, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He got personal, not me. He keeps being partial towards me and that to you is of no value of course. -- I'm Titanium  ^chat 13:15, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On that talk page I don't see any comments from him which make any personal remarks about you. He restricted his criticism to the content, not to the contributors. If I've overlooked a personal attack please quote it here and maybe we can get an uninvolved editor to help resolve the matter. —Psychonaut (talk) 13:18, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You might be right, but for accusations like this we need evidence, otherwise it falls under one of the definitions of a personal attack: "Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence." Could you post the evidence of him being partial towards you here? (Preferably including diffs.) If you give me an idea of where I should look I'll go and assess the situation. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 14:18, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I swear to God i have no clue how i got involved with you ppl. I hate Wikipedia now. I have a real life guys. I'm out of here, I'm gonna get myself into no correspondences anymore. U think i'm wrong? block me. U think i hurt someone, block me. I DONT CARE ANYMORE. I forgot that i have real ppl to attend to. This is so messed up i swear. -- I'm Titanium  ^chat 15:43, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits to the "Controversy" section of Bigg Boss 7 contained negative information about a living person, and the references you provided did not back up your claims. By my count this is the third or fourth time you have inserted information into an article and falsified the references. Please stop this immediately. Psychonaut (talk) 14:09, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bigg Boss, you may be blocked from editing. Martinian ^{Leave a message!} 16:58, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Bigg Boss 5 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Psychonaut (talk) 17:25, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've just blocked you for one week per this AIV report. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:31, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

can u please see wht r the issues on this page, as i dont knw much abt editing stuff http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.215.12 (talk) 16:56, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imtitanium (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I didn't know it was copyright material. Unblock me pls. I need to add current nominations to the Bigg Boss 7 page. No worthy editor edits the page except me. Please unblock me otherwise the page will go to the dogs.

Decline reason:

"I didn't know it was copyrighted" doesn't cut any ice here. You were repeatedly warned about copying material from elsewhere, and yet you persisted in doing so. If you copy material into Wikipedia from any source, the onus is on you to establish whether or not it is compatible with Wikipedia's licensing. A first infraction might be forgivable, but you have done this a number of times despite being told to stop. Yunshui 雲‍水 07:41, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Non-admin comment: Its high time now that you start understanding copyrights and stop copying stuff from other places to Wikipedia. You have been warned for that on multiple occasions. Your talk page history shows numerous warning related to copyvios. Examples: 1, 2, 3 and these date to 2012. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:14, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's none of your freaking business. Don't talk to me if I am not talking to you. Bye.-- I'm Titanium  ^chat 05:33, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. –Psychonaut (talk) 08:58, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Imtitanium, as you can not edit the noticeboard, you can put whatever you wish to say over here and then me or someone can take it up to ANI on your behalf. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:51, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your responses above, you clearly have zero desire to understand copyright policies or contribute constructively, so the block is indefinite now. Wizardman 13:52, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imtitanium (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't get it. I haven't edited the page whatsoever. I have been waiting for my unblock. I only add the nominations and the ratings now. I have had talks with Psychonaut and I understand and agreed that will not do so in future. The Bigg Boss 5 thing was an overlook mistake. Don't inflict such a heavy block on me. I have been contributing since forever. Please give me this last warning and spare me. I apologize. After this if you suspect any behaviour block me indefinite but pls spare me this last time.

1. I did add the BLP thing but Psycho confronted me and I didn't add it again. 2. Even before the BLP issue I added a copyvio summary. Psycho confronted me and I rewrote it completely. After that I didn't attempt to readd any copyvio summary again.
For both these issues you can consult Psycho since I strongly believe I'm not lying. Also The Bigg Boss 5 was a blunder on my part and I apologize for that. The whole section was removed and I thought someone had removed it as vandalism and I readded it. Had I known that all of it was copyvio I wouldn't have added it to begin with. As I said I might have overlooked it. You guys are being a little too harsh on me despite the fact that I am willing to comply with all of your rules. Mistakes can be made my every one of us. Not just once. I'm not the statue of liberty for God's sake. Cut me some slack. I am not paid to do this. Don't suppress my passion 'cause of some rules I have overlooked.

Decline reason:

Your assurances may have been taken at face value if there wasn't a CCI opened on your account and you weren't already warned numerous times. What you have been doing recently is wasting community time by making other editors clean up the serious violations and messes you create. If you really wish to request an unblock, come up with a convincing reason, and "I wasn't aware until so and so told me" is not valid, given your history. —SpacemanSpiff 06:14, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You know that this was removed as a copyvio. The reason was explained here. You even acknowledged and repaired the issue in that article. But you later put the copyvio text into another article, here. If it's unacceptable for one article, it's unacceptable for another. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 10:27, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

121.52.146.234 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) has been blocked from editing now as well for block evasion. I want to make sure that you know that it is against policy to edit any page other than your talk page while you are blocked. Doing so can result in your indefinite block (which may be lifted if you convince people that you understand policy and will comply with it) becoming permanent. Any edit you make while you are blocked from any IP or account can be deleted just because you made it. It's much better, if you hope to continue editing, to work with the processes to negotiate an unblock.

The main issue you would need to overcome is violations of copyright policy. It doesn't look good, that you seem to have deliberately restored content that you knew had been removed for copyright issues. And it isn't encouraging that even with something so simple as copying from one article to another, which you are allowed to do if you follow instructions, you did it without bothering to follow them. It suggests that you don't much care about complying with copyright policy. An unblock wouldn't be a good move on our part unless we can believe that this will change - that you will care and that you are able to follow those rules.

There are other issues you should consider as well. Wikipedia is simply not the place to share your opinions about celebrities - statements like "But of course, this seems hogwash because she was literally seen jumping after it was announced that she does not have to dance. You never know where the world is going. Too much douchebaggery" [1] just don't belong here. Our job is to neutrally summarize in due weight what reliable sources say about notable subjects. That's all. And you can't ever add a link to a biography like you did here in a way that suggests it is being used as a source for information in an article when it obviously is not - and when it doesn't come close to clearing the biographies of living people policy. Nor can you add sentences like this when neither of your purported sources says a thing about it: "The media analysing the actor's statement further reoriented the audience's attention towards the topic claiming it to be verging on bigotry and an insult to the LGBT community. Colors Viacom received around 560 complaints overnight regarding the issue."[2][3]

If we can't trust that you are neutrally adding accurate information and fairly representing your sources, then cleaning up the copyright problems won't matter. And if we can't trust that you are respecting and following our copyright policies, then it doesn't help if the information you add is neutral and appropriately sourced. These two serious problems both need to be addressed if you wish to continue editing with this account; editing otherwise means that everything you add may be deleted. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have learnt this the hard way and I can assure you all this will NOT repeat. I give you my word for it. Please spare me this last time let me prove to you that I can change for the better. After this any violation on my part shall result in the indefinite ban and I'll endorse it if the situation demands. We all make mistakes and not just a couple of times. I apologize. Really. -- I'm Titanium  ^chat 15:53, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imtitanium (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have learnt this the hard way and I can assure you all this will NOT repeat. I give you my word for it. Please spare me this last time let me prove to you that I can change for the better. After this any violation on my part shall result in the indefinite ban and I'll endorse it if the situation demands. We all make mistakes and not just a couple of times. I apologize. Really.

Decline reason:

I believe that you are really sorry that you have been blocked again, but I have no faith that the issues won't resume should be unblocked. Even below where Peridon asked you two very specific questions about socking, you failed to answer them, instead stating you never meant to vandalize. You're scrambling and just writing whatever it is that you think we want to hear, thereby missing the point of your block entirely. The account may be important to you, but you continue to use it not only inappropriately, but in ways that have the potential to bring real harm to the project. If you are sincere that you intend to learn from your mistakes, then I would suggest pursuing the standard offer. To wit, show you can be productive elsewhere, don't sock, and come back in six months to show us how much you've learned in the interim. That is how you will regain the trust of the community. Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 22:13, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Does the improvement mean no more sockpuppets? Peridon (talk) 18:49, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And abandoning the existing ones completely? Peridon (talk) 10:28, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I haven't been active lately. Just saw this message. I do swear, BY GOD, that I will not enter any copyright material into the articles. I will help you guys remove it, in turn. Please trust me this time. I am being extremely sincere. I have completely understood the severity of the issue. This account is important to me. I have never intentionally vandalized wikipedia. Please accept my apology and help me regain access to this account.-- I'm Titanium  ^chat 05:44, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You swore you wouldn't post any more copyright-infringing material, yet you immediately proceeded to do exactly that four more times: [4] [5] [6] [7]. —Psychonaut (talk) 06:28, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed your unblock request that was anything but an unblock request. Your talk page access has also been revoked. You can appeal further via WP:UTRS. —SpacemanSpiff 17:42, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Imtitanium. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans will be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 21:39, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan
	Hi Imtitanium! We are currently in the process of establishing a User Group for Pakistani Wikimedians with the following objectives; act as a hub for Pakistani editors working across the Wikimedia projects, act as a voice and representative for the Pakistani Wikimedian community, organize meet-ups, establish a Wikimedia Pakistan Chapter, acquire funding for various on-wiki and off-wiki activities including photo competitions, workshops and other public outreach events, and collaborate with the wider Wikimedia community. As an approved User Group, we will be recognised by the Wikimedia Foundation and officially supported by the Wikimedia movement. If you reside in Pakistan or actively work on Pakistan-related topics and can help in functional activities of the Pakistani User Group, please join the official planning group mailing list. For more details about the proposed user group, please visit the official page at http://pk.wikimedia.org. Together we can promote free knowledge in Pakistan!

You are receiving this message because you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan. This message was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 17:18, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Imtitanium!

Wiki Loves Monuments, the world's largest photography competition, will be taking place in Pakistan this September. The competition is all about capturing the cultural monuments and heritage sites of Pakistan and uploading these images on Commons to create an online repository which will be freely available to all.

Start taking photos of the sites enlisted here and upload them in September to be eligible for national and international prizes.

Email: [email protected]
Official website: wikilovesmonuments.pk
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WikiLovesMonumentsPK

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Pakistan[reply]

Hi Imtitanium!

Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan is organizing an edit drive for Pakistani Wikipedians on Pakistani Cultural Heritage throughout the month of July.
Top three contributors will be given a gift pack containing Wikipedia merchandise.

You can read the event details here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject Pakistan

Template:BBHM has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Psychonaut (talk) 17:41, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I AM She 2010 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I AM She 2010 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I AM She 2011 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I AM She 2011 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I AM She 2012 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I AM She 2012 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sylvester Rodgers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability only for being a reality show contestant. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:51, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tayaktribe.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Newswse.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Big Brother sidebar/Bigg Boss has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sambhavna Seth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable actress.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Winged Blades ^Godric 14:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Imtitanium/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 10:10, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SITribe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ApprenticeFan work 11:03, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rohit Verma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Verma (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ravensfire (talk) 19:07, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by DannyS712 (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 08:53, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by User:ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:16, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:19, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheDoctorWho (talk) 08:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pooja Misrra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pooja Misrra (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

bonadea contributions talk 18:52, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Falconhouse Grammar School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No source and no significant coverage in reliable independent sources to show its notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahsanullah2015 (talk) 23:04, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Iamshe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]